• More
Back to PopWatch Main
Complete Archive

Outrage over Chris Brown-Wrigley's deal smacks of ridiculousness

Jul 31, 2008, 03:10 PM | by Simon Vozick-Levinson

Categories: Advertising, Food and Drink, Music, To Care or Not to Care

OMG, have you heard? Chris Brown has betrayed an innocent nation's trust! You see, he's taking part in a Wrigley's promotion where pop stars record new versions of classic gum jingles — CB took on the Doublemint tune, Ne-Yo got Big Red, and country singer Julianne Hough is singing my personal favorite Wrigley's jingle, the Juicy Fruit song. And here comes the shocking, scandalous twist: Word got out this week that Brown's current hit "Forever," which has been on the charts since May, is in fact itself a crypto-ad for Doublemint! (Sample lyric from the hook: "We only got one night/Double your pleasure/Double your fun/And dance forever...")

That "pop!" you just heard was the Internets collectively blowing its gum-chewin' top about this. Cranky old Gawker is actually calling for a boycott of all Wrigley's products! Er, am I the only one who really, truly does not see what the big deal is here? "We don't want to appear as if we invest the music of Chris Brown with any meaning whatsoever," Gawker snobbily notes, "but now would be an appropriate time to begin boycotting Wrigley, if you would like to have the option of listening to songs that aren't sponsored by mega-corporations in the coming decade." News flash: Chris Brown is a talented dude whose music I enjoy, but he definitely already works for a huge multinational mega-corporation. It's called Sony BMG. Every time you hear a Chris Brown song on the radio, you are hearing a work of popular art which is also an ad: A catchy piece of sound designed to convince you to hand over your money to a rich executive somewhere. Same goes for every artist on a major label. Meanwhile, Gawker goes on to claim that the real problem with Chris Brown's Doublemint deal is that it was arranged in secret, revealed to the listening public only once they already knew and liked the song. Ooh! Secrets! Those are bad, sometimes. But come on. If you legitimately liked listening to "Forever" before, why on earth would it be ruined for you once you know that Wrigley's had a hand in it? It's still the same exact song, for crying out loud!

Furthermore: Gum is delicious and fun to chew. (No, Wrigley's did not pay me to write that.) As commercial products go, Doublemint just doesn't seem like a particularly offensive one to shill for. Am I missing something here? You tell me. But wait — before you answer, watch Chris perform "Forever" below, and tell me seriously if you can stop grooving long enough to care that Wrigley's commissioned it.

samina Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 12:09 PM EST

idk wa chris brown does he is soooooooo hot luv him to bits and did u see wen he was walkin down on the with u vid every1 was grabbin him lmao love him lots

stefan Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 07:00 PM EST

i think its very lame especially with the current turn in marketing scams and record business hullabaloo lol... when i first had the 'pleasure' of eharing it on the radio, if yud call it that, i heard the double your pleasure line and 1)as a musician and songwriter thought it was totally absurd and a lame choice of words if youre trying to take yourself seriously, and 2)if they want to make jungles let them do it... dont sacrifice youre integrity over it... plus that part of the song totally stands out as marketing...

tracey gray Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:53 AM EST

who cares whether or not chris is advertising chewing gum. it is a good song and he is a very talented young artist. give him a break!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

gunna Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 12:25 AM EST

I've lost brain cells trying to decipher some of "ur" comments. I don't care much for Chris Brown, and now I can care less after hearing this news. Maybe Dave Chappelle was right about celebrities promoting products. Rocapads don't seem so farfetched to me anymore.

monica Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 11:05 PM EST

the very second i heard him sing the words "double your pleasure/double your fun" i turned the song off. who did't notice he was selling gum or poaching lyrics from a jingle with that song? duh! ... double shame on him.

Astro Boy Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 07:50 PM EST

Ne-Yo's song for "CLOSER" is a Big Red remix!?

skye Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 06:05 PM EST

O yea nd anotha thng I LOVE U CHRIS BROWN!!!

skye Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 05:52 PM EST

Well all i have to say 4 chris brown iz congratz nd im glad ur doin better than most artist dat r old enuff 2 b ur father [hello R.kelly]...u mite not c it now, but this kid iz the future

Geo Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 10:53 AM EST

Amazing that we have gotten to the point where some people find out that they have paid money to download what turns out to be a commercial....and they're totally cool with that! This is great news for corporations -- maybe they can begin charging for TV commercials too, and add it onto the cable bill. Hey, what's the big deal, right?

kary Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 07:44 AM EST

Wats ur prblem making celebrities look bad is only ,aking u look bad. And come on who does this for a living. Im not saying this caues he's my husband but get a life. I luv you chris my husband. Actually I will always love you.

