• More
Back to PopWatch Home
EW Home

Oscar's burning questions

Feb 26, 2008, 11:50 AM | by Gary Susman

Categories: Oscars 2008, Rumor Control

Bradrenfrodies_l Still a lot of mysteries left over from Sunday's Oscar night, many of them raised in questions from EW.com readers. We've found a few preliminary answers for you; fuller explanations may be coming later. Watch for an article in this week's issue of EW that should put as many of these burning questions as possible to rest. Meanwhile, here's what folks wanted to know more about:

• Why were Brad Renfro (pictured) and two-time Oscar nominee Roy Scheider left out of the "In Memoriam" montage?

• What on earth did Gary Busey think he was doing when he accosted Ryan Seacrest and Jennifer Garner on the red carpet?

• Why was there no footage of Whoopi Goldberg's four hosting gigs in the montage of memorable Oscar show moments?

• Why was Best Song winner Markéta Irglová invited back to give her acceptance speech when winners of awards from smaller films or smaller categories are routinely cut off by the orchestra and rushed off the stage, never to be heard from again?

• What was behind the strange scheduling of the presentation of the awards — no acting awards at all in the first half hour, Best Actress about halfway through the show, kid-friendly presenter Miley Cyrus held 'til after bedtime? Was sexism behind the early presentation of Best Actress, with Best Actor being held towards the end with the other top categories?

Answers, as best as we can figure, after the jump.

Scheider died after the Jan. 31 cutoff date noted at the beginning of the montage; let's hope they remember him next year. Leaving out Renfro was an editorial decision made by the Academy, according to spokeswoman, Leslie Unger. "We just can't include everybody," Unger told the Associated Press. Still, why leave out a star of some major movies, like The Client and Apt Pupil? Was it because he died of a drug overdose? "I can't speak to what other people are going to think," said Unger. So, not much of an explanation there. Sorry, Renfro fans, but if it's any consolation, the montage also omitted Vampira, Andy Sidaris, Joey Bishop, and Yes, Giorgio! star Luciano Pavarotti.

The morning after his red-carpet run-in with Seacrest and Garner, Busey called into Seacrest's radio show to explain himself. You can read a transcript of his remarks here and listen to them here... There, does that make it clearer? Nah, didn't think so.

Why no Whoopi? Who knows, but Goldberg and her cohosts on The View were certainly miffed about the snub. At least they included footage of her Best Supporting Actress win for Ghost.

Irglová's reprieve was the result of a mistake by the orchestra, according to Oscar show producer Gil Cates. "She was accidentally played off. No one wanted to play her off," Cates told AP. "I asked her to come back. I asked Jon [Stewart] to please bring her back. It was a very emotional moment." Indeed it was. Still doesn't explain why other winners haven't received similar consideration.

As for the baffling placement throughout the show of the awards presentations, there's been no official explanation. It's understandable that they'd stagger the acting awards to keep people watching for three and a half hours, but the Supporting Actor or Actress award is usually the first one given, apparently to lull viewers into a false sense of urgency, as if other can't-miss awards will follow shortly. Also, it's unusual to present one of the leading-role awards so early; that's usually considered one of the major awards presented at the tail end of the show. Maybe they staggered that one as well to keep viewer interest from flagging, but wouldn't it have made more sense to present Best Actor early, since there was no suspense in that race, and leave 'til the end the nail-biter race between Julie Christie, Ellen Page, and eventual winner Marion Cotillard? I can only chalk it up to the short window that Cates and his team had to prepare the show this year, thanks to the writers' strike. Judging by the backstage report by EW.com's Adam Vary, the show was much more disorganized than usual this year.

Still have questions about the Oscar show? Let us know, below, and we'll see what we can find out for you.


Liz Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 09:12 PM EST

Does anyone know why Joseph Mazzello was included in the Memoriam when as best as I can tell from many searches he's not dead (the kid from Jurassic Park).

Diane Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 04:22 PM EST

Fix the Oscars-a simple format:

1. Nominate films that in 5-10 years people are going to want to see. I agree that Spiderman 9 isn't Oscar worthy, but I doubt I'll be interested in watching No Country for Old Men either.

2. Cut crap-very few people in the view audience care about Bee Montages or Preduction Design.

3. Get a new host-I like Jon Stewart, but not in this format

4. Megastars needed-even if that means Jack and Heidi Klum need to present every award.

5. Invite Cher-every year. At least we'll have something to talk about afterwards.

Chris Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:13 AM EST

"Bad enough Johnny Depp lost to boring Day-Lewis".

