'Iron Man 2': Terrence Howard's out, Don Cheadle's in

Louis53 Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 01:38 AM EST

I was so excited for Iron Man 2, but this bothers me...
Honestly, nothing upsets me more than when a sequel is made and they use a different actor for a major character. It's one of my biggest pet peeves!

Now, there is nothing wrong Cheadle; he's a damn good actor and I like him a lot, but I feel that Howard brought some sort of 'uniqueness' to the Roddy character. I liked Terrance Howard in this role.

Nevertheless, if Cheadle can pull it off as a better Roddy, then my hat is off to you. But if he can't...then I will be sorely disappointed.

Buddy Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 06:28 AM EST

I liked the flow with Howard in the 1st film ,especially since the Maybe Next time line,because that would mean war machine.But once I heard he was being replaced it made my intrest in Iron Man 2 go down alot...
Don is a good actor don't get me wrong but I think someone a bit younger looking would've been alot better.Cuba Gooding would've been a better bet than Don.

TMC Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 11:41 PM EST

I think Howard would have been better at the role.. not sure I will wait to see Iron Man 2

Alex Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:25 PM EST

Regardless, Howard is a fantastic actor ... one of the best working today! I just hope positive things come from this change and that I get to see more of Howard in future films.

michelleg Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 09:11 PM EST

oh cool there's gonna be an iron man 2?

champ Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 08:46 PM EST

ha! omg i cant believe terrence howard! he can kiss marvels ass for all i care! thats ridiculous that he is asking for way more than the lead actor! he is just taking advantage of marvel and he got kicked off! i mean its one thing to be the lead and getting paid the most but its another to be a greedy beotch> ): i will watch iron man 2! terrence howard or not

Chad Brenneman Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 02:14 PM EST

This is the kind of trouble you can get into when you have supporting actors being paid more than actors in leading roles. There was probably some miscommunication in the renegotiation or Howard's contract for the 2nd movie, some feelings got hurt, and the deal went bust.

jeff Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:45 PM EST

guess what? Howard, you are not that big of an actor. Take your role from now on!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Josh Allen Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 07:54 PM EST

Bad choice. Howard was the best for the role. I predict all the actors and actress' of Iron Man 2 to stick up for Howard. No offence to the other actor but when Howard said, "Maybe next time" while looking at the War machine suit, I couldn't wait for number 2. Now I'm dissapointed....

TiaoZao Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:38 AM EST

Very Nice Site.It was my pleasure to visit your Website. I am also very Website you enjoy the article.And I also have the feeling that it was really a pity that we didn’t meet each other earlier. Because the kindness and warmth in your Website can make me completely relaxed and happy. I hope that you will visit my blog too to see if you can have the same feelinghttp://www.buynikeshoes.com

Giovana Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 07:10 AM EST

No offense to Cheadle, but Howard is waaaay more appropriate for the role. He's got something besides talent. His presence onscreen is intense, whilst Don has that "nice guy, cool dude"-type of prensence. Not a super hero at all.
Now TH should never. EVER make more money then Robert (DJ). Come on! A leading role is one thing, a supporting one is something completely different.

Allan Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 08:45 AM EST

always a leading man role for Howard..hardly., he is has taken supporting actor roles pretty well.

JD Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:39 PM EST

I hate when they change actors in movies...its a huge turn off and even though Howard's role wasn't that big, its just lame that they are changing the actors...if he wanted more money and didn't want to pay it, they should have just cut him from the movie all together...I will probably not watch the movie because of this..when producers change actors in sequals I can't see the movies as before..its never the same..

Kelly Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 07:13 PM EST

They don't listen to us anyway, hence the change has already be done, it will suck and lose money cause of the change. Don Cheadle should go go go...
Sorry screwed up first post.

Kelly Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 07:10 PM EST

They don't listen to us anyway, hence the change has already be done, it will suck and lose money cause of the change. Don Cheadle should stay...

Drambuie Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 02:51 PM EST

While I think that T Howard is a great actor, I was uncomfortable watching him in role of Jim Rhodes. I found him unconvincing as a veteran, war-hardened Marine. I think that D Cheadle may be able to fold himself into the role more effectively. I do agree with some previous posts that SL Jackson as Nick Fury is bad casting. I find his acting to always be a little over the top and on the "campy" side - neither of which are attributes of the Nick Fury comic book character. I keep thinking of Jackson's character in the XXX movies with Vin Diesel and IceCube.

BJay Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 03:08 AM EST

Wow really...Terrence Howard has the whole package funny, goodlooking, and a great actor. After this move from Hollywood I will not be seeing Iron Man 2. Huge disappointment. By the way Howard is a very intelligent man with excellent English (responding to a previous comment where someone actually stated he did not speak proper English...read his bio girlfriend.

steve mclanahan Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:11 AM EST

I think that while Terrence is a talented actor, Don Cheadle is truly exceptional and truly underrated. I would cheer both ways, though, and look forward to the sequel.

David Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 02:48 PM EST

I am unhappy that they made a change. But, I tend to believe the article EW put out stating that it was rumored to be a combo of Howard being a bit difficult on set, Favreau not loving his performance in the first movie, thus trimming the character's role in the second... prompting to Marvel to offer a much lower salary than expected to Howard's agent... they balked and Marvel decided to not negotiate or tell Howard's people why the figure was so low... And Marvel makes a change to have less headaches and less drama on set. Enter Cheadle. But I think, they could have gone for the guy from CSI - Las Vegas and Aliens Resurrection. He would have been good with a haircut.

syisha Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 11:38 PM EST

you need to be more open minded. sure terrence was a great actor in the first film, but he obviously got greedy and asked for too much money on the sequel. Plus Don is a great actor as well. I have certainly enjoyed him in previous movies and i believe that he could do well in this one. Try not to dwell on the different face or voice, but judge him on his acting ability. I think the next Iron Man can be just as good if not better than the first.

GiGi Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 05:27 AM EST

I like the idea someone put earlier about RDJ playing a double role. He WAS so effing brilliant in Tropic Thunder (I'm a Black woman). He WAS the movie. He was BOTH movies! They should just do IM2 Eddie Murphy style and have RDJ play ALL the roles. LMAO!

GiGi Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 05:17 AM EST

Maaaan, I'm still pissed about this! I am SO not a TH fan and I DO like DC, but the continuity thing is what gets me. IF I were to go see the sequel, which I won't because sequels usually suck and because of this cast change, I'd probably spend the whole movie trying to make the change of cast right in my head. I wouldn't even be able to pay attention to the film! But I don't care too much because, as I already said, sequels usually suck and they're putting Sam Jackson in it. YUCK! Thus, I wouldn't be seeing it anyway. Why the four three double hockey sticks do they put SJ in everything anyway? I'd like to see Lawrence Fishburne in 99% of Sam's roles. Anyway, Ironman was the absolute best Marvel movie EVER and I don't think they can top it with anything; especially a sequel. They always do TOO MUCH in a sequel and make it ridiculous. Except X-Men 2. That way waaay better than number 1. But three. What the heck was that?!? I was sooo effing pissed and totally wanted a refund! RDJ rocks!

mL Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 08:35 PM EST

Terrence Howard and Don Cheadle are both favorites of mine. They are both great actors in every sense. I would have liked to have seen Terrence Howard reprise the role of Col. Jim Rhodes, but am confident Don Cheadle will give an excellent performance. I know that other great roles will come for Terrence Howard.

Beth Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:41 AM EST

I was an advid comic book junkie as a little girl and had alot of firsts. I think the changing of faces will matter little as far as this movie is concerened. Howard needs a role where he can star in a movie without having to be #2. I like Cheadele...He can be really funny or really scary....cant we all just get along?

Jevon Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 01:27 PM EST

"Iron Man" Was One Of the "Best" movies made in 08' and In my personial book, One of the Best Movies Ever. And as far, as I'm concerned Terrence Howard is way more Cooler & has more swag then this Don Cheadle cat, and for them to be switching him with that guy it really sucks & might not make the movie as good as the first one.

tk Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 07:58 PM EST

As to substitution of Cheadle for Howard, I am disappointed, although I am sure Cheadle will be fine. They are both fine actors, although I believe Howard is more charasmatic, and overall, a better fit for the movie. I am disappointed, but I will certainly go see the sequel regardless.

tk Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 07:53 PM EST

I read the following article on http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20236884,00.html which states that essentially the producers insulted Terrence Howard with a low ball offer. Essentially, they made him an offer for the second movie and then came back with a new offer that was 50-80% less than their original offer. Evidentally the new offer was in line with what supporting actors made in the FIRST movie. If this is true, then I blame the producers. You cant make an offer and then come back with an offer so much lower and think the person will accept. They new he wouldnt take it when they offerred it to him. Of course you can say he was difficult on the set when you are trying to force him to renegotiate his first deal. Howard's performance was very satisfying and seems pretty clear he was going to have a bigger role in the next movie, so why would the producers think that he accept such a paltry sum on a sequel to a blockbuster movie that is sure to be another blockbuster!!!!

vargus Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 08:23 AM EST

Both are excellent actors. I dont think either is right for this role though. I'm not sure if this is true, but if Terrance Howard is a jerk on the set and is demanding more money...Let him go imediately and I'll do it! This comic was around long before he decided to start acting. 1

Krista Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 03:36 PM EST

I'm so disappointed the change in the cast after making such a comment as "next time" makes the movie unauthentic. Its a shame because as a female I don't love these comic book stories and had no intention of really seeing IM but i did and was converted. I fell in love with the cast and the movie and thought the realtionship between Stark and Rhodes was genuine and if there was anyone that seemed out of place it was Gwenth Paltrow "trying" to play sweet and demure. But changes in a sequel take you out of the movie, make you miss what was, and wonder what it could have been like if things had stayed the same.

