• More
Back to PopWatch Home
EW Home

2009 Grammy Nominations Concert: Non-nominees perform old songs!

Dec 4, 2008, 07:08 AM | by Whitney Pastorek

Categories: Grammys, Music

Taylorswift_l Okay, so I think I just figured out what's wrong with almost every major televised awards ceremony in this country, but especially the Grammys: They spend so much time reminding us of how important and magical and woven into the fabric of a life we can barely understand in these crazy digital times their television program has been over the last half-century, they forget that the whole point of the ceremony in the first place is to celebrate the best of what is happening in our culture right this very second. And so while I think we can all agree that an Album of the Year race comprised of Coldplay, Radiohead, Lil Wayne, Ne-Yo, and Plant/Krauss is nothing to sneeze at, there was absolutely no need to announce the nominees in that or any other Grammy category during an hour-long Tribute To Songs Your Parents Like On That Network With Shows For Old People, designed to highlight the opening of an actual museum devoted to the aforementioned important magic.

Yes, last night's telecast was basically the equivalent of historically landmarking a Taco Bell Express, with performances from Celine Dion, Foo Fighters, and the most overexposed blond since Lady Godiva, Taylor Swift. And there were also nominations, both positive-- I'm sorry, did you say "Paper Planes"? are you sure?-- and not so much. (See the major categories here.) We're putting up a gallery of the worst snubs later today, but feel free to share yours in the comments. (I'm saving my controlled rage about Sugarland for the end of this article -- only five paragraphs away...) Let's begin, shall we?

Live, from the Nokia Theater in Los Angeles-- where John Mayer and B.B. King are quite possibly still playing "Let the Good Times Roll"-- it was the 2009 Grammy Nomination Special, a fun little project that probably wasn't worth pre-empting an episode of Criminal Minds for, but whatever, sweeps ended on Sunday. I've got a pretty bad head cold at the moment, so when we opened on Mariah Carey in a sexy Santa outfit singing "Christmas (Baby Please Come Home)" and throwing teddy bears out to the audience, I checked the channel to make sure I hadn't recorded the Rockefeller Center Tree Lighting ceremony by mistake. But no, I was right, because soon enough there were your hilariously mismatched hosts, Taylor Swift and LL Cool J, mincing awkwardly around as the camera circled them in front of the Staples Center before cutting to Ne-Yo as he announced the Best New Artist nominees: Adele, Duffy, Lady Antebellum, the Jonas Brothers, and Jazmine Sullivan. Shocking not to see Leona Lewis, Estelle, MGMT, Vampire Weekend, or Katy Perry come up here, considering they even used the latter's "I Kissed a Girl" in the introductory montage (a montage clearly designed to teach Criminal Minds viewers about the existence of the internet). Not shocking to see the Jonas Bros. grinning in the front row after the announcement of the nominees. Something tells me they weren't propped up there just so Ms. Swift could spend the night glaring at whichever one she used to date.

Next was a performance of Janis Ian's "At Seventeen" from Celine Dion that one might call "understated," but mostly left me wondering whether the dinner cruise would be docking soon. It was followed by an obligatory shot of Smokey Robinson, then a montage leading up to the Album of the Year nominations which proved that 1998 was the musical equivalent of Oceanic Flight 815. Again, I have no quibble with the nominations in this category, though I'm sure Alicia Keys and the Eagles would beg to differ. But who would you pull to fit them in? Lil Wayne and Coldplay are good and sold huge; Ne-Yo and Radiohead are just good; and Plant/Krauss could have played noseharp over a backing band of barking dogs and still gotten a nom, so the fact that they didn't was a nice bonus. But no time to dwell, for we must listen to the Foo Fighters slaughter Faster Pussycat's Carly Simon's "You're So Vain"! I take no pleasure in calling out Grohl for that mess, though I did enjoy the disdain for Rascal Flatts he barely bothered to mask while reading the noms for Best Country Performance by a Duo or Group. (Side note: Random to pick the Duo/Group performances in both Country and Rap to announce live, no?)

Christina Aguilera's lovely rendition of "I Loves You Porgy" should hush up those who found her corseted antics on the American Music Awards a bit unrestrained; Taylor Swift's barely serviceable rendition of Brenda Lee's "I'm Sorry" (see embedded clip) should open the door for anyone who'd care to join me in saying for the millionth time that this girl may be a savvy little songwriting/marketing genius, but she has no business singing professionally. Really, we're running out of excuses here, people. And of all the artists in the world, why was she the only one chosen to perform a snippet of her current single ("White Horse," which apparently requires that she sit down at some point)-- especially when she received exactly zero nominations this evening? Was that the snub of the night? Justice at last? Or does someone just really have it in for that one Jonas Brother?

