'Deathly Hallows': A question for those who've finished it...

aust Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 09:44 AM EST

In Harry Potter 2' Harry gets stabbed by a Basilisk tooth. Why doesn't that destroy the horcrux?

aust Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 09:44 AM EST

In Harry Potter 2' Harry gets stabbed by a Basilisk tooth. Why doesn't that destroy the horcrux?

Heather Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 04:36 PM EST

My question is why Remus and Dora had to die right after they had poor Teddy Lupin and to answer a few of others questions since i understood pretty much everything i read in the books except for how Draco became owner of the elder wand. Ron, Harry and Hermione did indeed finish school, Victoir is a french name and Fleur knew french which makes it obvious that Victoir is Bill and Fluers daughter. Maddie, you have very sharp eyes, you go! I have spotted a few mistakes J.K. Rowling made myself. In book six, Proffessor Slughorn says Rons real irl name which is Rupert.

parris Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:52 PM EST

i wanna know what happened to luna 19 years on she was on of my favorite characters

parris Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:51 PM EST

i wanna know what happened to luna 19 years on she was on of my favorite characters

emily Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 11:30 PM EST

what you said about the baby being Voldemort[i wasnt for sure] but that's EXACTLY what it thought it was!!

i was thinking about it the other day and i realized taht must be what it is.

ive been looking all over the internet for that answer and ive finaly found it.

thanks!

emily Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 11:30 PM EST

what you said about the baby being Voldemort[i wasnt for sure] but that's EXACTLY what it thought it was!!

i was thinking about it the other day and i realized taht must be what it is.

ive been looking all over the internet for that answer and ive finaly found it.

thanks!

Diana Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:02 AM EST

I was so sad with Fred's death that I refuse to believe it!, in my mind, he and George kept running the joke shop, and lived happily ever after just like Harry, Ron, Hermione, Neville, and Luna.

Lily Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 09:45 PM EST

J. K. Rowling said in an interview that the information on Hogwarts staffs' spouses were strictly forbidden and that you'll know why in the seventh book, however she didn't mention anything about it. Anyone have any ideas as to what it's supposed to be?

Galadriel Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:35 PM EST

Bill, come on! The "baby" creature is Voldemort transformed into a subhuman state after yet again being beaten by Harry and devoid of a soul.

Bill DeGraff Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 01:59 PM EST

What does the baby signify in the scene between Harry and Dumbledore? Is this Harry's rebirth because he was actually a horcrux himself?

Ryan MP Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 06:24 PM EST

Not really a question, but I just thought it would be interesting to have learned more about Hogwarts. For instance, we learned a little more on Rowena Ravenclaw, but I really wanted JKR to talk about all four of the founders; to know all four of their stories. What caused the feud between Ravenclaw and Hufflepuff, were they in the fight with Slytherin and Gryffindor or on the outside of it, etc. Also, I wanted to know more about their relics (et. sword, cup, diadem, and locket). Where and how they got them, how were they magical, etc. Lastly, I wanted to know about all of the house ghosts. We know most of Sir Nicholas and Helena Ravenclaw, a little on the Bloody Baron, and literally nothing about the Fat Friar. Couldn't we learn all four of their stories as well, how they died, why they became the house ghosts, and what were their real names (the last one focusing only on BB and FF). In general, I wanted to know everything about the founders, their relics and the ghosts JKR thought of

Ryan MP Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 06:24 PM EST

Not really a question, but I just thought it would be interesting to have learned more about Hogwarts. For instance, we learned a little more on Rowena Ravenclaw, but I really wanted JKR to talk about all four of the founders; to know all four of their stories. What caused the feud between Ravenclaw and Hufflepuff, were they in the fight with Slytherin and Gryffindor or on the outside of it, etc. Also, I wanted to know more about their relics (et. sword, cup, diadem, and locket). Where and how they got them, how were they magical, etc. Lastly, I wanted to know about all of the house ghosts. We know most of Sir Nicholas and Helena Ravenclaw, a little on the Bloody Baron, and literally nothing about the Fat Friar. Couldn't we learn all four of their stories as well, how they died, why they became the house ghosts, and what were their real names (the last one focusing only on BB and FF). In general, I wanted to know everything about the founders, their relics and the ghosts JKR thought of

Urbangirl March Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 10:30 PM EST

I can't get over the death of Hedwig! Why was that necessary so close to the beginning of the book? No mention of her history and importance. Why wasn't she set free later in life in the forbidden forest to join Hagrid's magical creatures? Or, better yet, become a wise old owl and join Harry's son Albus on his first trip to Hogwarts? What a perfect segue that would have been. A great heartwarming moment of old times past, to see her off with the children in her cage; full of wisdom, an important part of the full circle of Harry's life. Oh well... Maybe she'll return in a picture frame behind Fawkes in Dumbeldore's office... I'll mourn her JK!

kyle Thu, Aug 9, 2007 at 09:48 AM EST

That link below is a fake chat...just thought you should know. Question on there posed to Ms. Rowling about Snape being a hero, and her answer was "Yes, but a flawed hero." That directly conflicts with what she said on the today show, that Snape was not a hero.

JMG Wed, Aug 1, 2007 at 08:41 AM EST

Just found this highly informative transcription of a chat with JKR:
http://www.bloomsbury.com/harrypotter/content.asp?sec=3&sec2=1

It answers what happens to George after Fred's death, and many other questions.

JMG Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:16 PM EST

I was crushed by Fred's death. I do hope that JKR will eventually reveal what happened to George; I can't imagine what it would be like to lose a twin. Danielle/MHansen: The epilogue made it clear that Percy has something to do with Hogwarts and that he's still something of a git (he was on the platform talking about broomstick regulations and Harry was glad not to have to talk to him). I loved that there was an epilogue; I'm glad that Harry got the reward of a happy life and family.

MHansen Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 02:48 PM EST

As unlikely as it might sound to some, I think Percy should join George at the joke shop. George could use a partner, and since Percy quit the Ministry, he could use a job.

I agree that Percy has been a pompous jerk, but I think he started to turn the corner in Book 7. Remember, in Fred’s last moments, Percy actually made a joke. And sure, it will take a while for Percy to get into full-joke-mode, but I think it’s a journey he needs to make.

And going from the Ministry to the joke shop is about a big of a career change that he could possibly make. And that’s great, because I think he desperately wants to put his Ministry days behind him.

anu Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 12:18 PM EST

let me be a little clearer - if there were actually 8 horcruxes instead of seven, the eighth being Harry, then Harry's death would mean that two horcruxes would still remain - ie Nagini and Voldemort. Sure, Harry told Neville to kill Nagini, but who was he assuming would kill Voldemort, the final Horcrux, once Harry was gone? Who did Dumbledore think would kill Voldemort once Harry was dead? Or did he know all the time that Harry would be resurrected and go back to deal with any remaining horcruxes? He didn't indicate this to Snape in the pensieve scene, but I guess he was holding those cards close to his chest...

anu Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 11:59 AM EST

If Dumbledore had planned that Harry's death would be the end of VOldemort, then why didn't Voldemort die when Harry "died"? Was it because Nagini was still alive? If Nagini had already been killed would Voldemort have died when he killed Harry? If not, what was Dumbledores plan for who would have finished off Voldemort?

Nance Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 08:36 AM EST

Is it my age, or did I miss something in multiple readings of the series? Where are Harry's grandparents? If his parents were so young when they died, how can none of Harry's grandparents be alive? And if Voldemort killed them all, don't you think it would be worth a mention in at least one of the books? Wouldn't his aunt have shown more real hatred of Harry, if his survival had meant the deaths of her parents as well as her sister?

dough Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 03:20 AM EST

mann i loved the book im kinda "mourning" ahaa i finished with a saf yet satisfied feeling. imma read it again soon but nothing can duplicate the first reading im sure you guys agree? ahaa oh and so who's the new headmaster?

Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 06:22 AM EST

well actually what jk said was that harry and ron "revolutionize the Auror Department" and that hermione gets "pretty high up in the Department for Magical Law Enforcement".Pity she hadn't added that in the last chapter.

vh Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 12:01 PM EST

I want to know about George too. I was very upset about Fred's death. I sobbed so hard I gave myself a headache.

Sheila Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 10:43 AM EST

I understand how and why the elder wand became Harry's, and therefore rebounded on Voldemort in their final duel. What I don't understand why it would have allowed Voldemort to kill Harry the first time he (Voldemort) tries, when Harry first goes to Voldemort, accepting that he must be killed. We are told that Harry doesn't die because Lily's protection is still inside Voldemort, but wouldn't the elder wand have been unable to kill him anyway?

Jackie Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 11:59 PM EST

Why does no one seem to care about Fred/George, my two favorite characters?? What happens to George? How does he deal with Fred's death? And why did Fred have to die? Why couldn't it have been Percy? He reconnected with his family, and no one liked him, so....

kats Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 12:32 PM EST

Thank you Jeff! That is the funniest thing I've read all day ; )

Jeff Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 12:25 PM EST

Ah yes, Jen. I can see JK's next work now. Law and Order: Special Hogsmeade Unit...or...CSI: Godric's Hollow. "What was the Murder weapon Harry?". "Elementary, my Dear Ron, a Puking Pastille!"