Daneason Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:42 PM EST

I think Don Cheadle is the man, and I'd prefer him to T.H.

I'm Not A Hater Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 01:22 PM EST

Don't care. Never will. Iron Man was a piece of junk, anyway.

noirnoticvibe Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:46 AM EST

Don Cheadle is one of the few actors who becomes who you are watching much the way Gary Oldman did in Dracula...he's talented in that way..i believe he will deliever a powerful WARMACHINE...people forget the hulk was 1st portrayed by Eric Bana which wasnt bad even tho the film sucked was perfected by Ed(HEY) Norton in an almost immediate remake... remember Michael Keaton was thought to be perfect for BatMan but Christian Bale was the best by far even The late Heath ledger played a phenomenal Joker and that was considered hard after Jack Nicolson made him a hard act to follow...different actors bring different vibes some suitable some not...and after watching Don in traitor i believe he is a great choice

B.G. Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 03:08 PM EST

i have been reading all of the comments about T.H. not being in iron man i do agree with most of you that he did a fine job. But if you look at the dvd extras they cut out alot of T.H. scenes truth to the matter is T.H. was the first actor to sign on to the film he was also the higest paid more than anyone else even downey in the film, and he was said to be very diffcult on set.

Krishna Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 05:20 PM EST

I was looking forward to seeing Terrence Howard in Ironman 2. I liked how everything was perfect in the first movie so much that I couldn't wait for Ironman 2 to come out, but now I feel that it's not going to go so well. I might just wait for it to come out on DVD. I hope they lose money because of this move.

If they bring Howard back, I might see the movie in theaters several times, and then buy it on DVD the first day it comes out. If not, then I probably will go see it once in theaters, and then wait 'til it's super cheap to buy on DVD (I might even buy used).

Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 02:52 PM EST

Terrance Howard should play Rhodey. Don Cheadle is a great actor, but I was sooo looking forward to seeing Terrence Howard as Rhodey!

Brandon Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:45 AM EST

I feel the same way about Terrence Howard not being in part 2. I mean come on, the guy was awesome in part 1 then you're gonna give us Cheadle for part 2??? Cheadle just isn't the superhero/sidekick type in my opinion. He's more of a lifetime stand in. I just think it was a bad move to oust Terrence and an even worse one to oust him and replace him with Cheadle.

DONT REPLACE SOMETHING THAT WORKS. If he asked for more money, then its because he was part of making iron man the success it is. Give him a little extra and make the movie already!

Matthew Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 02:14 AM EST

Not sure how to feel on this one. Both are superb actors. I think Howard looks the part more than Cheadle, but then again, we're getting Sam Jackson as Nick Fury, so maybe appearances aren't so important. This is going to be a "wait and see" type of scenario.

Andrea Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 01:14 PM EST

I was quite disappointed to hear that Mr. Howard will not be in IM2...for whatever reason. He was great, I loved him in IM. Not to mention the interaction between Howard and Downey (love him too). When he said next time baby referring to the suit, I was extatic!! You guys popped my bubble on that one (Marvel)

Jon Fort Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 04:11 PM EST

For those whom don't think Cheadle will make a much better Jim Rhodes than Terrence Howard, you should do yourself a favor and check out TRAITOR... pretty sure that is what got Cheadle the attention for IM2

Danyul Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 02:23 AM EST

Oh, and for people saying that it's a mistake and that they shouldn't have replaced the characters ect. What can you do about it eh? I don't mean to sound like an arse but there's nothing anyone can really do, there was obviously some tension or some sort of disagreement between Howard and well somebody and they made a new decision, I was shocked and confused when I heard the news aswell but in the end I bet the movie will turn out to be rather well done.

Danyul Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 02:18 AM EST

Howard and Cheadle are both ungodly talented actors. But honestly I prefer Cheadle because he can immerse himself into any character set. Unfortunately alot of his major film roles are rather dark and well to overuse a word, intense.. I have no doubt Cheadle will do great in IM2. And the Avengers (whenever that decided to be set in stone)

Ben Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 12:51 AM EST

I personally am a little disappointed by the news that Terrence Howard will not be reprising his role. I understand that Don Cheadle is a great actor, but I feel that having different actors portray the same character in a sequel takes away from the effect of the movie, a la Maggie Gylenhall in The Dark Knight. I prefer her more than Katie Holmes, but it still takes away. I am disappointed, but I hope the sequel turns out as well as the first

