• More
Back to PopWatch Main
Complete Archive

Not MY Demo, Part 2: 'Sex and the City'

Jun 4, 2008, 06:51 PM | by Adrienne Day

Categories: 'Sex and the City', Film, Hell to the no!, Things That Make Me Die Inside

Enid_l I'll admit — I was one of the giddy groups of females who went arm-in-arm-in-arm-in-arm to see Sex and the City last weekend. Right before going, I read two reviews of the film, and then almost immediately wished I'd read neither, both illustrating what to me seemed like valid, though wildly divergent, opinions. ("It's sexy and fun!" "It's sexist and shrill!")

I walked out... confused. I honestly didn't hate the film at first, though after talking it over with a gal pal who loathed it and pointed me towards this, my dislike of the film increased dramatically. (Warning: Spoilers ahead; if you don't want to read them, skip to the next paragraph.) Every character seemed cast in a Jello-tin mold (with the possible exception of Candice Bergen. pictured, in another resigned-yet-lovable mommy-esque role). The Vogue shoot was nauseating. Carrie's behavior towards Mr. Big when he got cold feet was, I thought, beyond parodic vis-a-vis the "expected" feminine reaction — shallow, weak, hysterical. (Beating Big up with a bouquet of flowers? Where was her parasol?)

As a native New Yorker whose parents got hitched at City Hall (and not because the New York library was booked), I totally get where Dodai is coming from: "I used to roll my eyes at the women wobbling on heels as they navigated the litter of soda cans and condoms on downtown streets. Real New York women need to be mobile. Real New York women never know when they might have to run for their lives." And this point: where are movies about "ethnic diversity, genuine soul-searching, "Big" questions — not about men, but about women. About our changing role in society, about our continued second-class citizen status... Especially this year, election year, when the focus on looks, cosmetics and cleavage became politically correct."

Now that the dust is settling: What did you honestly think of SATC? I know, I know — it's entertainment, it's supposed to be light, it doesn't need to hew to reality. Yet walking out of that theater into the bright and unforgiving light of day, feeling very VUP in my nondesigner jeans, mealy T-shirt, and sneaks, my wallet noticeably lighter in my pocket after blowing $15 bucks at the concession stand, I felt it impossible to turn reality off. A quick check of my closet substantiates this. (Carrie's Big-ified closet is the size of my current apartment, I kid you not.)

Sour grapes? Perhaps. What do you think? Is there something that can be said about the times we live in, that a movie about finding happiness is pegged so clearly to material things? Or is such a film worth seeing based on its entertainment value alone?

fdjpmqw bpsncdywm Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:53 PM EST

fvtkwc unimvjct dsqp nbws ysukgv ucsqr artqjfyzv http://www.cxsoij.cimqd.com

rcmbjvp uhzyx Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:43 PM EST

poqs jzkvaqxf gjcltqord mehypb fnqz ubfky jsleih

bygrz unylhskv Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:00 PM EST

devqzr vysxug irqjxlph dmfq tzsikp yxrzbui szeuncb

nkgxtqzcf vlktmsye Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 03:03 PM EST

eudtasw bgxwiha ymfsako fsxl nmdheskit jhoeigk pvuolke http://www.cdnfli.olnzbrwve.com

ydzfinr iclahds Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 03:02 PM EST

clsk tcreqnsid rheavzkj nearifod vapou zakldqe gduvbo

xfugijq wtzbmg Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 02:51 PM EST

flabcq zumfjgni qzbdw uzpe fprwsjhud wravtgufs kchjfrd http://www.pjasi.usolzp.com

eujpfx vdombkx Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 02:49 PM EST

sxju bcgvyds ojxiqzbn ezcxd mposat szgvnox przjw

Annie Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:38 PM EST

Haven't seen the movie yet... but a quick shout out of THANK YOU for the shoe comment! As a Manhattan commuter I can't fathom the idea of traipsing around the city in Manolos. A) it would get incredibly uncomfortable after about 15 minutes, and B) the heels would get completely ruined by uneven city streets after about a week. That always drove me crazy in the show.

