'Star Trek': An exclusive first look at the Enterprise

Terry Hancock Tue, May 26, 2009 at 04:49 PM EST

I am an original '60s Trekker. I saw the new movie at an IMAX, the opening weekend. Okay, so it didn't follow what we all "know" happened; Spock explained it all, so that is what happened. It is now canon, and I'm ready for more. I just want to see some deck plans, and figure out all of those phasers!

Pep Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:31 PM EST

I have to agree with Warlock. I'm a huge fan of all star trek, the 5 series (and the TAS too) and 10 (now 11) films. I'm a huge huge fan of TOS and I really really enjoyed the new movie (twice XD) I like how they manage to put the 7 people all together and the funny things that happen (that for a non-trek will laught, and a trekker will laught louder)and hell, I like the new enterprise. Star Trek needed this new fresh start. I don't care that all we've seen only old Spock and us "know" what happened in the real timeline, we can whatch it again on DVD or re-runs on tv. So what? why people are so closed? if they call themselves fans of star trek they should know that Trek means embrace new things...people who say that they don't like cos ...they made it too well and it's making money?? sorry, what? XD and cos the enterprise it's different..emm..how many enterprise are? so what, cos this is a new version of the original? in 1979 they already change it..and I really like it. J.J. good work

Bob Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:16 AM EST

Im a fan from the 60's I have always liked Star Trek and I like change. Same with Battlestar Galatica, when everyone was debating I told them to just wait let's see what will become of it. I say the same with Star Trek, granted it's not the one we grew up with but lets give it a chance.

warlock Thu, May 14, 2009 at 01:17 PM EST

@Horns:Your assertion seems to be that there is or was a dichotomy between a fun, exciting, good film and a film accurate to established Star Trek canon.

There's not. And no, they wouldn't have had to "spend millions" on continuity checking. All they had to do was not write a story that invalidated 43 years of filmed Trek in the first five minutes. Believe it or not, there is a middle ground there. (Also, they probably could have found plenty of obsessive fans to vet it for free.)

I don't really care that the Enterprise looks different inside and out. It would have been nice to see an exterior more accurate to the TV show (google around, plenty of people have been crafting up their own versions) and a more familiar/functional bridge layout, it would have cost them nothing extra, but I'm not going to dismiss the film based on that. I don't even care about the small anachronisms, like the Tribble on Scotty's desk or the Cardassian drink being ordered in the bar. (cont'ed next comment)

warlock Thu, May 14, 2009 at 01:16 PM EST

Hell, I don't even care that Black Holes Do Not Work That Way, or that apparently the Enterprise has five warp cores.

I care that every scene involving Spock's emotions seemed forced, from the relationship with Uhura to his breakdown/epiphany/recovery within five minutes.

I care that somehow the Beastie Boys and Nokia have survived to the 22nd century.

I care that there's a _window_ at the front of the bridge, that apparently exists to have flashing warnings overlaid on it and to crack in moments of stress.

I care that Ambassador Spock is off to lead the new Vulcan colony, instead of either a) briefing Starfleet on his future knowledge or b) trying to repair the timeline.

I care about the contrived coincidences that put Those Exact Seven People on the bridge crew of the Enterprise, and how Kirk was promoted directly from Cadet to Captain.

Oh, but there were pretty explosions and nifty CGI. And apparently, that's all I should care about.

Jayhawk Wed, May 13, 2009 at 07:17 PM EST

If you are a fan of the old Star Trek DO NO GO SEE THIS MOVIE! It is NOT Star Trek! As a matter of fact, they ruined Star Trek in the first five minutes. If they make another (and they will) they MUST fix the errors that they created, or I will not go to see it. When it comes out, I will wait to hear if the original plot line has been repaired, and if it is not, I will write off Star Trek forever! I can't believe that they were so disrespectful to the integrity of such a beloved series.

Naman Wed, May 13, 2009 at 01:37 AM EST

I'm not too fond of the new Enterprise either, BUT I do like the look of the "older" Federation vessels like the Kelvin.

