• More
Back to PopWatch Main
Complete Archive

An Open Letter to the Sci-Fi Channel

Jan 7, 2008, 06:48 AM | by Marc Bernardin

Categories: I'm Just a Geek, Sci-Fi, Television

Flash_l Dearest Sci-Fi,

Why are you not way more awesome?

Don't get me wrong, when you're good—like with Battlestar Galactica or Eureka (and I'll even give you credit for Doctor who, despite that being a BBC show you just imported)—you're a phenomenal destination network. But let's be honest here, there's not a lot of "good" on your schedule. The Stargate franchise is stale, Flash Gordon (left) is a derisible, stillborn remake, and ECW Wrestling is…wrestling! (And I swore an oath never to speak of Who Wants to Be a Superhero again.)

The thing that infuriates me is that you have so much potential. We're living in the Age of the Geek, where pop culture has finally come around to our way of thinking. Where the most-watched shows on TV are geek-nip like Heroes, Lost, and Bionic Woman; where we buzz about movies like Pan's Labyrinth, Spider-Man, I Am Legend, and Iron Man. The audience could not be more primed for this material, so why are you offering them Ghost Hunters International and crappy "original movies" like Mansquito?

Again, why aren't you more awesome? After the jump, some friendly advice.

Why aren't you adapting more classic sci-fi texts—like you did with Dune—into miniseries events? (Ones that, hopefully, will fare better than Tin Man.) Where's the Foundation saga, or Ender's Game, or Footfall, or The Man in the High Castle, or The Forever War?

Why aren't you engaging today's premiere purveyors of genre material and giving them ten episodes to do whatever the hell they want? I'd watch contained, BBC-style series from folks like Neil Gaiman, William Gibson, John Scalzi, Cory Doctorow, Warren Ellis, Charlie Huston, Neal Stephenson, or China Mieville. The names alone would attract viewers by the truckload. And even if what they produced were failures, they'd be interesting failures—marked by reaching too far, instead of not far enough.

Why don't you try a daily sci-fi soap opera? Airing late at night, so people could actually be home to watch it—or DVR it. Why can't the same kind of serial storytelling that's worked for 50 years on shows like General Hospital be marshaled to create compelling science fiction? (Actually, I've got to give Evan Narcisse a tip of the hat for this one. Because I'm just that kind of bloke.)

Mark Harris was right when he said that science fiction needed to ditch the nostalgia if it's going to reclaim its integrity. Lucky for those of us who love sci-fi that there's a whole network devoted to it. I just want them to fulfill their mandate.

Imagine that. (No, seriously. Get to work imagining.)

RJP Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 10:47 PM EST

Stargrate, Yourgeeka, and Wimp Gordon are still on? Guess I should maintain my avoidance of anything SciFi channel.

avenger48 Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 09:05 PM EST

We need to have sci-fi get the license to play Star Wars movies any time. Use them and some classic Sci-Fi movies to fill the Saturday night slot. Also make a series based on the Xanth books by Piers Anthony, and use that to replace ECW (wrestling doesn't belong on Sci-Fi!) Also buy the license to Firefly and use that to replace Sarah Jane. Replace most of the terrible series with Sci-Fi classics and Star Trek, only keeping Eureka, SGA, and BSG. Bring back SG1, it was one of your best series. Or rename yourselves crap TV and continue with what you're doing now, sans SGA, BSG, and Eureka

Try it, it just might work.

John O'Neill Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 07:23 AM EST

The thing that turns me off the most about the SciFi Channel is their dependence upon cheap, risible made-for-TV American disaster movies which consist mostly of file film of traffic jams in Los Angeles

John O'Neill Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 07:23 AM EST

The thing that turns me off the most about the SciFi Channel is their dependence upon cheap, risible made-for-TV American disaster movies which consist mostly of file film of traffic jams in Los Angeles

Dustin Mudd Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:33 AM EST

t least it would be better then some of the junk thatyou show.You have no love,oh, I'm not talk sex.Violence is good,when there is a good.But sometimes reason for all the blood and gore.I'm talking about Oscar winning material.My God man,the sky is the lemit...Dustin Mudd

Dustin Mudd Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:33 AM EST

t least it would be better then some of the junk thatyou show.You have no love,oh, I'm not talk sex.Violence is good,when there is a good.But sometimes reason for all the blood and gore.I'm talking about Oscar winning material.My God man,the sky is the lemit...Dustin Mudd

revengeofscorpious Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 06:53 AM EST

who the hell owns scifi?i thought they were bought by turner broadcasting.

Wilwolf Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 03:25 PM EST

Sci-fi Channel,
Your import movie Warbirds (you called it a Sci-fi original) was absolutely horrible. Did all of the producer's biologists, historians and technical staff die,along with all of the competent writers in the world? Who is responsible for funding such shameless, pointless CRAP? I mean, PLEASE! flying dinosaurs that can fly along side or even over take a WWII Zero?(the Zero's top speed was over 320 mph) My God! what idiots you must take us all for?!
Almost without exception your imported original movies are the utmost in third rate garbage. So far,they all seem to have stars who can't act, or worse, stars who can but who are given dialog from the back of a cereal box. Did you fire all of your quality control people or did they do the honorable thing and just die of embarrassment?
You have so much to produce so little. But,I suppose that you're happy with so many sponcers and incessant commercial breaks.You even take up show time with those tacky screen blockers.Please!

Gary Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:31 AM EST

This is my new favorite site. SciFi Channel SUCKS Okay maybe not sucks but could be so much better than they are. I sent them an email about the same stuff almost every one of you feel. (no reply) Who every is in charge of programing is either 11yrs old or is 82 and with out a clue of what Scifi type people are intrested in. The Ghost hunting Plumbers WHOA!!! What makes them think they are an authority on spooks. They arent even PLUMBERS And thats FACT. (I can Prove it) so why should I believe them about anything else. Theres another show that is not put together very well at all. I guess if a network channel gives you a few Brand New Trucks and equiptment ta boot anyone can make a TV show Who said it has to be good, or you have to have people who arnt affraid of evey little bump in the dark or spider. Ghost Hunters who run when something lurks in the dark. The arguing amongst each other like a reality show sucks. Please a little compatition and Scifi would have to step up their GAME

David Richards Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 02:53 PM EST

To add to your list of writers, how about Terry Goodkind and Laurel K. Hamilton.

Ben Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 11:08 PM EST

I've never particularly liked the Sci-Fi channel. Mostly because I never felt that the owners/etc of the Sci-Fi channel don't share my enthusiasm for science fiction. I mean first lets get things straight, there is more horror and fantasy on the Sci-Fi Channel than science fiction. Though I can excuse the fantasy as long as its good and as long as they balance it out. Horror though needs to go, they need to make a new channel called "The Horror Channel" and that way they can stop showing all that crap.

Then there is Journeyman, I mean why the hell didn't they rescue it? I can understand if another network is the rights to the show at the moment but that isn't the case with Journeyman. AS it was made for NBC, the same company that owns the SCI-Fi channel. Then of course there's the fact that there is wrestling on the Sci-Fi channel, WTF?

Clearly whoever is in charge of the sci-fi channel isn't particularly partial to science fiction/fantasy.

chuckingthe tv Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 03:01 PM EST

Just get rid of the damn bugs, and popups the networks plaster all over the screen, and I'd watch just about anything.

Professor_D Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 07:44 PM EST

I love those Sci Fi original movies. Seriously. Raptor Island, Interceptor Force, Reptillian, Dinocroc, Snakehead Terror... Besides, what else would Harry Hamilin, Lorenzo Lamas, Jack Scalia, Corbin Bernsen, David Keith, Dean Cain, etc. do without them?

On the other hand, I can't stand Ghost Hunters or whatever it's called. What physical theory indicates that ghosts would show up on IR cameras anyway? Why not UV sensitive cameras, or in the microwave region. Oh, anyway I also don't like wrestling... jeez.

and just for teh record, I still think SG-1 rules!!! Especially with Jack O'Neill!!!

Ok. that's my rant. SG-one-niner out.

Semifore Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:55 PM EST

Why has the Sci-Fi station gotten so poor. I acquired Cable, years ago, just to be able to see that Channel and have always been a Sci-Fi fan; inheriting the fascination from my father. However, I recently cancelled Satelite TV because Sci-Fi no longer airs anything that I'm interested in. They brag about a show that was more soap opera than Sci-Fi; expanding neither your intelligence nor your imagination, and the critics loved it. But as a real Science Fiction fan, and maybe we should stop abreviating the name, it was not all that exciting. I found I could miss it without even wishing I had taped it. And that is the essence of true devotion. The stations broadcasting should not have been injured by progress but I swear it appears that the content has become female oriented, or just as my grandmother coined all Sci-Fi, 'stupid'. Chick flick pablum is not worth my time or my expenditure, I now understand young males alienation from TV..

Rene Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 01:06 AM EST

I used to like the scifi channel when it first came into existence. Now i hardly ever tune it in. It showed a lot more retro stuff. Now there's nothing of the great classics from the past. they've gone stale with crappy movies and reruns of the same old scifi-TV shows over and over again! To all those brain-dead execs at the network, get a grip people!! There are a lot of classic scifi, fantasy and horror films, as well as wonderful B-flicks from the past 70 years. Heck, TCM actually shows more classic scifi than you do!! It's time you started airing these shows on your channel.