Mr. Hyde Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 09:41 PM EST

a lot of you are complaing that Rhodes character seemed to be starring in his on movie. well if you go by the marvel universe, which I'm sure most of you do, doesn't Stark developing a drinking problem and Rhodes has to step up and become Iron Man. Um... I think he does. keeping that in mind Rhodes character is just as important as Stark. and I think that Terrence Howard did an excellent job at portraying Rhodes. In my opinion Don Cheadle does not look like he would be Rhodes. Acting apart, the comic shows Rhodes as a friendly yet strong character. Cheadle may be able to get strong right, but will he be able to pull off friendly as well as Howard has? I don't think so... but then again I will have to see the movie to get the facts. as will all of you!!!

bill Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 04:05 AM EST

The acting in the movie was really so much of what made the movie so enjoyable. You have the great FX and the the acting. Terrance Howard was good. His lines were great and he really brought out the other characters. Don Cheadle will be good, i don't doubt. I myself was looking foward to seeing the Rhodes in the suit. He was made to be in the suit. I don't see the problem with him. People bash Ang Lee's Hulk. The movie had great acting, great screen writing, and put together beautifully. The 2nd was not so good, but i understand the re-casting. Eric Bana was too big to play frail banner in an avenger's movie. I think that's the issue. Cheadle is supposed to come off as more gritty. I prefer howard. His character came out well. Underdeveloped. Chaedle will be good though.

howard and cheadle fan Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:54 PM EST

It's sad that TH can't comeback for IM2 but if he does have to be replace Don Cheadle is a master at craft and be anything he steps into I dig both actors and have seen 99.99% of their movies and I have no doubt that cheadle will deliver an amazing performance as Roadie.

Garth Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 01:33 PM EST

I just rented the DVD and Iron Man is now a favorite. I am officially a fan. Robert Downey is the main man and that will not change in any sequel. I like Terrence Howard. He is a fine actor and the relationship between Rhodes and Stark/Iron Man grew on me. Cheadle is also a fine actor and will probably do a great job. The loss will be in losing the essence and continuity of the relationship (Rhodes/Iron Man)in the sequel. It will be different. Thanks to the "suits" in movie land. They're the ones that should be recast.

Saved Oner Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 03:25 AM EST

This is just as stupid as Batman's Rachel!! Ironman is currently my favorite movie and finding out T.H. is out is weak! Dude, stop changing the cast in movies, it doesnt work, ever! Next thing you know Edward Norton wont be the Hulk in the Avengers movie, I was really exited about that movie coming out but now that I think about it, if the actors aren't the same it wont meet expectations. Hope old Don can hack it. I'm skeptical. SAVEDONER

Simon Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:51 AM EST

I agree Robert. All you need is to see Don Cheadle in the movie "Mission to Mars". Don in a spacesuit just doesn't work. It would simply be awkward, Downy,Paltrow and Cheadle(a super hero)? Sorry guys, it's not working for me. There goes another failed sequel. Take clue from the continuity of the Matrix!!! All the main actors STAYED!!!

robert gilmore Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:42 AM EST

although both are fine actors,i believe the film will be less favorably responded to by the movie going public,,sorry,,Mr.Cheadle just doesn't command super hero respect or aura for the role in this film or any film,,,

CJ Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:30 AM EST

I never write about things like this, but, you've gotta be kidding me!!! There was an absolute chemistry with Terrence and Robert. Don will not have the appeal Terrence has. He's youthful and exciting. Is Downy afraid of handsome co-star???

Mishii Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:02 AM EST

I'm sorry, Don Cheadle is not a wise choice to replace Howard. I was greatly impressed with Terrence Howard's performance. I think in the end, the it was wrong to replace him.

Sherry Haim Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:49 PM EST

Glad Howard is gone. Rhodes is supposed to be a Colonel. A Colonel is a college grad. Can you imagine Favreau trying to get Terrence to speak like an educated Colonel?? Instead, we have to listen to lines like, "Uh, hey man, doan say dat, day'll beleeeee dat." At least Cheadle speaks English.

Austin Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 08:22 PM EST

The movie is called "Iron Man" not "War Machine."

Both are great actors, but as long as we have Robert Downey Jr. as Tony Stark, no one will care about anyone else.

Jennifer Boricua Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 06:15 PM EST

http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/howardinironman2 a petition to show that the fans want Howard not cheadle

Brandon Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 06:07 PM EST

When I saw the Dark Knight everytime I heard the name Rachele I thought of Katie Holmes which made a perfect movie well...not perfect but it was acceptible because she wasn't that important like lets say Gordon or Alfred. In Iron Man War Machine is important in that universe and Howard was perfect for it and YOU ALL know it because we ALL got excited when he said next time! Well this next time around won't be as good because of the change not the actor skill cause they both are great. But for me "next time" around I will see the movie but only once unlike the 1st Iron Man that I went back and saw 3 times. I am sure alot of us will be doing the same so chew on that Hollywood/Marvel.