Norton Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 09:51 AM EST

Mardie - Draco used Expelliarmus on Dumbledore's wand on top of the tower at the end of Half-Blood Prince. He was therefore the owner and had ownership when Dumbledore died. He left the wand, but was still owner, even though it was buried with Dumbledore.

Jen Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 09:50 AM EST

JKR said on the Today show that Harry and Ron organized a new ministry of magic and that they were both Aurors. There is a new headmaster at hogwarts that we wouldnt know.

Mardie Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 08:22 AM EST

My biggest question is that I don't totally understand why the Elder Wand belonged to Draco...I thought since it was buried with Dumbledore that the magic of it was finished, so to speak. Can someone explain that to me? I really hope that Ron ends up working in the Quidditch office at the Ministry - that'd be perfect for him!

Mardie Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 08:20 AM EST

To Aunty: I think the general concensus is that Merope is the one who used magic later in life (from book 6). I wondered a lot about that too and found this answer on pretty much every fan site.

Barbara Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 08:07 AM EST

Why didn't Snape's picture appear in the Headmaster's Office?

jennifer t. Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 03:17 AM EST

My questions are 1) what happened to Luna? 2) what happened to george after fred's death? 3)did they go back to hogwarts and finish their education? 4)what jobs do harry,etc have now? I have loved this series from the beginning. I will miss the anticipation and enjoyment of reading a new HP book. I hope JKR will revisit Harry at a later time. I can't wait to see what she does next. I thank JKR for giving us such a wonderful world.

jennifer t. Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 03:10 AM EST

to jeff: bill wasn't at gringotts at the time of the robbery b/c all of the weasley's were hiding out at the time.

Jeff Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 10:04 PM EST

Thanks to Robert for answering my Bellatrix question. I hadn't read that yet.

Jeff Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 09:59 PM EST

I just read one of the posts where someone suggested that Fred be a ghost in the shop or in Hogwarts. My, My, what a team Fred and Peaves would make together huh? Fred coming back as a poltergeist would be PERFECT. I also would have liked to have whether harry was an Auror or not. I think Pansy Parkinson is a good candidate for the new Bellatrix, still loyal and trying to bring back evil. I think Teddy has the making's of a great character as well, it could be totally different spin on Teen Wolf.

Jeff Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 09:50 PM EST

Jeepers, it's taken me as long to read these posts as it did the book. A couple of questions I haven't seen posted yet: 1) If Bill worked at Gringotts, where was he during the robbery? 2) It also says in the book that Bellatrix AND her husband were still loyal to V. Does anyone remember his name? 3) Did any of the booka mention what house Dumbledore was in? I may have missed that? And lastly I concur with the others who want to know what happened to Luna and George, the rest I am satisfied with just wondering about. I also have a theory about the Veil in that it served merely as bit of foreshadowing to set up the existence of that "in-between" place where harry had his discussion with Dumbledore. Without the existence of the Veil we probably wouldn't have bought it.

Aunty Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 09:45 PM EST

It was hinted that a character would become able to use magic late in life by Jo. But it wasn't included in the book. My question is, which character was this initially meant to be?

aj:) Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 08:52 PM EST

Sinse Snape is really on Dumbledore's side, why is he treating the students at Hogwarts so rudely?
Is it because the Death Eaters are there?

kmyky Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 08:43 PM EST

kyjy868

Barney Joseph Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 08:39 PM EST

Marie,
You ask what Petunia was going to say but didn't. I'd like to think it was:

I have never understand the world you live in, but you have always been a link to my sister, your mother. I will miss being reminder about her every day. And I know if she were here now, knowing you were heading off to fight the man who killed her, I know she would be very proud. And wish you good luck. So Harry, for the memory of my sister, Good luck. And goodbye.

Veronica Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 08:34 PM EST

First of may i just say that i loved this book. It absolutely broke my heart with that whole thing with snape and lily. That really mad snape become one of my favorite all time characters that I've read about in novels. But i wanted to know what that deformed thing was at the king's cross. My guess is that it was the part of voldemort's soul living inside harry. But is there anything else to it?

arian sarris Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 08:33 PM EST

So what was Harry's career 19 years later? Ministry of Magic? Auror? Muggle relations? And Ron? and Hermione? What were they doing for jobs besides snogging?

Tamora Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 08:25 PM EST

I always liked Harry Potter books, and Deathly Hallows is definately tied with Prisoner of Askaban as my favorite. It's just so sad to see so many loved characters die. The Harry Potter series gets a ten out of ten from me. Maybe with the addition of Deathly Hallows, maybe a 15 out of ten.

Merri Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 07:07 PM EST

I absolutely loved the book. I think I felt from book 5 that Harry would end up with Ginny. And all along I thought that there was something we didn't know about Snape. After all Dumbledore trusted him so much and if you remember he tried to save Harry from Prof.Quirrel in the Quidditch game. I kept thinking that someone had kidnapped him and was using the Polyjuice potion to take his place.

Pamina Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 06:51 PM EST

I really wanted to spend some time with George after Fred died to see how he would cope. I was absolutely gutted by Fred's death, probably more so than with the others because of the extra level of horror at imagining George having to live without his other half. My wild hope was that we would see Fred living in their shop as a ghost, or, even better, at Hogwarts. I thought that George could teach a "Clever Crafts with Magic" class while running the owl-order business out of the astronomy tower with ghost-Fred. Anyway, that's my pitch for the next draft!

Robert Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 06:19 PM EST

What happened to Rodolphus Lestrange? He kinda just disappeared. Seems odd, since he was married to the #2 baddie.

Alex Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:13 PM EST

In the epilogue, it never explained what happened to Luna Lovegood. And what happened to Kreacher? Did he die, or would still work for Harry?

Marie Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 04:52 PM EST

Why didn't Snape's picture appear in the Headmaster's Office, like Dumbledore's did in Book 6?

What do you think Petunia wanted to say to Harry but didn't in the beginning of the story?

Which Weasley does Victorie belong to (I hadn't thought of Bill and Fleur like somebody else had said, but that would make sense...)

Ariella Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 04:21 PM EST

Julia - I had the same question about the wand ownership thing. At first, I thought the question of how Dumbledore could possibly defeat Grindenwald in a duel when he had the Elder Wand was settled by realizing that Grindenwald had only stolen it but was never master of it. But then the same conundrum occured to me: how is Dumbledore then it's master? I was wondering if maybe the whole wand ownership thing will eventually lapse if it's not claimed by its rightful owner for a certain period of time. After all, Dumbledor's duel with Grindenwald was like 50 years ago or something. Maybe over the years, when the wand's rightful owner never came to claim it, it eventually recognized Dumbledore. But it takes years. That would make sense and clear up all the seeming conflicts in the story.

Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 03:12 PM EST

Harry is the head of the Auror department. Ron works in the same department.

Hermione works for the Department of Magical Law Enforcement.

Pretty satisfying

Julia Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 03:11 PM EST

Since Harry is master of the Elder Wand now, if he's ever disarmed in the future (and it doesn't have to be with the Elder Wand, it can be with any wand!), the Elder Wand will recognize that person as its new master, correct?

But my big question is... why did Grindelwald become the master of the wand? When Grindelwald took it from Gregorovitch it wasn't a deathly duel or a duel at all--he pretty much just stole it! What if someone just stole any wand of Harry? Would the Elder Wand transfer its allegiance as well?

In trying to answer this, I thought maybe Grindelwald was never the master of the wand. That's possibly why Dumbledore was able to defeat him in their infamous duel.Well if that's the case, then Dumbledore couldn't become the master of the Elder Wand by besting Grindelwald, which means Draco couldn't become the master and thus Harry couldn't become the master either. So Grindelwald must have been the rightful owner simply by stealing it. Right?

smithe Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 02:58 PM EST

Glad Snape was a double agent and that he was dumbledors man all along. Have argued this for years and everyone thought I was wrong. So go Snape!

Virginia Kennedy Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 02:50 PM EST

For those of you hoping for more regarding the world of Harry Potter, or if you found the epilogue not as fulfilling as it could have been, JK Rowling is creating an encyclopedia that will hopefully answer all our questions. It will provide more background on each character and what they are currently up to. It will also let us know who the new headmaster of Hogwart's is (she says its not McGonagall).Rowling said she is not starting it now, but it wouldn't surprise me if she releases it at the same time as one of the last 2 movies or when they open the Harry Potter attraction in Universal Orlando which is to be in 2 years.

CAREN Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 02:47 PM EST

I am trying to figure out the dates. In the cemetary it showed that Harry's parents died Oct 31 1981. Harry was one years old so Harry would have been born July 31, 1980. He went to school when he was 11yrs old so that would be in 1991. Seven years later would be 1998 w/ the school year and the big battle ending in 1999. The epilogue said 19 year LATER. That would make the year 2018. Am I missing something? Why would she put them so far into the future? Help.

