• More
Back to PopWatch Home
EW Home

Roger Waters fronts a Pink Floyd tribute band at Coachella

Apr 29, 2008, 12:59 PM | by Chris Willman

Categories: Music

Coachellapig_l I nearly got trampled by pig handlers at Coachella. More specifically, I had my iPhone raised in the air, trying to get a nice snapshot of the undercarriage of the giant inflatable pig Roger Waters sent soaring out over the crowd, when I noticed just in the nick of time the handful of very serious-looking, flashlight-wielding, rope-holding roadies about to mow me down as they led the porcine wonder around the main stage’s field. I got out of the way but failed to get the desired photo of the porker’s belly, which was inscribed with the word “Obama” and a check mark next to it. Was this presidential endorsement the ex-Pink Floyd frontman’s, or the sinister pig’s? The former, we can believe, since Waters reportedly also commissioned a plane to fly over and simultaneously drop Obama leaflets, though we on the field saw none of them and they blew into nearby residential neighborhoods, instantly ensuring that the litter-hating desert cities of Indio and La Quinta will swing wildly for McCain in November. Anyhow, the highlight of the show came minutes later when the bovine wranglers let go of the ropes and let the pig float up to that great gig in the sky. I keep waiting for its deflated carcass to show up on eBay any minute and make some reservist in Twenty-Nine Palms a fortune, but no luck yet.

I would like to dub this installment of PopWatch “PropWatch,” since Waters has always been big on inflatable stuff and giant puppets in his shows. I was permanently warped, as an impressionable youth, by the original Animals tour in 1977, which marked the first time Pink Floyd sent critters over stadium crowds. Back then, the pig was pink and unmarked by political graffiti and had a set of glowing red eyes that appeared to be seeking out concert-goers to slaughter, as a sinister symbol of fascism. It was grandiose and it actually meant something vaguely political, too — what a perfect combination for a kid with budding pretensions as big as mine. Somehow, though, on that summer night in ’77, this awesome symbol of oppression seemed just a little less evil when it got stuck right over the middle of Cleveland Stadium and couldn’t be reeled back in after the Floyd had finished “Sheep.” In a slightly Spinal Tappish moment, the band had to stop the show and the house lights came up while for about 20 minutes the authorities figured out how to retrieve the recalcitrant porker. No wonder that, more than 30 years later, Waters is apparently mass-manufacturing his pigs and just letting 'em go into the ether when they’ve served their purpose.

Waters’ set climaxed the three-day Coachella Festival, and it drew the kind of massive crowd that Prince had been greeted with the previous night, as opposed to the minimal welcome wagon that showed up for Jack Johnson on night one. But this followed a lot of grumbling from Coachella veterans who felt that Waters’ booking — to play a 1973 album, The Dark Side of the Moon, in its entirety, along with selected other classic-rock staples — was a betrayal of the festival’s indie-rock principles. To see if these heated objections had any legal validity, I tried looking up the fest’s philosophical bylaws, and — surprise! — there aren’t any. Organizers are perfectly free to book the Steve Miller Band for the main stage next year if they so desire, and with the lack of commercially viable new acts emerging in any strain of rock nowadays, it may come to something close to that eventually. But I think there’s a case to be made for booking Waters at a festival like this… though I think I could make the case a lot better than the one Rog made for himself in his fairly dispiriting Sunday night set.

I will make the argument that the run of Pink Floyd albums from 1971’s Meddle through 1979’s The Wall is as solid a run of records as anyone has made in rock, including the Beatles, Stones, Who, and any number of more rock-critically correct bands. The legend goes that the Sex Pistols were formed in revolt against the pomp and circumstance that Pink Floyd represented, but I’ve always thought that Johnny Rotten and Roger Waters were two peas in a pod, in their mutual misanthropy. Dark Side of the Moon, for all its seemingly spacey tropes, is a relatively down-to-earth album about insanity, cynicism, torpor, and the encroaching inevitability of death — so no wonder it’s one of the most enduringly popular albums of all time, right? Waters’ crankiness was a little less disguised by stoner-baiting sonic splendor on Animals, as nasty a piece of work as you could find in the late ‘70s, or now. Remove some of Rick Wright’s slightly dated synth lines and the stuff holds up exceptionally well.