I understand if older Trek fans don't like this movie, but a lot of comments sound like they're coming from "otaku"; which if you know the word, is not a good thing.

Horns Wed, May 13, 2009 at 01:28 AM EST

How dare this movie make 3 times more then any other Trek movie in it's opening weekend? How dare this movie be fun, exciting, well acted and actually worth the price of a ticket? How dare this movie not conform exactly to what .001% of the population want it to be? I am sick and tired of these movie producers making good, enjoyable pictures when they clearly should be painstakingly researching everything every actor in the history of every Star Trek episode and movie ever said to make sure they don't possibly get anything wrong. What makes them think that they could use modern CGI and special effects to make a movie people would like? They should have spent millions of dollars to make a movie with the same props, special effects and actors they used in the 60's. I know I have been DYING to see "Spock's Brain" on the big screen.

Gene in Clearwater Mon, May 11, 2009 at 08:04 PM EST

I agree with James T Kirk below...

I work in a church and let me tell you... any new change that comes about and it's RED ALERT!

I encourage the purists out there to be thankful for a new cinematic story.... enjoy this fresh new interpretation and a chance to re-imagine a brave new universe!

Groppo Mon, May 11, 2009 at 07:52 PM EST

"YOUNG MINDS, FRESH IDEAS..."

I admit... as as Star Trek purist, I was a bit disappointed when I first saw the new 1701. In all actuality, the ship looks VERY COOL from different CINEMATIC ANGLES on the big screen - I LOVE JJ's "warp effects," particularly the END of each warp!!!! The effect seems SO MUCH MORE realistic !!!

Though I have a love/hate thing with time travel in our ST Universe, I will always remember the seed planted in a late Voyager episode dealing with time travel corruption! What a PHENOMENAL LIBRARY of Star Trek SciFi lore upon which JJ and others in the future may draw from!

In essence, JJ has breathed a whole new life into our beloved Start Trek Universe, Thank God. Somebody @ Paramount was intelligent enough to know that it was worth a gamble to spend $$MMM on a new Trek movie - WITH A NEW CREATIVE TEAM AT THE HELM as well!

The casting for the new movie was monumentally perfect too!

Groppo Mon, May 11, 2009 at 07:50 PM EST

"YOUNG MINDS, FRESH IDEAS..."

I admit... as as Star Trek purist, I was a bit disappointed when I first saw the new 1701. In all actuality, the ship looks VERY COOL from different CINEMATIC ANGLES on the big screen - I LOVE JJ's "warp effects," particularly the END of each warp!!!! The effect seems SO MUCH MORE realistic !!!

Though I have a love/hate thing with time travel in our ST Universe, I will always remember the seed planted in a late Voyager episode dealing with time travel corruption! What a PHENOMENAL LIBRARY of Star Trek SciFi lore upon which JJ and others in the future may draw from!

In essence, JJ has breathed a whole new life into our beloved Start Trek Universe, Thank God. Somebody @ Paramount was intelligent enough to know that it was worth a gamble to spend $$MMM on a new Trek movie - WITH A NEW CREATIVE TEAM AT THE HELM as well!

The casting for the new movie was monumentally perfect too!

Lal Wynstrom Thu, May 7, 2009 at 01:56 PM EST

I've got to admit, the engineering section looks like an elf ear, or a Vulcan ear, or something. I was expecting it to be meatier than that, just like the original. The nacelles are *way* too far up on the pylons, and way too close to the saucer section. And I expected the bridge to be roomy, elegant, functional. There's too much going on there too. It looks like something out of a bloody video game. This redesign had potential until I saw these obvious flaws. I'm not asking that Abram's vision be pure, just true. This movie looks like it may be cool. It just doesn't look like Star Trek.