Garrett Black Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 02:25 PM EST

How does the fact that Voldemort took Harry Potter's blood into him keep Lily Potter's sacrifice alive and prevent Harry from dying? And doesn't that mean that Voldemort was never able to kill Harry since he took Harry's blood?

Raechel Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 12:45 PM EST

What was the baby/creature thing supposed to represent when Harry was in limbo? That was probably the most confusing chapter of the entire series...

Jennifer Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:58 AM EST

AP:
The Resurrection Stone was in the snitch, not the locket. The snith was not destroyed.

aramis Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:26 AM EST

Rita Skeeter...why didn't she get what was coming to her in the end?! I loathed her in the book, and then nothing...

purplegirl247 Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:10 AM EST

Thanks for the link, kats! I thought it was funny that everyone assumed Hermione was a stay-at-home mom and Harry led a boring, mundane life just because they happened to show up at the station to send their kids off to Hogwarts. As we saw throughout the books, sending your kids off to Howarts is a BIG DEAL and I'm sure the Ministry is more than accomodating to give parents the day off. :-)

I'm sooooo glad Rowling answered those questions; now we can all stop wondering! *bliss*

bones Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 09:03 AM EST

Is Snape a Vampire?

kats Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 08:40 AM EST

Answers to some of our most pressing questions:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19959323/

Sadie Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 08:22 AM EST

Some of these reader questions were answered on the Today Show this morning; they aired part one of an interview with JK. Part two will air tomorrow, and the entire interview will air Sunday at 7pm on NBC.

Stef Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 10:55 PM EST

Thanks Mhansen and the next poster, I was confused about the rebounding curse on Voldemort and your explanations make sense I think.

Polyquats Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 10:53 PM EST

I have a very serious question for JK Rowling:
Given the comments (questions) that are appearing here and on other sites, is she concerned about the level of comprehension skills of her audience?

Stef Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 10:52 PM EST

to dagreers,
I think I can answer your question. I think in Prisoner of Azkaban, Lupin and Sirius were ready to kill Wormtail and Harry intervened, telling them that he thought his father would spare his life. This of course causes Wormtail to escape, and Harry feels guilty about it. I am pretty sure I remember Dumbledore saying something like Wormtail now owes Harry his life, that it creates a certain bond between them. There seemed to be foreshadowing of some kind of payback between Wormtail and Harry, so I think that is what Harry was thinking of when he said that about Dumbledore.

Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 10:44 PM EST

For MHansen
Because Voldemort used the Elder Wand, which rightfully belonged to Harry, and because Voldemort had used Harry's blood in GoF, so Harry couldn't die while Voldemort was alive. Dumbledore was counting on the latter, but the former was a bonus (he thought Snape would win the Elder Wand).

Dumbledore did seem to suggest that Harry could "go on", that is to die if he chose to.

MHansen Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 10:24 PM EST

After reading all the entries in an entire Harry Potter blog, I am satisfied with the explanation that when Harry let Voldemort curse him in the forest, Voldemort unknowing killed the part of his own soul that was in Harry.

But what I don’t understand is this. Right before Voldemort cursed Harry, Harry had two souls within him: Harry had his own soul, as well as a part of Voldemort’s soul. Given this logic, Voldemort’s curse could have killed either soul within Harry. So how and why did Voldemort’s curse specifically target and kill the piece of Voldemort’s soul within Harry, when it could just have easily killed Harry’s soul, instead?

Laurie Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 07:01 PM EST

I believe Draco is master of the elder wand because he disarmed Dumbledore before Snape killed him at the end of the Half Blood Prince. Since Draco "defeated" Dumbledore, he became master of the wand.

bootsycolumbia Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 06:51 PM EST

For all the people who complained that Ginny and Hermione ended up as "only" wives and mothers, keep in mind that JKR never says what ANY of them do for a living. Hermione is probably Minister of Magic, Ginny is probably helping George run Weasley's Wizard Wheezes, and Ron and Harry, who were no great shakes as students at Hogwarts, are probably content stay-at-home dads.

Elena Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 05:12 PM EST

Okay I have a few questions here!
1) How was Draco master of the Elder Wand?
2) It said the Gaunts (LV's relatives) were related to the Peverells. It also said Harry was descended from the Peverells. So Harry and Voldy were related?!?
These might be blatently obvious to the rest of you, but if someone could answer them, please do!

Elena Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 05:11 PM EST

Okay I have a few questions here!
1) How was Draco master of the Elder Wand?
2) It said the Gaunts (LV's relatives) were related to the Peverells. It also said Harry was descended from the Peverells. So Harry and Voldy were related?!?
These might be blatently obvious to the rest of you, but if someone could answer them, please do!

AP Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 04:02 PM EST

1. Why are invisibility cloaks being used successfully to hide from Dementors (in the Ministry of Magic and elsewhere), when in book 3 Dumbledore explicitly states that Dementors are not fooled by them? Was he lying to keep Harry out of trouble? Is it because the cloak was one of the Hallows that it works against Dementors?
2. Why, if only purebloods were attending Hogwarts under the new regime, was Colin Creevy around to sneak back into the school to die? Isn't he Muggle-born?
3. Why does the resurrection stone still work? Was the horcrux power destroyed, but now the Hallows power?

Amy Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 03:38 PM EST

Did Harry become an auror? What do he, Ginny, Ron and Hermione do now that they're adults? And what about Luna?
What did Dudley see when the dementors attacked?
Is Victoire the daughter of Fleur and Bill?

dagreers Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 02:32 PM EST

Voldemort didn't apparate to where Harry was because of the distance. If you recall, Harry said at one point that Voldemort would soon be close enough to apparate.

Also, I don't think Voldemort was in Harry's mind when he announced that Harry would come,; he was simply acting on what he'd learned about the boy.

My question, though, is about Wormtail. What did Harry mean when he said Dumbledore had seen his death coming? Did I miss that from an earlier book?

tommy Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 02:16 PM EST

Erin,
He pulled the sword out of the Sorting Hat the same way Harry did in Chamber of Secrets

Jess Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 02:02 PM EST

Fabulous ending. I finally feel vindicated for arguing pro-Snape all these years! I think his death was the saddest, b/c he'd spent all that time w/everyone thinking the worst of him. The only things I didn't like were Fred dying (couldn't Percy have sufficed?) and killing Tonks. I expected Lupin to die, but her too? And I wish the epilogue had been set at the Burrow, to find more about the family. BUT, it was still a very satisfying ending, cheers to Rowling!

Erin Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 01:18 PM EST

Does anyone know how Neville got the Griffindor sword back from the goblin in order to kill the snake?

Jen Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 01:09 PM EST

One thing that has bugged me since the beginning is what ever happened to Harry's grandparents? Lily and James were not old enough to have their parents dead already by natural means. Especially James since don't wizards live longer than Muggles? We got that glimpse of an anscestor at the cemetary, but that's it.

AMO Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 01:04 PM EST

Laurie,
To comment on your Quest #1, I think the reason why LV didn't read into his mind (we think anyways, even though at the end he seemed to know what Harry was going to do), because he couldn't stand being in Harry's head in OoTP he leaves it. I think that maybe him not repelling Harry in the 7th book as opposed to the 6th is because DD is dead and he has been able to get moving forward with his plans to rule the world and kill Harry. Just a thought

tommy Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 01:04 PM EST

So why didn't Voldemort just apparate to wherever Harry was. I mean the flying is cool and all, but couldn't he just appear whenever he was being called by one of his death eaters when they had Harry

Barney Joseph Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 11:20 AM EST

Do Harry, Ron and Hermione never get a high school degree, nor complete their Newts?
Why didn't Voldemort kill Hagrid?
Why was Voldemort "killed by his own rebounding course"? Why did his curse rebound? When Harry was 1 it was because of his mother's sacrifice. Why did it rebound this time?

Laurie Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 08:13 AM EST

Everyone has such great input, I am really enjoying all your posts. My questions/comments:
1. Why is the Harry/Voldemort connection only a one-way street Lord Voldy sees nothing of Harry's mind or emotions?-even before Harry finally gets the hang of occlumency?

2. When Harry goes back up to the headmaster's office to see Dumbledore's portrait after the death of Lord voldy, why is Snape's portrait not there?

3. Love the kickass Neville!

4. I cried the hardest (still tear up thinking about it) when Harry tells Al that Snape was the bravest man he ever knew! I loved Dumbledores comment to Snape that perhaps they sort to early, meaning that maybe Snape was a Griffindor all along.

5. Ending was great, Harry being the father he never had, such a good father, in fact, that Al confides in him rather than Ginny. All that Harry went through made life better for his children - every parent's wish.

