Annie Proulx sure is bitter over the film version of her short story ”Brokeback Mountain” losing the Best Picture Academy Award to Crash, or as she calls it, ”Trash.” Even Brokeback partisans who are still smarting from Crash’s victory last week will wince at her astonishingly petty rant.
Blog Roll
- Best Week Ever
- BuzzSugar
- Coolfer
- Dark Horizons
- Deadline Hollywood Daily
- Digital Music News
- Gold Derby
- Hits Daily Double
- Hollywood Elsewhere
- Hollywood Wiretap
- Huffington Post
- Hypebot
- Idolator
- jaded insider
- Lost Remote
- Movie City News
- Movie List
- MTV News
- Pop Candy
- PopBytes
- Popeater
- reality blurred
- Salon: Arts & Entertainment
- Stereogum
- The Beat
- The Programming Insider
- Thompson on Hollywood
- Tuned In
- TV Barn
- TV Tattle
- TVFanatic.com
- TVNewser
- Velvet Rope
Featured Video
Realite: Reality TV sexes it up!
Unsubtle sexuality on ''SYTYCD'' and ''Top Model,'' sickening turns on ''DWTS,'' ''Top Chef,'' ''Runway''
More 
Today's Most Popular
-
-
-
-
-
The Music Mix American Music Awards live blog: It's on!
Special Coverage
'Twilight' Saga: 'New Moon'
It's almost here! Get all the latest news, photos, video, and fan commentary leading up to the big premiere
More
Comments (1-30) of 47 Add your comment
wow – we are just a bit bitter aren’t we. I am glad that Crash won – it was a better movie anyway – and this coming from a Gay Northeasterner.
I feel your pain, Annie. They were wrong and you have a big rooting interest. But, the long-term benefits and accomplishments of this story and movie will last longer than ONE award Brokeback Mountain didn’t win.
Somewhat sour gripes, er grapes from an author who’s use of 5 dollar words would imply a slightly greater sense of dignity. Or maybe expecting maturity from a grown up author is asking too much somehow.
Plenty of unmasked snobbery, looking down on others and petty ranting about a movie that garnered more accolades. Sorry no one can live up to your oh so high standards Ms. Proulx, maybe we’re not smart enough to rent your movies.
The thing that really bothered me was how she trashed Three 6 Mafia and Hustle & Flow. I mean, talk about being intolerant (maybe she should have watch ‘Crash’ a little more closely – j/k). Don’t get me wrong, “Pimp” is not exactly Shakespeare, but it was terrible either.
I thought her article was quite funny. This is my kind of pop journalism, it’s so much more interesting to read a scathing satire from an insider than it is to read fawning sycophants gush over stars and their dresses.
well said jim, Brokeback has won more in people’s hearts than any number of Oscars…
I agree with Cecil. Proulx’s piece was an insider’s look at the Oscars with a jaundiced eye. A well-written one at that.
Are you all aware that the Kodak Theater is in a shopping mall? The Academy Awards are presented directly above a Virgin Megastore.
Boy, I’m so glad Ms. Proulx is so much smarter than everyone else that she can stand in judge of the artistic and entertainment merits of the nominated films and actors.
Hey there LADY. It’s YOUR opinion that Brokeback was better than Crash. And, excuse me, you are a littled biased don’t ya think?!!!!
And, isn’t it funny that when people like Ms. Proulx want to rant about something happening in culture or in the news in America, they run to a British tabloid?!!!!
True, it’s nice to read something that isn’t a puff-piece, but harder to take when it’s so clear that all of her dislike for the Oscars stems from the fact that her movie didn’t win (the Independent Spirit Awards, on the other hand, are “funny” and “lively”, and they just happened to shower it with praise). Petty is the right word for this article, and no one comes off looking worse from it than Ms. Proulx. I’m not saying that ‘Crash’ deserved its win but, ‘heffalump voters’? Really?
Get out of the bitter barn and roll in the hay….
