May 11 2007 08:06 PM ET

Reviewing the Reviews: 'Georgia Rule'

Rule_lTake note: Despite its marketably cutesy three-generations-of-difficult-women draw, Georgia Rule would be a very bad movie to see on Mother’s Day. You’d be better off renting Terms of Endearment, popping the seal off something with "Entenmann’s" on it, and calling it a day.

Director Garry Marshall’s latest, which stars Lindsay Lohan, Jane Fonda, and Felicity Huffman, received exceedingly poor reviews, all of which in some way made the obvious connection between Lohan’s inability to show up for work after her typical all-night benders on Rule‘s set last summer and the irresponsible wild-child train wreck she plays in the movie. "You wonder whether the role required much acting," said USA Today‘s Claudia Puig, and EW‘s Owen Gleiberman concurs: "Lohan hits a true note of spiteful princess narcissism. Unfortunately, it’s the only note the film allows her to play."

For some, producer James G. Robinson’s much-publicized letter toLohan telling her to shape up should have been a glaring hint thatmaybe the movie shouldn’t have even been made. The combination ofLohan’s antics and bad press made Puig wish Robinson had just called itoff, and according to the Toronto Star‘s Peter Howell, "Lohan would have done everyone a favour if she’d stopped the show entirely."

Lohan’s performance — which may have had something to do with herinsufferable character — hit a nerve with many critics who doubt herleading-lady chops. The Boston Globe‘sTy Burr called the "dreadfully executed" film a mere humiliation forFonda and Huffman, but "for Lohan, it’s something worse: hard evidenceshe can’t act." James Verniere of the Boston Herald agreed: "Lohan lets her heaving breasts and flashing thighs do all the work."

Maybe they should blame the complete unbelievablity of her character– a relentless slut and superficial brat who’s also really smart andheaded to Vassar in the fall. (What?) Aside from coming up with thebest headline of the day — "It Blohans" — the New York Post‘s Kyle Smith complained, "My head nearly detached from my neck when she cited Ezra Pound."

Others defended Lohan, like TV Guide‘s Ken Fox, who said the "talented Lohan isn’t what’s wrong with this misbegotten mess." The Chicago Sun-Times‘ Richard Roeper called Rule "Lohan’s best work to date," and William Arnold of the Seattle Post-Intelligencersaid Lohan "wins out over Huffman’s comic drunk and Fonda’s leatheryevocation of her father, Henry, in On Golden Pond." And according tothe Village Voice‘sElla Taylor, "A self-possessed, intelligent screen presence, [Lohan]can outgun almost any caricature, including a parody of herself." Iguess the real question, then, is whether Lohan was even acting.

Fonda’s performance, which can be seen as her second comeback after 2005′s dud Monster-in-Law,also got mixed reviews. Roeper called Fonda’s Georgia "the genuinething… We believe she’s lived in that little slice of Americana for along time." But other critics found something a little off with Fonda’scharacter, blaming the poor script and direction. Howell noticed Fondawas reciting her Idaho-hayseed lines with obvious chagrin: "I don’tthink I’ve seen an actress in this much distress from a bad scriptsince Maggie Smith was forced to mumble the ‘ya-ya’chant from Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood -– which was also penned by [Rule'sscreenwriter] Mark Andrus, not so coincidentally." Puig commented thatFonda did her best with what she was given: "You can almost see theresignation in her performance, as if she knows she’s on a sinkingship."

Most agreed that director Marshall, out of his element with thismovie, was to blame for the actors’disjointed performances. "Fondagets no help whatsoever from Marshall, who is so deaf to the dark toneof his film, he seems to think he’s helming another laugher like Pretty Woman or Runaway Briderather than the drama of sexual abuse it really is," wrote Howell. Andaccording to Smith, "Handing Garry Marshall a story about child sexualabuse and an ugly mother-daughter rivalry is a little like askingJessica Simpson to sing Wagner." Ouch.

Comments (39 total) Add your comment
Page: 1 2 3
  • Trogdor

    I wasn’t going to see this movie until I read the lines “heaving breasts and flashing thighs”…now my interest has been peaked.

  • Paul U.

    Monster-in-Law was a dud? I thought it was mildly amusing, but wasn’t it a medium-sized hit?

  • FAMUstudent06

    So basically lindsey lohan is movie death haha. And im glad she has become it. All those unecessary antics have ruined a promising movie career. She started off strong with MeanGirls a movie I still watch today but since then its been bomb after bomb. Maybe somewhere 10 years from now she will have a reprieve and win Oscar gold. But I dont see that happening with those recent picture of her snorting coke hitting the internet.
    Sigh.. Jane Fonda and Felicity Huffman deserved a chance but lindsey just ruins it.