6. Love that the final showdown took place at Hogwarts, which had such significance for both.

Kristin Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 11:28 PM EST

No real questions, though of course I wouldn't complain if she wrote an appendix or something. I loved it. I have never been so incredibly emotional over a book before. And I thought the Epilogue was very simple and very sweet - beautifully done. Ron and Hermione are an adorable couple...loved them all as parents, especially Ron, though Harry's comment about James and Albus sharing a room when he wants the house demolished sounded delightfully like the type thing my parents used to say. I'm still slightly confused over the veil at the dept of mysteries, but I'm probably trying to read too much into it. I was so pleased with all the little references in previous books that were explained in this one, like in book 6 when Dumbledore comes to Privet Drive and says to Petunia that they "have corresponded, of course" and Harry thinks it's an odd way to remind her that he sent her a Howler the previous year...but now we know they corresponded for real when Petunia wrote to him as a girl.

ari Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 11:25 PM EST

What an amazing book - and now we know that in HBP when Dumbledore says "please Severus" he was not begging him to spare his life - but instead begging him to kill him -- really interesting

robh Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 11:06 PM EST

I thought that the small child Harry sees in Kings Cross when he's with Dumbledore was the destroyed portion of Voldemort that was attached to Harry.

The Real Hermione Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 10:21 PM EST

I saw on MuggleNet that Naomi Watts has been cast as Narcissa Malfoy for "Half Blood Prince"(which in a way, is kinda wrong because she's Australian, yet born in England..) and Joseph Finnes and Stuart Townsend has been cast too. Can anyone confirm that because I haven't heard anything else about that at ALL!

bixers Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 07:51 PM EST

To those of you wanting to know when JK Rowling is going to be on television, NBC's Today show will have a two part interview with Jo on Thursday and Friday. You can read about on NBC's website

Sarah Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 02:44 PM EST

FLGirl,

I disagree. Even when the trio was captured and taken to the Malfoys, Draco and Narcissa did everything they could to not ID them. Harry had been disfigured, thanks to Hermione, but she and Ron still looked like themselves. Throughout the entire book, the Malfoys were hostages much more than willing participants.

Poinky Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 02:27 PM EST

I would have liked to see Hagrid end up together with Madame Olympe...Well, not "see" it, but you know what I mean.

Hey TD Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 01:57 PM EST

No problem - if you were anything like me after reading the book, you were in such an emotional state that it is understandable if your brain took a wee rest. ;)

FLGrl Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 01:54 PM EST

I don't think we're meant to be impressed by Narcissa keeping quiet about Harry still being alive. Her intent was not to save Harry because it was the right thing to do, but to selfishly find out information about and gain access to her son. The Malfoys allegiance has always been, not to Lord Voldemort, but to themselves, and Narcissa exemplified this.

TD Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 01:52 PM EST

Thank you, HeyTD! I did a, "ah, yes!" when I read your response to my question.

Leonardo DeCrappio Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 01:41 PM EST

While I did enjoy this series, I am somewhat relieved that it ended on a high note and we won't be subjected to future titles such as "Harry Potter and the Nephrolithiasis".

Hey TD, Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 01:24 PM EST

The scene from the cover art is the battle in the Great Hall. The reason it looks like the outdoors is that the sun was rising and you could see the orange-y sky through the enchanted ceiling (remember, the ceiling in the Great Hall always looks exactly like the sky outside - either snowing or sunny or whatever). The figures you see in the background are all of the people watching (Harry had told them all to stay back), and Harry is reaching into the air to catch the Elder Wand that has just flown out of Tom Riddle/Voldemort's hand - although you can't see the wand in the picture. At least the publishers were smart enough to not put THAT huge artistic spoiler on the front of the book, since they had chapter spoilers throught the book in the form of the illustrations above each chapter title. That drove me crazy!

TD Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 01:08 PM EST

Can anyone tell me what scene the U.S. cover art represents? If it's in the Forest, what are the structures surrounding them? And if it's in Hogwarts, where are Voldemort's and Harry's wands? Is there another scene I'm forgetting? Harry has his hand up like he's either trying to catch something or to get people's attention, and Voldemort actually looks terrified. Confused. Help?

Moo Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 12:53 PM EST

I would like to know what careers Harry, Hermione and Ron went into. What is Harry's first son's middle name? Sirius, perhaps? Do the Potters live in 12 Grimwald Place with Kreacher?

I have to say, I cried hardest when Dobby died. He never hurt anyone and was always more than willing to help. He was truly generous.

CherylB Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 12:33 PM EST

For those of you confused about the flayed baby in King's Cross, I believe that was what would become of Voldemort once he was totally destroyed. Dumbledore said there was no hope to help the baby (pg 709) and he also says about going back to fight that LV "you have less to fear from returning here than he does (pg 722.) Then Harry tells LV to 'try for some remorse (pg 741) knowing that the only thing that could save LV from being that whimpering baby in the afterlife would be to show some remorse for his deads in this life.

mmmm Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 12:12 PM EST

I would like to know what Harry's favorite breakfast cereal becomes. Why wasn't this covered in the epilogue?! ....Loved the book!

Lusi Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 12:02 PM EST

I have a suspicion that Luna was the character to get the death reprieve. Rowlings said she had written the epilogue a while back, and while Neville was mentioned, Luna wasn't.

Jeez Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 11:53 AM EST

The epilogue did not specify 18 years and 2 months, or 18 years and 10 months, it said 19 years later. So if Teddy was already born before the time of the final battle, and epilogue was 19 years later...stands to reason he would be 19 years old. In any case, 18 or 19 years old is too old to be going to Hogwarts, but all that was stated was that he was on the platform.

Laura Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 11:40 AM EST

As for the recurring question about Teddy's age. The current year is 2007. Nineteen years ago is 1988. If you were born in March of 1988, then today (nineteen years later) you are already nineteen. If you are born in say, August of 1988, then today (again, nineteen years later) you are only 18 years old. I can't remember when Teddy was born exactly in the timeline (months, weeks or days before the end of the book), but it is possible to be only 18 nineteen calendar years after you are born.

tommy Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 11:35 AM EST

harry didn't die b/c Voldemort was recreated with Harry's blood in GOF. That was why Dumbledore had that gleam of triumph in GOF when harry told him what happened in the graveyard.

Jaclyn Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 10:12 AM EST

What was up with the shriveled baby in King's Cross station? That's the only question I truly had. My guess: When V. killed Harry in the forest, Harry's blood in V. caused him to kill the piece of V's soul that was in Harry instead of actually killing Harry, and the baby was that piece of V's soul that made Harry a Horcrux.

Sadie Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 10:01 AM EST

Umbridge is obsessed with cats; McGonagal is an Animagus who turns into a cat, thus their patroni are similar.

Jennifer Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 09:48 AM EST

1) What was the behind the choices of the 2 quotes that began the book?
2) What is she going to do next?
3) Was everything planned out from the beginning-or were there things that got changed along the way?

Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 09:44 AM EST

Why did McGonagall and Umbridge have the same patronus?

Elisa Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 08:43 AM EST

I just finished the book last night and all I can say is WOW. JK did a superb job with wrapping everything up. I of course want to know what happens to Luna she is my favorite character other than Harry. Her part in this story was huge. I loved the fact that Harry lived and went on to a happy life and I don't think there should be another book because it ended perfectly unless of course she writes about his children. I cried more in this book than any other and I think that's a true mark of a great writer when you are so emotionally involved with the story. Hats off to JK and thank you for one of the greatest series I have ever read.

MAC Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 08:29 AM EST

Albus Severus, that name made me cry! Great book. Perfect.

Poinky Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 08:03 AM EST

McGonagall's Patronuses were cats...

Esme Swan Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 07:43 AM EST

1. What happened to George? How did he deal with the loss of Fred? Did he re-open Weasley's Wizarding Wheezes? (...maybe with the help of Lee Jordan?)
2. What happened to Luna?
3. Did Harry ever see the Dursley's again?
4. Did all the Malfoys reform?
5. Couldn't Snape do *something* to help the kids that were being tortured at the school? If he could fool Voldy all those years, surely he could fool Voldy & the Carrows to help the kids in some way. Even anonymously, so the kids didn't know who was helping them maybe?
6. What happened to the hand on the Weasley clock with Fred's picture on it after he died? Did it disappear from the clock or get stuck on 'mortal peril' or something else?
7. What was the importance of cats? I thought JKR always said to keep an eye on the cats, that there was more to them?

L.A.B. Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 07:36 AM EST

When is this big TV interview with J.K.R. that some people have referred to?

FJM Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 07:08 AM EST

I was thinking maybe Kreacher had been freed by the locket but decided to remain with Harry because of Harry's kindness towards him.