You obviously have never watch Day-Lewis ina single movie.

Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:13 AM EST

"Bad enough Johnny Depp lost to boring Day-Lewis".

You obviously have never watch Day-Lewis ina single movie.

Ames Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:22 AM EST

My biggest question about the "In memoriam" section is why can't the presenter say "please hold your applause until the end" so it doesn't turn into this morbid postmortem popularity contest. Every year this bugs me.

Charles Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 02:02 AM EST

By the way, my name is actually Chris. Sorry about that.

Charles Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 01:53 AM EST

Mr. Grizzly, I think I can answer your question. First off, the majority of the general public find award ceremonies in general, but especially the Oscars, to be too long and worst of all, boring. Even as a film fan, I can't sit through the whole thing. Secondly, the viewing public almost always have little to no knowledge or interest in the films or people that are given the nominations. The Oscar viewership has decreased since 1998 because, since Titanic, there hasn't been a single Best Picture nominee that nearly everyone on the planet actually saw before the voting actually began. To illustrate my point, compare the five Best Picture nominees of any given year to the five highest-grossing films of that year and you'll see how out of touch the Academy is with the moviegoing public. Unless the world goes to see a limited release of a festival pick or the Academy nominates Spider-Man 9 for Best Picture, Oscar viewership will decline until there's only a CNN press conference every year

Charles Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 01:16 AM EST

Is anyone else besides me baffled that The Golden Compass beat out Transformers for Best Visual Effects? I mean, I saw all three nominees in the theaters and, while the other two were impressive, they didn't seem as photo-realistic to me as those ones I saw in the latter film. This is a category that the Academy voters usually get right, but after Sunday night, I now question their integrity. Anyone else agree or disagree?

David D Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:38 PM EST

The Sam Jackson / Spike Lee / Lou Gossett answer is simple: so the director can easily cut to a reaction shot when there's any reference to an African-American. (sigh)

actingup Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:11 PM EST

They need to take agents and executives out of the "Memoriam" section. That is ridiculous! The only people in that section should be people who could actually be nominated for an Oscar (actors, directors, writers, film composers, etc).

peggym Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:05 PM EST

The fact that most people had no idea who Brad Renfro was may have been part of the decision to leave him out of the memorial.Yes, he was good in a few movies, but hardly had a memorable career.

JimmyG Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:19 PM EST

My yearly headscratcher - why are Samuel L. Jackson, Spike Lee (and usually Lou Gossett Jr.) always given good/close seats year after year?? I saw Spike and SLJ this year - did were nominated (no) did they present an award (?) Do either even have an award? Are Oliver Stone, Jodie Foster, Whoopi Goldberg, Sidney Poitier and Mickey Rooney in the nosebleed section? Don't Academy voters have to enter a raffle to even get a seat? Faye Dunaway won this year (nosebleed section) but Dakota Fanning lost? Did those two win some kind of lifetime seating pass for a previous snub?

JimmyG Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:19 PM EST

My yearly headscratcher - why are Samuel L. Jackson, Spike Lee (and usually Lou Gossett Jr.) always given good/close seats year after year?? I saw Spike and SLJ this year - did were nominated (no) did they present an award (?) Do either even have an award? Are Oliver Stone, Jodie Foster, Whoopi Goldberg, Sidney Poitier and Mickey Rooney in the nosebleed section? Don't Academy voters have to enter a raffle to even get a seat? Faye Dunaway won this year (nosebleed section) but Dakota Fanning lost? Did those two win some kind of lifetime seating pass for a previous snub?

Martha Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 08:48 PM EST

Sorry for the double comment - I'm too impatient when typepad gets slow!

Martha Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 08:47 PM EST

Marie, Kristen Chenowith didn't fall in her platform shoes because she's 4'11 and probably wears them a lot. Unlike me, who would have broken an ankle by the end of the first verse.

Martha Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 08:42 PM EST

Marie, Kristen Chenowith didn't fall in her platform shoes because she's 4'11 and probably wears them a lot. Unlike me, who would have broken an ankle by the end of the first verse.

Rob Grizzly Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 08:36 PM EST

Burning question: why were the ratings so low?