Except Waters isn’t removing any of Rick Wright’s slightly dated synth lines, or any other element of the original records. He seems convinced — and is probably right, unfortunately — that most of his boomer fans want to hear the songs recreated exactly as first created, from every drumbeat to every ambient quadraphonic sound effect. And so what we got Sunday night was the world’s greatest Pink Floyd tribute band. To be fair, this isn’t much different than the approach eternally estranged Floyd co-frontman David Gilmour took on his last tour, but at least there, Gilmour did have Rick Wright and the group’s original sax-playing sideman along for the ride, so you could almost forgive him for his control-freak exactitude. But whether he wants to include any of the songs Gilmour sang lead on or not, Waters has to do something about those brilliant guitar parts. Plus, by doing Dark Side in its entirety now, he is incorporating a lot of Gilmour-sung material. His solution, for Gilmour and the other missing guys, is to hire ringers who can do every once semi-spontaneous riff and lick note-for-note. You want me to defend that preserved-in-amber fussiness to a bunch of angry indie rockers? Can’t do it.

It doesn’t help that Waters hasn’t made a great record since The Pros and Cons of Hitchhiking, his first post-Floyd effort in 1984. From the evidence of the one “newish” song he played Sunday, we’re not about to get another one soon. “Leaving Beirut” was a textbook example of how wrong overtly political rock can go. Waters, in a rare address to the crowd, told of how he was taken in by a Lebanese family while stranded as a wandering youth in 1961. The tune that followed seemed to be trying to argue the position that because some Lebanese good samaritans were nice to him one night 47 years ago, war is bad. This may indeed be the case, but I’m not sure Waters’ weirdly pedestrian song argues it very effectively. In case we missed the point, there were lyrical shout-outs to George W. Bush (“That Texas education must have f---ed you up when you were very small”), Tony Blair (“Not in my name, Tony, you great war leader you… Now we are Genghis Khan”), and America itself (“Don't let the might of the Christian right f--- it up for you and the rest of the world”). However well-intentioned, this was painful stuff for an admirer of as formidable a talent as Waters’ to sit through.

So, hey, bring on Dark Side, with its Laserium-like film loops playing right to the stoners in the crowd, and the opening and closing Wall material. (Did we mention that this was the first Coachella set ever to last almost three hours and have a 20-minute intermission?) Much as I was chagrined to see Waters trade in pure nostalgia to pick up a paycheck, the material itself has aged well, and I even allowed myself to hope that some of the indie crowd who’ve settled for ephemera might listen and get into what was once great about this stuff and have a little ambition rub off on 'em. But they’ll probably remember the pig.


Suitor Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:26 PM EST

Add Your CommentComments(1) Suitor Fri, Feb 27, 09 at 10:56 PM
Pink Floyd is to the 20th century, what back and Beethoven were to the 19th century. Pink Floyd's originality and pioneering musical genius will not be repeated. I still after 35 years, find new journeys, in Pink Floyd's music.

gbmcfwd wgisct Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 03:03 PM EST

zvdnxc vklxbetyd iktym tiquh dvbza hzfleobkv xmhkpbwd

John Davies Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:46 PM EST

As an adendum to what I've written below how would readers feel about Waters undertaking a tour comprising just RADIO KAOS in it's entirety in the first half & AMUSED TO DEATH in its entirety in the second?

John Davies from Melbourne Australia Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:26 PM EST

It's unfortunate that Waters is now touring & playing so many Floyd songs in his set to the almost complete exclusion of his solo material. This concert is more like witnessing a defacto Pink Floyd performance than experiencing the works of just one man. Not withstanding my comments, I was thrilled to see the inclusion of "Sheep" within the set & thank Roger for paying homage to the truly great album ANIMALS.

tom Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 10:30 PM EST

I was at that concert in 77 at clevland stadium I will never never forget it. I still talk about it today.

Ric Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 10:26 AM EST

Amused to Death is by far as good as if not better than any Pink Floyd album! I've seen Rog several times, and twice on the DSOTM tour which indeed varied from the original recording a bit and was even amped up a bit by a guitarist who can remember what he is supposed to play. I truly am about improvisation, but not when it comes to Mozart. Roger is Pink Floyd and has been since '71.
You are quite an inept critic.

Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 06:39 PM EST

*Amused to Death is the greatest album ever...

chris Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 06:37 PM EST

agree with Bill...no music critic worth their weight in salt would not dismiss "amused to death" and Roger makes people cry...other shows are shows...Roger makes it a quasi-religious experience...I'll also ignore anything you ever write again...but I'm betting you won't have to much stuff out there to ignore...

terry Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:54 PM EST

roger has been mailing it in for a number of years that's true but i saw both "pink floyd" and roger waters in '87 as well as david gilmour in '84 on his solo tour and there is only one answer to the question "BY THE WAY WHICH ONE'S PINK" radio kaos was an extravaganza and the other was merely a concert just remember "this species has amused itself to death"

Mike Thu, May 15, 2008 at 03:14 PM EST

By far the most popular artist post-Coachella, Chris. Many claiming this to be the ultimate Coachella performance.

Wow were you wrong.

Bill weir Tue, May 13, 2008 at 02:13 PM EST

Oh- BTW, I'm 38 years old, and grew up with this music as a kid when it was new. I was at Coachella doing sound engineering, and I've also seen PF twice. I've mixed more shows than you've been to- I'm no "kid" as you say- and Yes, this was the most incredible concert I've ever been to in my entire life. I am mature enough to overlook the obviousness of having to replicate Dave's solos- but these are great songs, and if you change the notes they aren't the same songs anymore. That violinist however... Yes, I cried and felt remarkably HUMAN for a change. no other show I've ever been to gave me that. Seems like tens of thousands of others got that too. i truly am sorry it didn't work for you. You missed out and it is entirely your loss. Seriously!

Bill Weir Tue, May 13, 2008 at 02:00 PM EST

Chris, why are you a music critic? Dis spiriting? Whatever drugs you are on I don't want any! I feel completely OK in ignoring anything further I ever read from you. Just the fact alone that you can so cavalierly dismiss "Amused to Death" shows me you simply don't get it. Your article makes you seem like one of those guys that has to make himself feel superior by downing whatever happens in front of you. As far as your "stoners" comment goes, if this is a bad thing for you- go to your music collection and throw away 99% of everything of worth in it- cause they were stoned when they did it.

Farshad Tue, May 13, 2008 at 03:16 AM EST

Chris, if you'd like to see "Dark Side" treated as something new, then go to see hip-hop concerts!
"Dark Side" lives forever as its original with Waters.

DarkSide Tue, May 6, 2008 at 10:59 AM EST

Peter Moon, the writer is a highly paid senior writer on staff at EW and a published book author. He is not a $100-a-review freelancer.

adam Fri, May 2, 2008 at 06:29 PM EST

To Chivas 68. It was Chester Karmen on guitar (filling in for Andy Fairweather Low) and Dave Kilminster on guitar and vocals. While I'm not sure if either is related to Lemmy, I do know that Chester Karmen is Michael Karmen's son, and Michael Karmen played keyboards on The Final Cut.

anonymous Fri, May 2, 2008 at 03:35 PM EST

Waters not making a good album since Pros and Cons. Absolutely not true. Amused to Death is a masterpiece. Many of his fans love that album.

chivas68@earthlink.net Thu, May 1, 2008 at 09:48 AM EST

I saw the Denver show last night and it was outstanding in every way. Does anybody know if the guitarist Charles Kilminster is Lemmy's kid?

Mikek Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 09:04 PM EST

Adam, no cred for you or anyone else that claims to be a Floyd fan and does not know how to spell GILMOUR. Not that difficult.

jp Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 08:16 PM EST

Roadie: There goes Peter Frampton's big finale. He's gonna be pissed off.
Peter Frampton: Damn right I'm gonna be pissed off. I bought that pig at Pink Floyd's yard sale.