Poinky Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 07:03 AM EST

How can anyone say that Teddy is 18 years old 19 years later??? If you give birth to a child, one year later your child is 1 year old.

kats Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 06:49 AM EST

...and again, approximately 18 girls and 18 boys in each year. The dorms didn't appear to be that big and shared classes with another house would mean 72 students in at least all their required courses. Doesn't make sense to me. On the other hand, assuming, as I do, that there are about 16 in each year, in each house, the school would have approximately 450 students in total. Isn't Hogwarts the only Wizarding school in the UK? Is the Wizarding community along with the birth of wizarding muggles so small that between England, Ireland and Scotland, there are only 64 wizarding children born eac year? As I said, I know I'm completely overthinking this and please forgive me if my math is off as it is by no means my greatest skill.

kats Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 06:44 AM EST

Okay, I"m way overthinking this now as I'm sure my brain is being eaten but two more things...
First, I don't think Harry and Ginny and Ron and Hermione are necessarily living in the Muggle world. Yes, they have cars but remember that Harry and Hermione were raised in the Muggle world and it wouldn't be surprising if they held onto some of those traditions. Plus, Mr. Weasley loved Muggle things so maybe Ron took after him. With Teddy having dinner with them each week and Ron's family living in the wizarding world, I don't think they'd choose to live apart from their families. It seemed as though they all had regular contact.

Secondly, I read on mugglenet.com that JKR said Hogwarts has about 1,000 students, which they doubted and I do too. I feel as though we pretty much got to know most of the people in Harry's year, at least in Gryffindor and probably in Slytherin as well. If there were 1,000 at the school there would be 250 per house and approximately 36 students per year..

Kevin Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 06:28 AM EST

Book 7 takes place in 1998 when Harry is 17. The end of the book takes place in 2017, 19 years later, when Hary, Ginny, Ron, and Hermoine send their kids off to school.

kevin Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 06:26 AM EST

NO. A locket is not clothing.

Jake Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 06:22 AM EST

Was Kreacher a free elf after the locket was given to him? . . . I mean, the locket would count as clothes right?

wintersux Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 05:44 AM EST

Whoops, in reading through these comments I see Teddy was not actually on the train...I was really tired last night when I finished the book.

Amanda Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 05:30 AM EST

Did I read it correctly where Harry's parents tombstones said their dates of death as 1981? Harry would be in his 20's if that were true.

wintersux Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 05:11 AM EST

First of all, thank God I'm finished with the book so that I can go to bed at a normal hour tonight. Great book...it was so sad at the beginning when Ron, Harry, and Hermione had to be isolated for so long. I did miss the Hogwarts atmosphere...so I'm glad that's where it all ended up. Someone earlier did have a good point that according to the epilogue it was 19 years later and Teddy was still on the train to Hogwarts?? Since 17 is the coming of age for wizards, it would be nice to have that part explained.

Stephanie Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 11:23 PM EST

Harry didn't die because he had mastered all three elements of The Deathly Hallows. He had the cloak, the stone, and the Elder wand recognized him as the true master. Dumbledore wanted all three to overcome death as well.....Harry had them.

Ariella Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 10:52 PM EST

Question - when Harry told Voldemort during their duel that he can't hurt any of Harry's friends because he (Harry) had died for them and thus protected them with his love, was this ACTUALLY true, or was he just saying it to piss off/frighten Voldemort?

CSR Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:52 PM EST

Amazing end but few lingering thoughts.
1. What happaned to Luna, George, Bill, Charlie (ever marry). Mr and Mrs Weasly. the professors of Hogwarts, Minerva et all
2. Did Ron Hermiony and Harry become aurors?
3. Ron drives muggle cars; does that mean he and Hermoiny live in a muggle world?
4. Did Rita Skeeter and Dolores Umbridge get their just desserts? i needed that thread tied up. :(
5. Did Lavander die?
6. Viktor Crum? one chapter ... that's it? he should have part of the final battle i feel rowling did drop the ball on that end and Luna's father Xeno

Sid Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:34 PM EST

Ariella - I wondered that too about the expandable/extendable ears!

Sarah Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:29 PM EST

FabK,

Harry never tried to seek out fame, so it didn't surprise me at all that he wouldn't have told his kids. After all, like him, they wouldn't be able to escape it once they entered school. Until then, he was probably trying to keep them out of the spotlight as much as possible. Ron too.

Sarah Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:27 PM EST

Erica,

As soon as Harry was named godfather, I knew Lupin and Tonks were doomed. I don't think it ties in with Snape and Riddle, but it definitely completes the circle of Harry's life. Now all his parents' close friends are gone, and he has a chance to look over Teddy just like Lupin and Sirius looked after him. As I said, it completed the circle.

bootsycolumbia Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:17 PM EST

There was one other question I'd have liked cleared up. Did Firenze ever make amends with the other Centaurs?

I also loved the whole chapter about Snape's memory. My friends were always convinced that Snape was pure evil, but I always thought he was loyal to Dumbledore to the end, but couldn't figure out why he killed Dumbledore. I was glad that he turned out so heroic. His unrequited love for Lily was heartbreaking, and those memories brought tears to my eyes(I don't cry that easily!). Also, Dobby dying just about finished me off. I know a lot of people didn't care for him, but I loved his loyalty to Harry. I'm glad he was buried in a respectful way, because he deserved it.

FabK Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:11 PM EST

This might have been asked already but it struck me as odd that in the epilogue, Harry's kids were wondering why everyone was staring at Harry and Ron said something like "Don't worry about it, I'm really famous." Did Harry and Ginny never tell their children that their Dad killed Voldemort? Seems a bit strange that they wouldn't know. Also, I wish there was more Harry/Ginny interaction during this book so that their connection would be stronger. And, I'll just add my vote for "What happened to Luna?!?"

bootsycolumbia Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 08:00 PM EST

There were two things that bothered me about the book. Why did it take so long for Harry, Hermione and Ron to figure out that RAB was Regulus A Black? I thought it was kind of obvious, since Sirius told Harry his brother's name a long time ago. Also: Godric's Hollow. Hello? Wasn't it stated long ago that Gryffindor's first name was Godric? Why was that one so hard to figure out, too, that Godric's Hollow was Gryffindor's birthplace? I thought those were two kind of glaring logical mistakes in an otherwise outstanding series.
Someone asked how Neville could pull out the Gryffindor sword from the Sorting Hat when Griphook had it. Remember that Dumbledore told Harry that only a true Gryffindor would be able to get access to the sword in times of need, back in Book 2. Neville is obviously a true Gryffindor. The one question I want answered is: What happened to Luna? I loved her courage and her undying loyalty to her friends. She deserved a mention in the epilogue.

Olivia Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 07:42 PM EST

That would be perfect if Cate Blanchet played her! I think she could pass as Helena Bonham Carter's sister.
This is pointless to ask but throughout the book I kept on wondering what happened to Fudge. Did he try to keep on fighting?

kats Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 07:30 PM EST

Sarah~ I think Cate Blanchette would be perfect to play Draco's mom Narcissa.

nm Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 07:07 PM EST

any signifiance in it being 19 years later?

Erica Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 07:06 PM EST

I am reluctantly curious about the fate of the Dursleys, and unabashedly curious about the fate of Luna Lovegood and what our three protagonists do for a living now.

I'd also like to understand the reasons behind Tonks and Lupin both dying (aside from the whole "human collateral" aspect of their war)--is there always going to be that one boy at Hogwarts searching for his home and his parents and where he belongs? Or is the point of including Teddy in the epilogue that the lost boys like Riddle and Snape, after Harry, will always have a place to go and a family to look after them? I'm curious if Teddy Lupin was intentionally part of the Riddle-Snape-Harry tradition.

Sheila Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 05:35 PM EST

so i just found this site... and it's UBER helpful. it really is a DH faq with a bit of snark...

http://community.livejournal.com/spoil_me_dh/396007.html#cutid1

Harry's pal Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 05:33 PM EST

'SPOILERS' I loved this book, best of the series! I was really hurt when Hedwig, Fred and Dobby died. But I must say - I'm so glad that Harry Ron and Hermione lived. I was hoping J.K Rowling would make Harry and Hermione brother and sister, because they always worked so great together and I think that would have been amazing. I'm so glad Voldemort is dead! I totally loved the book. This book was a fantastic end to the series.
If! I'm saying "IF" J.K. Rowling were to make another book, if there is a bad guy I think the bad guy could possibly be Draco Malfoy.
I've loved the series since the beginning. I would love to say "Great job and Thank you" to J.K. Rowling for a great series! Thanks!

SuzieC Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 04:40 PM EST

A lot of these questions have probably been asked already.
What happened to the other characters? We only heard about the lives of the trio and a few others in the epilogue. I was hoping for something a little more in-depth.
Who did Teddy live with? It clearly wasn't Harry even though he was the godfather.
Why Hedwig? That was just a shock.
I really want to know what death she wasn't planning and what character got a reprieve.

Amazing book. Definitely the best of the series and well worth the wait.

Ariella Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 04:32 PM EST

to rockgolf: wow that is really depressing! So there is nothing interesting in life that happens after the age of 17? I guess I better kill myself now, I've already stuck around 10 boring years too long....