Mark Lukas Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:48 PM EST

I could not agree more! If I see an add for one more damn disaster or dinosaur "movie" on sci-fi channel I am going to vomit up my innards!
Aside from the aforementioned ideas for new mini-series (I would watch each and EVERY one of them!), what about replaying some old sci-fi favorites? Space 1999, UFO, The Prisoner, old 80's sci-fi films, the old Buck Rogers & Flash Gordon serials? There is over 50 years of great sci-fi our there! Why do they feel we need more sensless disaster and dino movies?

Peter Sat, May 31, 2008 at 08:58 AM EST

Great blog with lots of useful information and excellent commentary! Thanks for sharing.
http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/T1-Internet-Service.html
http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/Satellite-DSL.html
http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/Satellite-Internet.html

Paul Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:07 PM EST

This blog really provides great updates on entertainment and entertainers!
http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/Satellite-Radio.html
http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/Direct-TV.html
http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/Dish-Network.html

Gomez Wed, May 28, 2008 at 09:30 PM EST

Ghost Hunters is awful. I love how They alone decide the rules of what is or is not paranormal activity or what is a haunting . Did they go to college to study paranormal activity?

Jennifer Thu, May 22, 2008 at 03:05 PM EST

I was just talking about those horrible original movies that the Sci-fi channel cranks out. We decided that if they pool the money that they spend on all the movies for a year and just make ONE amazing movie, it would be worth it. Instead of subjecting us to this torture. One more thing, I noticed that a lot of people are talking about Sci-fi cancelling Firefly. Sorry, but Fox was responsible for that travesty of justice. Sci-Fi only showed the reruns. If they were smart (which we all have determined they aren't) they would have picked that up when Fox cancelled it. I'm surprised Eureka is still on. Thank goodness it has escaped the ax, so far.

Kdogg Tue, May 20, 2008 at 06:26 PM EST

I think to please everyone you could change your cable name to crappy horror channel and we may leave you alone as long as you release Eureka, BSG and Firefly to the "original" writers. I really haven't seen any SCI FI once BSG was on its hiatus. But yeah by canvasing some previously done works (and overlooked) books you can invest some "B-grade" funding to quality entertainment!

Todd Effler Tue, May 6, 2008 at 05:29 PM EST

Part Two: The Sci-Fi mini series of Dune and Children of Dune was truly a great event. Actually, I have not really been disappointed in Sci-Fi mini series. But this craptastic programming stuff for 9 year olds has to stop (i.e. Flash Gordon, Sarah Jane, ECW and Mansquito type original movies). For the love of God; if you want to know what you audience wants to see – put a poll on your website with a wide variety of programs. Ask your viewers what they want to see while you still have some. I can’t deal with the fact that a show like Flash Gordon is on and Firefly is cancelled after a handful of incredible episodes.

Todd Effler Tue, May 6, 2008 at 05:28 PM EST

Part Obe: Okay…. And now you come up with “Aztec Rex” and the Sarah Jane Chronicrap. You people that are in charge of managing and programming at Sci-Fi – what the hell is wrong with you people? Is someone at NBC calling all the shots? Someone that is not the least bit interested in quality Science Fiction? You have destroyed this network. Once Galactica is done with its final season; you’re done as a network. I’m not sure what makes you cancel or stop running quality shows. If you are using the Nielsen Box (ratings); you must know that those boxes are placed in homes that are outside your demographics for science fiction lovers. If anyone at Sci-FI or NBC that has any say about programming – here are the quality Sci-Fi shows your target audience want to see: BSG, Firefly, Dresden Files, Dead Like Me, Odyssey 5, Babylon 5, Eureka, Farscape, Star Trek OS and NG, Ghost Hunters.

someperson Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 03:08 PM EST

Sci-Fi needs to do what you what expect out of a network called Sci-Fi. Keep shows like BSG, Eureka, SGA etc. And for cryin’ out loud quit making those stupid crappy Sci-Fi Original Movies! They're the very definition of a bad movie. Bring back some of the classics: Babylon 5, Firefly(actually make a new series out of it), they could even buy the rights to all the Treks. But if I hear about another movie like "Bloodmonkey" and "Ice-Spiders" I might just throw my T.V. off my deck! Ridiculous!

Ajaan Rob Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 09:15 PM EST

It IS time for the Board of Directors to take Sci-Fi channel to the next level. It is time to release people within that holds backs this promise that was made when they first went out looking for investors money to create this proactive - creative venture. I agree there are so many good books to consider, one being the Terry Goodkind series Wizards First Rule. This would make a great daily sci-fi soap opera. It would also do the series justice. Another series for soap opera contender would be the Raymond Fiest series or even the funny Peirs Anthony book series and the list goes on and on. Remember when you listened to your viewers... now is the time to get plugged back in to your market...or lose it to others.

ELLIS E. Keel Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 08:46 PM EST

I am seriously considering droping the Sci Fi channel, because In the begining I got it because I love Sci Fi programs But tell me what WW raw or those animated foreign programs have to do with science fiction. The cable system has a multitude of channels that it devoted to this kind 0f junk. as for me you are ruining the sci fi channel

Jack Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 01:00 PM EST

HMMM, the SciFi Channel, now I could really go on a spree here. Like how they won't allow me into their Forums since I write them so much, imagine that, professional station being that thin skinned.
Well,quality is a joke anymore, and I agree they don't care what the public say or wants, they just cancel shows without regard to the public or the fans.
The joke is, I don't watch the station anymore, finally though I am a Sci Fi nut, I can get all the Wrestling if I want on n

Random Guy Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 07:28 AM EST

In a half hour using only MS excel I put together a schedule of content for the SciFi channel that would entertain the target viewers AND keep fresh (even if recycled) content on the "air" all year round.
If it only took me a half hour to think it up and lay it out why can't the "experts" make something even better.... instead of crap.

When my TiVo dies I am going to get rid of cable and just subscribe to netflix instead. That is how bad the overall quality of tv has gotten and the SciFi channel is one of the major perpetrators of the problem.

ml lowe Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 08:52 PM EST

The Ben Franklin guy way down in the comment trail has it right. Sci-Fi doesn't give two bits what folks tuning in want to see. They cancelled Dresden, PKJ, Farscape, etc, etc, etc not because they had bad ratings, but for apparently no reason whatsoever. Or, because the shows were doing well. I'm sick and tired of reruns of old shows every day, I'm sick of the retarded c horror flicks. I mean, jeez, it says Sci-Fi, not Joe Bob's Drive in (that old series on Showtime back in the eighties. I know it wasn't Joe Bob, but those of you who remember can correct me) - it supposed to be Sci-Fi. Science Fiction. Heck, I'd even take Spec-Fi, which could include some horror or urban fantasy. But Mansquito -- if I could drop Sci-Fi alone, from my DTV, I'd save myself the ninety cents and do it.

SamuraSaint Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 08:14 PM EST

Ok hold on...

Ghost Hunters is awesome. How can any of you talk bad about it or say its crap? yes the international version is baaaaad.

But the Origonal is one of my favorite shows ever.

Wrestling has no business on the SCiFi channel at all. Its Disgraceful.

Lastly i totally agree with these points.

1. Have a classic movie night. Where you play nothing but black and white scifi classics.

2. Make more mini series headed by quality scifi authors.

3. Please make a Mini-series based on the Thomas Covenant books.

maowun cyqbjwkx Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 11:33 AM EST

chpbq yjstqw oreyxluck nszdwpj fgujbslp cftapy uoevmqj

Matthew Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 01:23 AM EST

ECW must die! It would be tolerable except that it constantly runs about 5 minutes over the hour. This is incredibly annoying and may even effect the commercial break timing of the show on after it.

Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:14 PM EST

Firefly was indeed amazing, "amazing". Bought the box set as soon as I saw it, along with "Serenity". *bliss*

Rob Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 01:11 PM EST

I totally agree! SciFi needs a change for the better.

Please revive Firefly, Dresden Files and Dead Like Me!

Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 01:49 PM EST

the budget costs for providing nice special effects for a daily sci-fi show would be exorbitant and no where near profitable, nice idea though.

archworf Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 07:48 PM EST

Stranger in a Strange Land

ISHMAel back Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 06:01 AM EST

MESSAGE

ISHMAel back Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 06:01 AM EST

MESSAGE

ISHMAel back Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 09:37 PM EST

MESSAGE

ISHMAel back Fri, Feb 8, 2008 at 06:41 AM EST

MESSAGE

Dude Thu, Feb 7, 2008 at 08:58 PM EST

The Sci-Fi Channel is to science fiction what MTV is to Music.

Snowy Tue, Feb 5, 2008 at 06:14 PM EST

Take note:
Asimov, Card, Heinlein, Bradbury...
Even the sucky authors like Eddings and Goodkind.

I dropped my satelite two years ago because I was just watching sci-fi and it turned sucky. Quit watching SG-1 because they stopped going off world.

I hope the sci-fi channel reads these. You disappoint. If special effects are too expensive, hire an animator.

I miss Farscape!!!

screwtape Mon, Feb 4, 2008 at 03:13 PM EST

Sci Fi saved Dune from a really bad movie, totally reanimated Battlestar Gallactica, and should do the same for Starship Troopers.