Charles Yeager Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 08:04 PM EST

I will attempt to share thoughts on "Uhm's" question on sex and violence. Violence in movies is make believe. Punches are not really hitting actors faces, bullets are not real bullets and blood is not real blood. For the most part, sex scenes have real touching and kissing and real nudity and are in a real bed. You do not see a real killing or punch in violence but an attempt to realistically represent it. In nudity...it is nudity. In seeing a movie, you see SIMULATED violence but you see real sexuality. In passionate love scenes, there is something of reality to it even though it is not all the way for the actors. How many actors have fallen in love on the set (married or not) vs. how many have tried to take revenge over thier character being killed? Movies for the most part, show the end result of violence but not the results of casual sex. How many movies show pregnancies or STDs? I am running out of room so this is all for now. Just my opinion.

Justin Hammer Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 04:09 PM EST

Aw, no, yo. Terrence was da Bomb as Rhodes. How could they do this? This now puts Iron Man in the same category as Bewitched... even worse since a different Rhodey is a far greater offence than a different Darren.

Bryan Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 01:32 PM EST

Howard would b a very much better choice to play the role in the amour as war machine..
doesn't make sense if Howard doesn't play the role. Cheadle just doesn't FIT into it all of a sudden..

H-man Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 09:01 PM EST

Not for nothing but whatever happen to entertainment and you wonder why part 2 almost always suck anyway they should've kept it the same, and maybe setup a superfriends movie with the submariner, and xmen. then use Don as a villian. Plus Howard is cool if you already and funny.

asia Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 04:24 PM EST

WOW... THAT CHANGES ALOT!!! I liked Terrence Howard in the movie and I think its wrong they replaced him wiht Don Cheadle. Don't get me throwed but They are both some good actors,but I just dont see Don pullin off a part like that...Maybe because all the movies I seen him in he was all serious and business-like mane...Crash...sad and serious...Hotel Rwanda...dont get me started on how sad that was,I'll start a whole 'nother comment board talkin bout the Genocide... It'll be weird and I might not even give the movie a chance, but I might reconsider if when they show the trailers,they're good...u feel? The way I feel, this movie is either gonna do good or not-so-good...(I wont say bad)...That's a little exert of the way I feel about this... The customer's ALWAYS right!

FAIR Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 10:42 AM EST

I truly enjoyed Terrence Howard in Iron Man...I will miss him. If there was somthing i thought i could do or share that would place him back in the movie I would. But as much as I will miss him I do not want to ignore some of the comments being shared about Don Cheadle. Don, like Terrence, is a fine actor; both men continue to perfect their craft. I believe Don will provide an excellent performance: He will do whatever it takes just like professional actors do. Look at the new James Bond. Movie goers complained that he would not be a good fit--he stepped up and has become very highly acclaimed for his portrayal. How many times have numerous actors redefined themselves for roles. Don was excellent in Devil in a Blue Dress. Samething in Swordfish. I am very disappointed with the way Terrence Howard was replaced--unfairness is a part of life. My first instinct was to boycott the second feature--then i would be depriving myself of what I enjoyed--The Movie.

Knight Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 10:33 AM EST

I think this was a mistake.

Don't get me wrong, I like both actors, but you don't just swap in one actor for another just because he happens to be of the same ethnicity. You have to have a certain degree of consistency. While Terrence Howard did not play the leading role, it would make little sense to replace Robert Downey Jr. with someone else at this point who just happened to have a mustache.

I'm sure Cheadle will do fine, but he lacks the charm of Howard and Marvel Studios will not allow him to perform in such a way that he will give War Machine the type of presence as a character that goes beyond the role of simple side kick.

Anyone who knows the comics knows that there have been several points in times in which Stark and Rhodes have argued and their friendship was left in question. I believe that if this part of the story were to be followed, Terrence Howard would play the part a bit better, but only time will tell, I imagine.

shiv Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 06:50 AM EST

don't know the whole story 'bout WHY he is not back but since that is the case let's move on. Don will do fine, Robert Downey did fine, Christian Bale and Heath Ledger did great. i do believe RDJ could do a dual role, Tropic Thunder rocked! or if not i like James Earl Jones, we could squeeze him into the suit. or with some special effects, i really like Gary Coleman, "whatchu talkin' 'bout Tony?!?" could be the new catchphrase! am i right?

Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 12:33 AM EST

Terence Howard was hilarious and brilliant as Rhody. I'm highly dissapointed he won't be in the second film.

lenzeppellin Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 07:51 PM EST

In terms of physicality and appearance, I do think it is Howard over Cheadle for this role. Cuba Gooding comes into mind too. But Will Smith would have been a good replacement. Although I guess you can't have two superheroes for one actor. Anyway, all of the actors I've mentioned are all very extremely talented actors. Obviously sad regarding a slight loss of continuity with Rhodes character but these things happen. It may be show business but business is business.