Ariella Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 04:27 PM EST

...continued... I guess that would have given it away :)
Here's a general question about their world: Children are homeschooled, for the most part, before going to Hogwarts (JKR said on her website) and then for most of them Hogwarts is the extent of their study. Do none of them ever learn Math or English or regular Muggle subjects like that? Is the extent of the math knowledge in the entire wizard world only that learned before the age 11? Arithmancy sounded like it could be math-ish, but I'm not sure we ever figured out exactly what that subject was. But what about grammar and literature and spelling and such? Just wondering.

Ariella Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 04:24 PM EST

I just thought of another reason I LOVED the book: Before I started reading, I had totally bought into JKR's disinformation campaign and I honestly feared that Harry would die in the end. But as soon as he had experienced Snape's memories (and up to that point, my teeth had been clattering with fear for him as I read the final quarter of the book! Honestly for real) and realized that he HAD to die, that he was GOING to die, that he was ABOUT to die right then, that's the moment when I realized that he was going to make it out of the book alive. I love that. You can trust JKR that once Harry has accepted his dire fate, not to force it on him after all. I mean, he did die, but he lived. I always thought that he should because I thought that if he died, it would undermine the basic premise of the books, which was always about THE BOY WHO LIVED. Remember? That was the name of the very first chapter. I kind of felt it would have been nice if it was the name of the last chapter too, but...

kats Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 04:16 PM EST

Katie~ I agree with your take on what Harry saw with Dumbledore at King's Cross. I also think it was the piece of soul left within Voldemort. Dumbledore kept saying that it was beyond their help and then Harry told Voldemort that he saw what he was going to become. So, I agree.

kats Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 04:08 PM EST

Kim~ I think Luna ended up with Dean too, because he took her hand when they went into battle. I don't think that the need for Aurors necessarily ended with the end of Voldemort. Just because the ultimate bad guy is gone doesn't mean there's no more bad magic or witches and wizards willing to use it. Dumbledore's history showed that there was evil before Voldemort, I'm sure there was going to be more after as well.

rockgolf Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 04:01 PM EST

Please! No twenty-years-later sequels! What would have to look forward to?

- Harry Potter and the Receding Hairline
- Harry Potter and the Middle-Aged Spread
- Harry Potter and the Trial Separation
- Harry Potter and the Rebound Romance
- Harry Potter and the Acute Angina
- Harry Potter and the Forced Retirement
- Harry Potter and the Diminishing Pension

purplegirl247 Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 03:53 PM EST

For all those who are saying that Teddy stayed with Harry and Ginny after his parents' death: uh, they were 17 at the time. I seriously doubt that anyone would give a 17-year-old, "new" couple a child to care for! I agree that he stayed with Tonk's mom but was still friendly with Harry.

I thought it was a great book overall. I didn't agree with everything that happened but I respect Rowling's talent and wouldn't want to change a thing.

Katie Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 03:53 PM EST

Ariella, in answer to your question about the piece of soul, as I said in my comment waaaay below, I thought it was the soul that was left in Voldemort because of Harry's comments during the final fight. I wish I had my book with me to look up the exact lines, but Harry keeps telling Voldemort to "repent" because he's "seen what [he'll] become." And Dumbledore comments to Harry before he leaves the station that when he returns to King's Cross, he'll be in much better shape than Voldemort. To me, that confirmed what shape V. would be in.

I was undecided which piece of the soul it was too until Harry's comments during the final battle. At first I thought, "What is he talking about? How can he have seen anything?" and then the lightbulb went off.

Would be interested in hearing arguments for the other way though!

Ariella Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 03:42 PM EST

Did anyone else expect that after George lost an ear he would have found a way to attach one of the extendable ears? I was totally waiting for that!

Jonathan Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 03:40 PM EST

And one other thing...Luna was not mentioned in the epilogue either. Just another character I would have liked to hear about.

sarah Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 03:40 PM EST

i have really only one question: what did the letter that petunia got from hogwarts say?

this really isn't about the book but who is going to play draco's mother in the next movies? one of my favorite parts of "deathly hallows" was when she saved his life. i was so surprised by it.

Jonathan Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 03:38 PM EST

Not really any questions, just a few things that I wish she had tied up in the epilogue. I was curious about what had happened to the rest of the Weasleys. Did George continue to run the joke shop without Fred? I also wondered who was appointed headmaster/mistress of Hogwarts. I would have also liked to know what the main characters ended up doing, like if Harry became an Auror like he wanted. I loved the book. I just wish her epilogue would have gone into much more detail about the characters.

Brad Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 03:37 PM EST

I had huge expectations. Huge.

And somehow J.K. Rowling still surpassed them.

Great book.

Meg Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 03:28 PM EST

No questions, I think anything I had has been answered by the message boards... just a few comments... I loved the book. I thought the epilogue was pretty unnecessary and sort of fan fic-y, but if she really did write it a long time ago, it makes sense that it seems a bit out of place.

Also, Voldy didn't seem all that surprised when Harry wasn't dead after all. I half expected him to say "WHY WON'T YOU DIE??" Austin Powers-style.

Though I'm not much of a re-reader, I know that I will go back and read every scene featuring Snape that Rowling has written. What a pleasure, what a payoff. Ditto on the evolution of Ron and Hermione.

Jenny Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 03:28 PM EST

I wondered about the Gryffindor sword as well... I have a hard time believing it was a mistake, but how did it come back to the 'warts at the end?

cruzilla Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 03:19 PM EST

I really enjoyed this book a lot and am amazed both at the universe she created and how well she conveys Harry's sense of loss and longing for his parents. I know the loss of parents as a child is a very common theme in kids lit, Harry's was the first that truly reflected what I felt as a child who lost her father when she was seven. Harry's desire for the resurrection stone and to be able to see his father (and father figures) again is what made me weep.

Katie Kruger Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 03:14 PM EST

I thought of something else since yesterday. If the goblin from Gringott's had taken Griffindor's sword when the trio was trapped in the bank vault, how did it appear in the sorting hat for Neville during the battle of Hogwarts? Does this mean that Griffindor's sword can only be possessed by a wizard despite goblin laws of possession?

Ariella Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 03:12 PM EST

The question is whether the baby that was in King's Cross with Harry and Dumbledore was the part of Voldemort's soul which had finally been separated from Harry, or whether it was the bit of soul still left in Voldemort's own body? My first impression is that it was the bit cast out of Harry, but now I'm not so sure. Other people seem to think it was the part of soul left in Voldemort and that he and Harry were both in the same "place" when they were both knocked out after the killing curse, but that they saw different things. Then they both "returned" at the same time. I would be interested to know which is true.

Kelly Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 03:10 PM EST

I loved this book, but I felt incredibly sad for Snape. He had an incredibly hard life, starting with his unhappy childhood. Then as he grew up he loved Lily from afar, and although they were good friends she never returned his love in the way he wished. Even after becoming estranged from her after his "mudblood" comment, he continued to love her.

I wanted to cry when I read about Snape's memory of keeping the second page of Lily's letter found at Grimmauld Place, which was signed with love. So heartbreaking! (and quite an adult concept for a "kid's book!")

P.S. Did anyone notice that it was Snape who told Lily about dementors? In HBP Petunia knows about dementors because she heard "that boy" telling Lily about them. I also thought "that boy" was James, but now we come to find out it was Snape all along.

I *heart* Snape!

G Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 02:58 PM EST

love this blog item and everyone's comments! does anyone else think that "victoire" sounds like a boy's name? when i first read that line, i thought that teddy was gay (hey, there's always been diversity in the books, right?) but then they said "she," which makes sense if it means victory in french...

Merci Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 02:57 PM EST

i was really devestated by Dobby's death. I was so happy that Harry was able to live on, but they could have made the path of the Elder Wand a little clearer. Although, if they hadn't Voldemort would have caught on...i get it...it was a little rough to get though though

Jenn Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 02:49 PM EST

I wonder if James was a jerk to Snape because he resented the friendship w/Lily? Obviously Snape gave her reasons to end the friendship, but it's also clear that James liked Lily from the start.

Jenn Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 02:46 PM EST

JKR wrote the final chapter of this book years ago - so Harry wasn't the last minute reprieve.

The epilogue wasn't supposed to tell everything of every character's future (though that was a bit of fun). It was about the scar. JKR was very clear this book was the series "Definite end" By showing that his scar didn't bother him any longer, she showed that Voldemort was really gone.

Kim Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 02:45 PM EST

1. Does anyone remember what month it was when Lupin told them Teddy was born? I think it was Spring? So he was already born when Tonks died at the battle. So Teddy is exactly 19 - 19 years later.
2. I don't think Neville and Luna would end up together. I think she ended up with Dean after what happened at the Malfoys' and Shell Cottage. There was a line there that gave me that feeling.
3. I also think no one became Aurors because there are no more Death Eaters. Wasn't that the point of the last few paragraphs, showing that all of the Houses are combined now? Everyone is equal. No more racism.
There are so many unexplained things, but JKR did wrap up so many other things that I didn't think she would get to like Petunia & Dudley and Kreacher, and added so many new things, that I am not complaining. I just was surprised by the deathtoll.