TheHoldSteady! Sat, Feb 2, 2008 at 04:59 PM EST

Start with Larry Niven's Known Space stories as stand alone vignettes, move on to the Man-Kzin wars as a two or three season series and finish up with Ringworld as a movie.

Plus, broadcast Frank Herbert's Destination: Void live as a Playhouse 90 style character study.

You're Welcome.

michael allen Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 12:28 AM EST

Please SciFi bring over Red Dwarf. I have all of the episodes in my closet and the other day immediatly thougth why isn't it on SciFi or has it been? I search and find this page so I thought I would comment. There has never been a better scifi/comedy and with 8 seasons of great entertainment that the majority of the young scifi fans haven't seen. I'm 32 and own all of the episodes and would love to see them where they belong on the SciFi Channel. Put it on at midnight during the week 1 or 2 episodes a night. Market it with little snib-bits of jokes and one liners from all seasons then cut to "you're not a true SciFi fan if you don't know what a 'Smeg Head' is" Then cut to a slow-mo clip of Rimmer saluting, then text:'The BBC cult phenomenon coming soon to SciFi' fade 'Red Dwarf'...

I love BSG, Ghost Hunters, Enterprise but really that's about it. I wanted to like Flash Gordon but after 4 episodes I cancelled it from my Tivo.

Red Dwarf fits you like a glove...Please wear it!?

Stevehops Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 08:58 AM EST

LisaLisa Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 08:47 AM EST

I remember watching the very 1st Star Trek on TV back in the 60's. That is how long I have been watching Sci-Fi! I've decided to go back to actually reading sci-fi books. You know...books, those cheap things made of paper. That's how bad it's gotten!

Remember "Zines?" Zines were better than scifi channel.

Zine spoof:
http://www.tvscifi.com/content/view/58/28/

Stevehoops Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 08:57 AM EST

LisaLisa Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 08:47 AM EST

I remember watching the very 1st Star Trek on TV back in the 60's. That is how long I have been watching Sci-Fi! I've decided to go back to actually reading sci-fi books. You know...books, those cheap things made of paper. That's how bad it's gotten!

Remember "Zines?" Zines were better than scifi channel.

Zine spoof:
http://www.tvscifi.com/content/view/58/28/

Spencer Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:15 AM EST

Whoops... Diamond Age is actually by Neal Stephenson. (Got a little confused because i just finished the sprawl series by Gibson)

Spencer Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:14 AM EST

Just so you know... they supposedly have an adaptation of The Diamonda Age by William Gibson in the works. George Clooney is apparently producing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamond_Age

Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:23 PM EST

Try to read the novel “End of Run” at itisnottoolate.com
It is a Science Fiction novel about aliens, love and death.
Just go to website and click on Free Full Text Online.

Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 07:21 PM EST

Surely I'm not the only one who is completely baffled as to why "professional" wrestling is being aired on the scifi channel.i'll refrain from sharing my opinion on this so-called sport, but it is a FACT that wrestling has absolutely nothinwhatsoever to do with science fiction.

That is by far the most bizzare thing I have seen on television.

zach Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 06:15 PM EST

well I think the ghost busters cartoon from the 90's would be awesome on it.

apiaryist Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 12:29 PM EST

The people in charge of the money at the SciFi Channel have terrible taste. Either that, or they are too lazy to read scripts. Their original programming is completely uninspired. Give me the million that went to Mansquito, and I'll make an excellent, engaging, and fun movie for your network. Do they just hire their cousins or something?

Oh, and Cory Doctorow? Seriously? Did Cory write that piece? Could someone point me to a Doctorow story that's actually good?

tvscifi Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:55 AM EST

Scifi Channel, you are losing your audience to YouTube! Bring back MST3K!
I'd rather watch reruns of Manimal than wrestling. Wrestling, is scifi?
http://tvscifi.com

Rimmer's Pubes Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:15 AM EST

Red Dwarf anyone? Anyone?

becky Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 09:15 AM EST

Oh yes!!! You are SO right!

LisaLisa Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 08:47 AM EST

I remember watching the very 1st Star Trek on TV back in the 60's. That is how long I have been watching Sci-Fi! I've decided to go back to actually reading sci-fi books. You know...books, those cheap things made of paper. That's how bad it's gotten!

Scifi saturday movies Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 12:02 AM EST

hey i like all those low budget movies that sci fi plays on the weekends buty lately that were playing a bunch of crappy movies in between the good ones for the past 2-3 weekends i know alot of you arnt going to agree with me but thats what id like to see more of on sci fi but i rarely watch sci fi except when ghost hunters or ripleys is on not to mention the movies like mansquito and spiders 2 which is on now, so sci fi channel if you see this please play more of these movies

jccalhoun Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 11:13 PM EST

I don't understand why they are bothering to fund these crappy "scifi channel originals" when there are decades of sci-fi shows out there that the Sci-Fi channel doesn't show. Where is Space 1999, Lost in Space, Night Gallery, or any of the hundreds of black and white scifi movies? None of those would make ratings as high as a random Scifi channel original?

Cyd Black Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 10:28 PM EST

I'd like to see either a television show or a mini series developed based on the Amber books by Roger Zelazny. It would be great if the people who were in charge of producing Battlestar Galactica (the best Sci Fi show ever since Babylon 5 and Farscape) would do it so it wouldn't be campy like Stargate or silly like Tin Man. Dont get me wrong I watched Stargate for many years but after watching Battlestar Galactica, one cant go back anymore. It's too good.

Pi Rho Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 07:31 PM EST

You guys should start airing Life On mars, and geeze bring back the Prisoner or start airing Dangerman!

Ms. Karen Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:25 PM EST

I agree with everything except the bit about Stargate. Stargate is the ONLY reason I bother with turning on the TV Friday night. Never got into Battlestar, but the rest of the clan likes it.

Love the commercials for "the most dangerous night of television."

Loathe the wrestling.

I miss Dresden and Dead Like Me.

Thank goodness for DVD sets of TV shows, because if the quality of programming keeps going down, I'll just rent me some DVD's and skip Sci-fi all together.

Mansquito??!! What WERE you thinking??? Oh, nevermind, you were probably watching wrestling at the time you thought of it.

Alyushia Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 12:13 PM EST

I can't believe the crap that is shown...over and over and over again!
There is so much good writing out there. Why is it not being used?
It seems like when you do get something good you cancel it.
I am really disappointed in the channel. It could be SO much more.

Duncan Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 09:06 AM EST

Bring back firefly

Roger C. Everaert Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:35 PM EST


And why don’t you have one night a week where you show the great old classic sci-fi movies like This Island Earth, forbidden planet, invaders from Mars, the Day the Earth stood still, war of the worlds-the original one, etc. etc.

sg1fanatic Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:52 AM EST

Other than the fact that I still LOVE SG1, I agree with everything else. The SciFi channel is so far off-base it's pathetic. Every fantastic hit in the theaters is based on science fiction. The execs of SciFi talk about "geeks" like we are an inferior breed, which is a terrible mistake because "geeks" run the world! Science fiction requires intelligent and creative thinking, which is where these idiots seem to fall way short! I still say get rid of Mark Stern who seems to be trying to get his buddies in there to makes all kinds of poorly done B-movies!!! And force the studios to accurately report the ratings. You'll find their fantastic ratings they say they're having, most definitely aren't so fantastic!

god(well almost) Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 08:16 AM EST

dont you even DARE complain about the US sci fi channel. you should see the drivel they put on the sci fi channel in australia. apparently crap like buffy or angel are sci fi. we dont even get the good shows! why the hell would the consumer wait? we all just download the damn things!

Desmond Fuller Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 05:40 AM EST

Sci Fi channel I know you'll read this! Now all you have to do is listen....you should be awesome :(

MLM Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 01:25 PM EST

Amen. Geez, where are almost ALL of the RAH short stories, not to mention the NOVELS! Poul Andersons THREE HEARTS THREE LIONS!! YES, FOOTFALL for cryin' out loud. It is raining gold and you guys are pumpin' out lead.

jptech Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 05:00 PM EST

I wrote that letter in my head a year ago. What is up with sci-fi? I completely agree!

John Arnold Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 11:06 PM EST

What about a Sci-Fi news and reviews. I know there's a dirth of the stuff on the web, but what about Sci-Fi Signal. Interviews with authors, new interesting productions.

Brandon Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 03:38 PM EST

I was with ya until you started talking about a Sci-Fi Channel soap opera. Other than the fact that we are all carbon-based lifeforms, I'm dead sure the fan-base of General Hospital and I have virtually nothing in common.

Calviin Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 12:16 PM EST

I completely agree with this letter.

Julia Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:16 AM EST

New sci-fi on-demand channel:
www.illusiontv.com
They're on cable and satellite.

These guys rent out their sets to filmmakers for cheap in the NJ/NYC area:
www.venusrises.tv

If sci-fi channel cant provide what their core viewers want (scifi), we'll switch to Internet or on-demand channels entirely. That's just the way the cookie crumbles. Someone mentioned DVD sales to help profits but they fail to realize that the SF channel doesnt generally have DVD publishing rights of the shows they air. They buy the rights to broadcast these shows and charge for ad space.

