• More
Back to PopWatch Main
Complete Archive

An Oscar for Heath Ledger in 'The Dark Knight'?

Jul 24, 2008, 11:10 AM | by Dave Karger

Categories: 'The Dark Knight', Oscars 2009

Ledgertoxicologyreport_l Thanks to The Dark Knight, you might actually care about the Oscars next year. Though summer blockbusters don't usually show up in the big races at the Academy Awards, the film's glowing reviews make it a possible contender in the Best Picture, Director, and Screenplay categories, and it will surely be considered a front-runner for technical prizes. But its greatest Oscar hope has to be Heath Ledger, who'll likely become the seventh-ever posthumous acting nominee for his mesmerizing performance as the Joker. And it's safe to say that several million Dark Knight fans would tune in to the telecast to see if he can become the second such winner (after Network's Peter Finch in 1977).

The Academy Awards could use the boost. For the last several years, the gala has been filled with lesser-known nominees and seen its ratings plummet. This past ceremony, all four acting winners were foreigners, only one major-category victor (Juno) grossed more than $75 million—and the show attracted an all-time-low audience of 32 million.

Next year's telecast could end up being quite the A-list affair. Possible contenders include Brad Pitt, who ages in reverse for The Curious Case of Benjamin Button; Angelina Jolie, playing the mother of a missing child in Clint Eastwood's Changeling; Will Smith, reteaming with Pursuit of Happyness director Gabriele Muccino, in the character study Seven Pounds; Nicole Kidman, once more under the tutelage of Moulin Rouge maestro Baz Luhrmann in the epic Australia; and the Titanic duo of Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet, who'll reunite for the first time in the suburban drama Revolutionary Road.

Of course, not all of next year's nomination slots will be filled by blockbusters. But the presence of hits like The Dark Knight could go a long way toward keeping Oscar viewers from changing the Bat-channel. What say you, PopWatchers? Does Ledger deserve to be in the running for an Oscar nod? If the Academy starts paying more attention to well-crafted popcorn flicks, would it raise your overall interest in the Oscar telecast? (And if you can't wait for this week's EW cover story on The Dark Knight, by all means click here and read it online!)

nuri Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 01:45 PM EST

He definitely deserves it!

Quincy Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 08:57 PM EST

I think he deserves a nomination, I don't know about winning, because I don't know other nominees, but I was SCARED of Heath in the movie! He played that part amazingly well; I believed he was crazy. It was so believable and isn't that what acting's all about? Making the audience believe the act is the truth?

Quincy Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 08:57 PM EST

I think he deserves a nomination, I don't know about winning, because I don't know other nominees, but I was SCARED of Heath in the movie! He played that part amazingly well; I believed he was crazy. It was so believable and isn't that what acting's all about? Making the audience believe the act is the truth?

Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 02:58 PM EST

he deserves an oscar nom, but, seeing as he's dead, it would be unfair to the other actors for him to win.

trevor Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 06:37 PM EST

he deserves it.no one will not can not do better acting than heath ledger

Josh Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 09:31 AM EST

I've seen The Dark Knight twice. And I have to be honest, I never really paid attention to Heath Ledger untill this movie. I saw the trailer when I went to see I Am Legend, Sweeney and No Country For Old Men. 3 times seeing the trailer I didn't know it was Heath Ledger who was The Joker. If he doesn't get an Oscar nom then I think that would be a travesty. We cant really say whether or not he deserves the win because we haven't seen the other performances that are to come out yet. But as of right now, for sure he should get the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor. His performance was very strong and powerful. You got the sense that he melted away into his character. As did Marlon Brando as 'The Godfather', Johnny Depp as 'Jack Sparrow' along with Javier Bradem as 'Anton Chigurh'. I think Ledgers performance ranks as good as Javier's. And as we know last year he won the Best Sup. Actor award. I think certain people were born for certain roles and im glad Heath found his in The Dark Knight.

Mike Kerkhoven Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 02:10 AM EST

They used his death as a commercial promotion !!!

Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 01:42 PM EST

He deserves a oscar.

eliza Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 04:13 AM EST

Heath is just an Amazing actor and will always be.His character is entertaining and enthralling with a strong character development.He is very surprising and fearless to do any role.His role is truely a masterpiece and he should get OSCAR if not then NOBODY deserve.

Jose Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 02:38 AM EST

I haven't read all of the other comments, but I'm pretty sure I'll be the first one to say that Heath deserves a nomination, but not a win. This whole fiasco of him being a great actor has only been propelled by the fact that he is now dead. Now, that being said, I will say he was a pretty ok actor. True, in The Dark Knight he gave a good performance, but was it perfect? No. Was the movie the greatest ever? No. In either case, I think everyone needs to get their heads screwed on right and look at things like they're supposed to be and not through this barrier of him now being dead and the like. If he had never died, it would have been a good performance. He would have been praised for it, but the hype that surrounds it wouldn't have been so much. In short, no, I don't think he deserves to win the oscar because I feel it will be simply due to the fact that he is dead. I have to agree, though, that the oscars have become dull and pathetic. This will only make me see it as that much more.

Luke Atkins Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 05:59 PM EST

I seen The Dark Knight about 3 times already. and each and everytime Im blown away! Physically left speachless at the end of it! Everyone gives such a great performance but, as Im sure everyone has noticed, Heath delivers an even more epic, serious, funny, Deapth to the character of the Joker that I dont think we could ever see again. He was such an amazing actor, and there will be alot of angry people if he doesn't get this oscar! But he doesn't need on oscar to be the best!! He definitely is the best!! Outstanding!

Sheyne Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 03:51 AM EST

Heath Ledger SHOULD be nominated for an Academy Award for this movie. He was overlooked in Brokeback Mountain - a performance that was literally perfect in all its intricacies and it would be great to see him honoured publicly for his contribution to film. If the Academy overlook him because of the genre of film that produced this performance, they will have lost what tiny thread of credibility they currently tentatively retain.

Luke Couch Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 08:50 PM EST

This that even a serious question...Ledger's performance was one of the best of all time, the Oscars will become a "laughable" joke if they snubb him. His joker surpasses even the best of villans such as Lector and so on. I can't remember a performance so engaging so powerful and meaningful in my entire life. Ledger now stands atop of all the actors to come before him in delivering an unforgettable performance that lifted the entire movie from average to excellent.