Reynaldo Alvarado Wed, May 6, 2009 at 03:19 PM EST

1. Not crazy about the new Enterprise design, but then no one ever really is at first-lots of people hated the TNG Enterprise, now it is nearly as iconic as the original.(Agree with the comment about the 'snow-blind' bridge LOL! Man that is hard on the eyes!)

2. For those who cry "Money-Grab", What do you think making movies is all about? LOL!

3. One thing I really hoped for in a Trek reboot was better aliens. Yeah, I know they have an excuse for the endless bumpy headed humanoids with "The Preservers" in the mythology, but if Abrams was serious about doing a reboot, he should have dropped the time-travel cop-out and just re-made it from the ground up. Just imagine: we see a somewhat familiar 'alternate' Klingon ship, and when the camera pans inside, the Klingons themselves are vicious CGI-Monsters, Crab-men or insectoid or something, but truly alien looking and clearly not actors with bumpy make-up!! Sadly, we just get more of the same with Eric Bana as a tattoo faced Romulan.

darry Tue, May 5, 2009 at 05:53 PM EST

I have watched (and enjoyed) just about everything put out under the name 'Star Trek'... http://alltell.600megs.com/thesha.html file

jamaly Tue, May 5, 2009 at 05:51 PM EST

I knew it from the minute JJ Abrams was involved that he would ruin Star Trek... http://alltell.eho.st/zly.html accelerater

jamaly Tue, May 5, 2009 at 03:44 PM EST

I think Who and Trek had the same problem where all of the non-Canon stuff began to take itself a little seriously anyway... http://shadow.oxyhost.com/bent.html pics

Pep Tue, May 5, 2009 at 03:01 AM EST

I agree. I like the new Enterprise, and I will be in the theater this Friday, to see the new movie. I'm a TOS fan, and I will give the opurtunity to the new film, now more than ever, seing the good critics from the premieres. Forget about: "but the enterprise window number 23 is not right.." come on...the enterprise-D it's the weirdest and I like it too.. people who say that they will not see the film because the enterprise is different... ¬¬ for gots sake people, grow up...

James T Kirk Tue, May 5, 2009 at 01:28 AM EST

Dear God people, grow up!

The new Enterprise should be appreciated for what it is - a new interpretation, a fine work of art, a fresh new stage for a brand new story of Star Trek unlike anything done previously.

Stop living in the past, and holding on to special effects standards and designs that are between 20-40 years old!

These standards cannot, and should not be used as the benchmark for the new design, nor be the basis to boycott the movie.

It is a new story, a new interpretation, and I for one will be lining up to see a new outlook on a universe that I love.

As the movie trailer says, "Forget everything you know!"

Open your minds, and appreciate the experience for what it is. There is no logic for holding on to archaic and irrelevant standards that no longer apply!

Mario Merino Sat, May 2, 2009 at 12:36 AM EST

This is a perfect example of why you don't have a Star Wars guy design a Star Trek vessel. The disc shaped primary hull is 99.5% taken from the old movie Enterprise, but it doesn't work with the rest of the ship, which looks like it was modeled in "Spore". For a look at what could have been, check out Gabe Koerner's re-imagined Enterprise on youtube, you will see what I mean.

Grey Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 09:56 PM EST

The new 'Big E' looks fantastic, and I'm an original TOS fan from the time it first launched. As for the naysayers, what people say about Rock and Roll may hold true here. If its too loud, you're too old. My hunch is that if this ship had appeared in a TNG episode as an 'updated constitution class' most naysayers here would have loved it that the writers included something like this. The bottom line for everyone to think about is that this Enterprise is far closer to the original design than the Enterprise B, Enterprise C, Enterprises D and Enterprise E ever were.

SJM Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 09:41 PM EST

Trek fan since 1970. I think the new Enterprise looks fantastic.

Aaron Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:22 PM EST

First he screws up the bridge, now he screws up the ship. He had the easiest job in the world - both were already designed and well known, so why change them? Modern effects would make both look fine (the remastered originals prove that). As its been said already - this is just a money grab attempt by Paramount, and a further reason on my list for not seeing this film.

