Blue Velvet is a film directed by David Lynch. It is about a young boy’s journey into manhood. It features such spectacles as a severed ear, Al from Quantum Leap creepily lip-syncing “In Dreams”, some incredible Oedipal sex, Isabella Rossellini in various states of undress and mental health, and young love. Golly!
Keith Staskiewicz: Hey, Darren, what’s that you’re chewing?
Darren Franich: That chewing gum I like is coming back in style. Hey, Keith, what’s that you’re drinking?
KS: Heineken!
DF: Heineken? F— that s—! Pabst! Blue! Ribbon! Now let’s talk about Blue Velvet, Â David Lynch’s fourth feature film, after Eraserhead, The Elephant Man, and, of course, Dune, which is widely recognized as being the only terrible movie that no one has even enjoyed ironically. My question for you, Keith, is: Is Blue Velvet the most Lynchian movie David Lynch has ever made? Or is it one of the least Lynchian movies David Lynch ever made?
KS: Lynchian is one of those words like Altman-esque, Kafka-esque, and Jim Belushian, that people throw around without necessarily having a real definition for them. I’ve always associated it with dreams, merging and splitting identities, and midgets, none of which really feature in this film.
DF: I compare “Lynchian” to “Fellini-esque,” in the sense that both words really just mean “weird.” In popular usage, “Fellini-esque” means weird like a naked circus orgy, and “Lynchian” means weird like a blonde and a brunette who are completely different but also the same person. And scary lampshades. And red walls. Blue Velvet was the first film by David Lynch I ever saw, one summer long ago that I don’t really want to talk about. So it was interesting coming back to the movie, after seeing Lynch’s other movies. Because, really, Blue Velvet is not as weird as Mulholland Dr., or Lost Highway, or Inland Empire. Yeesh, when you consider that Lynch’s other “normal” movies are about an elephant man, sandworms, and an 80-year-old driving a tractor across the country, Blue Velvet looks like his most normal film.
KS: That’s actually a funny story, Keith. Sorry, I mean, Darren. I’m Keith. Hahahaha. But seriously, it reminds me of this dream I once had. I was in the lobby of a ’50s era hotel, alone except for a life-sized portrait of Roy Orbison and an owl hooting silently. Actually, I think you were there. But this was before I would have known you, Keith. Darren. You told me that one day we’d be discussing Blue Velvet and that, and this was very important, I must remember to never to…never to….I can’t remember. I’m sure it wasn’t important.
DF: Okay…but I think you’re underestimating just how effectively Lynch captures the sights and sounds of suburbia. This isn’t American Beauty, where “suburbia” looks sitcom-perfect. Lynch films several scenes outside at night, with giant trees lit like horror-film monsters that tower over the houses. He really seems to capture some wild and disturbing landscape beneath the veneer of suburbia: In a sense, Blue Velvet is a horror film about an entire country built on an Indian burial ground. Also, have you ever noticed that every song on the soundtrack for American Graffiti could totally be in a David Lynch movie? And did you know that George Lucas wanted David Lynch to direct Return of the Jedi? Do you think that George Lucas ever wakes up in David Lynch’s body?
KS: .decnad I emit tsal eht rebmemer t’nac I. But that’s a whole ‘nother Rewind. Blue Velvet is interesting because it’s probably one of the last Lynch films, The Straight Story notwithstanding, that is at least on the surface straightforward enough that the performances can be judged on their own terms. Do you know what I mean, Keith?
KS: I think I do, Keith. I mean Laura Dern and Naomi Watts are great in their films, but it’s hard to really ground a character who is maybe just the dream of a notion of another character who’s also a dog in a rabbit costume. There’s a reason why everyone calls their performances “brave,” which I think is just a code word for “God bless ‘em, because I don’t think they have any more idea than me what’s actually going on, narratively speaking.” In Blue Velvet, MacLachlan and Rossellini are able to give really good performances that are based in some sort of context. And Dennis Hopper gives pretty much the best Lynch performance ever as Frank, who is essentially a real-life, suburban Darth Vader, breathing mask and all. Plus it’s shot beautifully like most of his movies before he turned to video because he’s such a big technophile.
Ain't love grand?
DF: You’re right: The performances feel rooted in some sort of dramatic reality beyond their inherent movieness. The one exception might be Frank, actually, who’s such a strange compilation of incredibly evil traits that you can’t help but just laugh at him, at a certain point. Like, he’s supposed to be some sort of mega-criminal, but he’s the sort of guy who screams, “Let’s f—! I’ll f— anything that moves!” He seems like a villain in a Spaceman Spiff cartoon. It almost seems like…seems like…[Is crying] I’m sorry, I get very emotional when I can’t finish sentences.