Richard Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 12:25 PM EST

I don't normally leave comments but something had to be said. Yes, I think that Heath Ledger deserves an Oscar for an amazing performance, but I ask, does it really matter? The Oscars are kinda bull nowadays and their not what determines if a movie or a performance is good. So whether Heath is nominated , not nominated, wins, it doesn't matter because his performance will go down in history as one of the best of all time, and through that he will definitely get all the respect he deserves. He doesn't need an Oscar to prove his great because everyone already knows and understands it.

shawshank Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 04:03 PM EST

Maybe something could come along in the next few months that is even more deserving, but as of right now, not only should Heath Ledger win for Best Supporting, but Gary Oldman should also be nominated. He had a much less showy role but was AMAZING. Gordon was the window into the movie for your average moviegoer.

Chris Patterson Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 06:51 AM EST

let me just say i was amazed by the dark knight, i had set the highest standards for this movie and it still blew me away. heath ledger had such a diverse role and still came through with an epic performance. ill be honest, i had no idea who he was until this movie but i can guarentee that on just this movie alone he will be one of my favorite actors. he delievered so much energy and character into the joker so much respect to him and a job well done. its too bad he couldnt carry on with his career but i can say he went out with a bang! i could watch this movie all day everyday and wouldnt even get tired of it...great job all around to everybody...but let me just say that if heath doesnt WIN there is toatally something wrong... a nomination just isnt enough for this performance.... wHy So SeRiOuS?

tmara Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 12:08 AM EST

BRILLIANT performance. Ledger deserves an oscar!

Luke Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 08:22 PM EST

Simply Put,

If Heath Ledger is not nominated for an oscar for this performance , I will have lost all faith in The Acadamy Awards and will never watch them again. If They can't get over themselves and take a "superhero" film seriously then everything they are about has been lost and they should be cancelled.The awards should not be about what type of film it is but the performances in them.
I have never been so captivated by a performance in my life as I was when I saw The Dark Knight.He is a big loss for the film industry.

Luke , Dublin.

TDK Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 07:49 PM EST

I think he deserves a nomination all the way. I asked myself the other day if I would think any different if he was alive today - no way. His death hasn't changed my opinion on his performance at all. I loved Jack N's joker, i thought it was comical although it just didn't have that frightening touch to it. But Heath's just blew me away. I was stunned throughout the whole movie. It was a comical, terrifying and chilling performance, he made the role his own, and it captivated me. I don't usually write comments for things like this but I think he at least deserves a nomination. The whole film deserves at least one nomination, and I think its ridiculous if the Oscars pass it by because its a superhero movie - so what? Amazing performances from Heath and the rest of the cast, it was such a fantastic film.

Omar Awartani Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 06:30 PM EST

Ledger definitely deserves the Oscar nomination. He wasn't acting the role of the Joker, he was the Joker for 152 minutes. His performance made me lose the actual story of the movie and just follow his phenomenal performance of a character so imaginary, yet made it so real.

Arrol Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 02:42 AM EST

Oh he deserves the oscar for best actor or best supporting actor, but think realistically, do you guys really think the oscars will even bother looking at a superhero movie? well at least his performance wont be forgoten on www.IMDB.com

squiffis Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 07:12 AM EST

Who cares! The Oscar has lost all value by annually awarding a film PURELY FOR POLITICAL REASONS. Left wingers like Michael Moore & Al Gore winning Oscars...get real.

Heath Ledger put in a phenomenal performance & if the "gold plated doorstop" mattered, he'd deserve consideration. Last time I checked, Mr Ledger was dead and probably doesn't care. And If he doesn't care...neither do I.

Dushiyan Piruthivirajah Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 06:50 AM EST

Ok we all know Heath has to win a Posthumous Oscar for his astonishing performance as The Joker.

So I know nearly all of you reading this have a Facebook account. And what I want YOU to do is to join my group and in October this year I will present the ABC Network hosting next year's Oscar with a 'Mass-Vote' to get Heath onto the ballot papers for teh Award.

The Link is below-
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=22042728545&ref=nf

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE...let's try and get Heath what he deserves!

Pigpen Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 09:50 AM EST

My comment would be yes, not because of his death, or anything associated with that - but simply because to take a comic book villain, who is way over the top, as the Joker is, and make him what amounts to a fully believable, fully vested psychopath is something that very few, and I mean VERY few actors could ever hope to accomplish. A magnificent acting job in creating such a complete and believable, imho, psychopath should put him within reach of not just the nomination, but winning.

tia Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 06:25 PM EST

Heath Ledger, even he were still alive today, deserves that oscar. he was freakin amazing in that role and thinking about it now gives me goosebumps! its heartbreaking to know that he cant see the affect hes having on the world right now.

David Grants Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 04:04 AM EST

Heath Ledger did a phenomenal job playing The Joker. I believe deep down that, not just because Heath's passing he will win the Oscar, but his great perfomance. Hands down! Out of the whole movie he was the character that pulled me in, and kept me hoping that the movie would never end. R.I.P. Heath Ledger.

Jenny Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 01:23 AM EST

Hear the beautiful "Heath Ledger Song," a song written in tribute to Heath Ledger. Visit

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZDbNIa2jGU

or

Google "Heath Ledger Song" and click the entry with the black box

Kathleen Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 07:55 PM EST

Heath Ledger was absolutely rare as a person as well as an actor. His brilliant performances were from his great effort in addition to his huge talent. I feel grateful to have seen such an actor who gave all to his career and such a young human being who had a heart and a soul. He should have won the Oscar for his incredible performance as Enis in Brokeback Mountain. I would wonder what Oscar is for if Heath does not win the Oscar Award for his iconic performance in the Dark Knight. After all, Heath Ledger was the best with an Oscar or not.

Khaled Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:33 PM EST

I like heath ledgers portrayal of "the joker" more than Jack Nickolson, nickolson appeared to me as more of a clown, a like-able clown. no dark effect. ledger offered us a dark and gloomy disturbed character,which is hard because he has to laugh a lot, being the joker . for that reason i find the joker an EXTREMELY hard character to play.. for someone like jack nickolson not being able to do it as well as the young heath ledger , makes ledger outstanding, imagine what he could have brought to us with even more experience. its a very sad thing he is lost, but im extremely glad his last movie wasnt a corny tv movie. but something as huge as a batman movie, not only that but played so good, its amazing. i guarantee he will be nominated.

Nina Francia Guerra Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 04:52 AM EST

I'm a fan from the Philippines.
I really love Heath Ledger.
Another Award-Winning performance, there.