Mr. Helpful Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 07:41 PM EST

The point of Waters' recent tours was to "re-visit" his songs, particularly the Dark Side Of The Moon stuff...not "re-invent" them. This show is cutting edge all the way...from the giant LED screen to rock solid sound system and Waters makes ample use of both. I agree with one thing, though. His Leaving Beirut was nothing but an exercise in childish narcissism but it does provide an opportunity to run and use the bathroom before the crowds get there at the intermission. As for this nonsense about the world's best Pink Floyd tribute band, this band has something no other tribute band has...in fact that not even the reformed Pink Floyd had on tour in the eighties and nineties...the genius himself...Roger Waters.

john Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 07:36 PM EST

dear joeC,
the zep does not need any more props. have you been living under a rock? you can't turn on a classic rock station without hearing at least a couple zep tunes. you can't start a conversation about classic rock without someone mentioning "stairways" or "hammers of the gods." in fact i think it's time that the zep didn't get any props at all, for once. you act like they were the stooges or the new york dolls for-goodness-sakes. if there is one band that i don't think has to worry about being forgotten....that is led zeppelin.

Heather Wixson Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 01:08 PM EST

Wow...this review is just so wrongly assumptious. I came to Coachella from Chicago and ironically enough, I had zero desire to see Roger Waters play. However, my friends talked me into staying and I have to say that the entire set was amazing- not just to the stoner crowd either. Or the indie crowd. How about just acknowledging the fact that most of the people that showed up that weekend were just music fans, plain and simple? Trying to label 20,000 people is pretty hard to do these days.

JMar Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:17 PM EST

Chris, it is so charming that you keep coming back for more. I respect that. However, I disagree with you about Roger not making this version of Dark Side his own. I suppose you didn't notice the sounds that were added to Run. Although if you really knew that album well you would already be aware that the subway sounds, ambulance, race cars and gunshots were added. As most avid Floyd fans know, Pink Floyd was known for testing their albums out on their audiences before placing them out on the market (hence why there are tons of bootlegs out there), and I have to say that this particular show was excellent especially since I felt that he embellished it more than the shows I saw him perform last year at the Hollywood Bowl.

JMar Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:15 PM EST

Chris, it is so charming that you keep coming back for more. I respect that. However, I disagree with you about Roger not making this version of Dark Side his own. I suppose you didn't notice the sounds that were added to Run. Although if you really knew that album well you would already be aware that the subway sounds, ambulance, race cars and gunshots were added. As most avid Floyd fans know, Pink Floyd was known for testing their albums out on their audiences before placing them out on the market (hence why there are tons of , and I have to say that this particular show was excellent especially since I felt that he embellished it more than the shows I saw him perform last year at the Hollywood Bowl.

JoeC Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 10:36 AM EST

One last comment, Chris: As a HUGE fan of 70's rock, you left out a crucial band when you were talking about the classic bands of the 70's, Led Zep! Pink Floyd were great, but Zep defined the 70's, yes even more than Floyd, the Eagles, Elton, and anyone else you care to mention. Give 'em their props!

elly Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 09:41 AM EST

i don't listen to roger waters, but when i saw the pig story on cnn.com it made my week. anyone remember the old simpsons episode where homer joins hullaballooza and there's a gag with peter frampton's pig balloon? AWESOME! i got such a good laugh. so i salute roger waters and his pig for bringing me much happiness this fine day.

Dave Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 09:02 AM EST

Chris - you are really a laugh. But it is sweet that you keep coming back to reply to the near universal criticisms of your piece!
How much did you get paid???

john Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 08:08 AM EST

there is a good reason why rog decided with this outing (and the in the flesh tours of 99-01) to keep the songs exactly the same. the main reason is that no one wants to hear his new versions of those classics. he did it on pros and cons and again with his radio kaos tours, and look what that got him....bad record sales and horrible attendance. which is sad because those different versions were just as great as the originals. so don't blame mr. waters for fronting "the worlds greatest pink floyd tribute band." blame the fans.

on another note, why is this article treating the coachella performance like it's the first one of the tour? i saw it in seattle almost two years ago and again in st. paul 9 months later.