angela Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 06:43 AM EST

I was also disappointed with the film, after watching and loving every episode, ad nauseam for the past 10+ years. I don't think not liking it makes me any less of a fan. Clearly this is a group of characters that people care very much about. Carrie and her friends (over)analyzed everything, so why as movie goers, can't we? I thought the movie was contrived and flat, and 40+ minutes too long. The dresses for the wedding(the bird in her hair?!?) were too much, and she and Miranda spent most of the movie feeling sorry for themselves rather than communicating with their men to find out why things went array. I also felt like the movie itself became a commercial product in a way the tv series never felt.

noname Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 05:30 PM EST

One more thing, this move is not for the 20 year olds, I mean they will love it but not appreciate it. You have to be a real women to see this and understand. I have been married for 18 years and its been wonderful, my parents have been married for 40 years! Dont down it until you try it with the right one. Real love and the story is out there, you just have to make wise choices for the right reasons. True romanic in Houston!

noname Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 05:26 PM EST

We apparently did not see the same movie, I am 38, only watched a hand full of the first episodes and loved this movie. The theaters are packed with laughing and crying fans. It was wonderful. It made you laugh and at the same time, made you cry. Maybe its a northern thing but we loved id in the south. The clothes were a little much and some were down right hidious but... that was the show and you have to love it. I think you should see it again and relax, go with someone else. Laugh, cry, maybe have a drink before or find a really good friend to go with. enjoy!

cassie Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 03:17 PM EST

i was SO excited to see this movie and was SO totally disappointed in it- which is a strict contrast to my 23 year old friend that went with me {i am 32 btw}. first the only characters that remained true to who they really were were charlotte and samantha... thank GOD!! carrie was disappointing at best and i wanted to smack miranda! there's no way tv series miranda would have taken back sniveling cheating steve. and after having run from him the entire movie after he embarrassed her to no end IN PRINT NO LESS carrie married big! give me a break! this movie was not written for the 30 year old population of american women, it was written for all those 20 year olds that still believe the prince is on the way. carrie was only accurate when she was reading the fairy tale to lily & said 'it doesnt usually end up that way!'

movie writers: newsflash YOU RUINED IT for your target audience

Christine Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 02:17 PM EST

Never hit "post comment" before proofing your late night ramblings...I apologize for any type o's below and do know the difference between wear and where, LOL.

Christine Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 02:14 PM EST

Yes, it's true, most woman do not have designer lables bursting out of the close, where 5 inch heels day and night, have perfect bodies and endless cash flow to jaunt off to Mexico at a moments notice. However, I think each character reflects how we feel about relationships and love and gives us something to relate too. Just because you can't relate to Carrie's reaction to Big doesn't make her reaction weak and worthless. Have you ever had your heart torn out...and in public no less? Her emotions were no doubt already at the peak of bursting (her wedding day, helloooo) and although her forcing Big into an uncomfortable wedding situation was wrong, I dare say I would not only have beat him down with the roses...I might have thrown a shoe or two as well. Weak? Shallow? I think you missed the point where she pulled herself back together, moved on, forgave, and then admitted her own part in the fiasco. I call that admirable. People aren't perfect and neither are these characters I love.

clara Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 09:30 AM EST

I really enjoyed this movie, it was well put together. Not only is the love story great between carrie and Mr. Big, but the friendship between all the characters is what a girl could look for and not get in a life time. I just think that the people that are giving negative reviews about this movie have a liitle too much time on their hands to critisize a movie that is meant to be uplifting, and hopeful, along with Hollywood glitz. I mean lets be honest here, who really wants to go to the movie theatre and come out depressed, because the movie was all about hardship and reality?

Smith Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 12:46 AM EST

Was Jason Lewis ("Smith") drunk during his scenes?

Melissa Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:42 PM EST

In a world where reality is sometimes too harsh - whats wrong with dreaming a little? Sure, I was thrown at first by the extreme couture, but hey its the big screen! I also get that in real life its rare, if not unheard of, for us to meet the man of our dreams and end up in a penthouse suite on Park Avenue with a closet to die for and not to mention the clothes and shoes to fill it (oh, and the body to wear the clothes!) but that is what makes the movie appealing! Dont we want to spend our Saturday afternoons being motivated, entertained and uplifted? Who wants to go and see a movie that reminds you your life is hard, your alone, you probably wont ever step foot in an apartment nearly as great (let along own one) and your last shopping spree consisted on splashing out on a $100 pair of shoes as opposed to a $20 pair. It doesnt hurt to dream a little, it doesnt hurt to get 'CARRIED' away - pardon the pun! Come on girls, lighten up!