Raina Quibral Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 03:09 AM EST

I know he should have won an Oscar in Brokeback Mountain years ago. Now, even if he does win, what good is it going to be? He won't be able to receive it...

Kenneth Ramirez Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 07:36 PM EST

The Dark Knight shouldn't be discriminated from being a nominated for Best Picture, Best Director and Best Screenplay. The movie was beyond my expectations. Heath Ledger deserves to be nominated for Best Supporting Actor.
We have our chances. "The Return of the King", a sequel and a fantasy epic won 12 Academy Awards tied to aghh Titanic and Ben-hur. "The Departed" won an Award even though the ending was awful. This movie went beyond a comic book story. 'It became a crime epic materpiece involving the citizens of an American city in a Post-9/11 world, using fictional characters from a Graphic novel."

Joel Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 06:14 PM EST

Halle got an oscar for playing a georgia girl that loses husband and son and gets drunk, naked, and screws....

Heath locked himself away in a hotel room for a month and created the character of the joker, from the stupor to the legato way he poured his word on to his listeners.

He kept audio and written diarys of the jokers thoughts and motivations.

He stayed on set when he wasn't even in the scene to help the other actors focus.

Really ya'll? You can't lose a man to white red and black make-up, yet still, many of us couldn't recognize him.

All of the cast had excellent writing, but ask yourself; who had the BEST execution?

jamie fox had simliar execution for ray, but he had a LIVING BREATHING model from which to pull inspiration that was well respected.

Heath had a comicbook character.

He took that and turned it into a talk about oscar.

a talk.

A talk from people who don't even read comic books.

Oscar. all day.

Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 12:47 PM EST

Heath Ledger was awesome as the Joker and should win the oscar for that reason but the sad fact is if he wins every one is going to see it as the sympathy vote.

Ishy Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 08:31 PM EST

heath ledger was under estimated by me at first beleiving how he can top the first master peice havin seen this film it came to show how wrong i was. Heath delievered a mind blowing performance gruesome..unwillingness and chills running up my spine it was truly understood that young actor potrayed a diversity to de actual joker with de psycho syd exactly like sid vicious.. nd den pulled jokes nd explosive minded act heath definetly deserves it and this ain't from a biased fan cause if i had to choose one movie to watch this was one movie long waited that didn't dissapoint having said that dey waisted no tym in de first 5 minutes so it was an all rounder excitement

Mellissa Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 06:42 PM EST

Simply put, Heath Ledger protrayed the best Joker ever portrayed on screen. He nailed the performance. If he gets overlooked for this nomination, I will be extremely disappointed. Superhero movies seldomly get nominated, which is sad. The reason there are so many superhero movies is because the stories are interesting enough to attract the readers. This movie was the closest thing to the comic that I have seen in a long time. It certainly deserves to win.

benny Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 03:53 PM EST

Real simple if Oscar has any hopes of staying relevant it will nominate TDK for picture, director, screenplay, cinematography, sound, effects, and score. BUT the most important award is best actor/supporting to Heath Ledger. If it thinks of over looking the biggest movie in the past 5 years, it would have put the last nail in it's coughin after overlooking his first amazing performance in Brokeback Mountain

La'Shawnda Mason Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 03:48 PM EST

HEath deserves an oscar for his role he died playing it and he is the best Joker,and he put his all in this. i mean that literally.

will Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 01:15 PM EST

It was an awesome flick and Heath deserves an oscar, he was brilliant,good acting and by far an awesome performance. When I had seen his final performance on the "dark knight" I am saddened by his untimely death, and wished he could have seen his fine accomplishment. He had done well and was a good actor.

michelle Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:52 AM EST

I think The Dark Night was one of the best films that ive seen for ages. Ok the plot was weird towards the end but over all i thought it was brilliant especially The joker played by Heath Legder. I think some people are over the top about them using a knife in the movie. That is not encouraging anythink. People have there own minds if there gonna be stuipid enough to walk about with a knife.It dosnt mean to say batman has encouraged them to do so. Its an action film they should maybe stick to cartoons.

M Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 09:23 AM EST

Beloved actor + ferocious final performance + chance to award movie people actually see = posthumous Oscar

Michelle Honeycombe Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 07:52 AM EST

I think Heath deffinatly deserves an oscor. He is the best actor by miles and is very talented.

Test Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 07:40 AM EST

Test

Brandon Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 06:20 AM EST

You're right, it is a disgrace that so few Americans were nominated. Disgraceful that so few good American-made films were made last year. America's got to get over itself. We are by far a sub-par country as far as a lot of things go. And the superiority complex that so many Americans have is the reason that so many countries hate us. Heck, I hate us a lot of the time.

Lisa SImpson Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 06:14 AM EST

What an overrated performance in an overrated movie. Nothing there other than runny make-up.

Gerard Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 06:04 AM EST

I agree, I personally thought it was a disgrace that so many French people were academy award winners! What about Hollywood's true stars? They make the Oscars so exclusive, not random foreigners no one has heard of or cares about, Heath Ledger most definitely deserves an Oscar, that type of performance is one which deserves recognition!

Movie_Dearest Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 05:34 AM EST

Why is EW so stuck on the idea that the Oscars need to nominate blockbusters to up their ratings? Shouldn't movies be nominated for their quality, not how much money they make or how many people may watch? Thankfully, as far as the Academy is concerned, the answer is yes.

- kch
http://moviedearest.blogspot.com/

PnkFlyd204 Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 05:32 AM EST

Hey Diane Selwyn,

Do you remember a certain movie "The Silence of the Lambs"? Anthony Hopkins appeared on screen in that movie for a total of 20 minutes or something (it was quite a lengthy movie) and won an Oscar for his portrayal of Hannibal Lecter. One shouldn't judge whether or not Heath deserves an Oscar by the amount of time he was on screen. I personally think Heath's performance was amazing.

Jeff Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 05:03 AM EST

joker*

Val Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 05:02 AM EST

If Johnny Depp can earn a Best Actor Nomination for a Jack Sparrow, why can`t Heath Ledger be nominated for playing The Joker?

Jeff Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 05:01 AM EST

If Ledger doesn't get an Oscar for his remarkable performance as the joke, I'll never watch the academy awards again.

Vishal Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 03:33 AM EST

WE LOVE YOU THE MOST HEATH.....