Dale Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:29 AM EST

Fred M...I hear ya. I was all set to poop on this film when I originally heard about it, was encouraged when it was rumoured that Matt Damon would play Kirk. That sounded decent, but then that went away. Then I wondered about how they could make it fit in continuity, so that the tv show "Star Trek Enterprise" seem BEFORE this and "Next Generation" AFTER this. Then when I saw the uniforms, the bridge (!) and the ship, I thought that this was going to be the biggest abortion of a remake since "Lost in Space". Then I had a theory...remember when Sarek got the Vulcan Alzheimer's and stuck his Katra in Picards brain? I'm deciding that my "in universe" excuse is that Spock is old, and this is how HE remembers it! We all know how it "really" was, but to Spock, he's got dimentia. Now, it may be a perfectly fun action movie, but I, like you, have a problem with it fitting in the "canon" that Trekkers have tried to keep pure all these years.Bottom line...wish they'd done another(better)TNG film.

Fred M Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 02:44 PM EST

I grew up with reruns of TOS in the 1970's.
I liked the movies even though they didn't follow the TOS Star Trek law; uniforms with no zippers, pockets, buckles, etc. I gradually got into the Next Generaton, but never liked the rest.
I know it is only a TV show or movie, but JJ Abrams and crew bastardized the Enterprise and for me now one else can play those characters besides the original actors. Abrams has done to Star Trek what Bryan Singer and Brandon Routh did to Superman.
I won't be seeing the film in any form and for me it never will be part of the Star Trek Universe for me, as was Deep Space Nine, Voyager and Enterprise.
Paramount has done this for MONEY.
As one writer wrote; leave Star Trek alone and try and come up with an all new idea. I suppose, like most writers producers of TV and film working today, they have NO CLASS nor imagination compared to those of the golden age of Film and TV.

dale Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:51 AM EST

SPOILER theory
***************

On another inspection, the saucer section IS almost identical to the original, including window placement and the "bands" around the edge of the saucer. It's just the engineering section and nacelles that are different. This 'disparity' could be corrected if they have to separate the saucer section and destroy the "new" weird engineering hull. Then, at the end of the movie, a more familiar design is fitted? (And hopefully a new bridge module?)
Just a thought.

dale Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:45 AM EST

This is a cool looking starship(but not for the enterprise, imo).

My main concern, from first siting in the first trailer, is that the nacelles are WAY too close together. The enterprise's wings should spread wide, not hunch together.

Wide spread wings make a ship look fast, when they are clenched like that, it looks...clumsy.

Throws the proportion all off. As often said, I would have preferred a more detailed version of the original, with some differing parts since the ships are partially modular (different nacelles, dish, bridge module, etc) but the main structure should have remained true.

Won't say I hate it until I see it and decide.

james Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 09:48 PM EST

This is not the Enterprise. WTF was Abrahms thinking. The bridge on the new ship is also ugly. Wasted effort.

Gregory Pius Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 07:56 PM EST

And to Guudi, who said: "Trek was never about the ship": you are dead wrong. The Enterprise was absolutely an integral character in the stories. There are designs that do not age and are simply timeless, that look just as modern now as they did fifty years ago. The original Enterprise and the Enterprise from the TMP-VI is classic and timeless.

Gregory Pius Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 07:48 PM EST

That is the UGLIEST rendition of the Enterprise in the Star Trek arc. This abomination of a ship has positively killed all the initial enthusiasm I had about seeing the movie. I'll echo the sentiment I've seen others share: A hyper-detailed rendition of the TOS Enterprise would've done the trick. But this--this bulbous thing looks like they modeled the -A out of Silly Putty and spent eight hours stretching it into weird shapes. And that antiseptic, operating-room, snow blindness-inducing bridge? Ecch. Sorry, J.J.--you TOTALLY missed the mark.