Great Women Over 40! Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:24 PM EST

I loved seeing women my age (40) and older making different choices about relationships, including being happily single at 50. I hated the Bridget Jones-style movies where women were desperate to be married, which left me depressed and wondering why Hollywood couldn't seem to leave the 1950s.

Pop culture still treats 40+ women like our lives are over. We disappear from tv and movie screens or can only be seen as wives or moms, and even then only in the simplest terms. Or you hear "she looks so good for her age" crap, like it's a miracle to be attractive.

The SATC movie hit on points my 40-something women friends make when we talk: That we love knowing ourselves better than when we were 25 or 35, and that we look forward to growing and experiencing still more. That life changes in unexpected ways, and what makes us happy can surprise us. And that you can't have a good romantic relationship if you aren't being true to yourself.

I hope that SATC will help change Hollywood. It's time

Catherine Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 09:24 PM EST

I agree, we shouldn't pick apart movies to much. Its fantasy its what we wished life was like. Having a fabulous job, living in an apartment you can't afford in real life, and spending money on shoes and clothes you probably can't afford either. But I must say that the ending was a lot like the ending of the show. Big messes up, Carrie of course is lost with out a man in her life, ans poof Big enters the picture to save her. Its funny how the show is supposedly about independent women, but the only one who is independent is Samantha! So in conclusion the movie was pretty until the ending, at least for me.

Janet Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 06:06 PM EST

To answer The studded belt question. SJPARKER said that was her fav accessary (the most used in the movie) and she called the belt "roger", like roger-this, roger that ... I find her delightful.

She-Ra Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 04:36 PM EST

To answer your question murray the two women that Big was married to before Carrie was the woman he had a threesome with (remember the episode where he told Carrie he had a threesome with his first wife), I can't recall her name. And Natasha, the idiot stick figure with no soul.

Adam R Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:35 AM EST

are you kidding me with this ms. day? you expected sitc to make some sort of social commentary? i am so disappointed with ew writers these days. between this and the anti-superheroes column, there are some bitchy writers on staff.

Mezzer Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 09:23 AM EST

I couldn't stand the TV show but, like an accident on the roadside you don't want to admit to glimpsing as you drive by, I couldn't not watch it. I found each of the characters completely infuriating in the TV show, but I somehow liked them a lot better in the movie. At least this time, they faced some real challenges.

The one thing in the movie I couldn't stand was the ever-present sight gag of Samantha's little dog humping something. Yes, yes--the dog represents her desires and personality. We get it. Enough already!

Jessie Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 04:43 AM EST

Seriously, get over it! It's entertainment. You're not meant to think about it just enjoy it. I seen the film and lost myself in it for 2 and a half hours, forgetting reality! it was brilliant, everything it should of been!

murray Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 10:41 PM EST

Does anyone know who Big was married to two times before? Why did Carrie keep wearing that black studded belt. I did not like it that much.

John Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 08:04 PM EST

I saw it twice it was a good movie. It's not reality get over it!!!!

Amanda Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 06:47 PM EST

I am really disgusted that people pick apart movies so much. Why can't movies be fun? I also do not understand what is the big deal about them parading around New York in high heals and the movie revolving around love and relationships? Seriously have you EVER watched the show. You should have known what you were getting into. If you didn't like the show you shouldn't have seen the movie. I absolutely loved the movie and saw it twice. I honestly do not understand what the big deal is about the movie. There was absolutely nothing wrong with the movie.

ali Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 06:15 PM EST

Here, I have been reading all the posts out there after seeing the movie and still having mixed emotions...

read this post, it kind of gets at some of what I felt:

http://justsnarky.blogspot.com/2008/06/sex-sells-but-is-sex-and-city-movie.html

Mike Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 05:52 PM EST

I'm really surprised at the reaction to Carrie's reaction to Big. So you folks mean to tell me that when your fiance, who has already signaled he has cold feet the night before, lets you know by cell phone that he's not going to marry you as you're what, oh, ten seconds before walking down the aisle, that that's no big (excuse the pun) deal? He's lucky she didn't have the limo back over him. What you all seem to be missing is that it's only the audience that realized that Big had changed his mind. All Carrie realized is that he was apologizing for what she understandably assumed was not marrying her. Repeat not that he changed his mind and wanted to go through with it, which, how was she supposed to be sure that after turning around and going back to the church, he wouldn't decide again, "you know what? I really can't go through with it." Over reaction? I beg to differ.

to She-Ra Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 05:27 PM EST

I don't think people are "so" offended by this movie. People wanted more Stanford just because he had no lines and he was such a big friend of Carrie's (and funny as hell). Even you asked questions about him we all want to know.