Anne C Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 02:45 PM EST

To AJ:

The seven horcruxes are:
1)Riddle's diary
2)Slytherin's Locket
3)Hufflepuff's Cup
4)Ravenclaw's Diadem
5)Nagini
6)Marvolo's Ring
7)Harry

HKE Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 02:41 PM EST

Who are Rose and Hugo named for?

Mindy Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 02:38 PM EST

I haven't read everyone's comments yet. So sorry if these were brought up. I loved the book. I thought it answered every single important question. Here are the niggling questions I am left with

How did Regulus know the locket was a horcrux? Not where it was, or how to get to it, but WHAT it was.

Who was Snape's informant in the Order of the Phoenix? Does portrait Dumbledore know current Order plans, plans he didn't know before he died? If so, then those portraits are truly amazing.

Finally, I really want to know what happened to everyone. Luna, the Malfoys, the Ministry and Hogwarts, etc.

Wonderful book though. Really great.

kats Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 02:35 PM EST

Sarah~ That's our Ginny, not taking any chances with her man! Loved how Ron looked out for her after she kissed Harry on his birthday. He wouldn't even allow his best friend to hurt his little sister! I think Draco was a product of his family and the environment he was raised in, plus I don't think he had enough courage to be in Gryffindor. Snape was definitely more courageous than anyone ever gave him credit for. No wonder he was always so crazed by being called coward. So much that I loved, so much that broke my heart. Fred's death killed me as did Teddy becoming an orphan. I don't like the way she skipped over Lupin and Tonks' deaths. I know they were adults engaged in battle but it still bothered me. I almost feel like she killed Lupin so he could appear with Harry's parents and Sirius once Harry opened the snitch. I knew the book was going to be really tough as soon as Hedwig died.

william Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 02:26 PM EST

i loved the finale.....in its own right it was poetic and i think many people felt that harry was going to die or should have died but i think the only thing posible was for him to live..... after all the struggles he has suffered his entire life it needed to end with some vindication......i really wnated to kno what harry ended up choosing as a career and ron and hermione chose to live in the muggle world because ron got his license but did harry live there too? also i wonder who was minister and who ended up being headmaster/mistress? where's luna? i woouldve liked it if neville ended up being with luna and being headmaster =)......just a thought byut again i loved it.......a beautiful end to AN AMAZING SERIES........it truly is a phenomena.....the series started when iwas 8 and it has ended whenmy childhood did now that im 18.....it ahs a deepr meaning for me and most im sure who began the series when they were still wee ones.......

Sarah Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 02:23 PM EST

Kats,

I also chuckled when Ginny told Luna to accompany Harry instead of Cho. What really stuck in my head, though was the comment about sorting too early. Along with Snape, I was wondering if Draco would have turned out differently. It seemed like most of his problems were due to taking on more than he could chew, finding it out too late, and not knowing how to get out of the situation.

Jen Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 02:22 PM EST

Like Tolkien, JKR seems to have details of this whole world already mapped out. Maybe someday there will be an appendix, similiar to the one at the end of Lord of the Rings, that fills in some backstory and gives details to the characters paths/jobs/family after the end of the book.

Keeping my fingers crossed for it.....

Danielle Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 02:06 PM EST

This isn't a question, just a comment: I'd like to believe Percy joined George in running the shop. He seemed to already be changing when he was in the fray, and I think Fred's death would have made an impact. That's just my imagination.

kats Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:58 PM EST

Katy~ I believe that when Harry is questioning Sirius and Lupin about his parents relationship, having been so devastated by seeing how James treated Snape, they said that Lily and James did not start dating until 7th year. By then, Lily was no longer friendly with Snape since he was joining with his fellow deatheaters and had called her "mudblood". Given that Voldemort had already taken over it's possible that Lily and James bonded over their mutual desire to fight Voldemort, their respect for Dumbledore, etc. Also, James had always loved Lily and must have matured some by that point.

Brandon D Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:57 PM EST

I just want to know what the scene from the U.S. cover art is.

Stef Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:55 PM EST

I know that he was on the platform, that is fine. I am just commenting on the incorrect math. He is 19, not 18.

kats Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:55 PM EST

I'm not certain how old Teddy was at the end of the book (18? 19?). Either way, I do believe that he was only there to see Victoire off because I'm pretty certain that was what James said. I'll have to re-read that part. So he'd have been done with school. Perhaps he was in Auror training having been born with his mother's ability to easily change his appearance?

Katy Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:55 PM EST

In reponse to the last comment, Teddie Lupin was only coming to see Victoire off on the Hogwarts Express, but had already graduated.

I'm wondering how James Potter ended up winning over Lily. She must have had a change of heart at some point!

Stef Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:51 PM EST

OK somebody really has to explain how you can be alive (because Tonks died remember, so the baby has to have already been born) and 19 years later, be only 18?? It does not make sense! He is done with Hogwarts!

kats Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:45 PM EST

Afer so many posts about the use of Fred's name, I got to thinking maybe no one used it because it was too painful for them, especially George. Harry never knew his parents and naming your child after their ancestors is very common. Dumbledore and Snape were at least fully grown and had full lives. Fred was barely of age and his loss was more than likely unbearable (I know it was for me). Maybe they honored him by leaving his name to him only, or perhaps it was just too painful.

Sarah Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:41 PM EST

Hermione stabbed the cup with a basilisk fang. It was the diadem that was destroyed by fiend fire.

Koko Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:39 PM EST

I loved the book, but I was dissapointed that so many questions were left unanswered. I would have loved to know more about Lily Potter and why she inspired so much devotion; but I accept that J.K Rowling has finished her tale and whatever was left out was not ulimately important.

Ruby Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:37 PM EST

...hoped it would be. As for some of the questions I had concerning plot details, by reading all the posts I got most of my answers (just little things I missed as I zoomed through my reading). And as for the unanswered questions, like the so many already brought up here, I am okay not knowing. I'd like some details left up to my imagination. Fave parts were delving into Dumbledore's past, meeting Dumbledore at King's Cross, and Neville's gloriousness bravery, & was devastated by Fred's death (But I do agree Fred's name goes to George's kids).

Ruby Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:34 PM EST

Several people mentioned they felt that epilogue & the fact that no major characters(i.e. Ginny, Harry, Ron etc.) got killed felt kind of like a cop out. To a certain extent, I felt the same way. Then I realized that all this time most were expecting the big, dark ending. That the hero must die or at least be ruined, like Frodo was in Rings. And I never dreamed that we would get the "All is well" ending. That Harry would marry Ginny, live his life beside Hermione & Ron, & have a true family of his very own. The one thing I thought the OOTP movie did well was display how deep Harry's suffering had been and how much he'd already lost in the fight against evil. So, at the end, what better gift to give the character then give him a quiet, normal life. Like Harry mentioned several times, the life he glimpsed w/ Ginny that seemed so unattainable. So, in a big way, as always, Jo surprised us. We got the simple ending we never thought we'd get and it was wonderful as I'd always...

Annie Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:32 PM EST

Questions:

Where was Dolores Umbridge where all this was going down?

What happened to the Malfoys after Narcissa's change of heart?

Harry and Ginny? Albus Severus? Seriously?

castlenes Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:25 PM EST

Voldemort has a piece of his soul inside him still. He is not a Horcrux.

* 1 Tom Riddle's diary
* 2 Marvolo Gaunt's ring
* 3 Salazar Slytherin's Locket
* 4 Helga Hufflepuff's Cup
* 5 Rowena Ravenclaw's Diadem
* 6 Harry Potter
* 7 Nagini

Total 7 horcrux + 1 piece of soul left in Voldemort= 8 pieces total

Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:25 PM EST

Although there were many unanswered questions at the end of the story, the book gave excellent closure to the story. the ending goes to show that good CAN prevail and will always have a supreme power over evil. the story also shows on countless occasions the power of friendship amidst so much going on.

suntrap Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:22 PM EST

I disagree about adding more books to the series. The 7 books were perfectly planned out in her head and meant to end when and how it did. Anything more might not have the same magic and people would wind up disappointed (think the Star Wars prequels). Also - she has already said (or I heard that she said this) that she might release a Harry Potter encyclopedia of sorts filled with all the background information she worked up on all the characters over the years. I'd be down for that and it would most likely answer many of the questions people seem to have.

Kerry Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:22 PM EST

Teddy was born during the book. Nineteen years later makes him 19. He was seeing Victoire (Bill and Fleur's girl) off to the train. He's graduated.

kats Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:21 PM EST

Hey Sarah! What did you think?