Ximena Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 02:57 PM EST

Rhodey won't be the same serious and charismatic guy we saw on the Iron Man movie with Cheadle. I love Cheadle, but he's not as charmin as Howard is. If he got more payment than the rest it means that he's a valuable part of the cast and he deserves that. Made mistakes, so? Everybody does it! It happens all the time. Howard is as important as Robert D. Jr is to us. Changing Howard is like changing Robert! Please, get Howard back to the film.

Barbara Graehl Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 02:20 PM EST

Well coming from the more 'mature' crowd, very big mistake replaces with this other actor who played in 'Ocean's'. He will be totally unbelievable as a hero in a suit.
Terrance Howard was very believable as a possible super hero in a second suit. My whole neighborhood watched this movie and the adults enjoyed it just as the youth did. A very good movie, but not with out the original actor who played the Col.
Big mistake. Apologize and then move on with Howard in the film.

buddhacam Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 02:13 PM EST

Michael Jai White of Spawn fame could be an excellent War Machine. He has the acting and martial arts skills was well as the physical build to have been in the military. I would prefer to see Howard return to the role. Cheadle is a fine actor but as far as comic-based movies are concerned, the audience's belief in the actor portraying the comic book character and making it real is everything. You can skimp here. How they wound up paying Howard more than the movies star is an administrative error not a talent error. Howard is noted for his easy to work with demeanor and for being a real gentleman. I don't buy him being too difficult to work with. It's the director's job to direct. Don't approve a performance you don't like. And don't penalize a $300+ million dollar performance and change everything. You don't mess with the Coke and KFC recipe...nor the Iron Man recipe of Downey Jr., Paltrow and Howard.

mel Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 01:13 PM EST

I wish the movie CRASH AND BURNS. Payback is a B****.

Tedy Blessed Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:25 PM EST

I dont think its right to treat people like that. If you had a problem with the guy You should have said something then. The movie turned out great. So what if you had to reshoot several times. You have to get it right. I like Cheadle also, but they gave Howard the raw Deal. So what he was the Highest paid Actor. That shows how much they wanted him, Im not gunna bring up race (even tho it could be the reason why they did not want him back) The highest paid over all the actors they looked at that, becasue the reports doesnt state any little known people its states all the white actors. They are also great actors, if the Howard was so bad then the critics & people would have said so. I enjoyed it, i am an IronMan fan from the old days all the way up to the Present & future. Black heroes are limited and none but they do exist & i just dont see Chealde as that type of character.

tee Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:19 PM EST

i don't know i like both actors, but i really enjoyed howard doing this part. now that they are changing it to cheadle, i am a little skeptical , but lets see how he does, he's quite an "Ocean's man" lol.

Mary Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:59 AM EST

Well, everyone complains about TH's little time on screen... well, maybe it had ben more if he had actually done a good job, since according to other reports a lot of his scenes were cut or deleted. So I guess getting another actor was necessary. Besides, Rhodey is a sidekick, who cares? The Movie is IRON MAN, not "War Machine".

evanthered Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:13 AM EST

I think I can explain it, Uhm. Many people believe that certain kinds of sexual conduct (premarital, for instance)are immoral, and hence have difficulties with cinematic depictions that might influence people, particularly children, to engage in those off-limits practices. Most of these people are opposed to violence as well, and probably consider it worse than sexual immorality, but they, in my opinion quite rightly, recognize that sexual language or scenes are much more enticing and likely to be copied by youngsters than violent scenes. A whole lot more high schoolers are having sex in their cars than committing drive-by shootings in them.

chris Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:03 AM EST

T.H. was amazing in iron man. i dont know if i want to see iron man two who are they going to take out next? samuel l jackson? cheap bastards! im not even a big fan of T.H but he really was great in that movie. he will be missed.

Uhm Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:04 PM EST

Sorry for getting off the topic but I'm always flabbergasted when someone finds offence with sex scenes and not with violence...is there anyone out there who can, for once and for all,explain this phenomena to me. Maybe MickeyG?

workmaster23 Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:04 PM EST

I think marvel can replace any actors in this movie except Robert Downey Jr. Thats because Tony Stark IS Robert Downey Jr. If Tony will be a real person, he's no other than RDJ.

Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 10:34 PM EST

that sucks I don't know if i want to watch the movie now. I hate it when they change actors and plus I thought terrance howard did a good job as Rhodey.

Lane Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 09:48 PM EST

so lets get this right do all black people look alike because Don is darker and shorter and Howard is taller and lighter maybe the star might not have wanted him back who really knows but really they did the guy wrong and that's that I see a something different look I'm not saying that don cant act well his British accent ocean 11 was bad not good his acting in that really not very good at all. Mr Howard should be humble next time.