It was fun to see tiny little Grammy president Neil Portnow yelp with joy as he and Swiftie introduced the John Mayer/B.B. King Rock n' Roll Ain't Dead But We're Gonna Jam On This Song Until It Is memorabilia project, and then it just got kinda boring until Mayer cracked the joke that he "played cash register" on M.I.A.'s Record of the Year-nominated "Paper Planes." Can't make too much fun of John n' B.B.-- after all, unless you're counting Mariah sharing a gospel nod with three other people and a church choir, those two dudes are the only performers tonight who got nominated for any actual awards. And if my math is right, Mayer has the chance to win five times. So. Let those good times keep rolling, I suppose. Other nominations for Record of the Year, btw: Adele (big night for her!), Coldplay, Leona Lewis, and Plant/Krauss. Here again, we find Estelle and "American Boy" getting snubbed-- curiously, the 87 writers on that track got a Song of the Year nod instead-- along with folks like Chris Brown, Kid Rock, Rihanna, and Lil Wayne, although I'm not sure which one of his ditties could have been safely performed on the big show, so that's just as well.

And that was it. It was only an hour. Not too painful, but like I said, not too necessary, either. Now, as threatened: Seriously? Sugarland gets NOTHING for Love on the Inside, an almost universally-praised No. 1 album that was not only predicted to be a frontrunner in the country category but a dark horse for Album of the Year? (No, "Life in a Northern Town" doesn't count.) Probably what happened here was the whole thing was too "poppy" for the "country" voters, but my god it's like Steely Dan beating out Kid A all over again. Argh. I gotta take my rage and my head cold to bed.

Meanwhile, what did you think, PopWatchers? Did any of those performances do it fer ya? Have you now been persuaded to schedule a trip to the shiny new Grammy Museum (which, to be fair, looks pretty cool), and/or tune in for the big ceremony next year? Am I the only one who snickered when the announcer said, "All this, and the nominees for Record of the Year" as we headed to commercial, like he couldn't believe his cornucopia of luck? And can you think of a persuasive reason why they couldn't have somehow combined this shindig with the AMAs and saved us all some time?

More Grammys:
Lil Wayne, Coldplay: The Grammys finally get it right
20 crazy Grammy outfits!
Check out our full list of Grammy nominees in the major categories
Flashback: Who won last year's Grammys?
Grading last year's Grammy performances


haley mccray Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 08:39 PM EST

JORDYN SHELLHART IS AMAZING.

Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:18 PM EST

First off, I agree with the writer. Taylor Swift may be a gifted songwriter, but she is not cut out to sing. She does not have good technique, and her vocal abilities are slim. She has potential, but she needs to work with a vocal coach. I disagree with the person who said Allison Kraus is a bad singer. She's quite opposite. She can sing in tune and has a good ear for harmony. Her voice is beautiful. She isn't really an entertainer, though. I do find it unfortunate that Katie Perry and Vampire Weekend were not nominated. That's how the Grammy's go. It's disappointing to see that there is so much talent out there, but because it isn't commercialized, the artists don't get recognized for their fine musicianship.

Craig Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 06:37 PM EST

The boredom of the Grammys is just a side effect of the consequences of one entity (Clear Channel Radio) controlling the vast majority of the radio stations nationally. Top 40 radio and MTV at one time were formats by which artists could over time cultivate and grow organically with popular culture. Entertainers, radio and MTV shaped popular culture. That's not the case anymore - playlists that might feature at best a couple dozen white artist singles in the entire given year sandwiched between ignornant cliche booty raps, baby-mama-drama, bling-bling by the newest faceless r&b entertainer 'artist' makes for tiresomely dull entertainment. The record industry's miserable lull owes far more to Clear Channel's favoring of boring payola artist roster - the only music allowed mainstream radio exposure - than it does to downloading free music.

amanda Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 12:03 AM EST

I totally agree. The grammys are a joke. I don't undersatnd how allison crauss gets so much when she's not even a good singer. Oh and taylor swift is AMAZING. Even for those who don't like country music you have to have respect for someone who started at 16 with hit records and she is just as great live as she is on her cds. She is not a bad singer. Those would be people like miley cyrus (who ruined taylor's song tonight)

me Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 09:28 PM EST

taylor swift is extremely talented. so maybe she's not the best live, which does count for a lot, but if you heard her studio work (which is UNEDITED), you'd realize that she is a good singer. and so what if she's better at songwriting than songsinging? she puts everything she has into each song, and if that's not enough for you maybe you should try it yourself. but no, you'd rather sit and complain about everyone else than actually get up and realize that it's not as easy as you think.

Kaycie Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 05:01 PM EST

im a taylor swift fan but i can admit this wasn't a good performance
this wasn't her voice range, she's better with high notes
sooooooooo stop giving her crap for her performance!! shes just a regular kid..
she did better with white horse

ks Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 09:59 PM EST

YOU ARE SO RUDE, TAYLOR SWIFT IS SO GOOD, AND HAS SO MUCH TALENT, WANT TO EXPLAIN WHY HER ALBUM HAS BEEN #1 ON THE BILLBOARD FOR THE PAST 11 WEEKS? ITS BECAUSE SHE IS GREAT, DON'T EVER DISS TAYLOR SWIFT!

Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 06:23 PM EST

Ok, it does not matter what the people who do not like Taylor say. She sold over 500,000 albums in her Fearless debut week. The album has been number 1 for a total of 6 weeks...not just on the country charts. People like her. End of story. I have both of her albums and I love them. She has set many records in the country genre. To say that she's undeserving of everything that has happened for her in the last few years is very unfair. She has spent YEARS writing songs and she can play the guitar like nobody's business! Watch the stripped performances, where its just her and the guitar, how many pop artists play and write and sing their own songs. I ignore the people who say rude things about her. She's successful because people like her music. If you don't then thats fine. But she made her OWN way in this business. She signed onto a record label that wasnt very popular compared to Hollywood Records, etc. she didnt have a tv show, or a popular dad, she worked her butt off. The end.

shahab Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 01:19 PM EST

taylor swift is nise.
and she is not like evry one els .
she is only one and ther well be no one els that can get to her beauty.

Anonymous Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 02:30 PM EST

carlo Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 12:32 AM EST
This goes to carlo

U go to hell

Anonymous Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 02:30 PM EST

carlo Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 12:32 AM EST
This goes to carlo

U go to hell

meh Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 04:28 PM EST

ahem. The grammy's are a joke. Who are these people to judge how good music is? It's certainly an honer to win, but seriously it's just an overlong boring show. Maybe itll be better this year. Hope so

Bob Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 08:35 AM EST

Sounds like it was fortunate I missed the show. But I watched Celine's song on Youtube. What a performance, a musical gem. The styling, done in a less bitter and more reflective tone than the original was a perfect way to render this classic song 30+ years later. Appropriate, beautiful, excellent performance of a song I never really cared for, but now that's changed.

Emily Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 02:15 PM EST

Okay, so all you people saying that Taylor Swift sucks all also say you never heard her live before this. Did you SEE her at the AMA's? She was AMAZING. No, she's not always that good live, but she sure doesn't suck. Did you ever think maybe it wasn't her idea to do White Horse? && that it's an AWESOME SONG. Seriously, get informed BEFORE you make these ignorant comments.

Sarah Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 11:58 AM EST

I really don't understand why people like you take the time to write insensitive critics like this. If you didn't like the show, why didn't you just turn it off? Are you aware that you do not have to watch something just because it's on? I don't know who you are, but you have a lot of nerve to put down that many successful artists. If you're going to put someone down make it the people who produced the show, not the artists themselves. This artists have worked extremly hard and obviously you couldn't do it any better or you would have been asked to be there. As for your spiteful little Taylor Swift comments, if she had no business singing professionally then why did her first album go triple platinum? Why is she asked continually to perform on award show after award show? Why did her new album have the best first-week sales for a country album in a year? Saying someone with a career like that has no bussiness being a professional singer is just ignorant.

Muffy Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 11:45 PM EST

Xtina was great!

islandgirl Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 09:51 PM EST

Taylor Swift is a very pretty girl, good songwriter...but not a very good singer of other peoples work. In fact, not that good at singing her own songs....very monotone and breathy, which equates to boring for me!

Matthew Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 09:37 PM EST

The fact that she can be considered a role-model has nothing to do with her talent, or lack thereof, for that matter. Sure, she's someone that young girls can look up to, but she's not a very good singer. She's got songwriting ability, but her singing isn't really up to par. Plus, there are other female artists that girls could look at as role-models that are all very, very talented, as singers and songwriters--Kelly Clarkson, Alicia Keys, Sara Bareilles, Adele, Duffy, Ingrid Michaelson, Jennifer Hudson....the list goes on and on...

Katie Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 01:45 PM EST

Ok I agree that sugarland is an amazing country act and should have been up for a grammy for "Love On the Inside"wich is an extemly well done record . I really agree with your comments about them ...i don't agree with your comments about Taylor Swift ...ok yes she is an amazeing songwriter like you said ...but she can sing have you even listened to any of her albums?? sure she doesn't have amazeing powerhouse vocals but she has a understated voice that goes with her songs please quit syaing she can't sing and that she is over exposed seriously !! she is one of the only artists out there write now who is an excellent rolemodel for teenage girls please give her some respect for that!!!