Hit up Illusion TV (www.illusiontv.com)they're doing all the right things: bringing back oldies (triffids), edgy anime, pushing new series, interviewing scifi authors, getting obscure shows from overseas. They're like the TV channel equivalent of that indie-rock friend who finds you music months before it goes "mainstream".

moth Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:07 AM EST

A definite YES to Farscape, it's the best series i've ever seen and i've seen a lot!!!
Most of the time crap is being broadcasted, what a pitty and waste.

Milander Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 04:50 AM EST

Agreed, one reason why I cancelled my satellite and cable and no longer bother even with terrestrial chanels was because I decided to refuse to continue paying 100 dollars a month (It's expensive getting non-hungarian channels here) for english language channels that I only watch twice a week. Who is going to pay even 50 dollars a monh to watch just 3 or 4 shows a week?

I now download the shows I like and buy the rest when they come out on DVD, it's cheaper and easier plus I get to keep the best shows forever rather than rely on reruns.

Carl Leonard Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 05:12 PM EST

Aww Man Marc-I WANTED TO WRITE THIS ARTICLE?!?! I don't understand it either. Farscape- Genius. And tho SG-1 was stale, there's real hope for Atlantis. If money is the issue, Bring Back (the show)'EXPOSURE'- with all the fan films out there now- I should be seeing them on SciFi. Do a "Project Greenlight" to let fans compete to CREATE a new series for SciFi. I'd enter it! All the money they spend on those lame "if-it-can-eat-a-human-it's-scffi-saturday" frell-me films could so easily go to other opportunities to reach out, and really connect with fans. Don't want something new? Fine. pick GOOD old syndicated stuff- where's Red Dwarf? Bring Back Max Headroom. Newer but have you guys seen 'Charlie Jade'? Just go pick it up?! I have watched Sci-Fi Chan, I'm ashamed to admit, from the beginning. I cheered when they got the SciFi2.0 interstitial graphic ads- You went all legit looking. But by now there should be more content- more soul. With rabid fans like us how hard is it to listen?

Bosco Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 01:49 PM EST

Excuse Me ???
Mansquito / crappy ???
Never use those words in the same sentence again.

I AM MANSQUITO !

WE ARE MANSQUITO'S !

but it was crappy, funniest monster name in my lifetime though.

Mac McRee Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:17 PM EST

The best things on SciFi (ahahahahahah!)channel is their ads.

MaskimXul Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:16 PM EST

I absolutely agree with the submitter. I used to be an avid Sci-Fi fan, back, when Dune was still new and you could catch (good) scary movies late at night still. This new rash of original Sci-Fi movies (and it really is a rash...) is absolutely pathetic. I can understand not investing a ton of money into producing one good movie as a television network...but if you're just going to keep investing in bad movies, why not just put the effort (and money) in to make them quality? What the **** is up with "Mansquito" and similar movies? Was Dune--one of your earliest movies--the last decent flick you made? Out of how many? Dozens? Or have we made it to hundreds yet?

PD Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:06 AM EST

I only watch ECW on the sci-fi channel simply because I watch all WWE shows. Other than that, there is nothing for me. I gave it up when they canned Farscape!

HolySmoke Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:56 PM EST

Writing, directing, and acting, that is the key. Battlestar Galactica seasons one and two had some of the best writing and acting in all of television. Season three was some of the worst television ever. People are not stupid. Give them quality.

Long live Star Trek!

Andy Thornton Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 09:34 PM EST

Well Done - Totally Agree :-)

jpnwiaekt mekizolxu Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 07:11 PM EST

qrucoas yqvlh kxhcaeg cdilbrgp mxwv mgawyz kavz http://www.blwzsdfct.tesh.com

wcqoft jedqmvtk Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 07:10 PM EST

kwqd tjrsgf pgwmhdel sgmywa avnjyu nzucal tokjblqex

Lord Me Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 01:39 PM EST

It is not the sci-fi channel anymore. It is the schlocky craptastic wannabe horror slasher flick channel.

Dee Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:23 AM EST

I'm a huge Sci-Fi fan. But the Sci-Fi channel is just another number on the dial. Not much Sci-Fi on it. Not many good programs. No reason to go there. But that's ok, if I want to really watch something, really get into it and enjoy it, I'll download it or rent it. I can't get into a show with constant commercial interruptions. I use the TV as background noise when I'm doing other things.

JohnD Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 02:13 AM EST

LIKE battlestar gallactica!!!!! Are you F**kin serious! Sci Fi sucks! The Only time it doesnt SUCK HARD is when they are running some PG13 ripoff, or some spaceman bob garbage. Including all the battlestar galacticas, stargates, babylon, or anything else with people stuck in space!

Ben Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 07:01 PM EST

If SciFi put out a tv-series based on the Ender's Saga... they would pwn every other network with that show alone! The books are amazing, and offer a pretty immense world to recreate on screen.

Ali Garrigan Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 09:22 AM EST

I ABSOLUTELY agree. I started out watching the SciFi channel all the time--with great anticipation and excitement, and now, I rarely ever tune in because the quality of its programming has descended into the unwatchable. If they don't do anything more original and vital (which they SHOULD!), even re-airing some wonderful CLASSIC sci-fi movies would be preferable to what they are airing now. MANSQUITO??? Puh-leez. Get a grip.

Chris Halliday Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 09:01 AM EST

Anyone who thinks that SciFi is necessarily expensive because of the effects hasn't seen Primer, one of the most thought-provoking SF movies of the last two decades. Made on a shoe-string withn minimal effects, it was a major success because of the quality of the writing. If budget is an issue for the SciFi Channel, they should take a leaf from British SF series - most of which had pocket money budgets but are still regarded as classics because of the quality of the scripts.

I'm a huge SF geek. I'll watch all sorts of crap if it's entertaining and gives my brain a little something to nibble on. But unless SciFi is running one of its increasingly rare marathons of a show I actually like, I barely watch it these days. My wife and I call in the Stargate Channel, after a period of time when every time we turned it on, it was showing the same episode of Stargate.

Sadly, I think SciFi is a lost cause without a radical shake-up at the top.

Patrick Aquilone Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 08:48 AM EST

I totally agree. I was so excited when they created the SciFi channel years ago because that is the genre that I love. Then one day NBC/Universal/Vivendi decide that wrestling and other stuff wind up on the channel. So, I totally agree

soundping Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 10:02 PM EST

Sci-Fi Channel looks like a bleeder waiting to die... If you look at their actions.

Hadrian Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 07:55 PM EST

Firefly and Serenity were awesome to me.
I grew up on Star Trek and Star Wars initially passed on the show when it was on air. Now I wish I had watched it or maybe that it just didn't come on during the time Fox was just giving the axe to a lot of it's own shows.
Remeber Titus? Family Guy the first time around? Unless Universal has plans pick up the rights to Firefly/Serenity call up Joss Whedon and get the complete cast together depending on the continuity (before movie or after), Have Nathan Fillion and Summer Glau's characters killed in their current shows and bring'em back home and do it right. Personally there isn't a lot of Sci-fi out there with characters handled well enough to care about beyond the big dogs. LONG LIVE COMMANDER DATA!!!!!

Joe Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 07:41 PM EST

For those wanting Firefly, get HULU they have every episode and it's free and legal.

cNT Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 03:42 PM EST

my sentiments exactly. SciFi is channel has not lived up to its promise.

Joe Quellen Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 12:19 PM EST

Some classic sci-fi that would make great TV but for some reason it nasn't happened:

Harry Harrison's "Bill the Galactic Hero"

Keith Laumer's "Retief" series

Fred Saberhagen's "Berserker" series

E.E. Doc Smith's "Lensman" series

Lukasa Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 05:52 AM EST

a new scifi/fantasy book being made anually)
And since Fantasy is in the SciFi realm for some reason, give us a regular schedule like Mon wed and fri scifi, and tues thurs and sat fantasy. Sunday being a mixed bag.
And while I'm making suggestions, don't wait for Japan to make anime adaptations of Manga. Make your own anime or even better, serious live action. I'd love to see a live action Cowboy Beebop, Afro Samurai, Tenchi Muyo, Orguss, or Macross.
But overall, get some people in there that can WRITE! SciFi fanatics are almost all somewhat intelligent. Give us a plot to a show half a year long that doesn't wrap everything in a bow so that we can debate them like hell on a forum and we're happy for two freaking years.

Lukasa Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 05:50 AM EST

Here is my thoughts:
A premium SciFi channel.
I know a lot of you people want it on basic cable but the truth is that money is always going to be a factor and if they make it a premium channel they don't have as much pressure to demand cash generating shows and they have more freedom to take risks.
For those who would love a new Firefly series, the fanboys will need to accept that there will be a new Wash for obvious movie reasons.
And Farscape would be a lock. (I wanna see talon all growed up :( and am I the only one who literally cheered when I saw a large part of the cast in Stargate SG1?)
I'd also like to see something original like episodic movies. 2 Hour movies 7 episodes long for scifi/fantasy book series like the Ender saga or A Song of Ice and Fire. They'd need to be nice and long to cover all the plot points and do them justice, and since it would end after those 14 hours, they wouldn't have to make original content for them to make them a series. (shutters at the idea of

matthew Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 03:20 AM EST

Okay, I have something to put in that I dont think has been mentioned before...