Curtis Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 03:19 PM EST

Look everybody: We all saw the second Hulk movie with a different actor who can apparently play any role- and most of us would admit that it was very cool. Now we have the opportunity to see a second Iron Man movie with a different actor who also can apparently play any role. Let's face it- Don Cheadle was in all of the Ocean's movies and the man exudes coolness to the infinitive degree. Robert Downey Jr. is also super cool. These two guys will be great together and if we're fortunate, with all that coolness of both of them on the screen at once, some of it just might rub off onto the rest of us.

harris Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 02:42 PM EST

I would prefer to have seen Howard continue in the role of Rhodey. Although I did think he was a bit stilted he was good with what little screen time he got. I am a big Cheadle fan but he's too small for this role. But when has that ever stopped Hollywood? Where can I get hired as a casting director???

harris Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 02:42 PM EST

I would prefer to have seen Howard continue in the role of Rhodey. Although I did think he was a bit stilted he was good with what little screen time he got. I am a big Cheadle fan but he's too small for this role. But when has that ever stopped Hollywood? Where can I get hired as a casting director???

luke-b Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 01:08 AM EST

I hate it when they change actors between movies. I loved the first Iron Man flick and in fact thought it was the best 'Marvel' super hero movie to date...but the fact that Terence won't be in the second one will really bug me. He's an extremely talented actor and I was really looking forward to seeing him in the next one. The first movie made a butt load of cash as will the second...how much is too much? Pay the man!!

neLk_06 Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 03:08 PM EST

I speak for many filipino movie veiwers, when I say that its really disapointing that Terrence Howard won't be back in iron man2. it ain't a smart move to just replace anactor in following sequels, it ruins alot for the veiwers plus its anoying. They may continue with cheadle but to us movie fans iron man 2 dosen't exist.

MickeyG Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 08:32 AM EST

I just watched Ironman on Dvd. Loved the movie as a whole with two exceptions. Marvel has got to know that bringing superheroes to life will attract kids. Kids younger than 13. The sex scene was not necessary. They could have went from Tony and the reporter sparring with each other to her waking up in his bed. We, adults would have understood the implication.(Loved the "taking out the trash" analogy delivered by Pepper)

But it was Terence Howards performance that made me wince at times. He seemed to be starring in a seperate movie. It wasn't until the scene with the suit that he seemed to fit with the movie.
I think the Jim Rhodes character has just been upgraded with Don Cheadle stepping into the War Machine suit.

Dudette Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:40 PM EST

This is so saddenning. I loved watching Terrence Howard in the Iron Man movie. I will not be watching the second movie. I think that Don Cheadle is an alright actor, but I don't seem him as a lead-actor.

lucas Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 08:45 PM EST

A couple of things to say, to Jesse below, who said that changing a cast can effect the movies success, you can be right sometimes, but the examples you gave aren't really valid. With Hulk, the version that was released this summer by Marvel with Edward Norton did better than Ang Lee's version. As far as The Punisher goes, the first one with Thomas Jane didn't even do that well. And as far as Batman goes, really?? Do you not remember the dollar amount that The Dark Knight did this summer? I don't really think that changing from Terrence Howard to Don Cheadle is a big deal. Frankly, Don Cheadle is a better actor and I feel will do better if they do decide to expand on Col. Rhodes/War Machine's character. And if you read the other articles on EW's site, you'd see that Jon Favreau wasn't really happy with Terrence's performance, so it wasn't necessarily just a money issue. Robert Downey, Jr. is what made Iron Man, and he'll make the sequel.

KO Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 08:06 PM EST

It is odd that you can just replace ane black actor with another, but I suppose actore are easily replaced in superhero movies. Its sort of like changing the artist in a comic book.

Neither actor strikes me as having the physicality Rhody, but rhe Rhodes character is usually depicted as a stereotypical "Black Sidekick" in the comic, a BAMFer who replaced happy hogan. Loved Hustle and Flow, loved Cheadle in a lot of movies. So who cares?

El Conde Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 06:37 PM EST

Don Cheadle can play any role and do it well. Having said that, Cuba Gooding, Jr. could also have played the role and nobody would have known the difference!

anonymous Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 05:56 PM EST

i definitely think that Terrence Howard should be in the sequel. i know some people think that he might be an overpowering actor, but he was pretty good in Iron Man. He was funny and yet serious. All of his lines are good and he shows a great deal of loyalty and friendship to Tony Stark, otherwise Robert Downey Jr. He should stay in the movie. Plus this article mentions the "Next time" line and if he wasn't going to be in the sequel he shouldn't have said that. Terrence Howard is a good actor and thats why he should just take what he can get, financially, and then feel great when the movie scores great reviews. The director should definitely push for Howard. Now that we've seen him in Iron Man, it will not likely be the same in the sequel.