  • Ed

    I’m going to go out on a limb and stick up for L.L. I think she knew this movie was going to suck so she tried to get herself fired? How can everyone blame LaLohan for a dud? I don’t see how her “antics” have anything to do with bad editing or bad writing? If a great actress like Felicity Huffman can save a movie like this, or Jane Fonda, than something is wrong with the script.
    L.L isn’t doing anything out of the ordinary for her age.
    Heck, I’m a second grade teacher and I am looking forward to a wild weekend! Palms Springs and West Hollywood here I come!

  • aramis

    Ed I’m with you. This movie doesn’t really seem all too terrible, especially since it has my new favorite line: “If you call me a name, I’m going to find all your boyfriends, and I’m going to f@#$ them stupid.” Haha! Anyhow, I’m still also looking forward to LL in “I Know Who Killed Me”. That one will probably give LL an equal amount of scathing reviews, but oh well. The critics just don’t like her, and they’ve made that bias blatantly clear.

  • Anonymous

    I’m not a “relentless slut”, but I’m offended by the idea that you think a sexual woman cannot be intelligent. I went to a very selective and respected university and knew plenty of girls who got drunk every weekend, spelt with various men, and still made it to class every weekday to make A’s in their classes. A pretty girl, even a slutty, bratty one, can still be smart.

  • Anonymous

    slept not “spelt” in my earlier comment, typo there, which even intelligent women make

  • Ron Mexico

    Obviously, you young ladies that attended this very selective and respected university didn’t get A’s in the English 101 classes. I guess you were too busy “spelting” with various men.
    How does that work, exactly? You meet guys at the Student Union, maybe Frat Row. You do a few keg stands. You get a little amorous. Then you sit around and have a simulated spelling bee?
    Back in the 80′s, the Surgeon General had a safe grammar campaign. I guess he thought you shouldn’t “spelt” around either.

  • Anonymous

    I feel really bad for Huffman and Fonda, because almost every review and article about this movie is focusing on Lohan and her on/off screen activities. Maybe if the movie sucks so much; however, this might be a blessing for them.

  • Anonymous

    Okay, sorry Ron Mexico. I did correct my typo, which was just that, a typo. Actually, I made an A in freshman English, but thank you for the personal attack. All I am saying is that a woman’s intelligence in school is not directly related to her social life. A girl can write a wonderful paper analyzing Kafka, Faulkner, or Orwell and still go out and party. A smart girl can still have poor judgement with her social life also. Lohan and her character are both young and may be making many mistakes, as did many of the girls I did know in college, but they can all still be intelligent girls. Hopefully, they will all grow up to be intelligent and more responsible women.

  • t3hdow

    I think the critics just bashed Lohan way too harshly. The fact that this film was directed to sound like a dysfunctional family comedy instead of a dark drama meant there’s more at fault to this film than just Lohan. Even Tom Cruise didn’t get bashed this much during the release of Mission Impossible 3.

  • Anthony

    I really believe people hate to admit that Lindsay Lohan does have talent and she probably is the best actress of her generation but because she likes to party and have a good time they give her bad reviews. People her age all do the same thing…party! Who cares how much she parties, or who she has sex with or how much drugs she does-that is nobody’s busniess but Lohan’s and her mothers. We the people should only worry about if the girl can act and I hate to blow everyone’s horn (I know interesting choice of verb “blow”) but the girl can act. It’s weird because if it was Keira Knughtley doing a period peice everyone would be like, “Oh my god, she is so good” yeah she might be good but she is boring and so are most of the actors and actresses of Lohan’s generation. Lindsay brings fun and adventure whenever you lay your eyes on her. I only wish I could meet her because I can only give credit to someone who parties as much as she does, but yet she still is great at her job.

  • Ron Mexico

    It was just a joke, Ms. No-Name Super Smart. I meant no real offense. Playful banter is sometimes lost online. Sorry.

  • Elena

    Ron Mexico kills me – hilarious

  • cidigi

    I thought this was about the movie guys……
    Miss Lohan can do what she likes. I think people are concerned because she
    is so public with it and younger girls
    do tend to imitate these young actresses. And this one’s a mess.
    But look at her parents-dad just got
    out of jail and mama takes her to bars so they can hang together. And a
    few hours after leaving rehab Miss
    Lohan was in a bar. Think what you want.
    This is about a movie. She does a good job or doesn’t. Her personal life
    shouldn’t come into play here.

Page: 1 2 3
Add your comment
The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject - or we may delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field.

When you click on the "Post Comment" button above to submit your comments, you are indicating your acceptance of and are agreeing to the Terms of Service. You can also read our Privacy Policy.

Advertisement

TV Recaps

Powered by WordPress.com VIP