While Ms. Proulx’s comments do seem a tad simplistic (Hollywood is bad) and even mean-spirited, she does bring up an interesting point that I have maintained all along; which is easier, mimicking a real (albeit dead) celebrity or creating a fully realized human being from scratch? Phillip Seymour Hoffman has been one of my favorite actors for years, and I for one think his performance transcends mere mimickry. But I also think that Heath Ledger’s performance was more heart-wrenching, and technically more difficult. Hoffman’s performance was, in a word, glitzier, plus he is known as an “actor’s actor,” and Hollywood loves to shower these lesser-known but undeniably talented actors with “gimme” awards–even in years when there are better performances.
As for Crash, it seems to me an obvious choice for Los Angelenos to choose a picture with a theme of racism over a theme of unrequited love–homosexual or not–for much the same reason; it’s flashier, and despite what you may hear in the news–affects more people even in Hollywood than does homosexuality.
What bothers me about the loss is this; Brokeback Mountain needed to win Best Picture in order to transcend it’s “art house” or “genre” status. Now it can too easily be discredited as “that gay cowboy movie” than if it had won. Best Picture would have given Brokeback Mountain legitimacy in the eyes of the public at large.
While it does seem that her opinion is based on the fact that her movie didn’t win, she has some good points. There is a large part of the academy that is quite old, and loyal to the westerns that were made decades ago. I personally know that many members didn’t even view BBM.
I think that Crash had amazing acting performances, but the script was so condesending and it beat you over the head with its agenda. Because of this it was VERY predictable. Brokeback, however, was a delicate study of human nature. I think that the details make all the difference, and Brokeback had soooo many nuances that added up to brillance.
Ugh, I’ve seen this circulated around the internet for a while now. The only thing more upsetting than the fact that what she’s saying is petty and snobby is the fact that for the most part, I agree with her. BM was a far superior movie to Crash. But I’m more or less sick of the entire debate.
This is why art shouldn’t be pitted against each other in awards; one viewer’s “trash” is another viewers treasure. It’s impossible to compare.
Funny, I don’t see Martin Scorsese writing hateful, petty rants about the SIX Best Director Nominations he has lost…
Crash was a stupid movie. It relied entirely on coincidence and stereotype. Brokeback was vastly superior in every way,not even in the same category. Of course, the Crash win (cringe) proves what America never gets anyway – Hollywood is deeply CONSERVATIVE and always has been. Not to mention blue collar and unsophisticated.
Annie, you are a great writer.
She can say what she wants about Crash, but she shouldn’t diss the Three 6 Mafia — they were one of the definite highlights of the evening!
Ms. Proulx: Get over yourself.
Ms. Proulx, note to self. Brokeback was not all that groundbreaking. We already knew homosexual men can fall in love. You put it in an unexpected setting. So what? That trick’s been done by other authors thousands of times before. There were flaws in the adaptation of your story as well – sorry. That said, it was a better movie than Crash. But Ms. Proulx, you’re hardly the first to be snubbed. Good Night and Good Luck was a better movie than Brokeback and didn’t even get an award, so really by comparison, you’re movie did quite well. Also, note the Academy is not conservative, but rather risk averse. There is a difference. If you remember that, you might not take these things so personally. Try doing something mature and healthy like appreciating the accolades you recived and move on to your next project.
I saw each of the 5 films nominated for best picture. Saw BBM twice in the theatre; have Crash at home on DVD and have seen that at least 3 times. I read Annie Proulx’s short story. Her piece in the Guardian reaffirms that she is a Damn Good Writer and as an Artist she has every right to defend her work. The transfer from page to screen of her short story was brilliant. Every actor in BBM brought layers to the characters they played that is rare in today’s films. From the opening long shot of Jack Twist driving that lonesome dark road from his parents’ home toward a job that changed his life, to that long shot near the end when Ennis drives along that same dark road–only this time going the other way back to Jack’s family home–hoping to gain a last memory from a life he lost to a 1960’s society that couldn’t tolerate differences. 40 years later, much of it still remains with us. BBM is a film that will long be remembered after Crash. All the films nominated were Good Films. Too bad we don’t have more of them coming out of Tinseltown.
Three 6 Mafia the “highlight of the evening”? I’m an African American woman and was wondering if the academy members who voted for that awful pimp song were on drugs. Enough with my sistahs shaking their bare booties while the brothas prance around covered in clothes head to toe.