David D Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 08:08 PM EST

Pretty telling about Cates' explanation about getting Marketa back onstage: "I did that. I'm the one who asked Jon to bring her back." This after 48 hours of critical and viewer praise for Jon Stewart's class act. "No, no. Wasn't him. It was me. I'm also the one who ended 'Falling Slowly' with a shot of Bill Conti."

nathan Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:37 PM EST

I was annoyed that Roy Scheider was left of the Memoriam list, loved that guy, Chief Brody rules! Don't care that Whoopi was left off the host montage though, I just can't stand that guy.

Rebekah Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:23 PM EST

How come Amy Adams only sang one of the "Enchanted" songs? I love Kristin Chenowith, but Adams should've sung both the songs.
The "Once" win was a truly touching moment.

Delia Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:09 PM EST

We're agreed then? Get a new producer, because that was the biggest waste of time last night. Bad enough Johnny Depp lost to boring Day-Lewis, but add that to pointless, pointless montages, and dull songs...and you have just lost 3 hours of your life to no purpose whatever.

krikky Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:05 PM EST

Juno-lash, Ellen Page had just come off of a win at the Independent Spirit Awards. While "nail-biter" is probably an exaggeration, she was still a viable contender.

Juno-lash Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:44 PM EST

"the nail-biter between Julie Christie, Ellen Page and eventual winner Marion Cotillard"??!?! Are you people seriously THAT hopped up on Juno and Diablo Cody that you're calling this race a nail-biter that included Ellen Page now? Even your own experts didn't think Page stood a better chance than Linney.

not unpreposterous Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:20 PM EST

Yes, in answer to the question below: I would have noticed and been horrified if Bergman had not been mentioned. Or Antonioni.

Others not noted in the memorial montage include Ulrich Mühe, the star of last year's Best Foreign Oscar winner The Lives of Others, and Michel Serrault, as prolific and respected an actor as his countrymen Jean-Claude Brialy and Jean-Pierre Cassel, who were included.

Why was screenwriter Peter Viertel not included in the same year as his wife Deborah Kerr?

All of the oversights turn something touching into something that feels disrespectful.

Z Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:05 PM EST

The only people who ever seem to really care about winning an oscar seem to be the actors and possibly the directors, which is why they give heartfelt speeches about what an honor it is and thank people (like parents/spouses/person they portrayed if won for Biopic), who really made an impact on their lives. Other people, like for sound editing or whatever, either only thank their family(which is fine) or have a laundry list of people that takes up so much time. They should have the awards be:

-Picture
-Director
-Actor/Actress
and supporting
-Foreign
-Animated
-Documentary
-Adapt. and Ori. Screen play
-Song

The rest should be in a non-televised portion.

Kevin Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:03 PM EST

Why were there no clips from the best picture nominees? I watched the majority of the show so I don't think I could have missed all five.

Simon Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:03 PM EST

Why can't they find a better host? It was a boring show (had more fun watch the Independent Spirit - Rainn is too funny!) Jon is not a good host for this show. They need someone who can perform ala Billy Crystal.

Douglas Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:44 PM EST

Oh please, we all know why they chose to omit Renfro; he was a felon and a drug addict: an industry black eye.

I can understand omitting Kerwin Matthews, although the audience was full of baby-boomers who loved his Sinbad.

But there's no excuse for omitting Charles Lane, who was merely ONE OF THE FOUNDERS OF SAG!!! Not to mention that he was in more movies than all the other dead folks added together.

But they had time to include dead agents? I guess including dead agents was to cheer everyone up.

star Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:27 PM EST

re: amy adams.
I personally thought she did very well singing. to the lower poster, that was her singing. live. That's why she didn't sing the other enchanted number. She's not some professional singer and she was worried about the bigger number. She definitely was live though. you could tell because she sang the song wonderfully and only hit a teeny tiny note or two not perfect. Didn't take away from the performance though. The hand gestures were very much like the movie. she was acting as the princess in the movie was.

sam Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:24 PM EST

The show was terrible--Jon Stewart is a funny, smart guy, but stop asking him to host the Oscars! He is clearly uncomfortable and not very funny here. I don't remember seeing Steve Martin or Letterman, either--Whoopi needs to get over herself--she was a terrible host, too. They need to cut the show down to no more than 2 hours, focus on the awards and leave montages to showing the classics and no stupid stuff. Stop picking presenters like Miley (cute, but she didn't belong there). The Oscars used to be a great party with all of the biggest stars. Now, if they are not nominated or presenting, they don't even show up. A reflection on the "stars" we have these days.

Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:17 PM EST

Adrienne Shelly was not included in the 2007 montage.

Amy Adams was more than likely on the stage alone because the scene in the movie is her and CGI creatures. Would you really have liked seeing her with badly done CGI animals or people dressed up as animals?

Not to be rude, but would there have been so much flack about the "In Memoriam" montage if Ingmar Bergman had been left off? I seriously doubt it, even though Bergman has a bigger influence on film than Renfro.

Matt Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:10 PM EST

KSK - I think Miley Cyrus slipped on that same spot, too! I saw Travolta slip, but didn't see Farrell. I'll have to rewatch. That really is the kind of thing we want to know.

DanOregon Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:10 PM EST

How much sway does the broadcaster (ABC-Disney) have in deciding who will be a presenter? There seemed to be an awful lot of Disney folks there.

Jake Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:02 PM EST

I really dont understand why everyone made such a big deal about Gary Busey. He didnt seem to do anything really out of hand. Garner and Seacrest both came off as rude and snobbish to me.

KSK Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:46 PM EST

As insignificant as it was, I am curious about the spot behind the presenter's podium that Colin Farrell tripped on after which he made a comment to have it fixed. Yet, I think later on, John Travolta (or Tom Hanks?) tripped on the same spot. Inside joke or actual stage obstacle?

Sven Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:31 PM EST

It was either last year's Emmys or Oscars where the Best Supporting Actor/Actress were not announced until later in the show. I think it was the Oscars, so this was not the first year. Either way, there was a precedent for it.

Ellipsian Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:24 PM EST

Pai, you took the words right out of my fingers: "Don't care why Marketa was invited back, just glad she was!"

Marie Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:10 PM EST

My two questions:

Why did Amy Adams have to perform all by herself on a completely bare stage when every other nominated song was given a production number? They should've at least played some footage from Enchanted behind her!

And how on earth did Kristin Chenoweth not fall in those ridiculously high platform heels?!

bootsycolumbia Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:57 PM EST

I seem to remember a few years ago, watching the Tony Awards, and the winners would give their acceptance speeches, and there would be a list of everyone they wanted to thank on the bottom of the screen. The speeches were pretty entertaining and sometimes really moving because they had more time to say what they really wanted to say. Maybe the Oscars could try that next year.

bootsycolumbia Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:56 PM EST

I seem to remember a few years ago, watching the Tony Awards, and the winners would give their acceptance speeches, and there would be a list of everyone they wanted to thank on the bottom of the screen. The speeches were pretty entertaining and sometimes really moving because they had more time to say what they really wanted to say. Maybe the Oscars could try that next year.

Pamela Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:43 PM EST

I'm with Crazy Fox: Why is Gil Cates still in charge? After the terrible decision several years ago where "lesser" awards were giving out in the aisles, I expected he would think harder about why people are there at all - to accept awards and give their thanks. But no, they are still getting it wrong - Marketa Irglova was the most prominent but EW you are right, bringing her back doesn't explain why others don't get to have the same moment in the sun either but bigger award winners can get to ramble (Cuba Gooding Jr anyone. How long did that "speech" go on for?).


Another question related to the In Memoriam: Why the 31 January cut-off date? I assume if a Hollywood bigwag had died on February 22nd they would have found a way to include it. After all, how hard can it be to insert photos and captions?

Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:15 PM EST

The winners should take out an ad thanking everyone in the NY and LA times (and other papers) and then keep the acceptance speeches to something moving and touching. Problem solved.

Joanna Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:11 PM EST

You did see Whoopi when she was included in the Best Supporting Actress montage. She's upset she wasn't included in the Hosts montage as well.

CrazyFox Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:57 PM EST

What I don't get is why they keep letting Gil Cates produce the show. Ratings have slipped steadily most of the years he's done it. His tinkering makes things worse and his decisions are arbitrary. The presenters are seldom given anything interesting to say even when they do have writers and the production numbers are always awful. Having somebody new produce the show might improve things. This year, even the opening wasn't entertaining.