Loved it when...
-Ginny sent Luna with Harry to Ravenclaw tower rather than Cho.
-Dumbledore, after remarking on Snape's courage, mentioned that maybe they sorted too early. How would Snape's life had turned out if he were in Gryffindor?
-Teddy having Tonk's appearance changing ability.
-Lee's radio show - remember how great he was as a quidditch commentator?
-Sirius giving Harry his first broom and then later his Firebolt
-Ginny trying to send Neville her love through James, Molly would do the same exact thing
-Luna's friendship picture
-The use of plants (snargaluff pods, etc.)in defending Hogwarts
-Neville's grandmother entering the fight
-Aberforth and everything he did
-McGonagall leading the charge of the enchanted desks
-That other than Gryffindor, Huffelpuff represented the largest number of students that stayed to fight
-Harry risking so much to take Moody's eye so he could bury it

Brandon D Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:13 PM EST

We need to collectively implore J.K. to add more stories to the Harry Potter universe. She has created a truly unique universe that will live on forever and be very hard to leave.

Amanda Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:08 PM EST

Also, I thought it was a nice touch that Draco's mom repaid his life debt to Harry.

suntrap Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:07 PM EST

TO AJ - the 8th Horcrux was the diary Harry destroyed in the Chamber of Secrets.
I absolutely loved the book. I'm in the same boat as a lot of you - no one I know has finished it!! So frustrating not to be able to fully discuss it yet. I too would love to know what Harry and Ginny & Ron and Hermione were up to (as far as careers), but not knowing doesn't affect my enjoyment of the book at all. I think it's like several posters have said - some things are better left up to each readers imagination.
I'm with everyone who sobbed throughout the book. Even the happy, hopeful things reduced me to tears. I loved that Neville got to be a hero. Oh and I agree that he was able to get the sword because he was a true Gryffindor who was in need of it. What a great experience this series has been!

becca Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:07 PM EST

Someone mentioned how Snape could allow so much torture to occur at Hogwarts when he promised Dumbledore he would not let harm come to the students. Certainly he had to keep up appearances in front of the Carrows, but he would also know that the other professors would not submit their students to that type of detention. And remember when it was left to him to come up with a detention (for Luna, Ginny and Neville when they broke into his office) he only sent them to work with Hagrid as detention. Clearly he really was trying to protect as many as he could.
And truly his was the most heartbreaking story. When he responded to Dumbledore's insistence that he kill him instead of Draco because he had done it before, his response that lately the only ones he had killed were "those I could not save"... so sad.

Amanda Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:05 PM EST

-I think it was implied that everyone would finish school, because at the end, Harry looks forward to going up to his bed in Gryffindor tower--implying that he'll be staying at school.
-It couldn't have been Harry who was spared--JKR said she'd had the last chapter (epilogue) written for years. I felt like I didn't need the epilogue to make me satified that Harry would lead a happy life, and it didn't give us much more info than that, although I thought it was beautiful when Harry called Snape the bravest person he'd ever known. It would've been better to give us nothing or everything.
-While it was sad that Hedwig died, a snowy owl would have been a huge liability when they were on the run, so Harry would have had to part with her at some point.
-It seems like there are 3 valid explanations for why Harry didn't die when Voldemort "killed" him: his mother's blood was still alive in Voldemort, he was in possesion of the three Hallows and the Elder Wand would not want to kill its owner

Sarah Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:05 PM EST

To all the people commenting on Teddy's presence in the epilogue: 19 years later would make him 18. He's finishing up his last year at Hogwarts still.

Jenny P Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:04 PM EST

I may just be quibbling at this point, but what scene was represented on the American cover? The adult British version was obviously Slytherin's locket, the kid's British version was the trio's trip to Gringotts, and the Deluxe American version was of the dragon, correct? I guess I was just confused because neither Harry nor Voldemort weilded wands on the American cover, and since their wands played such an integral role in the plot I thought it was a silly detail to leave out.

Olivia Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:02 PM EST

Maybe someone already asked this question, but I was wondering how terrifying was Voldemort in the whole wizarding world? He was obviously very important in the UK, but did his tyranny reach the rest of the wizarding world? We saw that he went to Romania and killed a few people, but was that it? Also, did JKR purposely make Grindewald seem like Hitler by placing them in the same time period and with the same goals of punishing "undesirables"? Were readers supposed to get the impression that the horrific events of the Nazis could have been controlled secretly by the wizarding world? Or am I just reading way too much into this?

Denise Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:01 PM EST

This is just a small thing. But the Deluminator that Dumbledore bequeaths Ron is called a Put-Outer in the first book. (In the second chapter, where Dumbledore puts out all the lights on Privet Drive.) I know they are the same item because they do the same thing and are described the same way (silver cigarette lighter like.) Is there a reason the name is different? I can't see Rowling making a mistake like that? Was it because at age 11, Put Outer would make more sense than Deluminator, where at 17 it's understandable?

Jason Watson Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:57 PM EST

I have a few questions: 1) Did Ted Lupin stay with Tonks' parents or go live with Harry? 2) Did George continue the Weasley shop alone or did Ron join the business? 3) What career did Harry finally decide to go to, Auror or perhaps something else in the Ministry? Or any of the other characters, we only heard about what Neville ended up doing. 4)Did Harry take residence at the house Sirius left him? 5) Was Lucious, or any of his family, forced to serve time in Azkaban for their actions? 6) Did Harry free Kreacher from servitude after the battle at Hogwarts? 7) Did Harry ever reunite with the Dursleys? I know some of these questions are not important, but just a few that came to mind.

Brandon Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:57 PM EST

I have to say I was a bit dissapointed by the final battle between Harry and Voldemort. It wasnt the "epic finale" I was expecting. Harry and Voldy just circled each other in the Great Hall and harry spent 4 pages scolding and lecturing him and then they cast only one spell and it was over. I think this fight really trivialized the true power voldy really was supposed to have. I also would love to know what Harry Ron and Hermione are actually doing. They have real gifts that other wizards and witches really lack and it would be a shame to see those gifts wasted if they just faded away into the sunset to live happily ever after. After thousands of pages in the present, I wish J.K. had given us at least a few more in the epilogue's future to settle things. Otherwise, incredible ending to an incredible series

Stef Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:51 PM EST

I think it is silly to say that we did JK Rowling a favor. She is a truly gifted storyteller and I feel extremely lucky to have the chance to share in her brilliance with everyone here!
I am enjoying the Horcrux conversation. My 2 cents is that Harry definitely was a Horcrux, maybe not an intentional one but by the time Voldemort got to him, his soul was so unstable that the explosion broke his soul again. Remember, nobody had ever attempted more than 1 Horcrux, so what he was doing was unpredictable. Also I think that Dumbledore had to have known there were 7 Horcruxes and was simply lying to Harry because he wanted to wait until the right moment for Harry to know he had to be killed.

Dan Neitzel Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:50 PM EST

I found the ending of the story quite dull there was no real excitment when it came down to Voldy and Harry. The epilogue was excruciating. writing of harry as an adult in one of the dullest situations made harry lose some of his magic. she should have left him a child for her fans.

Dan Neitzel Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:50 PM EST

I found the ending of the story quite dull there was no real excitment when it came down to Voldy and Harry. The epilogue was excruciating. writing of harry as an adult in one of the dullest situations made harry lose some of his magic. she should have left him a child for her fans.

PotterFan Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:50 PM EST

Very emotional to see the series come to an end. She did a beautiful job tying it all together - i would have liked there to be more time with Snape and Harry now that we know he was good. I am just blown away at J.K's talent -she should be so proud of herself. Unbelievable.

anne Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:48 PM EST

I'm going to have to re-read the end of the book after I've slept. The part of the book dealing with whether or not Voldemort can kill Harry and why or why not is fuzzy for me. Brian's comment below was better than any explanation I've been able to come up with. Also, was Voldemort's sould torn into 8 pieces or 7? Was Nagini really a horcrux or was that a red herring covering the revelation that Harry was the 7th horcrux? Also, after the defeat of the Big Bad, what was the world like? Was it like American and European society's return to normalcy after WWII? It seems that way from the epilog. Perhaps as someone mentioned earlier, they didn't need Aurors post-Voldemort. I have to say that it was chilling to see the flashbacks that revealed Dumbledore to be so calculating. Finally, I do wish we knew what had become of Luna. I love these books.......

Sarah Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:48 PM EST

I want to know what happened to Luna. Also, did Harry speak to the Dursleys again? It looked like there was a slim chance for at least some sort of connection with Dudley and Petunia, especially after viewing Snape's memories. I also wanted to know what jobs they had in the future -- we only know Neville's. Did the missed year at Hogwarts have any long-lasting career effects, or was heroedom enough to overcome lack of education? What happened to the Malfoys? How was the ministry restructured? I have many more questions, but this post has to end some time.

bones Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:48 PM EST

was Susan bones important in this book at all? I don't remember her being mentioned

bones Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:46 PM EST

I can't believe Charlie didn't die. I always thought he was the disposible weasly not Fred. But I guess thats why was a twin.

Kelly Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:44 PM EST

I have a few questions but they have already been asked, so I will just share a comment: my favorite line in the book was "NOT MY DAUGHTER, YOU B*TCH!" from Molly Weasley. That was effing amazing...

scott Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:42 PM EST

How did Neville end up with the Gryffindor sword at the end of the book? The last we saw, a goblin h