KS: Can’t finish sandwiches?
DS: Kant Finnish sandwiches?
KF: Chant Franich Staskiewiczes?
DF: That’s what I thought you said, bucko. But I want to get back on point here for a second. I happened to rent Blue Velvet earlier this week while I was staying in a hotel. I found it at a Blockbuster, which I didn’t think still existed. Unfortunately, I was leaving early the morning after I watched Blue Velvet, so I couldn’t return it myself. My parents were staying in the hotel for a few more days, so I set the DVD case outside of their room when I left early in the morning. As I was walking away, I looked back at the DVD case. I tried to imagine what someone would think if they were walking down a hotel corridor and suddenly found a copy of Blue Velvet lying on the carpet. It would be like finding an ear, or hearing a voice you don’t recognize mumble “Jack Durant is dead” over the intercom, or being an elephant man.
KS: Sandworms.
DF: But that’s a whole ‘nother Rewind.
KS: Hey, Darren, what’s that you’re chewing?

Next Week: In honor of Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who leaves office on January 3, we’ll be watching three of the films that defined Schwarzenegger’s long-ago career as a movie actor: Conan the Barbarian, Commando, and Predator. Join us for the Official PopWatch Rewind Festival of Vintage Schwarzenegger, Non-Terminator Edition. Come on out!
Silencio.








EW should burn this post immediately and hope it never resurfaces in any form.
Agreed. The Rewind posts are usually hilarious. This one is just incredibly bizarre and awkward. I think they were trying WAY too hard.
Find a new occupation boys.
Mulholland Drive is the most Lynchian movie Lynch has made. It’s also my personal favorite in all of his work. He should have won the Best Director Oscar for it!
I like BLUE VELVET best because it needs no surrealism to be disturbing or weird. Save for Dern, MacLachlan, and Rosselini, the behavior on display is depraved and chilling. Frank Booth is like an exaggerated version of characters I’ve encountered at some of the local juke joints and Dean Stockwell is a disconcerting oddball himself in that film. My second favorite Lynch film is Mulholland Drive.
I’ll probably get stoned for saying this, but I hate Blue Velvet. I was so excited to see it and it’s the type of film that should be right up my alley, but I absolutely hated it. I hated the plot, I hated the characters, especially Kyle Maclachlan’s character. I was just waiting and hoping for Frank to kill him. And really, I was just waiting for the movie to end because I was so annoyed by it.
I have to say that Twin Peaks Fire Walk With Me is his most Lynchian film ever made. i think its highly underrated. I think his most “mainstream” Lynchian movie would be Wild at Heart.
More mainstream than The Elephant Man or the G-rated and Dinsey-released Straight Story?
*Disney*, excuse my poor typing skills
You could make a case that “The Straight Story” is the most Lynchian because having the term “G-rated and Disney released” in any way related to Lynch is very, very disturbing indeed.
This rewind article was not good, not good at all. However, do I love Blue Velvet.
awkward.
…I like “Dune” ironically. Bring out the floating fat man! Sting in a bikini! It’s by will alone I set my mind in motion. It’s the gift that keeps on giving!
I actually really enjoyed Dune quite a bit. In my warped mind, it’s a classic.
Same here. If it’s on, I must watch the whole thing. It’s one of my favorite “chilling on the couch” movies.
I like Dune.
I think Frank Booth should not only go after the guys that wrote this article, but their families, and the entire staff of EW and their families, and friends, and everyone in the city where the offices of EW are located. Just to be on the safe side that lame crap like this never gets posted again.
Larry, that is the first intelligent post that I have read coming from you.
In Paris,David Lynch was in the Cinémathèque two months ago.Great.Isabella Rossellini(cult in Paris)’ll come to the Cinémathèque with Guy Maddin to present “Keyhole”;
Blue Velvet is a great film and Twin Peaks is its beautiful TV Hybrid. Thank goodness David Lynch is there to give films and TV a boost in the right direction. I came across a good series of articles on Lynch’s films. Here’s the url for the Blue Velvet review:
http://entertainmentguidefilmtv.blogspot.com/2010/11/blue-velvet-1986.html
It seems I’m the only one who enjoyed the article! I thought it was great! And Blue Velvet is a classic!
Interesting post and view, hope to hear more what the future holds THANKS Great post. Probably saved thousands of hours between everybody here. For me,this clearly is a heads up on which methods to focus on to maximise my online success . I¡¯ll start concentrating on your other articles instead. Really great advice. Thanks for sharing.
Thanks for interesting blog post. You guys are always provide information that it makes it impossible not to want to buy your next product ;I can¡¯t wait to see what you guys come up with based on all your research and data that you gather.