There are two types of people: those who ardently seek out the set list for every Bruce Springsteen show prior to the tour arriving in their town, and those who don’t. Well, maybe that’s an exaggeration. I suppose I represent a smaller, third subset of humanity: those of us who go on the Web and briefly get obsessed with that kind of minutiae at the start of a tour, and then think better of it a few dates in, realizing that when he gets to our city, it might be nice not to know that "Badlands" will inevitably follow "Long Walk Home," or to be completely surprised if "Candy’s Room" or "Meeting Across the River" or some other song that’s only been performed once this tour has the chance of being pulled out as a wild card. (You say there’s a fourth category of people — those who couldn’t care less about Springsteen or his shows, at all? Listen, my little census can’t account for every bizarre variable.)
We all know what constitutes a spoiler in the world of movies — and in case we at EW ever forget, our readers are there to angrily remind us. But is knowing what might be or is probably coming in a rock ‘n’ roll show grounds for spoiling, or does it simply whet the appetite all the more? I’d be interested to know your thoughts, PopWatchers, being of two minds about the whole thing, myself. It’s not as if we haven’t heard these songs and even committed them to memory, so, you might reckon, what’s to ruin? And with Springsteen, who usually changes his set by at least four songs from night to night, it can be thrilling for a diehard fan to know that an oldie everyone else down the row is taking for granted is actually that holy grail that fans refer to as a "tour premiere." (Last night in L.A., there was one of those: "Kitty’s Back," being played in California for the first time since the 1970s, by some fan accounts.)
While you continue to wash off all that blood and gunk from 
I won’t lie: When I saw the 
It’s been less than 48 hours since Robert Goulet shuffled off this mortal coil, and already the Associated Press is working overtime to honor his memory…by publishing 
When on 
The Sex Pistols turned up on The Tonight Show last night, just after Tom Cruise showed off his new early-Beatles hairdo and Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul had finished trying to explain his tax policy to Jay Leno. A passable version of the Pistols — a paunchy but growlingly energetic Johnny Rotten (pictured), guitarist Steve Cook, bassist Glen Matlock, and drummer Paul Cook — performed a nicely blaring version of "Anarchy in the U.K." Rotten/John Lydon bent over and wiggled his backside in the direction of Leno and Ron Paul, and ad-libbed a mid-song remark: "When are we getting out of Iraq, Mr. Paul?" Jay, of course, didn’t react to this, just scampered over and shook hands with the band when they were done. Thus posing the question: Is it anarchy if no one reacts? 
My least favorite part of the writing process is titling my work. I’m very particular about titles, because I judge all books by their titles. If the author couldn’t come up with a few intriguing words for the cover, what exactly should I expect in the following 450 pages? Let’s say you’re a writer and the title of your book is 
Kudos to Reaper’s writers for 
I love Halloween episodes, if only for the opportunity to see my favorite characters dressed up in wacky costumes. And last night’s episode of