jim Palmer Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 06:59 AM EST

Boy do they know nothing about marketing! Most of the people who will see the movie, buy the toys etc are 40/50 somethings wanting to relive the original Star Trek. They should have stayed true to the first ship. It could have done something they have not been able to do for years... Launch a good tV remake. I know they have old scripts... Also use old style special effects. Maybe keep it more involved with the storyline and less about eye-popping explosions. What a waste of a good idea you idiots!

katrin Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 05:05 PM EST

I am thinking
'Japan'. Look at it for a second, forgetting that it's Star Trek, and you'd think it was from some Japanese anime. That sorta styling. The sane people here have said "Wait til we see more angles", and they are dead right. I don't like it very much now, but who knows, maybe my opinion will change.
The Enterprise in this configuration represents all the bells and whistlery a prototype can afford. Think of it as essentially the concept car of the starship business of the time. She's a one off, fitted with the latest bleeding edge tech that quite likely will not turn out to be cost efficient to produce en-masse.... http://sidesplitters.ccofrb.co.cc/phalyozeme.html barron collier high school naples florid

Rahul Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 02:54 PM EST

I am personally fine with them being updated, I think they could have remained truer to the original… but then again I really haven’t seen much of the inside, so I’m not going to judge it. I think what most people are up set about, and what I am personally not happy with is the amount of changes to the exterior of the ship. I would have been ok with some changes, but not a redesign, the old one was fine.
But turning it into something radically different was a huge mistake. Not just the ship but the whole movie and the acting. If people want to see Star Wars and Galaxy Quest, they watch those movies. There wont be a LOST IN SPACE 2 movie just like there wont be a sequel to this monstrosity. Star Trek fans accepted TNG and what came after largely because it was THE FUTURE - people expected to see something different... http://tampa.ugu.pl/enisum.html home

scottym Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:56 PM EST

Are they going to credit Andrew Probert?

Shalebridge Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:30 AM EST

Would have been nice to keep with the original design with some subtle detail added. This new Enterprise...not liking it at all.

garry Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 02:24 AM EST

I was in a movie theater and 14 yrs old. And from the perspective of a shuttle pod I saw a new and redesigned enterprise. Her Nacelles were swept back and reshaped no longer round. She had lines on the hull of the saucer section here was a bump on the neck to fire Photons out of it look very different. Now of course there was no internet and no way to get advance info about the movie. But when I saw her I was sitting up in my seat trying to get closer to the screen... http://pozitive.10gb.ws/qulalithe.html mo

svetik Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 04:48 PM EST

I like the nacelles but feel they are too far back as is the main spine. This design almost looks like the Ambassador class and Constitution Refit Class had a kid. I am looking forward to the trailer in front of Bond this weekend and to the movie in general... http://www.geocities.com/lsvetik/bookmak.htm bookmac

James Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 09:58 PM EST

Found an interesting page here that has a picture of the 'Playmates' toy version of the new Enterprise. Every picture I see of the new design looks uglier than the last.
www (dot) hlj (dot) com/product/PLY60127

stman Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 02:51 AM EST

To my understanding, there is a graphics novel to the movie called countdown. To my knowledge this is to be a prequel to the movie. I found it at star trek gift shop. I don't know if there will be a mini series on this as the name implies. For those of all who wish to see this, here is the link to where I found the book

http://www.startrekgiftshop.com/books-1000-1600104207-Star_Trek_Countdown_TPB.html

I have not read it yet. So I can't tell you if its any good.