Sara Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:56 PM EST

The answer to some of these questions is the REASON the Oscars don't have good ratings. Get a funny, brave comedian who's willing to GO there (ala Dave Letterman ten years ago). Maybe nominate some movies that are actually being shown in our towns, or at least try to get quicker DVD releases so we have a vested interest in them. And finally put an END to the boring, long montages that don't have anything to do with anything. Oh yeah--and could we cut out some of the awards from the telecast completely??? Who really cares who wins Best Live Action-Short? I mean, come ON.

pianogal Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:53 PM EST

I am not impressed with the reasons why they left out Brad Renfro and Joey Bishop.

I'm a HUGE Heath Ledger fan, but I was completely prepared to wait until 2009 to see him memorialized in the 2008 awards, as well as Renfro and Roy Scheider. If you're going to honor those who died who were in the movie biz, then include EVERYone--as they've seemed to always do in past years. Yes, Heath's death was a stunning blow, but he should have to wait his turn like everyone else. And to ignore Joey Bishop? C'MON. That's just plan ridiculous. They'd rather include someone who's been on the planet for five minutes rather than someone who has been contributing to the biz for decades?

Finally, if we're going to include Joe Schmoe who did editing jobs back in 1927 (in other words, some guy no one has ever heard of), then you better include EVERYBODY. Otherwise, eliminate the segment from the already bloated proceedings.

Martha Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:48 PM EST

Maybe the banter would be funnier and the speeches better if they served drinks, a la the Golden Globes. Not to Gary Busey, of course.

dma69 Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:45 PM EST

The three songs from Enchanted were pretty underwhelming. Amy Adams's was too minimal, Kristen Chenoweth's set was way too busy, and Jon McLaughlin's looked like the Beauty and the Beast set was hijacked, but he sounded the best of the three. Nonetheless, the Once song deserved to win.

pai Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:43 PM EST

Don't care why Marketa was invited back, just glad she was! Long live Glen and Marketa!

Eva_baby Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:30 PM EST

Normally I'd agree that people should be allowed to have their moment of acknowledgment rather than being played off the stage. However, the problem is that too many of them simply have a laundry list of thank yous to people nobody cares about. Only a handful actually make great acceptance speeches. To be fair, The Producers try to tell people this every year and every year all they do is pull out their list of thanking their agents, lawyers and hairdressers. You almost only ever want Brits to win because they actually do give great speeches.

Carli Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:27 PM EST

Marketa coming back on stage was the best part. Glen talked for 30 seconds and then right when she gets to the mic, the music plays. This was their moment and they blew it! Love Jon Stewart (or whoever it was) for getting her back up there.

Steph Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:23 PM EST

The omissions of Brad Renfro and Joey Bishop (and others!) were just plain disrespectful. Oscar awards are not given to certain types of "executives", so why include them in the In Memoriam montage? The Oscar TELECAST is for viewers and moviegoers, not entertainment business insiders. If they must pick and choose who they will include, it should be people who made an impression in the public eye. The academy left out well-known actors in favor of practically every executive in the business who happened to pass this year. By that logic, then every deceased person who ever bought a movie ticket should also be included in the montage as "patron".

Here Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:16 PM EST

To those questioning Adrienne Shelly not being included, she died in 2006, not 2007. I assume she was shown on the 2007 telecast.

Mike Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:14 PM EST

This awards show has been a let down in recent years. They need to stop the unfunny banter and pointless miontages so they can give more time for acceptance speeches. Even the host has no point other that to open and close the show. And as for the Best Actress award being given early, it rotates. Last year, Best Actor was given before Best Actress. Next year, it will switch.

swerds Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:10 PM EST

I'm just happy that the 5 nominated songs were actually a PART of the movies this year. Not something tacked on to play over the opening or closing credits.

pop Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:03 PM EST

are you people high!! amy adams was TERRIBLE! she was clearly lip singing!!! the hand gestures and lip singing was cringe inducing, i had to turn her off she was so bad. as for marketa she actually had a great speech so i didn't mind that they brought her back.

Damion Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:59 PM EST

I think the ommision of Renfro was quite the insult. Ledger was there, so Renfro should have been included. Maybe they can't include everybody, but Renfro was hardly just another person that died...and his passing was just a week prior to ledger. Both should have been included.

As for Whoopi, why do I remmeber seeing her if she wasn't included!?!?

aymzer Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:56 PM EST

Adrienne Shelly died in November of 2006. She was in last year's montage I believe.

to alan Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:52 PM EST

I think she died during the time frame for last year's awards. I seem to remember her death being right before her film was screened at Sundance...which would have been in January of 2007, therefore in the 2006 montage. I seem to remember it being there last year...am I wrong?

