Jul 4 2009 01:00 AM ET

'Ice Age 3': Does historical accuracy matter when you're talking kids' movies?

Tagged:

Ice-Age-3-Dawn_l Okay, so it's early in the three-day weekend, but perhaps you're like me and you've already needed to sit your children in a dark theater for close to two hours so you could catch a break. If so, it's probably a good assumption that you spent your time with Manny, Diego, and Sid of the Ice Age series. While the animation looks spectacular — especially the remarkably realistic snow — the story is a bit troublesome. I get it already… kids love dinosaurs. But really, a land of dinosaurs living happily beneath the Ice Age sheath? I don't expect a history lesson when I take my kids to the movies, but couldn't we find a less ludicrous way to spice up the sequel? What do you think? Did it bother you that Ice Age 3: Dawn of the Dinosaurs disregards decades of scientific discourse on dinosaur extinction, just to eke out more cash for the series? Or is it enough that your kids were entertained? Share your thoughts…and have a happy 4th of July!

Comments (38 total) Add your comment
Page: 1 2 3
  • Chris

    I’d hate to hear your take on The Flintstones. It’s a cartoon, not an episode of The Universe.

  • Christian

    Historically, animals couldn’t talk during the Ice Age either.

  • amy

    it does slightly bother me….but only a little bit

  • lagitha

    Other scientific innacuracies in kid’s movies:
    Elephants cannot flap their ears and fly; tornadoes cannot lift your home into a black hole and into the kingdom of Oz; poor eating habits do not make you blow up like a giant blueberry.
    They should outlaw all of them!

  • RD

    Um…it’s a MOVIE, not a National Geographic documentary ;-)

  • Laura

    Christian–LOL. Animals couldn’t talk during the ice age? NO WAY! ;)
    Obviously, the dinosaurs didn’t bother me. My kids were satisfied and they’ll learn that dinosaurs came before sloths, mammoths, and saber-toothed tigers in that thing they call school.

  • Adam

    Yes, ids love historical accuracy. Just like Toy Story, Harry Potter, and Sponge Bob.
    http://tvdonewright.com/2009/07/04/tv-tonight-saturday-july-4th-2009/

  • bonkers

    Good question.
    What about decades of original religions, being bought, slaughtered or referred as “SATANIC” and force combined into 1 religion. Aren’t “they” making money till now ?
    Before you want to make a punch bag out of a movie. Try to think about EVERYTHING

  • RayT

    Considering that 70% of the country (i.e. the south) think dinosaurs and humans coexisted, I don’t think too many people will notice this error. Just like no one noticed that they had cavemen walking around in “Year One.”

  • Mike

    It bothers me when writers are unable to find a valid subject to write about.

  • Ludie

    I guess we should also eliminate The Flintstone, Ally Oop, King King and any other movie or show that suggest that Dinosaurs and evolved mammals coexisted. Heck, let’s just eliminate all forms of entertainment except for documentaries.
    It is up to the parents and school to educate children, not Hollywood.

  • Jen S.

    Poor Nicole, you just asked an honest question and you get sarcasm. I’m sorry you live in a world where people just can’t yes or no, you have to get the rude ones too. I think no, it would not bother me b/c it is a cartoon and they will learn the lies in school about ‘millions’ of years ago, blah blah blah…

  • justsaying

    I’ve always disliked the way some movie critics assign literal meaning to movies they don’t like based on whatever bias they have going on at the time. They’ll review a movie like Drag Me to H., rave about it, and totally ignore the asinine premise that a superpowerful witch can summon up an evil spirit any ol’ time she pleases, but can’t create some magic to pay her mortgage. It’s amazing critics can dispel disbelief sor some movies, but an animated movie and a movie with giant talking robots from a distant planet fighting to save the earth are critiqued for literal interpretation. And critics who reserve the smart vs dumb arguments for only some movies need their hearts examined as well as their heads. A critic has no credibility when they can defend the illogical events of movies such as The Dark Knight and Slumdog Millionaire, and mercilessly attack cartoon related films for their lack of realism.

  • jen

    When I was a little kid, I read every book and watched every show I could to learn more about dinosaurs. Despite the fact that it IS just a cartoon, the inaccurate premise of this movie would have bothered the heck out of me! The Ice Age meant no more giant reptiles, regardless of how cute you make them.

  • Laura

    I’m 13 and I have hated ice age since I was 7 and it first came out. I never found it very funny or entertaining. I know loads of people who like films like these and in many cases they are intellectually challenged. Finally, it kind of says something about a person who would send their children to such a brain rotting animation.

Page: 1 2 3
Add your comment
The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject - or we may delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field.

When you click on the "Post Comment" button above to submit your comments, you are indicating your acceptance of and are agreeing to the Terms of Service. You can also read our Privacy Policy.

Advertisement

TV Recaps

Powered by WordPress.com VIP