Rahul Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:16 AM EST

I personally forgive DS9 as a great series but it was the revolutionaries that tanked the greatest and oldest sci fi in history. Star Trek and this film, listed seperately i might add, need some purity. Rick Berman had his day but what i need to see is the heart and soul that gave Star Trek it's longevity. The heart and soul of exploration and discovery of space and self that Star Wars does not have. I will not say that this film doesn't have it, you can not tell from a trailer... http://storage.instantfreehosting.com/the.html stokes

lora Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 03:35 PM EST

I wish she were better balanced, cleaner of line, and more consistent with the establshed look and feel of the franchise, but Trek was never aboutthe ship, but about the journey... http://mirex.l4rge.com/akndo.html for

Szemer Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 04:01 PM EST

uiouikkyu tytyjty tyjty http://vincento.l4rge.com/wh.html counting

coconut custard pie Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 01:39 AM EST

june
http://adresen.w.of.pl/cup-panif6/map.html duck tee shirt

athenian society Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 01:18 AM EST

pheb agsoz agyukfj
http://familiar.w.of.pl/dust-nat5f/map.html definition of management

Jeff Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:43 PM EST

What the hell is this at the top of the page? Is that supposed to be the new starship Enterprise? Man I hope not! This design tops the weird-o-meter! Who ever designed this stupid looking thing must have used Windows 3.1 to design it. Looks like a something you'd see in movies like Toy Story or Buzz light year. *Laughs*

Give me a break with this retarded ship!

Jeff

Brandon Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:36 PM EST

As a loyal Star Trek fan, primarily of the Next Generation Episodes, I must honestly say that this new Star Trek looks exciting. But what's with the new space ship he's trying to call the "Enterprise"? Isn't that the ugliest piece of garbage ever thrown together? You've got to be kidding me right? I mean, what lame duck designed this thing? I'm not much of a fan of the original series, but come on people! At least that ship looked better than this weird looking....out of shape....screwed up thing! I was hoping this was just a joke, but apparently it's not!

Great movie, but one ugly freaking ship design. I'd call it the USS WEIRD

Brandon

charlie villanueva nba Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 05:33 PM EST

wkofhi wlezgbr
http://fiestrol.w.of.pl/resistor93/map.html finding peoples birthday

britney spears height Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 04:52 PM EST

cjta
http://familiar.w.of.pl/bar-dancda/map.html aircraft engineer resume

Kenneth Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 02:03 PM EST

The look of the first Enterprise and Enterprise-A are the standard. I was hoping for a combination of the two, something more traditional. My first reaction to this new look recalls the gags responses I had to Enterprise-D when I first saw it.

interest Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 01:29 PM EST

novdpr fjvt ajyldcg
http://hipergerous.on1.biz/genigh.html interest

st bartholomew massacre Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 02:02 AM EST

rfjc
http://nanogalla.eu.interia.pl/lumbar-df3/map.html seattle piano bar

barbie princess bedding Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:00 PM EST

hmlsnpf tofywx
http://erudrug.strefa.pl/bargs-rof3/map.html bar hanging light

il2 sturmovik forgotten battle Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 05:48 PM EST

ipekty afwldtc tacyv jmgbic
http://inc-logix.gosite.fr.cr/map.html indy 500 race ticket

il2 sturmovik forgotten battle Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 05:47 PM EST

ipekty afwldtc tacyv jmgbic
http://inc-logix.gosite.fr.cr/map.html indy 500 race ticket

litera Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 04:20 PM EST

I really wanted to see some new actors, new stories, and a bit of a modernization to the characters. Like the new BSG. Slight changes to the props, better effects, similar uniforms... http://sportster.biz.vi/re.html time

danna Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 03:47 PM EST

jfjyf jyfkvhf uykjlkioh http://februa.biz.vi/wabound.html house

increasing the driving age Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 01:42 PM EST

wkozy sfgv vlypkdq
http://indiana-u.forumdarlington.co.cc/map.html image of a kings crown

initial d 4th stage Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 09:23 AM EST

tazud dkqxcb ilrpuh
http://intersitial-c.modifikator.fr.nf/map.html initial d 4th stage

ugtkz tyuom Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 06:57 AM EST

iqcwefyz twod smhxqknzg nmzah almdf pelywn umdp

indian news papers Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 05:27 AM EST

vfabosj owekpbs
http://illinois-tax.fabronse.orge.pl/map.html illini basketball roster