Iron Man fan... Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 03:41 PM EST

Will Smith is the perfect choice for the roll, problem is, he would probably steal the screen from Downey.

Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 07:08 PM EST

Terrence Howard should be in Iron Man 2. He originated the role and he is very good in it. I looked forward to the next movie but now I'm disappointed. I find him to be much more charismatic then Don Cheadle. He is a good actor as well(Cheadle)but when actors are replaced in sequels it takes away from the film. For example the new mummy movie this past summer, recasting the leading lady took away from the film. She seemed like she was trying too hard and it showed.

A comic book fan. Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 05:36 PM EST

Personally, I think they are plenty of other actors who would fit the roll better. Even though Don Cheadle can act circles around terrence howard, I have a hard time envisioning him in this role.

Maybe within the next few movies the War Machine character demanded much more screentime and dramatic acting, thus they thought Cheadle would be more bang for the buck.

Personally I think Blair Underwood would make a perfect rhodes. Chiwetel Ejiofor(He played the bad guy in Children of Men and Serenity)

Cuba Gooding Jr. or even Eamonn Walker(Oz, Lord of War) would fit.

melissa Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 04:53 PM EST

The first part was good I even bought it, now the big chance it wont be good. I hate character change, if he's asking more money take give it to him, the movies going to be a hit regardless, I feel un intested in the ironman 2 because Howards out. I like him.

Mark Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 04:48 PM EST

I have nothing against Don Cheadle, but I was very happy with Howards performance. I was looking forward to seeing him back in the sequel. I am a Cheadle fan and hope he fits the bill as well as Howard did.

willanscofield Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:05 PM EST

i think shaquilee oneal is the best for ironman not robert dawney,shaq is better like his fast movie..did you remember still ? shaquille for tony stark and lionel ritchie of the commoders for war machine..next time baby...lionel ritchie is better than howard and cheadle he can dance and sing and his hair is afro.thats so nice

Von Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 04:56 PM EST

Love Don as an actor, but I want the original cast back. Terrance, next time, baby!!

JESSE Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 10:54 AM EST

The line that T.H. Howard delivered "Next time, baby" was a strong reminder that we would (A) Get a sequel to this amazing film (B)Get to see more of T.H. evolve into someting greater. If you change the formula then it will distract the audience when watching IM2. We will be focused on the new actors take on the character and thus be viewed as a whole new beginning, this will definitly take away from the success of Iron Man 1. EXAMPLE: HULK, Punisher, Batman, etc.

Neil Mason Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 07:18 AM EST

I personally think that Howard played the Air Force Colonel very well (Which is a new version of Rhodey, lets not forget). My Step-Dad is ex Air Force and what I saw on the screen was what I saw at home. He COULD have been a scene stealer if he really wanted to (Howard has turned in some impressive roles in his career) but franchises wont grow on upstaging.

I think Cheadle is a great actor but not sure I can see him replacing Howard after watching one too many bad "cockney" accents while on the Oceans Trilogy, Im Black and from Britain and I dont know too many brothers that sound like that!

The real deal is this though, Cheadle is CHEAPER than Howard, if Marvel Studios are to be believed. If it really was about money then Cheadle has just proved he will work for less and believes he can outdo Howard on screen. I think they have done Howard all wrong and I would LOVE to see him do another comic book based role (in the lead) and smash it to remind Kevin Feige what he missed!!

Mpm2twenty2 Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 04:30 AM EST

I am all about continuity when it comes to sequels. While I thought Gillenhall was a better choice than Holmes in Batman, there is a big difference between an ancillary character and someone who is slated to become the sidekick. It is a decision not to be taken lightly and if these industry people (on both ends) weren't so freakin' greedy and actually cared about the art they are trying to create, then bringing Howard back would be a priority. I thought Howard did an exemplary job as Rhodes and I feel Rhodes will be cheapened with the addition of Cheadle. No disrespect to Cheadle, he's a great actor, but I feel that keeping with the original cast gives the movie more credibility because the if the cast stands behind it, then it presents a united front to the movie going community at large. Bring Howard back, with no disrespect to Cheadle, I love the man and my opinion has nothing to do with his acting ability, I just respect a movie that can maintain continuity throughout. Trust me.

lew Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 01:03 PM EST

I read how many "comic fans" didn't like the way T.H. portrayed Rhodey. Now, how many of you think the director is responsible for that? I have seen T.H. in other movies where he plays a tougher/rougher actor, Hustle and Flow. If studios have a sequel option then they should make the actors sign contracts up front for all sequels. These things take many years to produce and you KNOW that if there will be a 3rd, it is already being worked on. Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter, Matrix, etc (get the idea?) They are both fine actors but keep some continuity please. The REAL comic fans have to remember that movies are made for a larger crowd, they would not be able to make a high quality movie and pay for it all if it was made JUST the comic loyalists.