Elizabeth Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 06:43 AM EST

People are bent about that, but Kid Rock rips off Sweet Home Alabama & Werewolves of London and no one blinks? That little ditty is more blatant than CB, but its classified as 'sampling'... got it.
Maybe Chris should do a commercial like Juan Pablo Montoya does for Big Red and call it a day. (Yes, I crossed NASCAR with PopWatch - does it have the same effect as when they crossed the ectoplasam rays in Ghostbusters?)

sane Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:29 PM EST

i luv u chris brown!!

sane Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:29 PM EST

i luv u chris brown!!

Manuela Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:01 PM EST

AmOoOoOo s2s2s2s2s2

To Devin Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 09:16 PM EST

Yes, but people mostly have a problem with product placement in television when it's so blatant as to be intrusive and disruptive to the viewers' enjoyment of the program. Unless Chris Brown explicitly sang: "We got only one night/Double your pleasure/With Doublemint gum..." or something, the effect the song has as a piece of light and breezy entertainment doesn't really change at all. Besides current recording artists, especially rappers, mention brand name products in their songs all the time...this song isn't even that overt, so while I find the marketing ploy rather gimmicky, it doesn't "offend" me or change my opinion of the song.
Also, the song isn't getting airplay because people like Doublemint gum; it's because the song is obviously clicking with some R&B/pop fans, which is what it's supposed to do.

Ashleigh Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 09:00 PM EST

"We don't want to appear as if we invest the music of Chris Brown with any meaning whatsoever..."?
My God, get over yourself, Gawker!

ANOYMOUS Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 08:59 PM EST

I THINK THAT YOU ARE SO WRONG. I DONT SEE ANYTHING WRONG HERE. SO? WRIGLEY WANTED TO HAVE HIM REMIX THEIR JINGLE. AND SO WHAT IF IN THE PROCESS OF IT HE THOUGHT OF A HIT SONG. WRIGLEY IS =NT COMPLAINING SO WHY DO YOU CARE? IM SURE THAT IF HE WERE HERE IN FRONT OF YOU, YOU WOLDNT BE TALKING SMACK LIKE THIS. IS THIS A SLOW NEWS WEEK OR DO YOU JUST NEED SOMEONE TO PICK ON FOR NO REASON.

Devin Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 04:16 PM EST

Well SVL, the truth of the matter is that this is akin to product placement in a television program, but instead of a show being paid to feature a product, the show was created entirely to sell the product. I'm not going to boycott Wrigley's or Chris Brown (who's overrated to begin with), but still. It seems desperate to me and perhaps a little pathetic. Justin Timberlake wrote a jingle for McDonald's "I'm lovin' it" campaign, but no one thought it was anything else but a jingle. Sure, the "double your pleasure" line in "Forever" is brief. But the fact that it was written as an ad masquerading as a song is bothersome.

donner Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 03:36 PM EST

seems to me that people should 'get a life'...really...THIS is a big deal? good grief...

Crystal Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 03:35 PM EST

The double your pleasure double your fun line always struck me as odd (and like Kristen I thought...is that copyright violation!)

...now I say marketing genius!!

It's a fun dance song - who cares?

Alison Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 03:33 PM EST

Eh, it's kind of a shady marketing ploy if it's true, but it won't stop me from listening to the song.

(And yes, I'll be more likely to associate it with SYTYCD than Wrigley's anyway.)

Dylan Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 02:50 PM EST

Gawker makes a name for itself being snobby and pretentious and delights in mockery and dericision, as if the ability to berate famous people or be sarcastic and cynical about politics grants them some sort of authenticity or moral authority. So what's new there?

SarahP Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 02:45 PM EST

100% agree with you. Songs/music mean something different to every individual anyway. Whoever produces it or puts it out there....it's however you interpret it or however you remember it. For example, this song now makes me think of So You Think You Can Dance with Twitch & Comfort's awesome routine to it.

And really, why is this so much more offensive than something like Fergie being paid to name-drop whatever shoe brand (Candie's?) Or anytime a singer name-drops a brand name or another artist or a movie or whatever?

Kristen Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 02:16 PM EST

Eh, I don't really care. I had noticed the "double your pleasure" line and thought maybe Wrigley would sue him, and then thought, man this is not a good song. So, I'm actually pleased it's a gum ad- now I don't feel bad for thinking he had WAY better songs to release as a single.

advertisement

Add Your Comments

The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject — or we may delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field.



  • 1000 characters remaining
    • When you click on the "Post Comment" button above to submit your comments, you are indicating your acceptance of and are agreeing to the Terms of Service. You can also read our Privacy Policy.
Latest Comments

follow EWPopWatch at http://twitter.com
Top Categories

All Categories

Blog Roll
Top Authors
Recent Posts
PopWatch Archive
October 2008
S M T W T F S
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Complete Archive