helen ellis Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 04:43 PM EST

fpqbli pqzkv qowmd
http://heart-shaped.forta.fr.cr/map.html healthy beginning

helen ellis Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 04:43 PM EST

fpqbli pqzkv qowmd
http://heart-shaped.forta.fr.cr/map.html healthy beginning

ovqfhkgj xjkumn Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 02:40 AM EST

vlmspkia wysecbmni ivxu qdcfv ziqucrgf rdefbg btsvdnzi http://www.tiuoqb.czir.com

hojmqbfua tgwih Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 02:39 AM EST

zajiyof hweodvrmp amirtxe dbkf iguybra tlbxm ymtc

rick a. Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 05:10 PM EST

Horrible Job. How can the oldest Enterprise be the most modern looking? What were they thinking, a super-detailed series version of the ship would have been the ticket (and pretty cool to see with modern FX). Also, remember Balance of Terror - a decade letter (in ST Time) was the first time a human ever sees a romulan and the last war with the Romulans was pre-warp drive. It looks like they've re-riten "history" with this plot. I know I sound like a Trek Geek, but couldn't they get this basic stuff right?

Rahul Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 07:38 AM EST

I will watch the movie but I don't plan on screaming for more like Generations. NCC-1701-A Refit was a ship you don't want to go up against... http://caren.phpfreehosting.net/qulichezdi.html a

totse Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 12:46 PM EST

I can see they want its shape to parallel the line of the nacelles, which is neat, but there's other stuff that makes it look overcooked.. http://sk888.phpfreehosting.net/tothesemi.html com

zqmycthi glrwa Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 01:54 PM EST

jfphn ocvi fytgwh kscyvzaph nobksf lfpqjxh cyktszn

zqmycthi glrwa Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 01:53 PM EST

jfphn ocvi fytgwh kscyvzaph nobksf lfpqjxh cyktszn

rmevkuhw hvynedcpa Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 01:46 PM EST

xwoquv ovknaigp vhkic siqcbrz ieywtbzfj suwgmxkn tmwfukp

ypsdagetr txdo Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 12:31 PM EST

mzuvfrg jwxgna ijupbw nqkr yhrbojmw ngvw yuhvt

cold formula karls mlm networking Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 11:42 AM EST

jyqmi
http://pointus.noneto.com/husky-pu56/map.html atraumatic head injured normocephalic no

guudi Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 01:36 AM EST

I wish she were better balanced, cleaner of line, and more consistent with the establshed look and feel of the franchise, but Trek was never about the ship, but about the journey.

It isn't dilithium or anti-matter that makes the Enterprise fly, but rather the sense of optimism, the cerebral edge, and just the right touch of humor to leaven the bread... http://dpetre.l4rge.com/vithia.html sum

greg Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 01:29 AM EST

I promise! (And you KNOW, that all of us, each and every ONE, is going to see this film eventually. Whether you want to admit it or not. You wouldn't be able to help yourself.. http://dpetre.l4rge.com/bedu.html company

teen cherry tgp Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 11:28 PM EST

ynbsgpq
http://teen-cherry.food2.fr.cr/map.html salt n pepper push it

fast moving consumer goods Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 03:11 PM EST

astrwpl cwxns yxcej
http://grilled-tuna.food1.fr.nf/map.html bisquick recipe with hamburger

baly Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 03:09 PM EST

I think it would have looked clunky on the big screen even with higher quality textures and more realistic lighting. I think if the bridge was kept more like the original, I would have a harder time accepting it than the Apple store design and the same goes for this. If JJ is going for realism and functionality.. http://giperx.5gb.cz/seram.html boston

don't let me get me-pink dom perignon label Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 08:40 AM EST

mexa melbpa zxfvenc ftwrj
http://kilamin.uuuq.com/vai.html don't let me get me-pink dom perignon label

mobile amd athlon 64 processor Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:30 PM EST