Vishal Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 03:31 AM EST

Well ive gone to theatres thrice only to watch the fantabulous performance of Heath Ledger 'The Joker'. Well hes overshadowed everyone in the film & i guess the best joker till date and i doubt if any other Joker would be able to beat his performance, his little sense of humour combined with the sick attitude and the wicked gestures was absolutely unique. no1 would ever be the 'Joker' that he has portrayed. I was really sadden with the news of his untimely death. This is what the f***ing thing called drugs does. It takes away our precious and priceless actors away. The bottom line is that this performace is priceless and if Heather dosent deserve Oscar for this performance then i dunno what does the jury want more from the artists.


FAREWELL HEATH LEDGER......

Jake Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 03:23 AM EST

I think that this film will go down as one of the best pictures of the year, and easily the greatest comic book flick of all time. Heath Ledger has deserved an Oscar before, but now more than ever. And it is not due to his passing, but his chilling and brilliant performance as the Joker. He completely disappeared. Jake from themoviespace.com

Diane Selwyn Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 01:52 AM EST

After reading all the raves, I went to the film today (7/24) and was totally underwhelmed. All these folks I've seen online saying it's one of the best movies they've ever seen...have they only started seeing movies last week? It was okay, but got increasingly tiresome as it dragged on and on andonandonandon. Ledger was good. Underused. Appeared too little in first half of movie. Don't know about an Oscar. Then again, Oscars don't mean as much to me as they did when I was younger. I guess ultimately I don't really care.

April Loa Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:52 AM EST

Heath Ledger was absolutely brilliant in this role as the Joker. I went into this movie completely excited to see what he had done with the role since it seemed that every person I've ever known was ranting about how great he was. He did a beautiful job in portraying this insane, creepy villian and I must admit I was surprised. Heath Ledger never struck me as the psychotic villian, but he played it well. I am not a fan of superhero movies, but I find myself marking this one down as one of my new favourites. The Joker's morbid and colourful personality was a splash of vibrance unto this film; I found myself starving for more of the Joker as the end credits roled forward. Heath Ledger was simply amazing. And most definitely deserves acknowledgment for this, his last performance. If he doesn't get it, it's a shame, but the audiences will remember him and that is great acknowledgement in itself.

jpratm Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:27 AM EST

Ledger deserves a nomination a menacing and engaging performance in a film that stays with you even after leaving the theatre... you marvel not only at its entertainment value but its clear and crisp imagery and choice of diction ... nolan , ledger and THE DARK KNIGHT deserves the accolade for the mere fact its the only comic book film that transcends beyond its core audience ... its pure gold

Jeff Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:24 AM EST

Best Picture...no way!!! Director, slightly more plausible, I guess. But this is Heath's to lose! Mr. Ledger redefined such an already great character, resulting in one of the greatest performances of the decade. He was the "The Dark Knight" (not the character, the movie). He owned it. I didn't even feel that it was a scene-stealer, partly because I felt it should have been and was his movie all along. He is definitely going to be nominated for Best Supporting Actor, and he's right now the one to beat. But Best Actor (as some of you guys suggest)? Not a chance. Remember that this will be next year, people, and the Bat-mania will probably have subsided by then. But Supporting I say yes to. Heath was a real actor, because he did not "impersonate" the character. He literally became the character, by understanding them. Even Annie Proulx said something about how Ledger understood her own character more that herself! He had a shot at greatness equal to that of Brando. What a shame.

Lisa Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:22 AM EST

Heath absolutely deserves the Oscar for this one! He stole the show! I have never seen a performance so real. I miss the days when the Academy Awards went to big films such as Titanic and Braveheart, films that everyone went to watch. The Dark Knight was a great and entertaining movie, and I don't even care for comic book movies, but this one deserves top honors!

Lianne Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:06 AM EST

Absolutely Heath Ledger deserves the Oscar nod and win. If you haven't seen the movie, then you need to. Heath was absolutely INCREDIBLE in the role......as well as the others in this VERY incredible film.
The performance alone is what matters when talking about nominations and wins for awards such as these.
Heath took this role very seriously and justly deserves a great prize for his accomplishment.

It is very sad to see pictures of all the cast together and know that Heath is missing and it looks wrong......

Everyone in that film was great, another very big look to Gary Oldman who seems to get overlooked ALOT.....he was the quiet hero again and did a GREAT job as well......

The Dark Knight was fantastically incredible.......

Thank you.

Raven_Moon Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:48 PM EST

Heath Ledger's Joker was brilliant. He definitly deserves a nomination. I tend to agree with what Micheal Cane said, "I'd like to see a performance that was better." At this point, he deserves to win. I also think the "The Dark Knight" deserves a best picture nod. Who cares that it's a summer blockbuster. A well-crafted movie should be just that, whether it be a box office hit or a small indie film that most people haven't seen. The Academy needs to get over itself.

bob Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:41 PM EST

Yes, Heath Ledger is amazing in The Dark Knight.

vanessa Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:23 PM EST

Om my gawd, if Heath doesn't getting an award, then the oscars are just plain crap. Heath made this movie, and without him, it would of been very boring......Love you Heath!

Kendo Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:00 PM EST

I'll be honest. When I went to see "The Dark Knight" I was convinced that Jack Nicholsons role as 'The Joker' would always be my favorite portrayal of the Villain. In a way I didn't WANT Heath's role to be as good.... But his performance absolutely blew me away. He owned the role, turned it inside out and made 'The Joker' a living, breathing character of absolute brilliance. Heath Ledger will always be THE Joker now. He deserves the Oscar for the amazing life he breathed into the role.

bryce Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:14 PM EST

he def. should get the oscar i couldn't even recognize him he was fully the joker

James Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:49 PM EST

Ledger will get an Oscar nomination and he will win. His performance was complete immersion in the character, just like Daniel Day-Lewis in "There Will Be Blood." Dead or alive, he deserves it. A great performance in a great movie.

christopher Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:38 PM EST

heath ledger has gone above and beyond the acting expectations in the dark night, such a captivating and real performance should not be over looked or ignored just for the genre of which the film is categorized. the oscars are about all films, and the academy has all to frequently put at house films that are supposedly on another level a higher level of intelectual cinema. what bullshit, the great films of the silver screen are being sold out by oversensitive film critics.

heath ledger deserves an oscar! it has been a long time since a performance or a role that has swept me off my expectations.

a mesmorising film that deserves the recognition of the so called all important academy.

