Britney doesn't have to wear underwear if she doesn't want to

Lynn Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 02:54 PM EST

My "fluids" stopped after a few weeks, maybe something is wrong with "yours," kelly, or I'm another medical miracle,lmao.I've seen the pic, they are free in some places and she has nothing running down her legs. And yes, it's her, she has the c-scar. And the people are entirely correct when they say she is "not stretched out" , they are forgetting she had a C-section which leaves you intact.And it IS her right to wear or not wear whatever she wants , if noone was on the ground in front of her noone would have known , now would they ?

Linkin Mall Thu, Dec 7, 2006 at 06:41 AM EST

My girlfriend Britney is an athlete at Hilton High School.

Britney tried out for girls wrestling and for girls boxing. Britney didn't care for girls wrestling, because her singlet pulled up in Britney's crotch and let everybody see Britney's panties. The audience would chant, "We've seen Paris, it's in France; we've seen Britney's underpants." She tried wrestling without underpants, but everyone started a rumor that Britney went commando or Britney is allergic to underpants. Her coach Rosie said Britney should put some panties on.

Britney preferred boxing because people couldn't see Britney's underpants. Britney soon realized she was a better boxer than wrestler. Others agreed.

Kevin, the bus driver, is like a lot of people. He knew about Britney's wrestling, but he'd never seen her box. So after driving Britney's team to the Class AA girls boxing finals last season, Kevin decided to see for himself what all the fuss was about. Kevin said "Now I understand what everybody's been talking about, Britney can't wrestle, but you ought to see her box."

Britney is a credit to her sex, but the future for girls' boxing is a little hard to predict. Boxing is badly funded for boys, let alone girls, and there is still a resistance to girls boxing. Whatever happens, I'm glad I got a chance to say, "Britney can't wrestle, but I got to see her box."

Stephanie Travitsky Tue, Dec 5, 2006 at 01:14 PM EST

You know after Brit and her big brown beaver partying with Brain Dead Hilton and Lindsay Cokehan, and her ex'es escapades, the judge should just hand the kids over to the mother Lynne Spears. Neither Brit or Kev are mature enough to handle children.

Christopher Fri, Dec 1, 2006 at 01:36 PM EST

Julie, in the past two years, Britney's been pretty notoriously not taking advice offered her, sadly.

Vendredi Fri, Dec 1, 2006 at 01:22 PM EST

I find this all puzzling. Why would Spears want this kind of publicity? I was kind of excited when she was skating around the rink, looking cute and back to her old self. I don't understand what is going on...again, she seems to be out in the world alone. Where is her second kid? Why does she need to go out every single night? How about on weekends or a few days a week like everybody else? WHERE IS HER FAMILY? HER MOTHER? She seriously needs help and it is painful to watch this trainwreck. KFED is starting too look better as he at least is not necessarily out every night but maybe he is but the paps don't follow him around as much. I feel for those sweet babies. Parasite is a partier but she doesn't have little children so she can do what she wants. Once you are a mom, you have other responsibilities.

KTS Fri, Dec 1, 2006 at 11:33 AM EST

The photographers are going to be there period. Britt, Paris and Lindsay? Of course they're all over it. Britt's private parts being exposed like three times in a week? That's a desperate cry for help if ever there was one. Once might be an accident, twice potentially really bad judgment, but three times?

IMHO, which is of course only that, she really ought to think about staying home once in a while. I've got a 5 year old and a 2 year old and I haven't been out in six years as much as Britt has in the last two weeks. Paris and Linds may be irresponsible and crass but at least they're not bad parents....yet....

Rose Fri, Dec 1, 2006 at 11:33 AM EST

I must say, I find the tone of Annie's post fairly obnoxious. Annie, even with my then-miniskirt ready legs of my teen years, with my teeney, tiny skirts, I wore undies. This was because I didn't want the world to see my pookie. It's a simple matter of physics, and even a walking, talking dumb blonde joke like Britney Spears could figure it out.