Stop looking at tv series as investments for their time slots. Sci-fi fans love to purchase series on dvds, or even online. I personally have watched every stargate and BSG on tv, and gone out and bought the Dvds. Make series with the mind set that they will make money off of sales rather than just commercials.
Come on Sci-fi you are missing the point. Get some balls, and stop producing to make a penny on a craptastic movie that is shown once, and produce something that can be shown time and time again. That is where the money is at...

Gort Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 01:47 AM EST

You might add: Why do (almost) all made-for-SciFi-channel movies suck so bad? So bad it seems intentional.

Rejean Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 12:07 AM EST

SCi FI could be much better. However I must speak up and defend Star Gate. I love it and the Atlantis spin off. These are 2 of the best made SCI series and they contain many referrences to other sci fi works. I'm a huge fan of all things Star Gate.
Wrestling has no place on a SCI FI channel. The Dune mini series was awesome. Never had any interest in Tin Man and I'm sick of seeing commercials for it.
Hope to see more SCI FI shows on the network. I do believe that there is a time slot for all things Trek out there to rerun on this channel as well.

daneyul Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 10:17 PM EST

What about this: When they DO show Star Trek (TOS) THEY CHOP THE HELL OUT OF IT! They knock a good two minutes of content out of each one, and do it with incredibly clumsy editing. What's up with that? I realize commerials are longer now than in 1970, but for the premier SF network to have this lack of respect for the content of the show illustrates their complete lack of caring about Science Fiction.

Roger Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 09:39 PM EST

And they have BUTCHERED "The Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy"! They cut out the Babelfish scene!

mxyzplk Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 09:13 PM EST

Oh yeah! Let them make their lame ass "Mansquito" movies, show them Friday night, then have a Saturday morning MST3K where they rip on it. That would be boss.

andrea Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 06:51 PM EST

Yes sci fi, give us some more doctor who!

Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 06:25 PM EST

And while your at it, how about science shows instead of wrestling and crap?

Charles Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 05:14 PM EST

I couldn't agree more. Unfortunately when people say Sci-Fi these days they lump in so many non Sci-Fi genres. Fantasy, Horror, Comic Book heroes, Metaphysical nonsense, Wrestling?

Watered down Sci-Fi in my opinion is worse than no Sci-Fi at all.

There are so many great Sci-Fi stories to be told in film and tv that I cannot believe that there is any problem finding content. Licensing maybe, but even there, the fact that it has been ignored for so long must mean that some Sci-Fi authors are clamoring for the big or even little screen.

Here are some names that have produced many great stories that are itching to be put on film.

Asimov, Orson Scott Card, Arthur C. Clark, Neal Stephenson, Robert Heinlein, Phillip K. Dick, or even Robert Sheckley's short stories (would make great comedies).

Of course there are many more, but Sci-Fi has been so overlooked that a channel that dedicates itself to the genre should have no trouble filling the lineup with great original programming.

Ben_Franklin Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 03:58 PM EST

Those of you asking sciffy to adopt Firefly or other cancelled shows are just wasting your breath.

Why would they care to do something that the fans want? Why would they take a chance on doing something that would make fans happy and make them support the channel, its shows and sponsors?

THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT THEIR CORE AUDIENCE. They prove it over and over and over again.

Campaigns to save a show on the network produce nothing but nasty and vile responses from the execs there. Good ratings seem to make them angry at the show producing them so they either cancel the show or only renew it for partial seasons (BSG) and then fight with the producers.

BOYCOTT SCIFFY.

Everyone knows there are other ways to watch the shows other then on the network...

They are like rick berman, they hate the fans that put money in their pockets.

harry Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 02:56 PM EST

Hey TinMan was pretty good. It was conceptual and very visual. I am curious to see how much of the issue is financial?

harry Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 02:55 PM EST

Hey TinMan was pretty good. It was conceptual and very visual. I am curious to see how much of the issue is financial?

Eric Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 01:15 PM EST

I don't have much respect for the Sci-Fi Channel with the exception of "Eureka" and "BSG" which is unfortunately ending soon leaving them without their best show. I have had no desire to watch their 'enlarged or swarming animals gone amok' movie of the week. "Dresden" had so much potential and while watchable I found that to be waterdowned. I don't think the channel's management is taking the relative intelligence of their targeted (or should be targeted) audience into account.

Koolaid Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 12:36 PM EST

Why is it that you drop a compelling series like Firefly, but then continue to air the crap that is Ghost Hunter? All it is is "Lets go record 10 hours of a wall, then watch it over?" "Did you see that? (shakes camera and que dramatic music)

Tom Ferguson Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 12:21 PM EST

The soap opera is a great idea. Two words: Dark Shadows. Just make it actually scary.

Chris Roberts Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 12:17 PM EST

Dear Sci Fi, Adopt some cancelled TV sci fi and when you've finished re-running what they've made so far, make new episodes. *cough* Star Trek *cough*, *cough* *Enterprise*.

Repeat good old sci fi shows like Classic Dr Who (Pertwee, Baker). Instead of lame TV movies... try real cinematic treats from the genre.

Ditch Wrestling and gameshows (no matter how you've tarted them up to pass as sci fi).

Lynn Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 10:43 AM EST

Hot discussion. I am Lynn, a sexy BBW who just loves hot and nasty relationship! My father is a very wealthy man, so you know I am not looking for money. I have uploaded my photos on that popular http://www.largesingle.com. My username is lynnsexy.

Thomas J. Newton Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 06:15 AM EST

I stopped watching ScFi channel after they stopped the best scifi series ever, Farscape.
I watch some things they offer (Tinman) but am no longer a regular viewer.
Your Know SciFi "Children Of Men" could have been made with little special effects...
But how about: The Speed Of Dark or The Icarus Hunt or American Gods (just wishing) or Blood Music or Falling Free... Just to name a few of the thousands of short stories that would make great two hour tv movies.
What about cult comic books? Concrete, comes to mind.
Astro Boy (any version) would make a great early morning show. So would Kimba, Under Dog and Speed Racer!
Where's the early Ultra Man? Or Get Smart?
Re-make the classic Outer Limits "The Man With The Glass Hand" into a two hour movie. Use the same set, it still stands!
Show us science fiction movies, it's been years.
Start a Horror Channel.
Start a Wrestling Channel.
Bring back FireFly and Farscape because in the long run they will make plenty of cash.
imho, TJN

broughty Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 06:09 AM EST

Seriously... the love i had for the Dresden Files only to see it flounder, or the fact that i would give my left arm for an Ender Saga mini-Series or "television event", or the loss i feel at having lost Farscape to budget needs for Stargate; all this makes my head hurt.

rit456 Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 03:48 AM EST

EVERYONE needs to see the movie
'idiocracy'!

THEN ask yourself why SCIFI shows
wrestling!

lt_kitty Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 01:25 AM EST

**Because SciFi usually entails Special Effects. And Special Effects entail Huge Amounts Of Money.**

Many of the older sci-fi mini-series were done on a limited budget, even for their time, and are still fan favorites decades later because of the fantastic and intelligent writing.

One of the best science fiction films I've seen recently, "The Man from Earth," took place in one room in a cabin in California, with no digitial effects and few practical effects. It was a beautiful exploration of several ideas that are common themes in science fiction, and it was the performance of the actors that made the just-beyond-real aspects convincing.

Sci-fi is about ideas and speculation. The effects are nice, and for some stories it's needed. But its not as central to sci-fi as people think.

Zarina Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 12:19 AM EST

What is mind boggling to me with Sci-Fi the last 5+ years, is the lack of unique and original great series! It’s not as if these great series are hard to find – Sci-Fi has actually aired a few. Then they cancel them.

The viewers are telling the channel’s decision-makers exactly what they love to watch and exactly why these shows are so excellent. Yet the customers/viewers are ignored. Instead the channel airs mindless low-budget bug/disaster movies and chooses to re-imagine or remake old shows that all lack the originality and quality the customer is begging for.

Why are you making these decisions, Sci-Fi?! Tin Man saved your ratings for 2007, but how long do you think your customers/viewers are going to stay when treated with such disregard and lack of respect coupled with such low-quality fare?

stevieG Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 11:09 PM EST

I have to agree with most of what I've read so far. I purchased cable so I could have a never ending thrill fest of all the sci-fi I could handle. Long story short...it's the least watched channel in the house. Ghost Hunters is crap, as is most other series being aired. The BattleStar series is played to death. For the Holidays we have to endure 24/7 Twilight Zones episodes from the '60's. I'll admit I'm from that era...but like they say, Been there, seen that, not to mention Scifi channel will never keep a younger audience interested with old black and white reruns. There are so many interesting scifi movies out floating around it amazes me that they will run these loser series and "played to death" no imagination movies;i.e. Mansquito, any "it came out of the lake" movie. AMC channel plays better shows than Scifi. As a matter of fact, AMC is playing 'The Day the Earth Stood Still' right now....Friday 1/11/08.
Get a clue SciFi Channel.

David Manzi Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 11:07 PM EST

Bring back Battlestar Galatica for sure, Eureka, Firefly. How about looking to shows like 4400, Journeyman, and Invasion. Also, Dresdin files was hit with many people, and it was refreshing to see a new idea like that.

I believe you are doing well with Stargate, don't dare drop that.

No more wrestling, if your looking for something new, some Japanese anime might fit in well with Sci-Fi related content. Look for deap and dark thinks, that Cartoon Network won't air.