Brad Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 07:43 PM EST

While I understand the point about blockbuster films raising the viewership at the Oscars, I think the problem really lies with the fact that most of these blockbusters simply aren't very good, and kudos for Nolan for aiming high. I don't typically get behind the comic book/superhero genre, but this was far better than I anticipated it being. It just seems like the studios continually crank out ill-conceived remakes and sequels, and hype them up so people flock to the theaters to be disappointed time and time again. (The Pirates sequels? The Matrix sequels?) I think it's time the studios start focusing on making their films fun AND intelligent. It's possible to do, but mostly, they just opt for blowing things up without regard for making a satisfying film. Glad to see Nolan respects his audience. Until more big budget films stop treating their audience like they're all idiots, I'm happy to see the indies and foreign films get their due.

Felicity Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 07:23 PM EST

Watched the movie, Legder's performance was the best I've ever seen. He deserves an Oscar. Too bad he died so young.

jake Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 07:21 PM EST

I really wish that Academy voters would take a movie like the dark knight seriously, as well as Sarah Jessica Parker's Mesmerizing performance in Sex and the City. So what if they are popcorn movies, it seems the academy likes to go out of its way to choose small movies that no one sees but there was a time when they used to nominate movies such as Star Wars, Raiders of the Lost Ark for Best Picture and Julia Roberts for Pretty Woman and Melanie Griffith for Working Girl. I hope that the Academy has not lost touch and will nominate the dark knight for best picture and SJ Parker for Sex and the city -- not because they made a lot of money -- but because they deserved to be nominated because they are the best of the year.

TDK Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 07:12 PM EST

I just saw the movie yesterday, and must say I haven't been this impressed with a movie in quite some time. The entire movie was extremely well done. Heath's performance should not be overlooked, as it has been his entire career. It was truly amazing and stunning to watch. Aaron Eckhart's performance really couldn't hold a candle to Heath's ability to completely transform himself the way he did. Sadly, even if he does win? People will cloud that saying he won just because he had died, which is a crime. If he wins, or is even nominated, it should be for nothing less than an outstanding performance. and YES, I would say that if he was still alive. Many incredible performances (Johnny Depp has had several) have been overlooked. Regardless of the academy's decisions, we are the people who buy the tickets and make these movies successful. Its a shame that Heath isn't around to know how much his performance riveted so many people. We were robbed of his great talent.

Tom Credalch Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 07:10 PM EST

This latest Batman movie moral-less. The plot is a shambles and the villany is discusting. Hollywood pumps this drivel out, and America will reap what it sows. Americans just don't get it - these movies are teaching terrorists how to commit crime. Remember the movie Escape from New York? There was the scene where the president's plane is about to slam into a building, from the one angle it looks like it will hit the WTC. Lo and behold 911 comes along and the terrorists copy what Hollywood has created. While praise is heaped on these corrupt actors, terrorists are most probably taking notes on how to commit the next nightmare. Will anyone look back at this movie and think maybe it wasn't such a good idea?

Robert Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 06:41 PM EST

Ultimately, this is a deciding point for Hollywood. The Academy has continued on a downward trend because they concentrate on artsy films, that few watch. I'm sorry, but "No Country" was not that good. Summer movies are generally disdained, but why? They're the highest grossing movies of the year. More people watch them. More people like them. If you're going opposite the crowd, especially in the entertainment sector, you're wrong. Dark Knight was an electrifying -experience- to watch, and Heath took acting to whole new levels, at least in my book. I, along with many other Americans, have become tired of Hollywood's brusque attitude towards good movies, and depictions of reality (for example, how many truly "Hollywood" movies have you seen without a gay couple in the past few years?) If Hollywood once again chooses to look over a great movie, I'll be greeting "Baliwood" with open airs.

Anthony Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 06:23 PM EST

I'm not one to usually fall for "hype" and using death to market a movie. However, all the "hype" for Heath's performance is justified. He owned the movie. If I knew nothing about the movie or the actors involved, I would've never known that it was him. Yes, it might be too early to say his performance is the 'best,' however, by year's end, it'll be one of the best if not the best. My money is on Heath. If they can give Lord of the Rings: ROTK accolades, why not TDK, which is a better film...

duncan houst Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 06:20 PM EST

I say that the academy awards needs to nominate a box office hit in order to revitalize veiwership. Very rarely does an actually groundbreaking blockbuster appear which it now has. If they give the film multiple nominations including ledger for supporting actor and the film for best picture they better win otherwise you will hear oscar disappointment around the chart.

Candice Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 06:13 PM EST

I think the fact of Heath Ledger's death should not be taken into account for the oscar, but rather his amazing performance in the role. Although the Dark Knight is not best picture material, I think Heath Ledger did a phenomenal job as the Joker, where there were only a few instances where I could actually tell it was him playing the role!

GREAT JOB HEATH!!! :D

PJ Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 05:40 PM EST

To say he derserves a nomination, right now, is too premature. There's still 5 months left of films to come out and to take a slot away from a possible better performance isn't right. Ledger was good, but he and the film are a bit overhyped. While I enjoyed his performance, I don't think it's Oscar worthy, and if he were still alive, there wouldn't be this talk.

BigBalsz Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 03:49 PM EST

lmfao
I love it when people keep on bringing up Ledger's death as the reason why his performance is so popular. That's got sod-all to do with it and is seriously dishonest. Many an album and film have been sold on the back of a celebrity's death. But this is something else and his death has got nothing to do with it. I wish people would stop using that.

Jonathan F. Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 03:48 PM EST

I think the Academy owes it to Ledger. In my opinion, he should have won his Oscar for Brokeback Mountain. Sure, Philip Seymour Hoffman as Capote was fantastic, but it really was nothing more than an amazing imitation. Ledger's Ennis Del Mar was a creation - everything from the way he moved to the way he spoke was formed by Ledger and executed brilliantly. It was an incredible and heart-breaking performance. Now of course, his Joker creation is incredible and proves further what great, versatile talent we lost.
If the Lord of the Rings 3 can win Best Picture basically being recognized for the accomplishments of the trilogy as a whole, then Ledger's tragically short but impressive career should be as well.