Shawn Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 02:49 AM EST

The Jonas brothers were live at the Grammy show, and their appearance on the Rockefeller tree lighting was pre-taped.

jason Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 09:20 PM EST

does taylor know she can't sing live? maybe she's just nervous. she always sings SOO low you can barely hear her. songs are good though. as far as overrated, and yes i am going to say it, and probably get attacked, lil wayne. you can't understand him half the time. also, how good is someone when EVERY song has to have a featured artist. that drives me up the wall. the roots and nas don't have to rely on others for every song. i guess we had to nominate wayne because he sold the most cd'.s i wanted the grammys to be relevant, but c'mon now, he certainly isn't the second coming. but, about the show. don't EVER do it again academy. the 300 year old songs? please, no. i like celine dion, but damn i fell asleep during that song. the quickie 15 minute announcements on e! television were fine as they were. this concept was a waste of time. i'm just glad U2 didn't have anything this year so coldplay and radiohead could be nominated.

Mark Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 09:02 PM EST

Carrie Underwood is a good singer, but her material is nothing special.

losercarriefans Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 08:42 PM EST

I see Carrie's fans are out and about!!!!If Brittany(lip-syncing)Spears can be one of the biggest star in history, I don't see nothing wrong with Taylor. At least she tries to sing live. When was the last time Brittany did?

007 Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 07:43 PM EST

Even though I kind of like some of Taylor's songs-- I think she should write them for singers to sing, as she is a strong song writer, but is not meant to be a singer.

Danny Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 07:37 PM EST

Taylor Swift has maybe a seven-note range, so why can't she hit any of them on key? I have never heard her sing live before--wow. What a disaster. She makes early live performances of Avril Lavigne look like Kelly Clarkson.

MarshaMarsha Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 07:10 PM EST

I think Taylor got more promotion and exposure then President to be Obama. I have never seen someone more over-exposed, over-rated, and un-deserving, then Taylor Swift. They are trying to create this super star out of a voice that wouldn't even make it past the first round on American Idol.

Allison Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 07:08 PM EST

Taylor is a prodigy alright- in her own mind. She may have some potential as a song writer- but she is the worst singer in any genre right now. Even Britney Spears can hit a few notes occasionally, the few times she actually sings live instead of miming.

Taylor never sings well-- so the excuses her fans keep coming up with will not fly. She sings poorly with or without the jonas brothers there... so find a better excuse please.

Sarah Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 06:07 PM EST

So not fair! Taylor Swift is amazing at her age. Overexposed?!? She's been called a country prodigy! Her success has breached that very THICK line between pop and country.

Jenn Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 01:48 PM EST

Couldn't agree with you more. Sick of Taylor's overexposure. She's a good songwriter but she sucks in singing. Monotone, weak and shrilly voice.

And isn't there enough promo for her album already? Geez, and she still gets to sing her own single. I thought it's supposed to be all tribute songs?

Amber Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 01:25 PM EST

Whoever wrote this is absoultely horrible about taylor swift.Can u get ur ass up there and sing infront of bunch of people?no u cant without breaking ur voice alitte cuz ur teareyed ovr ur ex boyfriend.I would be same way and so would everry1else so shut up about her.

Brianna Cooper Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 12:12 PM EST

I love Taylor Swift! :)

carlo Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 12:32 AM EST

christina was the best performer last night. This woman can sang. Celine was good. Mariah was ok but it's just sad that she has to rely on her whistle register to belt out a certain note. She has no more chest voice at all. Christina definitely has replaced Mariah as the female singer to look up to now.

Roberto Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:24 PM EST

Mariah performance and physical appearance was outstanding. It's amazing to see how spectacular she now looks after shedding so many pounds. She now looks 15 year younger, the same as in her earlier days. I am very disappointed to seeing her with no noms for this year 2009. That's so typical of grammy voters. Further, those awful songs paper planes and chasing pavements were an idiotic choice for record and song of the year. However, i am glad to see Sara Bareilles "Love Song" on the major category of Song of the year, well deserved for her!.

Irene McDonnell Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:16 PM EST

what a disappointing show. I didn't agree with most of the nominations. thank god Carrie Underwood was nominated for country vocalist, they at least got that one right. Taylor Swift, she totally destroyed the song "I'm sorry". She cannot sing live, only in the studio with all the sound gimmicks to make her sound half way decent.

Lauren Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:14 PM EST

I just happened to watch both the Rockefeller Tree Lighting and parts of the Grammy nods program but HOWW is it that the Jonas Brothers were on BOTH PROGRAMS that were both supposedly Live?? Does anyone know, because this question is killing me? Which one was taped????

John Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:02 PM EST

Taylor Swift may have given the most horrid performance in the history of live TV performances.

Matt2 Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:44 PM EST

My God, what a horrendous nomination show. This was so unnecessary. It will surely hurt the ratings of the actual Grammy Ceremony as it was a complete turnoff.

Rock Chick Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:35 PM EST

I will not be watching the "Crappies" this year. This show sucked, except for Christina A. who can sing better than any nominees. Will anyone speak up and tell me that after hearing Miley Cyrus, The Jonas Bros. and Taylor Swift sing (especially LIVE!) they think they can sing? I have never heard of half of the nominees and I try to keep up with all types of music. UGH!

John Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:17 PM EST

After this year's developments and the snubbing of Leona Lewis for the likes of someone named Jasmine Sullivan for BNA, maybe the Grammy committee just needs to do away with the category entirely! What an utter disgrace!

AlternativeForever Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:12 PM EST

I USED to respect the Grammys. They didn't USED to go ga-ga over the one hit wonders or sucky teen lipsychers like the Jon-ASS Brothers. And Taylor Swift. And (god forbid HIPHOP from staying popular) LIL WAYNE. COME ON PEOPLE!! Get your ears checked. You've lost all the integrity of the awards in a desperate attempt to rack up ratings by nominating the current obsession. 3 comments: Lil Wayne DOES NOT SING. Taylor Swift's voice makes my ears bleed and need extensive repair from my iPod. And the Jon-ASS Brothers? If they're still dominating in one more year, music has officially died. HOW CAN THE SUCKFEST LIPSYCHERS SING IN COWBOY STADIUM!?

My point is is that the Grammy leaders have lost the POINT of these awards: to honor good music. NOT necessarily music that will give them ratings (and believe me, the Jonas Brothers just scared away their entire mature audience). The Grammys need to return to being about the MUSIC, not the people singing it!

JOBROS -KISS MY ASS. That is all.-E

Oh My Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 09:30 PM EST

Rhoda, Brenda Lee is not in a grave. She's alive and well. I sure hope she wasn't watching.

face Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 08:56 PM EST

RADIOHEAD, YOU HAVE GOT TO BE SHITTING ME!!!!!!! THEY ARE THE WORST BAND IN THE WHOLE WORLD AND THEY ARE BEING NOMINATED FOR A GRAMMY FOR BEST ALBUM!!! HERE ARE MY THOUGHTS, RADIOHEAD SUCKS BIG HUGE HAIRY MAN BALLS AND TAKES DICKS TO THE ASS.

Allison Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 08:48 PM EST

I thought mariah did ok-- she hit the notes. Her voice just sounded a bit scratchy. It was not her best-- but it was leagues better then taylor swift. Wow. that was just-- BAD.

Kate Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 08:42 PM EST

Has no one found the gumption yet to expound on the heinousness that was Mariah Carey butchering her own classic?! Inappropriately lauded or not, at least Taylor Swift has the professionalism to not SQUINT on stage in anticipation of her wretched high notes like Ms. Carey continuously did. Lay off the drugs, or whatever is stripping away your once enviable talent, Mariah; your performance was a vocal disaster.

MRC Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 08:04 PM EST

The Jonas Bros. ? Seriously. What a joke. I laugh everytime I hear them talk about how they are self taught. Yeah boys, it sounds like it. you all suck. And my god, please, will someone get a shepards hook and yank Taylor Swift off stage! And the, just when I think it cant get any worse, Lil' Wayne is nominated a gazillion times. WTF is that!One song about a "Gurl Wearin her hur down 'er back like his" and hes Grammy material. The Award has now officially become a joke.

Meredith44 Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 07:28 PM EST

I have given up on the Emmys recognizing what I consider to be deserving shows, and I have a feeling that I shouldn't expect anything from the Grammys either. I know that I'm biased because I love Sugarland and saw them live this year, but I can't believe Love on the Inside wasn't nominated. I like all of their albums, but each is better than the last, and Love on the Inside was really great.
(And I cannot believe that there are people who think Jennifer Nettles can't sing. Wha? I can understand not liking their music, because no music is for everyone, but I don't see how anyone can say that she isn't a good singer.)

Cher Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 07:26 PM EST

I'm just happy Radiohead is nominated for In Rainbows. I cried when they lost to Steely Dan.

Hopefully, this will be their year.

Rhoda Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 06:52 PM EST

I agree with the comments about Taylor Swift. Great article EW!

It is high time that someone tells the truth about that over-rated spoiled brat. She cannot sing, and needs to stop thinking the world revolves around her.

Brenda Lee would be turning in her grave if she heard that "performance" last night. *shudders*

Rhoda Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 06:52 PM EST

I agree with the comments about Taylor Swift. Great article EW!

It is high time that someone tells the truth about that over-rated spoiled brat. She cannot sing, and needs to stop thinking the world revolves around her.

Brenda Lee would be turning in her grave if she heard that "performance" last night. *shudders*

Allison Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 06:47 PM EST

Carrie Underwood was snubbed from Country Album of the year. Carnival Ride is a GREAT album and deserved some love.

At least they gave Carrie a Grammy nom for Country Vocal Performance. Thank God for that. But she deserved more.

Someone kick Taylor to the curb. She sucks!

Thomas Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 06:45 PM EST

Taylor was god awful last night- and every night. She is the worst singer in any genre-- and the most over-rated, over-exposed to boot.

She butchered that song last night. Why was she even invited? Carrie Underwood would have done a lovely job on that song- and she wouldn't have promoted her own song like Taylor did.