Of course, I guess the point is that public decency laws don't apply to celebrities. They should be able to walk around naked from the waist down, beat their hired help, take all sorts of illegal drugs, evade taxes, engage in insider stock trading, and even kill their spouses without any consequence. Because they're rich. Because they're famous. Because they're better than us and shouldn't live by petty rules that the ordinary, smelly masses live by. To suggest otherwise makes you some kinda commie, right?

EP Sato Fri, Dec 1, 2006 at 11:28 AM EST

Here's to hoping the judge who review's Britney's custody case isn't a Perez Hilton fan...

julie Fri, Dec 1, 2006 at 11:16 AM EST

When I first heard that Kevin was fighting for custody, I thought "no way", but it seems Britney is doing what she can to assure that it will be fight and not the slamdunk that we all thought. If he is only doing it for the money, he should watch out, cause he may end up with those kids. A single mother who goes out partying everynight and whose private parts the whole world has seen does not seem to be the kind of mom who could get full custody. Do the people who advise her have even one brain between them??? A Woman who is not a celebrity is advised by her lawyer to keep a low profile and spend as much quality time with her kids to show the court she deserves custody. Hanging out with the poster child for slutty morons(parisite hilton) seems to me to do the opposite. This is just another example of the shame of america that other countries must laugh at on a daily basis.

Rahul Fri, Dec 1, 2006 at 10:38 AM EST

Someone sent me a link to these pictures, and I think I saw her scar from her C-section. She needs some frakkin' undies fast.

GeeMoney Fri, Dec 1, 2006 at 10:20 AM EST

I heard her crotch is like all stretched out and gross. Maybe she should have waited a few more months after the birth before she bared her beaver.

Kiba Fri, Dec 1, 2006 at 10:04 AM EST

It's got to be a publicity stunt...I mean, come on...I could see the first time being an accident, but for photogs to get a shot of her vag 3 TIMES IN ONE WEEK?? You'd think she'd be a little more careful about getting in and out of cars after the first, or even second time...unless of course she wants her hoohah all over the internet

Rose Fri, Dec 1, 2006 at 10:01 AM EST

A song for Britney (to the tune of My Sharona)

I always give it up
I'm a s!ut
Such a dirty thing
I drive my handlers nuts
They'll clean it up
Or there's no ka-ching!
My, my, my, my, my, my
Muh, muh, muh My V@gina
Muh, muh, muh My V@gina

Sally Fri, Dec 1, 2006 at 09:52 AM EST

Did you all feel this way about Janet and the OOPS! mistake on TV?

Tommy G. Fri, Dec 1, 2006 at 08:50 AM EST

Oh, come on. Can't you tell? It's a PUBLICITY STUNT! The "Oopsie Crotch Shot" is the boob slip of 2006. What easier way to garnish a whole bunch of free publicity than by being slightly naughty in public?

Besides, if Miss Brit wants to let America see straight up Broadway, then so be it. But some of us are already tired of this trend. You've seen it once, you've seen it...well...

ceejay Fri, Dec 1, 2006 at 08:49 AM EST

Speak for yourself, Annie. Walking around flashing people crotchless has NOT been done by everyone... It's trashy, classless and to me it's totally desperate. Brit gives a bad name to white trash..... FedEx is beginning to look good.... and THAT cannot be good!

Christopher Fri, Dec 1, 2006 at 08:33 AM EST

But now, you're not allowed to REPORT on Britney's decline, either. What kind of mixed signal would it be to decry all the panties reference and then immediately engage in another round of them?

Why are we so fascinated with Spears, anyways? She doesn't even sing dynamically-- she warbles and babytalks. She can definitely dance, and she's attractive by most standards, even in her decline.

Some say she got in on looks and quite literally marketing herself to fans of JAILBAIT magazine, but even folks who claim to hate her music seem to like it when it's performed by another artist... preferably, with a hint of irony.

The best quote I ever read about Spears might have come from EW: "She strips and strips and strips, and reveals nothing." And that really seems to sum her up well.

She reminds those with short term memory of Madonna, but never me-- Madonna (and I've never really been a fan of Madonna's except for Take a Bow) was open and unapologetic about her life and living it, whereas Britney can't seem to tell the truth about anything-- she's all spin.