Kathy Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 03:48 PM EST

I would definitely wonder what Oscar is for if Heath Ledger does not get the Best Actor Award. Heath's performance as the Joker was his life effort with his head, his heart and his soul put together like all his other unforgettable performances. His brilliance does not come easily in movie industry. He died for it. He will be missed forever (whether with an Oscar or not).

aps Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 03:38 PM EST

I personally thought Eckhart was better in the movie than Ledger was and deserves the nod over Heath. While I think that he did do a great job with the role, I do not think the performance is Oscar worthy, especially as a Best Actor. He is really not in the movie enough to be considered for that. I can see a best supporting actor nod. But, I don't feel that he should win (granted it does depend on the other nominees). And even though it is something we don't like to think about, a portion of this is in response to his death. As much as we try not to use that as reasoning, it will appeal, and his nomination would, possibly, slightly increase some ratings.

dksp Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 03:29 PM EST

The role had little, if anything, to do with Ledger's death. Honestly, it was just a role, and he had his problems before. I personally spoke to Morgan Freeman about this (believe me or not, it doesn't matter) who was also in the film, and is strongly of this opinion.

Sean Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 03:18 PM EST

"This past ceremony, all four acting winners were foreigners..." *chuckle* if Heath wins, it will be another foreigner... he is Australian after all

Movie Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 03:07 PM EST

Now what's the problem with a non-American winning an Oscar for Best Actor/Actress?

Michael Slater Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 03:05 PM EST

It's so tempting for people to state Heath's drug-taking as some form of irrelevant point that he shouldn't win a post-humous oscar as if that matters. After all, how do you begin to moralise his use of drugs when everyone is using them in some form or other (cigarettes/alcohol etc) but are still great people with such great talent?

I thought his performance was the best thing I've seen so far. When people talk so enthusiastically about films post-cinema the one thing that many don't talk about much is the acting on such a level as this. This has not happened since the days of Brando, and it's the type of thing that people will talk about for a long time, so much so that I'll bet that there are many amateur actors out there in drama groups all over the world who have seen the bar being set by Ledger and he has reigned in a new age of theatrical and dramatic performance that many will want to aspire to. If there's anyone who deserves this award it's Heath. R.I.P

RYAN RENEGADE Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 03:03 PM EST

IN RESPONSE TO PEOPLE SAYING BIG BUDGET SUMMER POPCORN FILMS DON'T GET ANY OSCAR ATTENTION...UM, DIDN'T JOHNNY DEPP GET NOMINATED FOR THE FIRST PIRATES MOVIE?? THERE IS NO REASON WHY HEATH CAN'T BE NOMINATED FOR TDK!

Shawn Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 03:00 PM EST

Ledger disappeared into the role. The stories of his getting too deep into the head of Joker requiring him to take medication just to sleep change from ridiculous to understandbable, and possibly even likely once you see the film. If the Best Actor is TRULY about acting, and acting is about a character eclipsing the actor, Ledger deserves the award. It was rare to see Ledger in the Joker while watching the film. For a character so outlandish, freakish, and psychotic to show very little trace of the man behind the makeup... the man deserves the recognition.

darkside Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 02:59 PM EST

Heath Ledger as joker is oscar material.

frank stein Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 02:52 PM EST

No Oscar. Performance is competitive. But when you OD on drugs we do not reward you. We exclude you as a reminder to the living, you have to be in the game to have a chance of winning.

lauren Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 02:42 PM EST

Heath Ledger did an excellent job as the joker,and should definately win for best supporting actor, but you also have to give credit to the rest of the all-star cast,it was a well crafted film!

Mozz Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 02:21 PM EST

I would be very upset if Heath Ledger was the only nominee. His astounding performance was part of a whole, an incredible story well told. It's time the academy matured into a film recognizing organization regardless of genre. The same goes for Iron Man, Robert Downey Junior.

Christopher Hickey Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:58 PM EST

Films should be nominated because they are exceptional films. Genres should not matter just the quality of the film. Heath Ledger should be nominated for his brilliant performance, he is mesmerizing. Right now he's the frontrunner. I would like to see the performance that beats Ledgers...if it's possible.

Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:56 PM EST

I seem to be in a minority, but I totally thought he was overrated, and kind of a ham in the movie. Totally not worth the Oscar that people are already adorning his grave with.

birdgirl39 Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:54 PM EST

Yes...yes....a thousand times yes.

tony Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:41 PM EST

i think he shoudl be nominated for the sole reason of boosting ratings.

Joe Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:40 PM EST

Ledger's Joker is one of the greatest portrayals of cinematic villany in history of film. He truly lets all his pride go and transforms himself into a frighteningly real character, meaning, for all the fantastical antics, you could actually believe such villain could roam the streets of a city near you. To me, it was a better performance than Bardem's Chiguhr, truly deserving of at least a nomination.

Jamin Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:35 PM EST

People forget that Russell Crowe won for his role in Gladiator. A blockbuster movie if there ever was one. I haven't seen Dark Knight yet, but what makes any character within a movie such as this unworthy of an award. Its not a story award, its not a character award, its an acting award, if he was truly deserving its deserved. I hope the academy can truely judge on that basis and not be swayed by his death. But I fear if he does win people will always say its because he died. Its a no win situation in a way, a shame.

Michelle Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:30 PM EST

If Heath doesn't at least get nominated, I'm going to be VERY angry. He deserves it without a doubt. He was INCREDIBLE. Stole the movie. TDK is the best movie I've seen in years so it should get nominated as well. The Academy's prejudice against "genre" or "comic book" films is ludicrous. A great film is a great film no matter its source material.

sergio Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:25 PM EST

Heath created the best villain ever in film- better than hannibal lector, better than hal 9000, better than Riddley Scott's alien, and even better than Javier Bardem's oscar winning villain. Surely Heath deserves a statue. So does Nolan for that matter for helming such a beautiful epic action film.

Brett Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:18 PM EST

Alonzo, you wrote that post like you haven't taken high school english. You dumbass.

Ash Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:17 PM EST

Heath Ledger does not deserve an Oscar because he died, he deserves one because his performance as the joker is one of the best performances i've ever seen, whoever said the guy who plays harvey dent deserves one: NO! loads of actors could have played that part, no one could have played the joker like heath did. i cant think of ANYONE who deserves an oscar this year more than he does, he put a lot of dedication into that part, he deserves it, whether you think its out of sympathy or not, he deserves it

bmac Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:15 PM EST

Seriously people, wasn't Heath as good or better playing the Joker as Javier Bardem was playing the psycho killer in No Country for Old Men? Just because it is a movie based on a comic book does not diminish the story or the acting.