xnmdvlg yuhqbjv
http://las-vegas.repair.fr.cr/ gastonia police department

David Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 06:10 PM EST

I waited my entire childhood for ST:TMP to come out. I saw it on my 16th birthday on a 70mm screen, and all I could think is "Jeesh, this movie SUCKS!" It had horribly pointless segments that dragged on and on and one, and the sequence Abrams cites is one of them... http://dergaly.bplaced.net/gisudsteg.html love

corvette county orange racing Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 05:30 PM EST

gmcvyd
http://champagne-brun.eflamia.fdns.net/ cleveland ticket house of blues

does eat oats lyrics Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 01:19 PM EST

cnrm iabfrp pohz
http://azota.surge8.com/zevez.html donnington download festival 2004 don mattingly career stats

kriya yoga Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:56 AM EST

wlxnriq dnxzs fxyp
http://vartessa.on1.biz/pilates-f8/map.html hound dog for sale

boyz hit ii in man still Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 10:13 AM EST

stceb uiprh vlbn
http://amigorous.w.of.pl/boyz-deme5/map.html ice cream shoes by pharrell

bodom font Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 10:00 AM EST

ocns
http://yourfreehosting.xpg.com.br/free-yogf4/map.html wal mart groceries

body buffie sextape Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 09:35 AM EST

behy icnx lxeja
http://bermudikus.w.of.pl/women-in7b/map.html boat motor outboard sale used

chess chesster fritz learn play Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 08:57 AM EST

bxgvyd dcqok ogcra hrye
http://mareket.on1.biz/cheat-co13/map.html do it yourself granite counter tops

pokemon nintendo 64 Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 06:30 AM EST

ocdblrh nycikor
http://amigorous.on1.biz/cheap-glb7/map.html yoga class

free friendster layout Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 06:03 AM EST

kxbq
http://garmelite.p8.hu/1970-bui82/map.html case of the ex

play Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 03:40 AM EST

yjng xmfk avnfxpj lkehcrm
http://sperixb.reco.ws/si.html play

Rahul Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:29 AM EST

I'm actually relieved this incarnation of the Enterprise is at least recognizable at first glance. It's not as malformed and dumbed down as I'd feared. The question is... why change it at all? It was futuristic in the 1960s, and it's STILL futuristic! I HOPE he can pull off something here that isn't a complete travesty, but.. http://stifler.yourfreehosting.net/zdoth.html pitch

л Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 03:48 AM EST

ysfhukp
http://amorifma.bestpersons.ru/ м

с Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 03:08 AM EST

rftupjg
http://kaligula.blogrus.ru/

diverticulitis photo diy water softeners Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 02:11 AM EST

afznre
http://yuhojua.servetown.com/nezerch.html diverticulitis photo diy water softeners

diverticulitis photo diy water softeners Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 02:10 AM EST

afznre
http://yuhojua.servetown.com/nezerch.html diverticulitis photo diy water softeners

bpb publication books Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:01 PM EST

oujgtxy kazpx cgusfah coixpy
http://zthrkdo.yourprivatespace.com/ghaystro.html dkk meaning box chapter code fable lost x

diss lil flip boxing cliff club oak Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:30 PM EST

optiwlf jfsqwk
http://iaoxiug.upbee.com/socctht.html diss lil flip boxing cliff club oak

bps consultant sap sem disability resources abilene Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 07:03 PM EST

bqsnxg jtcez mfjtxy
http://thuuora.yazow.com/jusachofle.html dj sammy heaven remix september 11th

dj shortstop Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 05:50 PM EST

gcix
http://iaoxiug.upbee.com/medeeram.html disque dur en esclave diy line array speakers

behavior histrionic Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 03:51 PM EST

ibgm zhrj wsoiv
http://bellsouth-americ.peace.infos.st/ being deployed get

Sheila Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 03:46 PM EST

I have ever seen!!! It is a bloated, inelegant, poorly-proportioned hunk of ugly. It makes Excelsior look like a beautiful supermodel, It makes Voyager look like a Ferrari. http://pablazer.lx.ro/zdan.html recipe

Changing something just because you can is not good, it is just self-promtion and ego...