2006 has been a year of overexposure. Jessica Simpson... Lindsay Lohan... Nicole Richie... Mischa Barton... Paris Hilton... Lachey and Vanessa from E.T... can we put them on a rocket and launch them to a place no cameras will ever find them? It's a *very* scary year when a Jennifer Lopez appearance feels like a breath of fresh air. Celebrity-on-celebrity marriage was the mode... now, at the end of the year, it seems celebrity-on-celebrity divorce is the new flavor.

I want to put Britney, Lindsay Lohan, behind me, and I want you to do the same. Band with me, people. Ignore the fabulousness and intrigue of these celebrities until they learn to move on and stop sensationalizing their own lives. We're being marketed to our own weakness for celebrity, and people who have no business being idols are in the news twice a week.

Stop the madness. Show me the money, or at very least, the beef. Won't someone think of the children?

JD Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 11:24 PM EST

Whoa! Whole lotta hatin' goin' on! Not that Brit's my favorite person or anything, but really, did we expect any different? She's just trailer park trash with money.

BTW to KELLY: I had a c-section and the "fluids" stopped in less than a month.

Also: Nothing would be stretched out down there if you didn't pass the kid through the old-fashioned way unless you're a skank-'ho who's been around the block a couple of times. Just some FYI...

Jen Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 11:17 PM EST

Uhh, Tinah...maybe I'm dense, but I think Annie was defending Britney---in some sort of stranged, twisted fashion. Have a cocktail (if you're over 21) and calm down.

Celeste Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 09:29 PM EST

"Everyone's done it at least once."

Hm, nope.

oonagh Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:30 PM EST

She knew the photogs were going to be there, she intentionally didn't wear panties, she intentionally groomed her twat and she intentionally flashed her nether regions. She's a trashy, skanky girl (poor Justin must be heaving a huuuuuuuuge sigh of relief) so why are you all surprised??

Tinah Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:07 PM EST

Shut up Annie! You're a damn hater. When Britney's new music drops, she'll own your magazine and your pathetic, sloppy lil' column too. My twenty says she probably looks better than you-above and below the waist. She's not gross-she's probably avoiding panty lines under her tight dresses! Love you Brit-may these hating columnists/bloggers develop searing, chronic arthritis and not be able to type this kinda bull.

Jazzy Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 07:22 PM EST

The reason why Britney is walking around with her va-jay-jay in full view is because WE'RE TALKING ABOUT IT PEOPLE. We're giving her exactly what she wants. PUBLICITY. Paris does it, Lindsay does it-and-like OMG they're always in the press. Looks like Britney is trying to stay relavent by talking a page from Paris and Lindsay. So, if you want people to stop caring, taking pictures, STOP TALKING ABOUT IT.

Ang Knee Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 07:07 PM EST

Airing Coot-Coot in public is surely a message aimed at KFed. "Gonna air that man right outta my crotch," or something along that line.

dre Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 06:47 PM EST

You can't tell whether a small child is well-adjusted from photographs!
Now the mother, on the other hand...

Stacey Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 06:34 PM EST

Plus, it's none of our business what they are wearing underneath, if anything. It's gross that the paparazzi are taking such pictures and plastering them all over the internet. Britney or anyone.

Yes she should spend more time at home. But then I am of the opinion, she's unable to stay home all night because she misses Kevin and doesn't want to be alone. So she goes out and hangs out with friends. And really, from what we know. She spends the daytime hours doing errands, and with her kids. She's not out getting drunk at 11 am and 2 pm.. She has a nanny to help her. She has every right to do what she wants. She's newly single. After being with someone for two in a half years. She's young and single. It's not against the law for her to have a good time. And it's not going to prevent her come-back when the next CD does come back... From those pictures of Sean last weekend. He is apparently a very adjusted little boy. So she must be doing something good!