Taylor needs to get a reality check: a tribute song is supposed to be a tribute to legends, not yourself.

She needs to take vocal lessons, or just be a songwriter. Whoever told her to be a singer??

Virginia Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 05:55 PM EST

One has to wonder what her record company was thinking in signing this no-talent travesty. She wouldn't get past the first agonizing auditions on American Idol and would end up as one of the people the judges ridicule mercilessly. Really, this girl cannot sing. She was flat, then sharp. Her tone is inconsistent. She has no control whatsoever. It was painful listening to her maul "I'm Sorry" which was so the wrong song for her. It isn't an easy song to sing and she made it even worse. My niece used to love, love, love Taylor Swift, but even she has come to her senses and has realized this girl has no talent whatsoever.

Doug Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 05:39 PM EST

Hey, yous are way more entertaining than this music. As further evidenced by the fact it's just as important who's old (John Mayer is actually some decades older than he looks) as who's sexy (sorry, not Mariah or Celine). But Christina - hmm - after years of thinking very little of her I have to say that the conspiracy by Britney, Paris & Lindsay to make Christina look intelligent & mature has finally paid off, and since she's suddenly down with music from before her mom was born, well, wow.

Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 04:54 PM EST

91 = # of words in Sentence #1. 78 = # of words in Sentence #2. Wow.

joy Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 04:40 PM EST

Celine singing At Seventeen was the most disgusting moment of the night. The irony was that the beauty queen was actually singing the song and not very well. Janis Ian deserved better.

And stop with the ageism comments, already. I wasn't even born when Nina Simone was at her best, but even I can appreciate her incredible voice. (And while Christina did a good job, you people really need to hear Nina Simone's version - on vinyl. Nothing compares. Nothing.)

eaturveggies Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 04:40 PM EST

Whitney, I love you! Your articles and blogs are always so enjoyable, although as a fanatical Sugarland fan, I may be biased. I'm so sad that "Love on the Inside" did not get nominated for Country Album of the Year.

James Moore Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 03:56 PM EST

Who the hell is Lil Wayne? I heard a clip of his "music" and it was pure rapper noise.

Joye Beth Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 03:54 PM EST

Honestly, I feel like the Grammy's don't even represent the best of the best anymore. With the digital revolution, how can anyone decide who has the best music anymore? Not the people at the Grammy's-that's for sure. I was so disappointed with the noms for best new artist. Where the heck was Katy Perry? Be for real. I stopped watching after that because it was boring. Plus I was so hyped at the beginning thinking that Mariah Carey was going to sing "All I Want For Christmas..." And then my spirit was crushed when she didn't. That ruined it for me.

Georgia Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 03:53 PM EST

Christina's performance was incredible. It was definitely the highlight of the evening. Such a beautiful and soulful rendition of an old-time classic. That girl can sing. Christina undoubtedly will be around for a long time.

Doug Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 03:51 PM EST

Entertaining analysis. Too bad you don't get Steely Dan. I put the whole thing down to generation gap and continue in my reverie.

Matthew Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 03:48 PM EST

Whitney--you are now officially my hero. I'm glad that someone agrees with me that Taylor Swift is so over-rated.
There are some great nominees among this list that I'm really happy about--Coldplay, Adele, Sara Bareilles, Radiohead, Jennifer Hudson, Alicia Keys and Duffy. I'm a little disappointed that Alicia Keys didn't get an Album of the Year nod, though.

Anthony Tomeo Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 03:41 PM EST

Music award shows regardless of who is putting them on is only about money and sales. When I looked at the nominations for the "Hall of Fame" two years ago, I wanted to throw up. I haven't looked back since! AT

Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 03:36 PM EST

Taylor Swift may not have sounded great singing "I'm Sorry" but her cd is actually very good and she is a talented writer, she writes 100% of her songs, many on her albums were written when she was much much younger then 18. Christina Agulera sucks she over does all her notes on every song she ever sings

Dakota Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 03:34 PM EST

I honestly don't get Taylor Swift. The girl can't sing a note in tune. She's truly awful. She may be a good songwriter, but for heaven's sake get some else to sing the songs. Anybody who thinks she can sing is tone deaf. Unfortunately, that means most of the country. Listening to her "sing" is painful.

wiseass2147 Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 03:32 PM EST

Foo Fighters were awsome! This writer is a jackass.

Emily Walters Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 03:29 PM EST

This is one of the funniest articles I have read in a very long time. From one journalist to another- that rocked! Thanks...I missed the show but washing my hair was more important!