IAMANTI Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 10:34 PM EST

SG1 - RDA = POO

Cyrrik Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 10:32 PM EST

Sci-Fi is broke, man. They're just part of a cable package. If you're looking for quality, go rent a movie, or better yet, read a frigging book. Are you actually whining about the quality of a commercial tv channel? Can't you think of anything more substantial to write about?

theDane Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 10:10 PM EST

mystery science theater 3000 needs to come back NOW, thank you

Jason Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:36 PM EST

Gods yes, PLEASE BRING BACK FIREFLY!

Thats just such an amazing series..I am desperate to see more of it.. I promise I'll buy the DVDs more than once if you bring it back!

McWill Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:32 PM EST

bring back Firefly. You alone can save the cult classic because, well let's face it FOX dropped the ball and is to stubborn to admit it by fixing their mistake. If you are looking for Sci-fi literature to adapt into miniseries use Larry Niven's Ringworld, or remake Conan, and maybe YOU can actually get it right. If you're going to keep rehashing 1970's and 80's sci-fi you either need to completely revamp them our maintain the cheese factor that made the originals so great, or and here is an idea, AIR THE ORIGINALS.

Rev. Spaminator Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:04 PM EST

Maybe it is time for a competing channel. Something that is 24 hrs instead of infomercials early in the morning. (That is the best time for the scifi geek.)

Mike Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 08:15 PM EST

Battlestar, you bet--bring back Firefly, Farscape, Tremors, keep airing Dr.Who, and Eureka, and pick up and continue 4400 and there might be hope--and read some of the other suggestions that were made--then the sci fi channel would really be sci fi! How about doing a really good Martian Chronicles? Or Ubik? How about doing Riverworld right next time too while you're at it. There is so much good sci fi in print that surely your channel could be worthwhile.

Michael Crumpton Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 07:28 PM EST

Why why why?
They choose to cancel a great show like the Dresden Files, and continue sorry excuses like Wrestling and Ghost Hunters.

When they create a quality product like BSG they do very well with it. I wonder how well the do with Flash Gordon or Do You Want to be a Superhero?

Sci Fi fans tend to be an educated bunch, so why not aim high? Make a show that is puzzling and complicated! It worked for LOST, and it is not like there is any shortage of great Sci Fi books in the world to make movies and shows of.

albert Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 07:11 PM EST

Yeah, I thought it was just me that noticed most of the programming on SCI-FI was terrible. Why don't they have a show that is everything geek. With comic-con sand diego turning into a major force it would be hard to make a weekly or daily show about what is going on. Make sure the female host is hot. It practically sells itself. EW let us know if some one responds from SCI-FI channel

Metz Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 06:53 PM EST

before I was so rudely cut off....I'd rather see 22 hours of infomercials and 2 hours of decent programming a week from Sci Fi than the dreck they put on there now. Unfortunately, enough of you like Stargate, Flash, Ghost hunters, wrestling and Mansquito that it makes financial sense to continue making them and airing them and wasting a channel on my cable system.

metz Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 06:47 PM EST

I'm sure the suits in the front office know a heck of a lot more about ROI then you guys do. That's what they are getting measured on. If they can produce a Mansquito for $500k and sell $750k in advertising, that's success for them.

Farscape was running about $1 million per episode to make and wasn't bringing in enough numbers to make it cost effective (although I loved the show). It's a lot cheaper to make crappy Stargate shows w/ no makeup, stars or FX than it was to make Farscape. It's also a lot cheaper to snag Dr Who & Torchwood from the BBC than to make something worthwhile.

You need a true visionary like Moore, that also knows how to handle a budget. That's why you see episodes of BG like Black Market with no FX because they need to do a budget cheap episode to balance off the FX laden eps.

Yeah, there's lots of good Sci FI out there, but how much of it could be made to look good for little $. That's the true litmus test.

culdesac Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 06:13 PM EST

Obviously, the SciFi channel is still considered a marginal channel and thus okay to assign an MBA to run it, who doesn't like/understand SF. As noted previously, when first started, the channel DID try to live up to it's potential, by at least trying to show a variety of the SF already available. A show I miss, though relegated to a 3 or 4 am slot, was Retro SF Theatre, where they showed Really old SF, such as MEN INTO SPACE and SCIENCE FICTION THEATRE (great nostalgia for us really oldsters). To which, if reintroduced, could include other ancient shows such as ROCKY JONES SPACE RANGER, SPACE PATROL, TALES OF TOMORROW, MAN AND THE CHALLENGE, and even the old FLASH GORDON serials (now there's the REAL Flash!!). But, as pointed out previously quite nicely, MBAs are ONLY interested in the profits for THIS quarter, and nothing else.

Nick Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 06:08 PM EST

if they buy firefly from Fox...ill love them so much more...cause fox doesn't know how good of a show they canceled..

Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 05:36 PM EST

ALSO, BRING BACK FIREFLY

Fatal Claws Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 05:26 PM EST

I just wrote a letter to BBC America. All they do is air the same shows over and over again. At Christmas they had _no_ special programming, which is just plain sad. They are now showing Dancing with the Stars on Sunday nights... WTF! This is the American version.

Scott Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 05:22 PM EST

Why doesn't SciFi acquire the rights to all of Star Trek and show those daily?

But seriously, I agree with this letter 100%.

karl Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 05:22 PM EST

Yeah, with all the shows that get cut, how does Ghost Hunters get renewed? LOL! Wrestling?

Adam Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 05:08 PM EST

Sci-Fi, you make made for TV movies all the time. Why not make a SLIDERS one? True SLIDERS fans don't mind if the actors change (although I would like to see Cleavant Derricks and John Rhys-Davis on). Or better yet, bring sliders back, and just start from the end of season 2 before it left FOX.

boomz Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 04:59 PM EST

I doubt anyone is reading comments this far down, but SCI FI just launched their HD channel last week or so, I just noticed at a friend's place that has Comcast which I don't have...It was simply labeled SciFi without the HD at the end so at first I was confused and thought they moved the regular SD channel. Too bad they were showing Flash at the time.

Don Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 04:41 PM EST

The biggest money maker on SciFi is the wrestling whither we like or not. That fact was published by several entertainment magazines when they announced the move. The same people that own USA also own SF. Also, horror sells better than real hard SF. I would prefer good SF/Fantasy to Horror any day. BTW, I loved the 4400. But, I really want to see good SF. (Oh and I still like Ghost Hunters. I can't help it ;) )

xdarkxanarchyx Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 04:33 PM EST

I think there should be a HD channel even though I don't yet have a LCD monitor. (Refuse to buy a TV). I think they should allow people to watch Sci-Fi online in some way and charge a small fee. Use bittorrent to distrubute it. I hope one day they could seperate from NBC Universal who owns them. Also, I enjoy the original "B" movies.

iPat Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 04:32 PM EST

As much as all the crappy made-for-TV creature movies that they're guilty of, the Sci-Fi Channel is also guilty of one of the biggest sins in cable TV. The endless repetition. There's so much interesting Sci-Fi out there, and what does Sci-Fi run during any given day? From sunrise 'til primetime they'll run hours and hours of one show at a time, whether it's X-Files or Outer Limits. Why not give us a regular schedule, so that I know if I tune it at, say, 2pm, I get to see an episode of RoboTech, or Space 1999, and that it'll be followed by something like Star Trek or something. The library of past sci-fi is so expansive, any viewer out there could write you a schedule that's more interesting than what you do now.
And while we're at it, why not a predictable nightly movie night. Maybe a classic movie night. How about some real science and tech shows, rather than all the ghost-hunter crap.
There's so much that could be done with this channel, if only the owners gave a damn.

Ben_Franklin Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 04:26 PM EST

The bottom line is that THEY DO NOT CARE.

They do not care about their "core" audience, they don't care about fans, they don't care... period.

Battlestar Galactica is their biggest hit EVER. What do they do? Move it around and then they do not renew it for a full season and force the producers to make this season the last just so sciffy will renew the show for a full season. THEN they pull the show from the schedule for almost a year. What do they think, this will make people watch more???

The cancel Dresden which did well in ratings and with the fans... and replace it with the piece of dung version of flash gordon.

sciffy does not care what you think, they don't care what I think and they would urinate on science fiction fans in person just like they do with their decisions and programs.

WHO the hell watches Ghost Hunters? Who? I don't know anyone and no one I have ever asked knows ANYONE who watches this stupidity but they show it about 80 times a week.

BOYCOT SCIFFY!!!!!

jimbo92107 Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 04:18 PM EST

They could have a sci-fi soap where readers write scenes. Screech the Monkey Boy, Adventures in Hell.

Dissapointed SciFi Guy Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 04:17 PM EST

Dear SciFi - Why in the name of all that is holy is there no SciFi HD channel? Seriously, I have discovery channel, broadcast networks, even the freaking food network. But nothing calls for HD more than SciFi.

Is the SciFi channel where the guy who canceled Star Trek went to die?

karl Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 04:15 PM EST

1. hey! I love stargate 2. Wheres my HD? 3. Enough wit the "B" movies. 4. Kill flash gordon already, damn. 5. Stop running your channel like its about bad porn. 6. Why does everyone like firefly, that show sucks and the guy can't act.

Graham Fair Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 04:08 PM EST

At least the Space channel in Canada is carrying Robotech and Star Trek each day.