Chris Willman Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:31 PM EST

Friends, if kids who've never heard Floyd before were at that show and came away with respect and awe, I think that's wonderful, and said as much in my last paragraph. If I'd never been privvy to the wonders of Waters before, I'd probably think that was the greatest show of my life, too. It's only with experience that we come to expect a little more, even from our heroes. It's because I think so much of "Dark Side" that I'd like to see it treated as something that still has some life to it instead of strictly as a museum piece. If exact note-for-note recreations of solos are your thing, there's a place for that, and it's called classical music. I wish I could feel the same as the commenter who said that bringing in a ringer to precisely replicate every last note of Gilmour's solos was a sign of respect for Gilmour's work, as opposed to audience pandering. But if Waters really respects Gilmour that much, I wish he'd make peace with the guy instead of hiring somebody to do a Xerox.

wibadgers8 Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:12 PM EST

Let me just say this, I didn't go to Coachella but I saw the identical concert at Milwaukee's Summerfest, siting about the 12 row, front and center, and I thought it was AMAZING...Roger also released the 'pig' and I thought it was a really amazing experience. Also, just stayed tuned for Radiohead at Lollapalooza....

Peter Moon Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 09:58 PM EST

Gosh...Chris Willman, you really don't write very well. It must be hard going to a show and instead of observing the fabulous crowd reaction you have to view the whole thing with your critic' hat on. And for all that effort you probably only earned a $100 or so for this article. Sad.

Chris Willman Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 09:34 PM EST

If you want to know what happened to the pig, PopWatchers, check out our sister Hollywood Insider column. Details on the retrieval of the bovine carcass are here:

http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2008/04/roger-waters-pi.html

Jason Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 08:03 PM EST

This was the greatest concert I've ever been to. And I'm glad the songs were kept the same - it's not just the arrangements themselves but the context of the music as well; the atmosphere and crowd and visuals accompanying the music are what made this set so special. But hey, cynicism and negative criticism sells and gives you an air of superiority I guess.

Mike Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 05:37 PM EST

Chris, how about a retraction or admission of error? The consensus is this was the greatest Coachella show ever. People are talking about how they cried and so forth....

Why do you presuemt to speak for the young, open minded Coachella crowd?

Don't believe me? See for yourself:

http://www.coachella.com/forum

TJ Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 04:59 PM EST

Only a "Critic" could be at such a momtoues event, and not get high to the greatest high muisc in the world ! ! ! ! I guess Chris does his designer drugs in the Carribean with his "rich" friends....

Susanq Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 03:44 PM EST

I found the Pink Floyd pig in my driveway Monday morning! Evidently it had escaped from the concert at Coachella on Sunday night, and climbed a little too high. It now more resembles "pulled pork" than the pig it once was!

Patrick Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 03:43 PM EST

The Roger Waters show at Coachella was the greatest concert I have ever seen hands down. I think that playing Gilmore's licks note for note was a sign of respect, as in 'this does not need to be improved' the guitarists up there obviously had the chops to do whatever they wanted to; that was a personal choice not a lack of anything. One more nit: the stoners in the crowd? Dude, you weren't tripping??? What a total waste.

Mike Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 03:02 PM EST

Thousands of fans saying they weren't Floyd fans but are now, people calling it "the greatest Coachella performance ever".

What show did you see?

Mike Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 03:01 PM EST

Chirs, you are out of touch. If you go to the Coachella forum, you will see the Waters show is being widely touted as the greatest Coachella performance ever.

Did you have a bit too much to drink?

JMar Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 02:58 PM EST

The only thing bad about this show was the fact that Chris Willman decided to go and write this lame review. Why don't you take a good look at the lyrics of some of your favorite Floyd songs and see who wrote them. Or instead you could go back to listening to Phish, Rush, Queensryche or some other band that you somehow think is better. That or get a better day job.

JoeC Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 02:55 PM EST

Like you, Chris, Pink Floyd was an important band when I was growing up, and past. I actually thought at Live 8 in 05 and their induction into the British Rock and Roll Hall Of Fame that they'd at least buried the hatchet, but no. 'So you think you can tell/Heaven from Hell indeed....Actually I love the idea of the Floyd's pigs buzzing those pretentious kids and their festival!!!!

Greg Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 02:53 PM EST

Mr. Willman, I am emphatic agreement with Adam. "Amused to Death" is one of the most amazing concept albums in history and it contains all the musical genius that's been missing from Pink Floyd since his departure. And a comment to the deluded stoner that commented on Coachella being an "Indie" event, there's not an indie band in existence that hasn't already rehashed an idea that was previously recorded by Roger Waters. Hell, even "Radio KAOS" was a better album than a lot of indie bands can muster. You should check them out.

john Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 02:39 PM EST

Roger Waters is spectacular in concert. I saw this show last year in Hartford and he had a pig and played Dark Side of The Moon cover to cover in the 2nd set and it was probably the best concert I saw last year. He's so controling when it comes to the live shows that the often bickered about it in Floyd. waters wanted everything to be precisely tiimes out while on stage and it doesnt always woirk that way. He his a very talened artist. There last tour in 94' was Epic. These guys should tour they'd make more than the Stones do!