Becky Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:14 PM EST

You know, I had to make myself think about Heath Ledger's performance and would I still think it was amazing if he was still alive and my thoughts were hands-down, yes! He absolutely was chilling and incredible and deserves a nomination...and probably the Oscar unless someone can out-do his performance. But I watch the Oscars every year no matter what. I love art of all kinds and really appreciate seeing ppl recognized, esp. when it didn't require a Blockbuster to get noticed. There's definite con's and they do miss the mark at times on the noms and wins, but overall, I think it's still on point. As far as The Dark Knight not worthy of being nominated because of it's genre, are you kidding me? Art is art..some is good some is bad. It absolutely deserves the cred.

Lina Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:11 PM EST

Would Heath Ledger be getting all this Oscar buzz had he not passed away? I'm seriously asking this question.
And on a separate note - that Alonzo makes no sense at all.

To Alonzo Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:58 PM EST

The Oscars don't have categories like "comedy"... That's the golden globes.

Alonzo Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:51 PM EST

The Oscars is the big joke. It has become so big and unpredictable it is the joke. Giving an award to a dead man for the wrong reasons is typical in Hollywood. The name movies like they have not taken high school English. They make movies that are not. They can honor Heath if they want - as an actor. If they want an Oscar for him in the comedy category that is fine. But for best actor? Batman is a comic book character, fictional and bit if sci-fi thrown in. The Joker is a joke. Again Hollywood succeeded in creating a gold mine.

dee hesse Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:47 PM EST

I just want to say that unfortunately it's not the general public who decides who is eligible for OR who receives the Oscar- correct me if I'm wrong but I think that's why we have the PEOPLE'S CHOICE AWARDS -LOOK BACK AND SEE HOW MANY ACTORS & ACTRESSES HAVE WON THE PEOPLES & THEN THE OSCARS NOT MANY- NOT MANY I feel the general public really has no say- sorry

Merlin Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:44 PM EST

I agree at least an Oscar nomination for Heath. What a great character he created. If only the Academy could come down from their palace in the sky and recognize that it should be about what the audience reacts best to, appreciates and enjoys. But this year should be a tough one because there are a lot of great movies this year and we have yet to see them all.

MikeM Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:44 PM EST

If Anthony Hopkins was considered for an OScar far Hannibal Lector then Heath Ledger's Joker must be considered.

JerseyGirl Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:37 PM EST

I have no faith in the Oscar noms. Every year the real deserved winner is passed over while the Academy tries to cover it's behind by awarding it to people who should have won for prior work. It's a never ending cycle. So, because of this I don't mind if Ledger wins for the Joker. 1. He should have won for Brokeback and 2. He actually was amazing, and so far this movie season, is the deserved winner in my eyes.

namar Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:36 PM EST

I've seen TDK twice...

and each time i see it. Heath still amazes me. He is the first actor that i believe has totally removed himself from a character. The jokers mannerism everything is amazing. He deserves an oscar, not because of his death but because of this earth shattering performance.

TDK Oscar Noms- Best Pic, Best Screenplay, Best Direction, Best Support Actor [Ledger and Eckert]

and of course the technical awards also!

Sam Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:35 PM EST

I just hope Aaron Eckhart gets nominated, too. He was absolutely amazing and often gets forgotten about in "Dark Knight" conversations.

Scott Checkland Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:30 PM EST

His performance is absolutly incredible, i never normally write these things but its the only way now we can show our appreciation for his role as Joker. Should win the Oscar for his performance no matter the fact that he passed away, sadly.

Laura M Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:29 PM EST

I absolutely agree that Heath Ledger deserves an Oscar nomination, and not just because he died. He was brilliant, and gave a truly remarkable, original, and terrifying performance.

And I also agree that the whole film deserves a Best Picture nod, and Nolan deserves a Best Director nod. The film is a riveting masterpiece, and is certainly one of the best films of the past decade.

Eddie Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:25 PM EST

He deserves it no doubt, no question, absolutely deserves it. As of now. If someone comes and beats his performance I wont say that. But at the same time I don't believe anyone will. And the reason for that is because of how different the joker was from his normal character. I wish the academy would take that into account cuz if they did he would have the best performance in YEARS. Script is half of a character, and many times the actor just has to say it in the right tone... that isn't the case with ledger. He had to walk different, talk differnt (with 2 DIFFERENT voices in the movie), laugh different, and then act crazed, which is also different for him. Every part was flawless. Then compare it to people who do a good job acting as an everyday joe. Which is harder? Crying, laughing, & maybe acting depressed or doing all of that? Heath Ledger deserves this one, AND he deserved one for BrokeBack Mtn as well. The academy very much owes him this one, and I hope he gets it. RIP Heath!

Ruby Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:25 PM EST

I think he deserves the nomination at the very least. I realize his death will color everything, and maybe it's hard not to separate his tragedy from his performance, but why is that a bad thing? Besides all that, he was truly a revelation, death or no death. Talk about a character that almost completely removed the actor. Under that performance, who even saw Heath anymore. It was all Joker, deliciously evil, unabashedly sadistic, and undeniably mesmerizing.

jolie Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:21 PM EST

no. No one deserves an oscar just because they had an untimely, sad death. Wait..you mean if actors and actresses start to die it guarentees an Oscar out of compassion, pity, grief, ?? well, what are they all waiting for!

Wade Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:58 AM EST

I vote for WALL-E to be nominated for Best Picture.

Guy Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:57 AM EST

Ledger was great but you can't suggest an Oscar till the rest of the movies this year comes out. Aaron Eckert was just as good or maybe better as Harvey Dent, and just because hes alive hes doesnt deserve the same chatter? The movie is one of the best comic book movies made, but give more credit to Nolan for giving Ledger great Dialogue and Direction

Guy Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:56 AM EST

Ledger was great but you can't suggest an Oscar till the rest of the movies this year comes out. Aaron Eckert was just as good or maybe better as Harvey Dent, and just because hes alive hes doesnt deserve the same chatter? The movie is one of the best comic book movies made, but give more credit to Nolan for giving Ledger great Dialogue and Direction

Sean Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:53 AM EST

I think the academy needs to look at Dark Knight as a crime thriller and not just a superhero pic. It had just as much depth and action as The Departed and was on par with the level of acting. I think not only Ledger needs to be looked at for supporting oscar but also Aaron Eckhart(who got hosed already once by the academy). Also I think Robert Downey Jr. can't be forgotten either in discussion for best actor in Iron Man.

Sean Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:53 AM EST

I think the academy needs to look at Dark Knight as a crime thriller and not just a superhero pic. It had just as much depth and action as The Departed and was on par with the level of acting. I think not only Ledger needs to be looked at for supporting oscar but also Aaron Eckhart(who got hosed already once by the academy). Also I think Robert Downey Jr. can't be forgotten either in discussion for best actor in Iron Man.