Kelly Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 06:32 PM EST

Okay, not to be gross but a new mother HAS to wear underwear. Your ummm....fluids (for lack of a better word) expel from your body for months after childbirth. Most women actually have to wear a pad for the entire time until he stops. So my question is, how did Britney just give birth to a child a month and a half ago and can walk around without any under garmets? She's either nastier than we ever thought possible and doesn't mind juice running down her legs or she's the one woman on EARTH who does not have seepage after birthing Her own mother must be so proud.

Howard Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 06:03 PM EST

Once again, the curse of Federline destroying some young woman's life.

Girl's gotta ditch the parties, ditch Paris, make a new record and try and reconnect with her fans, most of whom have outgrown her music.

brandonk Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 06:02 PM EST

Wow, that's crazy...It must be intentional, although I don't know why they would think it's a good idea. I mean, these people are surrounded by photographers whenever they go anywhere, so they must have known that pictures would be taken, and there doesn't seem to be any attempt at modesty. It definitely makes them seem skankier, which I wasn't aware was possible. Surprise!

Hate to Say It Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 05:49 PM EST

Sorry to be the one to suggest it, but THANK GOD they haven't yet mastered smell-o-vision for the internet. Ewwww....

dre Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 05:29 PM EST

I agree about the desperate photogs, it is sick. But c'mon, they're not getting off the ground or out of the gutter, they've been down there for years. I haven't seen the pics, nor do I want to, buy what I don't get is - how is everything all stretched out when she had her kids via c-section?
If there is an upcoming custody battle over those 2 kids, as reported, this is a really really stupid move on Brit's part. But stupid's nothing new for her. Could you ever have imagined that Fed-Ex would be the more fit parent? Those poor, poor children.

lola Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 05:28 PM EST

If Britney doesnt want her cooter splashed across the tabloids, then she should just wear some freakin' underwear. Which makes me wonder if Brit actually DOES want said cooter making a splash. In which case, double yuck. I know you have no class, Brit, but seriously, for the sake of your kids who'll grow up knowing millions have seen their mommy's private parts, just GROW UP.

timm Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 04:55 PM EST

I Agree with you Annie Good point!

melissa Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 04:51 PM EST

Nice point about the photographers.

shelby Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 04:43 PM EST

Madonna did something along these lines way back in 1992 with a lot more class. Not only did she hire the best art director and photographer to publish the photos and was in total control, but she made millions selling the masterpiece that is the sold out book SEX. As usual popular culture is just catching up to her...14 years too late!

steve Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 04:38 PM EST

For the love of God, please stop using the term "the internets." It is not, and never has been, funny.

Thanks.

aron Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 04:38 PM EST

Yeah, she doesn't have to wear underwear, but she should. Not just because it looks nasty, but because it's called etiquette and being a lady. To grab publicity this way is so low, lower than the paparazzi who take the shots she knows they will. Learning this from Lindsey Lohan is a slow as one can get...even Britney. She should learn to exit a car in a ladylike manner, even if it is 6 in the morning and she's wasted.
NO. EXCUSE. ANNIE.

EP Sato Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 04:36 PM EST

I didn't find Britney's nana any less appealing than Lindsey Lohan's. The issue isn't that she's letting the world see her cooter, it's that she's giving it away for free.

Britney has the right to go commando and the right to hang out with whoever she wants to. But she's a mother now, and most wild celeb hotties know to cool it down at least a little once they've had kids. Or they at least know to ask for real $$ when they show the goods. Demi Moore agreed to show off her goodies for lots of $$$$. Remember Halle Berry's boobies? I do, and I also remember that she got a few million $$$ extra for showing them off in that Hugh Jackman/John Travolta crapfest flick a few years ago. Them breasteses were well worth the price of admission, even if the rest of the movie (like it's title) were less than memorable. If she's desperate to show the world her nekkidness, Britney should agree to star in some summer blockbuster movie and ask for real dough. Then the paparrazzi will have nothing to shoot but yesterday's news...

mike Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 04:33 PM EST

Her timing is off. Five years ago, Britney going commando was for another awards show. But, it's two kids later.
Britney needs a court appointed adult to take care of the kids, keep her away from dead beat wiggers and making sure Brit puts on her plus size panties.