Scout Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:48 PM EST

To Alan: Spot on about Adrienne Shelley. I'm sorry to admit I forgot her absence from the montage, despite the fact that I have the Adrienne Shelley Foundation website bookmarked for a donation. She certainly did have an impact on the film industry this year and hopefully will continue to do so through the Foundation.

Mary Beth Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:42 PM EST

Personally, I enjoy the awkwardness of the presenter's banter. It's often so bad its funny, or sometimes genuinely funny (though not so much this year.) It can make for crazy moments in TV.

And i have no problem with cutting the lesser category winners off. There I said it. Most of the time they are just name-dropping person after person to thank. Good for the person who got to hear their name, boring for us. Now I think thanking a zillion people regardless of whether the winner is famous or not is boring, but I understand they won't cut off the major winners as much. So that's why I say I am at in favor of cutting off the smaller category winners. Not everyone can be allowed to go on and on.

Now if they started saying more interesting stuff, making statements about their craft or the work they won for, maybe I'd care more. Like the singer from Once who got to come back out. She had something interesting to say about art and hope. Good stuff!

JMC Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:28 PM EST

I'm sad to say it, but Chenowith really let me down. I love Youtubing her, but she was just bad last night.

And poor Amy! Kristin gets a set, back-up, and a costume change, and poor Amy's left with nothing. Amy was the star of that movie, she should have gotten the big song. Kristin would have been fine Galindafying the Happy Working Song.

Alan Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:25 PM EST

I think they should've included Adrienne Shelley in the montage. She was an indie movie queen, and her death was tragic and well-publicized, and Waitress was well-received. I think it was a major oversight on the Academy's part.

Eli Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:24 PM EST

It's the oscars, shouldn't the In Memoriam only include past oscar nominees and winners or people who left an indelible impression in the filmmaking world. I mean, actors die all the time... you can't include everyone. Brad Renfro was never oscar nominated nor did he leave an uneraseable mark in the film world. Get over it.

Ms Daisy Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:18 PM EST

I have never understood why presenters have to come out and do anything other than say the nominees are and the winner is. And you wouldn't need writers to pen all that phony awkward chit-chat.

And Whoopi: maybe you weren't included in the montage of greatest host moments because you were just not that great.

carr Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:10 PM EST

junior, i fully agree about your death montage. I guess I was just defending the thing for no real reason. It would be simple to include all the people that they omitted. I still think that it's their decision to do so and they have that right. That doesn't make it correct or proper though.
As for Marketa's speech. I definitely think what you said plays a part in it. no doubt. i still think that what i said has a part in it too though. I've seen that happen in the past years and past award shows where they didn't necessarily let the recipient come back on stage- especially if they're cutting to commercial.

peaches Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:03 PM EST

Here are my burning Oscar questions-
Does Bed, Bath, and Beyond sell the sheets Cameron Diaz wore? They'd look great in my guest bedroom.

What happened to Best Supporting Actress award being presented at the beginning of the show?
Why was the sound so bad during "That's how You know"?
Were the censors nervous that Diablo Cody's lady business was gonna pop out during her acceptance speech?

cruzilla Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:00 PM EST

This is the first negative feedback I heard about Marketa Irglova being invited back on stage. I don't think anyone associates "fairness" with the Oscars, so why is anyone complaining about a nice gesture? I thought it was great.

Scout Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:55 PM EST

Kim: Hear, hear, sister. Forgot about the painful presenter moments. I'd be interested if anyone really enjoys them enough to keep them around. Most of the time, they're not even funny and I can forego the few funny ones to give some winner his or her moment in the sun. And you're right, we might not want to hear the sound-editors comments, but I'm sure his/her family is sitting on the edge of their collective seats. Those lesser-known folks get the least amount of back-patting around, they should get their due at the ceremony.

T-Rex Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:54 PM EST

As to the Best Actress award, perhaps it was presented earlier because over the years it has become more of a beauty pageant than an acting award.

bizzbee Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:47 PM EST

I think they could have omitted some of the "agents" and "producers" and included Renfro, and Joey Bishop.

Kim Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:39 PM EST

I agree with those who think people should get more time to talk in their acceptance speeches. We didn't need all those montages and they could've had a Best Song medley instead of five full numbers. Do I really care what the Sound Editing winner has to say? No, but I will happily sit through the greatest moment of his/her life and forgo the montage of bees and the painful presenter banter.