And that is the first I've heard of someone asking about their jobs. It was obvious Carrie's a writer, Sam's job revolved around Smith too much in LA, and Miranda is a busy and tired lawyer.

She-Ra: Princess of Power Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 05:17 PM EST

The Jobs- Another complaint that people have had was about the heavy emphasis on love and fairy tale endings and not enough about these women working and doing the whole "breaking glass ceiling" bit. Well I paid to see a movie called Sex and the City, not Job and the City. These women have already established that they can work. I and countless other women have established that we can all hold down a job. Love is another tricky messed up story, which was what I wanted to see in this movie. My goodness Samantha grew to hate her job because it was revolving all around her boyfriend. Carrie wrote freakin books. I don't really know what Charlotte's job was, except that of being a mother, but what is wrong with that? She made a choice about her life. A choice that many women make. And of course Miranda's job created stress in her marriage, how is that not a reflection of real life? I just don't understand why people are so offended by this movie.

She-Ra Princess of Power Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 05:08 PM EST

The Men- Ok so I have heard so many people lament the fact that the male characters were missing. "Where was the character development of Big, Harry, Steve, and Smith?" so many people ask. Umm, I am a woman who has long sat through many a movie where the only character development was with the male characters. The ladies only had one-note roles. They were either sex-object, victim, love interest, or mother. So I think it is alright for a movie to turn things around and focus on female characters and putting the men to the side. I somehow think the world will still move if female characters drive story, regardless if you agree or not with their character development. However, I would have liked to have heard some mention as to why Stanford and Marcus were no longer together and how Stanford and Anthony seemed to have some undertone of the lusties.

Sara Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 03:42 PM EST

I was so sad that Steve cheated, Stanford was so nonexistent in the film, that Samantha gained weight just to "keep from eating a d*ck" and Carrie married Big. Other than that, I loved the movie. Does that make any sense??

Sara Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 03:39 PM EST

I loved it. I laughed, I cried. Loved the love themes--finally, a movie for ME and MY interests! :)
However, 2 things I DIDN'T like:
1) The movie moved quite fast. Did anyone else notice this? It was like, the next day, we were at our rehearsal! Huh??
2) I didn't want Carrie and Big to get married. Isn't the premise of Sex and the City that you can be single and fabulous and still have it all? Now they're all married and having babies. Even though they're doing it later in life, they're still conforming to society's standards. In the BOOK, Carrie doesn't end up married... Plus, Big is just freaking creepy.

R.C. Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 03:34 PM EST

Does anyone else think that whether you like the movie or not, it's generated a great discussion?

R.C. Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 03:30 PM EST

LAURA:
First off, I need to clarify that the "My Dear" was meant to be tongue-in-cheek. That being said, I still disagree with your basic argument which is that these women are somehow shallow and don't care for other people. If they didn't care about other people, then explain to me why Charlotte was mad at big, why Samantha struggled with her decision to leave Smith, why Miranda was tortured by what she had said to Big, and why Carrie even cared about Miranda forgiving Steve? And by the way, how does what I said prove your point? Perhaps I was a bit too harsh when I said get over it, that I can agree to. But to say that I proved your point? What point? It seems to me, and I'm not trying to be a jerk here, that you just went into the film expecting the worst.

True Dat Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 03:10 PM EST

I completely agree with your point about the over-the-top hysterical reaction to Big's... whatever it was -- not even leaving her at the altar! he takes a freaking lap around the block and then comes back and apologizes only to be whacked with flowers. From that point on I was like, he got cold feet, and you won't even TALK to him? I get being upset and hurt (and yes, I do know their history I watched the series), but "Will I ever laugh again?" REALLY?!? Whine whine whine. It was another two looooooong hours of whining and product placement. I just could not get on board for Carrie's storyline at ALL and since that was 98% of the story, it was a really unsatisfying movie.
Also, she tells Miranda "You ruined my marriage" when Miranda admits to saying that one comment? ONE COMMENT!!! If Big is swayed by one comment, what is she doing marrying him anyway? And where is the blame on Big for that? Isn't he a grown man? And since when does Big get swayed by one comment from Miranda?! Argh!