I guess it’s too much to expect an adult, award-winning writer to be mature and allow for the possibility that the academy members thought “Crash” actually was better than “Brokeback”. As a gay midwestern farmer, I did.
Both films were good, neither deserved to win Best Picture, but I don’t understand why so many people seem to find it impossible that both films were good. They were. Get over it, and get over yourself, Ms. Proulx.
Proulx is a great writer and I’m sure the short story on which this movie is based is excellent. But the movie, not so great. It went on way too long and it wasn’t able to sustain the dramatic intensity once everyone had to start putting on their “older” makeup and costumes. Then it just got stupid.
One more thing – both Crash and BB were filled with cliches and stereotypes.
Crash was the only watchable movie of the five nominated
Munich was cool in a way too. But Brokeback? C’mon, who’s shocked today by two cowboys kissing? So, what? Where’s the story? Where are the distinctive characters? The plot?
Annie Proulx get over yourself, just because you write doesn’t mean you’re a writer. Who will remember you after 100 years with the trash you publish as high art?
Who can blame her? BBM was robbed!
“Brokeback? C’mon, who’s shocked today by two cowboys kissing? So, what? Where’s the story? Where are the distinctive characters? The plot?
Annie Proulx get over yourself, just because you write doesn’t mean you’re a writer. Who will remember you after 100 years with the trash you publish as high art?”
Jarrod, where to begin? First of all, where are the distinctive characters? Are you kidding? I was just talking with a friend the other day about the fact that, although we have both seen Crash, neither of us could remember one single character’s name (other than Shaniqua, but only b/c that was a plot point). Instead, we remembered: black TV producer; racist Asian driver; racist white cop, Latino locksmith, etc… Strange that the characters in Crash are reduced in memory to race, rather than as people that we came to care about while watching the film. Ennis and Jack on the other hand have practically become real to audience that has seen BBM. Not only that, but so have the even the smallest supporting characters (Alma, Monroe, Lureen, Randall, LaShawn, Bobby Twist, etc…).
And Annie Proulx not a real writer? She is a Pulitzer Prize-winning author who’s work has been featured in some of the most prestigious publications in existence. I think it is safe to say that her work will have a place in history.
Her comments on the Oscars were spot-on. Not to mention extremely well-written. People have been complaining (justifiably, in my opinion) about the outcome of the ceremony for a week and a half now. Why should someone directly involved in BBM not be allowed to speak their mind? We have become so used to a white-washed, PC version of Hollywood created by PR agents that it seems shocking when someone actually expresses an opinion that isn’t all sunshine and rainbows. I for one think it’s refreshing to hear some honesty for once.
All this over what an Oscar? I mean really is it so important? People need to let this go.
I’m sorry, but immature ranting is not the way to go on something like this. If the Oscars are so backwards and out-of-touch with America, then why does she even care that they snubbed her movie?
She should be thankful that the movie managed to overcome so many taboos and defy social norms, yet still garner critical acclaim and box office success. Yes, the Academy Awards are important, but nobody is going to look at the fact that Brokeback lost “Best Picture” and start saying that it’s an inferior, worthless movie. People still love the movie. Critics still say it’s good. So what’s the big problem here?
She has every right to be upset. She has every right to say that the movie was robbed of the “Best Picture” Oscar. But bashing Crash (and even other winners who had nothing to do with Brokeback’s loss) just makes her come off as bitter and immature. Nobody’s going to take away Crash’s Oscar and hand it over to Brokeback. It’s done. Over. Just cut your losses and move on.
One word for this rant: Wow. At the end of the day… does any of this stuff even matter?
The bottom line is that 50, 60 years from now, people will still watch BBM like we still watch “Citizen Kane”, “The Grapes of Wrath”, “Sunset Boulevard”, “A Place in the Sun” and “Double Indemnity”, none of which won the Best Picture Oscar…
Could it be that BBM didn’t win Best Picture because it was BORING? Endless shots of scenery, sunsets and sheep with only intermittent scenes where something actually HAPPENED. Without all the overblown imagery, this movie could have been boiled down to an hour. Crash was a superior film in every way – one that triggered endless discussion and introspection. I suggest that Ms. Proulx – a woozle if ever there was one – get over herself and move on.