Rose Tyler Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:27 PM EST

Why not cut the unfunny presenter banter(ie. Steve Carell and Anne Hathaway, Jonah Hill and Seth Rogan)to allow more time for the speeches? Either that or let the Coen Brothers write all the acceptance speeches. They sure know how to keep it short and sweet.

Scout Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:27 PM EST

For me, the whole reason to watch the AA is for the acceptance speeches. I've either seen the movies or not, a lengthy clip isn't going to add or detract to the experience. I love music, but show a clip, we don't need the whole production. Cut the production numbers, cut unnecessary clips, cut most of the jokes and let the winners TALK. The rest we can get elsewhere, not to mention the fact that the moment is perhaps a once in a lifetime for those folks. Give them their five minutes (not literally, but enough with the playoffs and too short time restrictions).

Snarf Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:25 PM EST

Once again the best answer is this petty people making politically motivated decisions run the Oscars. Explains almost everything - except Gary Busey.

junior Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:22 PM EST

carr, I have to disagree with you. The only reason Marketa Irglova got asked to come back is because the camera was focused on the stage after Hansard finished and she went to speak and the microphone was turned off. So not only did the audience see she was cut off but also the TV viewers. If you watch when other people get cut off, they pan to a wide shot so you can't see anyone on the stage and TV viewers don't know that someone was cut off. Irglova was so obvious they had to ask her back. And why is it so difficult to double the amount of people in the death montage? If you do a split screen of 2 people for 2 seconds a slide, you can fit 120 people in 2 minutes (I love PowerPoint). What's the problem?

yum Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:20 PM EST

lyn, I agree about amy adams. she was great. and adorable. but i was surprised that she was alone up there. i knew they would do up "that's how you know" but i thought they would do something with her song.
Carr, i agree completely about the speeches. I'm all for giving people their time in the spotlight. but...if the oscars really are concerned about viewers, cutting people off (to a certain extent) is needed, otherwise the broadcast would be even longer and viewership would drop more.

aps Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:15 PM EST

i think it's perfectly fine that they didn't include Renfro. They didn't include everyone. That's it. End of story. It's not a sign of disrespect. Yes, it was a more controversial death due to the drugs, but still, it's their decision. As for whoopi, seems just like a mistake to me. It's not like they ignored her existence. If it didn't fit, it didn't fit.
The presentation schedule was odd. I'll give you that.
But more than this, the real problem is stuff like Bee Movie placement- not funny, drags the awards out. If they didn't have crap like that then they wouldn't be pressed for time and would be able to fit these other things in.

Lyn Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:12 PM EST

Amy Adams did very well, but why was she alone on that huge stage? Kristen Chenoweth got a bridge and Bavarians, but Amy Adams couldn't get a broom?

JEK Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:12 PM EST

I know I am not alone when I say I am sick of deserving winners being played off the stage before or during their chance to say anything. THIS IS ONCE IN A LIFETIME, PEOPLE! Cut them some slack. I think the next person asked to host the AA's needs to accept on the stipulation that people will not be played off. In a time when the academy is worried about slipping ratings, they need to realize that cutting people off puts a bad taste in the viewers' mouth.

carr Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:09 PM EST

I think Marketa Irglova got to come back on because everyone enjoys the best song category. It brings some much needed vibrance to the show. Glen Hansard really didn't speak for that long and...did you hear the ovation they got? everyone seemed so happy for them. i know i was. plus...i personally thought her speech was fantastic. I'm not saying that they mean less to the moviemaking process, but people would rather hear something from someone recognizable that they saw perform rather than the third person involved in set design.

junior Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:08 PM EST

I liked the show generally (well I liked Stewart and the winners speeches) but with all these gaffes, obviously Gil Cates needs to stop producing this little affair. And I don't buy the strike excuse, while the strike was going on, you still could have PLANNED! You don't need writers to remember to include Whoopi or order the awards in the best way.


advertisement

Add Your Comments

The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject — or we may delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field.
When you click on the "Post Comment" button above to submit your comments, you are indicating your acceptance of and are agreeing to the Terms of Service. You can also read our Privacy Policy.
Latest Comments
Top Categories

All Categories

Blog Roll
Top Authors
Recent Posts
PopWatch Archive
July 2009
S M T W T F S
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Complete Archive