Anonymous Coward Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 04:00 PM EST

This was an excellent article. The Sci-Fi channel must have the most under developed programming and potential in TV history.

mentat Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 03:56 PM EST

I am sick of it netflix or xbox live marketplace

Scotty Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 03:45 PM EST

Why is everyone complaining so much. Every network suffers from this, no one is putting out any thing besides leftovers and reality shows. Sci-fi and the other networks are showing episodes that are already in the can, remember the WGA strike! They can't create new and desirable content, no one can write it.

dan Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 03:35 PM EST

A note about the comments on putting the budgets from the crappy SciFi original movies into other Projects.

First of all, most of those oringal films I think are filmed in Vancouver with budgets between $1-3M. That coupled with the BC film production tax breaks (+ $exchange (not anymore)) and cheaper crews make these films very inexpensive to produce.

Reallocating this money is not going to produce a quality scifi episodic serial where the budgets normally run around $1+ M per 40minute episode.

While these movies suck, I imagine they make money off these film with foreign sales and DVD rentals.

dan Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 03:31 PM EST

A note about the comments on putting the budgets from the crappy SciFi original movies into other Projects.

First of all, most of those oringal films I think are filmed in Vancouver with budgets between $1-3M. That coupled with the BC film production tax breaks (+ $exchange (not anymore)) and cheaper crews make these films very inexpensive to produce.

Reallocating this money is not going to produce a quality scifi episodic serial where the budgets normally run around $1+ M per 40minute episode.

While these movies suck, I imagine they make money off these film with foreign sales and DVD rentals.

Marty Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 03:30 PM EST

I forgot to add, the emphasis on special effects instead of a compelling story is exactly what is wrong with most of what is on SciFi today.

I could careless about special effects. If you have a really good story, you would need special effects.

Marty Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 03:26 PM EST

Article and many comments are spot on.

Too many 'oh no there is a big bad creature out there' movies. Too many shows that have NOTHING to do with SciFi.

I would like to see more anime that is scifi based... like Cowboy BeBop and Ghost in the shell.

I would even be willing to watch classics as filler... like Space 1999, Blake's 7, Lost in Space, Star Cops etc....

Also, start showing some of the really good movies that have been produced....like Solaris. Show the orginal and the remake back to back.

In fact a series that deals with issues Solaris dealt with could be made with very few special effects and could be very compelling.

Anyway...I hope SciFi gets its act together. Much more of the crap they produce as 'Science Fiction, and I'll end up getting all my scifi needs off the internet.

David Weinstock Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 03:03 PM EST

Having read the response to this column I shook my head sadly and determined that it appears my sci-fi hunger will only be sated by books and the occasional movie...and certainly not the network that shows horror films and attempts to pass it off as science fiction.

Still I can't help reflecting that many of the authors mentioned in the column wrote their best work well before special effects became the rule of the day. It seems the network might do some programming around those stories, and, hopefully, set aside enough cash to tackle the occasional sci-special effects show.

Dan Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 02:57 PM EST

I think part of the reason SciFi didn't get Firefly restarted is that it was originally on Fox. Which is also part of the reason it was cancelled, Fox has a habit of killing the best shows it gets. But anyway, all I have to say about whoever declined Joss Whedon's offer to restart Firefly on SciFi is a complete and total idiot. What really sucks is they've never even shown all the episodes, and they were never actually shown in the correct order. One of the last few episodes aired on Fox was actually supposed to be the pilot episode.

RTM Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 02:54 PM EST

ANSWER: Because SciFi usually entails Special Effects. And Special Effects entail Huge Amounts Of Money. Do you really want to see The Forever War or Foundation end up looking like Lexx? We cannot produce these mini series and TV shows if the networks are showing them. As much as you'd like to believe it, our viewership is nowhere near what theirs is. Without viewers, we get less ad revenue. Without revenue, we cannot afford to develop these shows. Sorry.

Revenant Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 02:39 PM EST

As an additional thought, don't you think that a genre specific channel like this lends itself more toward modular, say story based, presentations over a more character based approach? Like I think Sci-fi would find more success with defined storylines that will play out over certain number of episodes rather than a space opera that you never if your going to get another season. I'd rather see more Babylon 5 types. Write a story and tell it over one season. Then move on to the next project. I think they would find success in well made on time made for tv movies as well (note I said well made).

Robert Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 02:34 PM EST

All very good points! I am a Stargate fan though and want as much as I can get. I have seen every episode. I am hooked on Battlestar. Live action flicks based on SciFi and Fantasy writings would be awesome. If they took the funds used to create the horrible movies they are making and made things that we all long to have a movie made of (Goodkinds "Sword of truth" series and Weiss and Hickman's Dragonlance novels.) Anything other than some of the tripe that they are putting out. I love SciFi (not wrestling) unless you got a few of our favorite SciFi hotties to do some wrestling (Morena Baccarin, Jewel Staite, Summer Glau) and that was just from one show! Damn. Nerdy girls are hot. :)

stephen Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 02:34 PM EST

LOSE the FANTASY. It ain't SCIENCE fiction.

Revenant Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 02:31 PM EST

The problem here is that they don't know how to make a good story, science fiction or not. A lot of these bad examples above came complete with brilliant back stories and ideas and Sci-fi was able to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory by turning those idea into mush.

Andromeda was an awesome concept...bad implementation. Same with Farscape (though I know some people swear by that series). Flash Gordon and Dresden files...I don't know how they did it but they made terrible shows with those. Battlestar Galactica is so surprisingly good that I feel bad because I almost didn't give it a chance because of sci-fis rep.

If Sci-fi wants to fix their reputation then they have to stop thinking that they can get away with budget cuts to make a show as cheaply as possible so that they can have a place to sell commercial space. Work on your stories first...the sci-fi should be a natural part of it, then spend the money to make it look good.

Michael Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 02:25 PM EST

I may somewhat unique here, but I _love_ the cheesy "B" movies like "Ice Spiders" and "DinoCroc". I agree that SF should have more imaginative scripted series like BSG, etc (and get rid of that wrestling crap); but the corny movies make for a great Sat afternoon diversion - it's like MST without the robots!

Craig N Raynor Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 02:24 PM EST

This is what happens when NBC gets a hold of a formerly decent Themed Cable Show and figure that the bottom line is more important than the theme , so now we have the Horror , Wrestling Channel with a bit of Science Fiction thrown in......There are hundreds of Sci-Fi movies available , just check out NetFlix List.............I now call it the "Lack of Sci-Fi Channel" or "LSC" ..............Thanks!! NBC For Ruining what was a half way decent channel for the Sci-fi aficionado....Typical American Corporate Mentality .....

Buckly Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 02:15 PM EST

All excellent points, except for Ghost Hunters. I really dig that show and am looking forward to checking out the spinoff.

David Hagler Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 02:13 PM EST

I think scifi is suffering from from "star trek" syndrome. where every thing must be episodic and has no true continuity to the next episode. Babylon 5 was amazing IMHO just because it was a 5 season storyline planed from the start. They need more writers like that, and I mean scifi original movies are great for "B" movies but are lacking in quality, I'm sure the writer strike isn't bothering them , no one could write worse made-for-tv-movies than the scifi channels current lineup

Reevers Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 02:09 PM EST

I email them every day about bringing back Firefly and thanking them for BSG.

Nick the Hat Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 02:06 PM EST

This article is so spot on, Sci-Fi channel is a huge let down, even Battlestar is sub-par compaired to older sci-fi serial shows, and I mean older (remember Project Blue Book or Koljack Night Stalker?). If your going to be Sci-Fi, work from the Sci-Fi masters and quit with all these Cheese ball movies of the week, Please!!!!

sw333tal Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 02:03 PM EST

Yea why not FireFly? the movie was Distributed By Paramount, Paramount is conected to NBC,NBC owns scifi.(maby this media conglomeration wasnt such a bad idea after all) sombody get Joss Whedon on the Phone!!

TBailey Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:53 PM EST

Firefly.
'nuff said.

zzupdown Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:52 PM EST

I agree with the author completion on this one, though I think the Stargate Franchise is as close to a sci-fi soap oper as we're gonna get. I think SciFi's basic problem is that they're trying to make or buy these shows on the cheap. They also make so many concept shows with "edgy" characters, where the concept is the only interesting theme, that I end up watching briefly to see how well it's done, then dropping it forever, i.e. "Flash Gordon." For years, I used to joke with my wife that SCIFI Network would randomly steal and combine concepts from other sci-fi sources and churn out a cheap retread for its Saturday movies. It's a shame, really, because there is almost an unlimited amount of good science fiction that could be made inexpensively. Maybe they think that high-concept original work is too obscure and might not get an audience.

Michael Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:52 PM EST

Why can't someone make a Battletech/Mechwarrior series? That would have to be the best show ever created.

slashdotcomma Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:48 PM EST

Really wish they brought back The Dresden Files. The Lost Room was another great mini-series like others have said. Stargate used to be good, but it's starting to get old.

chris Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:47 PM EST

Wow. You sure nailed it. I've more or less given up on the Sci-Fi channel but thought I was the only one as I couldn't believe all that crap was actually finding viewers.

Anyway, I hope the execs see this post and all the comments and take it to heart.

So much potential...

elamb Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:47 PM EST

The Sci-Fi channel is proof that God has forsaken us..

damn.. i feel the same way. Sci-Fi used to be my pagan shrine. But there is so much BS on TV and in the theaters that I'm just not excited about it anymore.