Nathan Poitras Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:47 AM EST

When Iron Man came out everyone was talking nomination for RDJ... is that over now?

I think that was just fanboy talk, there was never a snowball's chance in h*ll of that happening.

Nathan Poitras Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:42 AM EST

Ledger's a sure thing for a nomination, but the question is will it be for Actor or Supporting Actor?

Kathleen Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:39 AM EST

As far as the Academy paying more attention to popcorn flicks . . . my biggest beefs are that the nominees are always late-in-the-year releases so I'm scrambling to see them, and living in a town that only has one "arthouse" theater (what up, Dayton Ohio) it's sometimes REALLY difficult to see the lesser known fare. Most cinemas around here didn't even start showing "No Country" until nominations were out. So it's kind of double edged - those quirky flick nominations get people to check out movies they might not normally see and bring business to a little independent theater. But at the same time, RDJ at the multiplex was just as fine a performance as DDL in the itty bitty 50 seater. There should definitely be enough Oscar love to go around.

Sylvie Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:35 AM EST

I've seen the film and although I thought it was great and Heath Ledger's performance is really good, I wouldn't say it's Oscar caliber. He definitely deserved it for Brokeback Mountain, but this nomination would only be a sympathy vote which is unfair to the others in the category. Definitely not an OSCAR performance.

Dave Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:24 AM EST

By my count, The Dark Knight deserves nominations for Supporting Actor (Ledger), Picture, Director, Screenplay, Editing, Cinematography, Sound, Sound Effects Editing, Visual Effects, Art Direction, Makeup, and Original Score. Now, do I think a summer blockbuster comic book movie will get 12 Oscar nominations? Of course not. But if it could somehow get nods for Heath Ledger's brilliant performance, Christopher Nolan's inspired direction, and, ultimately, Best Picture, that would truly make me one happy fan.

Chaddogg Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:04 AM EST

Um, while Ledger deserves nomination, clearly....why not the whole film? The Dark Knight was one of the most intense, thrilling experiences I've had at the movies in a LONG time....

meg Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:58 AM EST

I also want The Dark Knight nominated so I can see Christian Bale at the Oscars.

KateDFW Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:54 AM EST

I haven't seen the Dark Knight so I don't know if Heath deserves a nom or not. I will let you know after I watch it on DVD, later this year. But I agree that if the Academy would nominate some more movies that are loved by fans than the critics, they could raise their viewership. Almost every top award goes to some movie that no one sees in the theater. I didn't see a single movie that won last year until it came out on DVD. In the rare years that "blockbuster" movies are nominated, more people tune in. Oh yeah, also bring back Billy Crystal as host. No one else has proved over the past years that they can hold a candle to his hosting duties. Especially the opening song montage, always my fav!

Snarf Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:52 AM EST

I can't think of a finer tribute to the mans memory than a final nomination for what may be his defining role.
If the Academy wants more people to watch, films with broader appeal will HAVE to be nominated.

jaime Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:51 AM EST

The film is a masterpiece its so real and raw it deserves to be in the run for best pic along with a nod for Heath. Its just an amazing movie if only the academy would notice it and maybe they will! Yes its a comic movie but the story line is just amazing and so real.

Hunter Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:48 AM EST

Of course he deserves a nomination; he was able to take an iconic character and make it his own. I found myself wishing he were on the screen more.
And as of now he deserves to win. I know there are still alot of "award caliber" movie to be released between now and the end of the year, but I doubt a supporting actor will light up the screen the way this dearly departed actor did.
Also, what happened to the practice of nominating BOTH indie dramas and high grossing action/thillers (like with Tommy Lee Jones and the Fugitive)

DRS Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:46 AM EST

While I wholeheartedly agree that Heath deserves a nomination, I am even more excited that a summer blockbuster is being considered in the running for best picture. What will get me excited about the Oscars isn't necessarily big star wattage as much as it's an acknowledgment that you don't have to be in a big, foreign, arty epic to turn in a good performance or write a great script or create fantastic costumes. What will get me excited about the Oscars is diversity in the nominees, not just in ethnicity, but in genre and scope as well.

Rob Grizzly Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:45 AM EST

Weren't we saying the same thing about Robert Downy Jr in Iron Man just a couple of months ago? As usual, once the hype dies down, people will have forgotten about it come November. A superhero movie nominated for an Acting Oscar? If only the Academy would be so cool...

Stacey Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:43 AM EST

I think if RDJ gets nominated for Iron Man as I think he should (he was unbelievable, and the movie was better than Batman), it will be in Best Actor as he is the lead. Heath was supporting in Batman. Christian is lead in that movie. Different categories. That is if they nominated either since usually they don't look fondly at comic book heroes or villians.

meg Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:38 AM EST

Definitely deserves a nomination as of now. On another note, words cannot begin to describe my excitement over Kate and Leo's new movie, which I've been eagerly anticipating since it was announced. Even though it's a downer, I will probs go see it.

dan jones Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:38 AM EST

When Iron Man came out everyone was talking nomination for RDJ... is that over now?

Stacey Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:28 AM EST

He will probably get the nomination unless someone comes out in the last five months or so of eligibility to knock him out. While I do think he was incredible. I am not sure if he deserves to win. But I'll see whether he'll be nominated, and against the others who are in the category. He'll probably be in the Supporting Actor category right? Time will tell. But I am not convinced he'll win. He'll be dead over a year by the time the awards come up. And unless he's the best person of the crop, he shouldn't win just because he died. And people may tune in to see if he wins; if he's nominated.

Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:24 AM EST

He will probably get the nomination unless someone comes out in the last five months or so of eligibility to knock him out. While I do think he wa

paige Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:17 AM EST

yea he deserves a nomination but if there are 5 better supporting actor performances between now and december- id gladly remove his name off my list... i dont see whats the hate with "genre" performances- alec guiness and ian mckellan were nominated for Star Wars and Lord of the Rings... and Anthony Hopkins won Best Actor (for clearly a supporting role) for a horror film!

advertisement

Add Your Comments

The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject — or we may delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field.



  • 1000 characters remaining
    • When you click on the "Post Comment" button above to submit your comments, you are indicating your acceptance of and are agreeing to the Terms of Service. You can also read our Privacy Policy.
Copyright ©2008 Entertainment Weekly and Time Inc. All rights reserved.