MsfStl Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 03:25 PM EST

This was the worst writing I have read in some time. Whitney, did you finish your English classes in high school? The two run-on sentences in the first paragraph were horrendously difficult to wade through. My dear, if you would like a career in journalism, please do us all a favor and learn how to write. Never make your readers do the work for you. Say what you mean, mean what you say.

trashman Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 03:10 PM EST

Oh forgot Celine

Celine = C (she was mouthing the words)

steve Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 03:04 PM EST

I tuned in when Celine sang that dreadful 'At Seventeen' just like seventeen seconds it should have been. It was too long and dreadful.
Taylor Swift hacked 'I'm Sorry', but I thought she was real and noteworthy in that second number she sang right afterwards.
Was that second song her own song?
If so, I could notice the slight transition to a more confident and very talented singer.
The Foo Fighter's 'Your So Vain' got to my veins.
Christina is NO Nina Simone, what were they thinking?

eva Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 02:58 PM EST

the music industry is beyond hopeless. seriously.

Melanie Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 02:54 PM EST

What happened to music? Where did all the good music go? 60's were okay. 70's were great. 80's were super. But when the 90's rolled-around, music lost me as a customer. Music lost it's soul, it's rhythm, it's melody, good voices, etc. WE NEED TO GO BACK TO GOOD MUSIC ... pleeeeze???

stiffy Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 02:51 PM EST

Disappointed that Mariah was shut out for Part 2 of the Mimi CD (E=MC2), but she's NOT totally zapped by the Grammy blues.
Attention all Mimi fans:
Mariah is nominated in the Gospel category for Best recording by a Gospel Artist with 'I Understand' with others from the Randy Jackson CD compliation!
That's heavenly!

Jen Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 02:51 PM EST

I wholeheartedly agree that that Taylor Swift is terrible. I always thought she was overrated, but it was confirmed watching her CMT Crossroads with Def Leppard. She's just bad. My theory is this: if she's not a 6 foot tall blonde teenager, there's no way she makes it in the industry. She can't sing. She can write songs that high schoolers identify with, I'll give her that. But for the love of all that is holy, please make her go away. And if I heard that stupid Love Story song again, I think someone might get shot in the foot.

trashman Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 02:50 PM EST

My grades:
Mariah Carey = D- (ick, barf)
Foo Fighters = F (worst I've ever heard)
Taylor Swift = F (that girl can't sing)
Cristina = A (amazing rendition)
Mayer & BB King = B (BB still da KING)

Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 02:49 PM EST

Did I miss something? Live Grammy Nominee show, Live Rockefeller Center Lighting...and the Jonas Brothers were at both? How did that work?

Martin Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 02:49 PM EST

Wow, this is the first time I have listened to Taylor Swift, she really sucks. Whats with the fist shaking, nothing was that emotional !

Alan Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 02:47 PM EST

I had never heard Taylor Swift sing until yesterday. I was HORRIFIED!!!!!!!!!! She wouldn't have made it past round 1 of American Idol. Any pathetic individual who buys her music should be ashamed of herself. She not only can't sing but she ruins an old classic too. SUCKS!!!!!!!!

Catlin Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 02:41 PM EST

Im glad to see that there were some good nominations for the Best Female Pop Vocal Performance and Song Of The Year... GO Jason Mraz! I agree about Taylor Swift, she cannot sing at all...I always wondered why she was so popular...arent all her songs about boys shes dating anyways, wow so inspiring and different.

Sara Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 02:39 PM EST

Totally agree on the Taylor Swift comments--she sucks at singing. And it isn't her age. I am a high school teacher and I have kids who could blow her out of the water two years younger.

dennis_k Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 02:38 PM EST

I'm a huge, huge Foo Fighters fan, but I was embarrassed by their wimpy, inexplicable performance of "You're So Vain." Sounded like they hadn't even rehearsed. But Grohl redeemed himself somewhat with his reading of the noms.
Remember, the Grammys started as a backlash to rock 'n' roll, and they've been trying (and failing) to catch up ever since.

wsre Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 02:35 PM EST

and so they Robbed Alicia Keys get off this computer

jo jo Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 02:31 PM EST

that dam grammy award was a hot dam mess so never but lil wayan on there he no good ass

kenj Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 02:30 PM EST

Mariah not getting any nominations for EMC2 is just pathetic. It was one of the top R&B albums released this year.
She performed well despite the vocal issues she's been having lately. She needs to rest her voice, she's been performing constantly for 19 years now.

They Robbed Alicia Keys Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 02:22 PM EST

How in the world could Alicia Keys get snubbed for one of the best albums out. As I Am was an amazingly good album but the Grammy Awards snubbed it. The Grammy Awards are now officially irrelevant. I can predict that no one is going to watch this dud.