Chris Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:41 PM EST

Firefly is the way to go. Way before BSG did its anti war kick that got such critical acclaim Firefly was there. They produced incredible magic and even more incredible DVD sales.

Firefly makes sense to me, Go for it Scifi!

Pete Bondurant Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:40 PM EST

Bring back Mystery Science Theatre 3000. They could even give Mike and the Bots some of those SciFi Channel original movies to riff on.

John Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:40 PM EST

Just so you know- SciFI is in HD for all those DirectTV subscribers. It's just not out for anyone else yet.

JJ Pagac Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:39 PM EST

Yes Please oh please take away wrestling! Who woke up one morning and debated wrestling to be sci-fi?

jgodsey Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:34 PM EST

because they are also very very cheap.

Get 'em Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:33 PM EST

Oops, forgot to paste the address..heh...
feedback@scifi.com

Kiki Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:32 PM EST

Please bring back Firefly!

Get 'em Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:32 PM EST

If anyone cares or is too lazy to look it up themselves...Here is Sci-Fi's feedback email thing...I'm copying and pasting the letter and comments and sending it to them.

Just a suggestion.

Cup of Joe Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:30 PM EST

I would love to see old franchises brought back that were canceled. For example, with Journeyman, Invasion, Firefly(I mean who doesn't want them back), and so on. That would make this geek happy.

Agreed Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:28 PM EST

And please also get to the High Definition viewing standard in the near future. . because your sci-fi, you know, the future. . and the present already has it.

Jeff Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:27 PM EST

Dear Sci Fi Channel...

BUT THE RIGHTS TO FIREFLY AND PRODUCE MORE EPISODES!!!

writergal Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:26 PM EST

"because they are also very very cheap."

This is true. Regal Entertainment Group creates a lot of programming for the likes of SciFi, Lifetime, and other 2nd tier cable channels. The CEO came to speak for my writer's group and said his productions are low budget, under 500K total, so I can only assume that's why the material may or not be on par with what our article writer is asking. I too wish SciFi would pull the plug on some of the worst programming and take it up a notch. I had cable only for BSG, and now I can get that online. If there were better programs on SciFi, I'd get cable again.

Joe Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:19 PM EST

I really think that the people making the descisions at SciFi channel should read a few of the classic SciFi books. There's so many great stories that are the embodiment of what SciFi CAN BE.

While I enjoy a good Star Trek flick, it's just not the same as Asimov, Heinlein, Bradbury..

Richard Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:18 PM EST

If they resurrected Firefly, they would get a free pass from me to make as many Mansquito movies as they like!

Brian Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:15 PM EST

WHERE IS THE FREAKING HD?

I mean its Scifi for God's sake and its still Standard Def?

Come on!

Mike Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:13 PM EST

Two things:

1. The I, Robot movie had *absolutely nothing* to do with the Asimov books. The script had already been written with another title. It was only later that someone else decided to just call it "I, Robot" and insert a few lines about robotic laws. It was never written as an adapation of Asimov's work.

2. As horrible as they are, those stupid sci-fi original movies are consistently among the highest-rated shows on sci-fi, and also the most profitable. Maybe the first step in getting sci-fi to stop making them, is for us to stop watching them?

ts Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:06 PM EST

Hey, I still like the Stargate franchise :(

SantaBJ Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:06 PM EST

Why are they not more awesome? Cos they're not producing my concepts, that's why.

T_Adams Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:05 PM EST

Yeah Why don't you move Twilight Zone from 1:00am to like 11:30pm so more people could see it. I really get tired waiting up till 1 in the morning and then I fall a sleep half way though and miss your commericals.

theguyspodcast Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:04 PM EST

A-freaking-men!

The Guy Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:04 PM EST

Sci-fi has WAY too much horror, someone please explain to them what sci-fi means! And they totally screwed up the Dresden Files which should have rocked like the books. NBC obviously didn't spend an extra dime there.

But like they say at the Daily Show, "it's basic cable"

elliot stearns Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:03 PM EST

They let Firefly and The Dresden Files both die. I'm still pissed.

Pete Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:52 PM EST

MST3k was one of the best shows Scifi ever had.
More star trek but its ownd by CBS and NBC owns scifi so thats out.
More anime like you used to have in the 90's. Maybe even movies on Staturdays, like HHGTG, Matrix, Hackers, Aliens 1 2 3, extra.
A scifi daily soap would be grate but kinda of like Earth: Final Conflict was.

Aaron Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:48 PM EST

If you look at a classic series like The Twilight Zone (the original Rod Serling series), the focus was on the writing. CGI wasn't needed and those shows hold up very well today. Pure and simple, they need better writing and less of a focus on cheap CGI.

H. Lampert Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:47 PM EST

The SciFi channel used to be a god send compared to the rest of the drivel on TV, then they got invaded by the pod-people. Please OMFG, hire someone who knows something about Science Fiction.

Good stuff (some still around and some sadly gone):
Firefly
Farscape
Stargate SG1
Stargate Atlantis
Battlestar Galactica
Lexx (this show was awesome - come on they destroyed the universe!)
Sliders (some might disagree but I liked it)

Chrontius Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:41 PM EST

Anyone else watch Odyssey 5? Probably not - I had to import my DVD set from the UK. One of the best sci-fis I've seen in a while, heavy on the transhumanist themes and such. Great story, very unique.

I want to see Odyssey 5 again in some way, shape, or form - reruns, sequels, remakes... something.

regeya Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:40 PM EST

Yeah, what the frick. The downfall of Sci-Fi is part of the reason I not only don't have cable, but don't overly desire it (unless my local provider offers a kick-ass phone/tv/internet deal.) I know I'll change my tune as soon as the final eps of BSG start up, esp. since the episodes aren't available via iTunes anymore but instead through the WMP-powered Unbox.

Yeah, what's the fine excuse for Sci-Fi not being a high-def channel? They, of anyone out there, should be on the cutting edge. Instead, you get 10 years of SG-1 and some of the worst made for TV movies ever made.

NOT U Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:38 PM EST

Is anyone making sure someone at Sci-Fi actually sees all these comments? if not then you are all just rambling for no good until you can get an actual executive or even their assistant to read this its just another wasted words on a computer screen that a bunch of us geeks enjoy ranting that never actually gets us anywhere because no one from the channel is reading it, get this out and all over so its such a buzz that they have to listen to at least one idea!!

Mike Caprio Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:37 PM EST

@ r3tr0: CBS Viacom/Paramount would charge NBC Universal/Sci Fi through the nose for original Star Trek reruns. That's why they aren't showing them.

Joe Bake Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:37 PM EST

I don't know how many of you will read this far down, but we should add another miniseries to the list: The Lost Room. it was a fascinating show with good characters, interesting premise, and great actors. if you haven't seen it, get it. I wish that it had done better in ratings if only to serve as a backdoor pilot (a la BSG) to a series that had a lot of open-ended possibilities.

Plot: In the 1960's a couple who runs a motel in Bumfrack, NoWhere finds a key for a room in their hotel that doesn't exist. when they enter the room they find many objects that each possess a strange power of some kind. (the key opens any door in the world to the Room and you can travel to any door upon exit, a pen that emits lightning, a pair of scissors that is telekinetic, etc). Using the objects in conjunction produces new powers. Eventually the objects are scattered across the globe and sought after by many people and groups for either curiosity or power.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt08303

Ron Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:36 PM EST

I'd be happy if they just got rid of wwf...granted they could do a lot better with series, wth is wwf doing on sci-fi?

Mike Caprio Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:33 PM EST

The reason why Sci Fi is mediocre in its original programming is because NBC Universal puts all of its budget towards the network production, and not the cable production. All the good shows go to the network (Heroes, Bionic Woman, Journeyman, Medium and Chuck (which could conceivably be stretched into sci fi genre)).

I suppose we should at least be thankful that NBC Universal is pioneering speculative fiction so much on the network; ABC/Disney only has Lost, and CBS only has Ghost Whisperer.

meh Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:31 PM EST

Ghost Hunters is a great show. They just need to stop playing the same episodes as often as they have been. I think one or two hours on Wednesday is enough. Any more than that seems to be overkill.

Moe Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:29 PM EST

Bring back Roswell the series. That was awesome!!

Hal Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:23 PM EST

What about Nick Sagan's triology (Idlewild, Edenborn & Everfree)? I think they have a lot of potential for a show.

Alan Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:23 PM EST

Flash Gordon is an awesome show, I enjoyed Tin Man very much as well.

Jane Doe Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:23 PM EST

I knew SciFi channel was going in the toilet when they cancelled MSFT:3000. And for this they give us that Loch Ness dreak last night. And DinoCroc. God, they suck. And that Land Shark! The onyl reason we have Stargate Atlantis and the Stargate reruns is the grace of GOD.

Pat Cahalan Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:21 PM EST

On the "soap opera/serial" idea:

Get someone to adapt James White's Sector General novels into a series. ER in space, except it would actually be... fresh :)

Jim Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:19 PM EST

I'm just finishing up a collection of short stories by John Varley, and almost everyone of them would make a good movie, mini-series...

tWiST Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:12 PM EST

Bring back Space:Above and Beyond too, while your at! And more clasic sci-fi movies, use that budget you use to make the craptastic 'sci-fi movies' like Ice Spiders...