Judi Molinari Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 02:10 PM EST

The original creative genius behind Pink Floyd is SYD BARRETT. Most of Floyd's material after they kicked him out was based on Syd's life. Syd paved the way for the psychaedelic Floyd music we all listened to and came to love in the 70's. I love Pink Floyd with Syd and without Syd. They are all talented men and should not be pitted against one another. Roger Waters is great, but he is better with David, Rick and Nick. He does not stand out alone. His solo records could never compare to Pink Floyd. Although he does throw a mean concert these days. Love the Syd Barrett tribute he does. Just wanted to clear things up. And on another note, I don't appreciate Roger coming to America and trashing my President, both current and past. Remember where you got your freedrom from Roger. You'd be speaking German right now if it wasn't for us. So shaddup already!

Huge Floyd Fan

Maggie Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 02:03 PM EST

FYI: There's a $10K reward (plus free Coachella tickets for life) for the person who finds the pig:
http://www.mydesert.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=200880428034

adam Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 01:37 PM EST

Chris, "the only possible answer" is not that "fans expect to see a young, dark-haired lead guitarist singing that song instead of him." Rather, at 64 years old it is amazing that Roger can sing at all, let alone for 3+ hours each night. From what I've seen, the "only possible solution" is that part of the majesty to the Floyd sound was the dichotomy between Waters' "dark" or even "crazy" voice and Gilmore's polished and "clean" vocals. It is best illustrated on Comfortably Numb, which is basically a duet where Gilmore's and Waters' vocals complement each other and demonstrate the conflicting nature of the song. (Gilmore's parts clean, Waters' parts filled with angst.) And if you don't think you got your money's worth out of Roger's over the top performance, I doubt any show will ever satisfy you.

Which One's Pink? Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 01:26 PM EST

Pink Floyd was a band not Roger Waters solo act. Have you notice how much RW's solo stuff sucked?

Chris Willman Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 01:07 PM EST

Adam, I don't doubt for a second that Water was the creative genius of Floyd, and that he deserves to be performing that material more than Gilmour, if deserve's got anything to do with it. But why, for example, doesn't HE sing "Money" during the Dark Side recreation? It's not like that one is out of his range. The only possible answer is that he thinks fans expect to see a young, dark-haired lead guitarist singing that song instead of him, and so he hands it over to the Gilmour ringer, for no other good reason. If Waters sang Dark Side in its entirety (except maybe, you know. "Great Gig in the Sky"), and fussed around with the parts a little so it wasn't so completely like listening to the original CD on the world's greatest sound system, I'd pay good money to see that.

adam Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:58 PM EST

Mr. Willman, you've got it all wrong. Roger is, was, and always will be the creative genius behind all of Pink Floyd's greatest albums. It doesn't matter who got to sing the parts, the words were all written by Mr. Waters. The three other members who tour as "Pink Floyd" are the real tribute band, as they continue to play Water's hits. Plus, you lost all credibility when you claimed Roger hasn't made a "great record since the pros and cons." Perhaps you missed it (because Waters could not release it under the Pink Floyd banner) but Amused to Death is quite possible the greatest Waters' concept album of all time. Much more elaborate and "Floyd like" than the Division Bell, with Roger's signature political slant and angst that is missing with the post-Waters Floyd. Water's words continue to be relevant and attract young fans almost 40 years after they were originally written. A true legend in his own time.


advertisement

Add Your Comments

The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject — or we may delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field.



  • 1000 characters remaining
    • When you click on the "Post Comment" button above to submit your comments, you are indicating your acceptance of and are agreeing to the Terms of Service. You can also read our Privacy Policy.
Latest Comments
Top Categories

All Categories

Blog Roll
Top Authors
Recent Posts
PopWatch Archive
July 2009
S M T W T F S
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Complete Archive