To the writer of the blog Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 02:21 PM EST

There's nothing wrong with mixing old school with new school. Music was not made in a vacuum. It's juvenile to think otherwise. How old are you, twelve? Nothing wrong with acknowledging history. The mix of styles and songs should be done by influence and with some thought. To see a current artist sing the song of someone they were influenced by and a little clip acknowledgig that influence would have been cool. To see artists that can't do anything with the songs is another thing. To hear Taylor Swift butcher "I'm Sorry" was horrible. I wonder did she pick her Hall of Fame song and was it given to her? Or is she like you, not able to see anything beyond her time which in her case, since she's so young would make sense but as an artist, wouldn't make her that deep. Now, as far as nominations, yeah, the Grammy's are stuck in the past and I hope they don't decided to honor Plant and Krauss in every category they can.

kelse mictro Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 02:20 PM EST

can i be a star to i have a lot of talent and i did it with lil wayan and he dis claim me but it all good it was good

Keys Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 02:19 PM EST

I think Alicia Keys album snub came about because last years ceremony seemed to already celebrate her. She performed and won for No One (which was the only single released and eligible as the full album released too late to be eligible). This type of confusion has occured before and maybe artists who seek Grammys need to reconsider project release dates in the future if they hope to be visible come nomination time.

SteveSanders Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 02:08 PM EST

Haha...that performance was crap.

60'schild Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 02:01 PM EST

Taylor Swift singing "I'm Sorry" ??
I missed Criminal Minds for THAT? Yeah, I'm sorry..so sorry.

curt Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 01:58 PM EST

Yes, last night's "conert" & announcement of 6 grammy categories was a collasal waste of time. You are right on the money about Taylor Swift. I cannot stand her. She has zero stage presence & I don't think she ever sings a note on key anytime I've ever heard her perform live. She is definitely over-rated & overexposed. Overall, I was glad that Alicia Keyes, another OVER rated singer was largely snubbed. Sheryl Crow--pop album? Wasn't it drubbed by critics? Name recognition is clearly a factor in how some of these nominees are selected. The Grammy's have been & will most likely always be out of touch. I'll not be watching to see their "amazing collaborations" they haul out. Does anyone desire to see Rita Coolidge perform w/ Lil Wayne. How about Olivia Newton John and Kenya West? I thought so. The show & the nominations are just ridiculous. Here's hoping the Jonas Brothers win the Best New Artist--they will forever be jinxed. May they rot in hell w/ Miley Cyrus.

seattle_girl Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 01:58 PM EST

I guess if the Jonas Bros can be nominated for best "new" artist this year there's still time for Vampire Weekend to get a nom next year. Guess the Grammy's *gasp* are a bit out of date.

LOL Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 01:51 PM EST

Dave Grohl and John Mayer should definitely present all the awards on Grammy night.

Gulp Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 01:49 PM EST

I'm still trying to figure out how The Jonas Brothers could be live in L.A. ("Grammy Nomination Special") and live in NYC ("Christmas in Rockefeller Center") at the same time.

? Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 01:41 PM EST

I wonder if we get enough people to petition this horrible list of noms we can get deserving artists up there instead of media crazed no talent performers.

Kelly Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 01:37 PM EST

We get it. You hate Taylor Swift. No, she's not Christina Aguilera or Beyonce or Mariah Carey, but there's a difference. Taylor Swift isn't known for being a powerhouse singer. She is a talented ARTIST who has a gift with writing lyrics, creating memorable melodies, and structuring songs in a way that make her an amazing songwriter. Also, she's 18 years old. She's growing up and maturing, and with the way she can write songs that are extremely easy to relate to, you might as well just sit back and face the fact that she is going to be around for a long time, monopolizing radio airwaves, performing on award shows, and selling millions of records. Maybe it's time you stopped picking apart the vocal and actually listened to the music!

florida Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 01:30 PM EST

Horrible show. Bad songs, bad performances. The camera trying to follow Swift and LL was obnoxious. Celine sounded like she was wearing poorly fitting dentures and I thought she was going to accidentally swallow the microphone. Loved Dave Grohl's nomination announcements. He gave them they respect they deserved, which is zero.

DenverWriter Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 01:26 PM EST

Check out Jordyn Shellhart at www.myspace.com/jordynshellhart. She's a singer/songwriter living in Nashville who is going to do great things someday, in my opinion. What makes her different from some of these other young singers is that she REALLY sings....there won't be a gimmick with her. Just true talent with what looks like an amazing team behind her.

MB Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 01:22 PM EST

The Grammy's have been irrelevant for years...

mi2jax Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 01:20 PM EST

THANK YOU!! Finally someone noticing that Taylor Swift should not and cannot sing.Do you think she would ever get passed Simon??She seems like a nice well polished teen, but gimme a break on the vocals...Where was Kelly Clarkson, Jessica Simpson, Pink, the list can go on and on...Geez

bvb;hm Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 01:16 PM EST

taylor swift writes all her songs


advertisement

Add Your Comments

The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject — or we may delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field.



  • 1000 characters remaining
    • When you click on the "Post Comment" button above to submit your comments, you are indicating your acceptance of and are agreeing to the Terms of Service. You can also read our Privacy Policy.
Latest Comments
Top Categories

All Categories

Blog Roll
Top Authors
Recent Posts
PopWatch Archive
July 2009
S M T W T F S
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Complete Archive