Bethann Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 03:08 PM EST

I remember agreeing with Carrie's way of thinking when I originally say the show in my 20s, but now I see her for the superficial, self-absorbed, commitment-phobic character she is. She has never evolved throughout the course of the show and I was bummed that that continued even in the movie. What I did like? The clothes, the shoes, and the realness of the friendships between these women. And if I would've added more to this movie, it would've been more Stanford. I don't even remember him speaking in the movie!! Wasn't he in a relationship too??

Bethann Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 03:05 PM EST

Overall, I enjoyed the movie for its frothiness. But I also saw flaws. 1)Charlotte was totally underused. It seemed like b/c she and Harry were happy, their story wasn't important at all. 2)I also thought Carrie's reaction to Big's cold feet was almost comical and played really poorly on the big screen. 3)I found it odd that Carrie, who didn't have the "bride gene" just suddenly got swept up in everything so fast only to throw it away 4)I thought Samantha and Smith's end was abrupt and trite. We saw all this evolution in Samantha in the last 2 seasons of the show and all of that gets unravelled b/c she wants to sleep around again? Plus, I thought it was weird that Smith was her only client. Or was he? They never made that clear. 5)Steve's cheating was more out of character than Miranda's extreme reaction, but it still felt forced. 6) Carrie's fight with Miranda just solidified how self-absorbed and annoying her character actually is and has been for all 6 seasons of the show.

Gretchen Weiners Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 02:58 PM EST

IT'S A MOVIE! If a movie makes you feel bad about yourself then the problem is with you, not the movie!

gillian Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 02:41 PM EST

Based on entertainment value alone? No. And before I go on, I must make it known that I wasn't a huge fan of the show. I watched the last 2 seasons and enjoyed it, but really still wonder what all the fuss was about (my theory: nudity and the supposed novelty of hearing women talk about sex so frankly).

The movie had its moments (for me, they mostly belong to Kim Cattrall's Samantha). But for the most part, I found that it replicated the worst excesses of the show - weak storytelling, worshipful materialism. I thought it was goofy for Big to be absent for 2/3 of the movie; but then again, showing his side of things would have meant giving his character actual dimension - something he never got even in 6 seasons on the show).

Bottom line: for something that's supposedly empowering and forward-looking for women, SATC - THE MOVIE, struck me as hopelessly old-fashioned and trite.

TardisJockey Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 02:38 PM EST

Chris, totally agree with you! I would have loved to have seen Magda be the one to have gotten Steve and Miranda backed together with her knack for saying the right thing at right time that always causes that "D'oh" moment.

And I also believe that Stanford could just as easily have created a Big e-mail folder for Carrie. I love Jennifer Hudson, but her character made no sense, except to serve as a Michael Landon/Roma Downey stand-in. "Touched by Sex on the Highway to the City."

TardisJockey Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 02:30 PM EST

What really surprised me was the audience reaction to Miranda and Steve's drama. First of all, I thought that after all they had gone through, Steve's cheating - even just once - was out of character. Just another case of having to make the guy the Bad Guy. But then it became all her fault for being too stressed to want sex. THAT's real life. I heard a lot of comments about "serves her right for not taking care of her man!"

Now, I thought her throwing him out and starting divorce proceedings the very next day was extreme. But I found it more unsettling that people in the audience thought she deserved to have him cheat on her. Like wedding vows are only valid when it's convenient....

Very sad.

TardisJockey Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 02:24 PM EST

Overall, I liked the movie. There was a lot to relate to and laugh at. I must admit, though, that I'm another one who thought that Carrie's reaction to Big's cold feet was over the top and - considering the timing of when he came to his senses - unnecessary.

Having courted, broken up with, reconciled, broken up with, and finally married my own Big, his reaction should have been expected. And having expected it, I would not have laid my cell phone down for an instant! I'd have been the one calling him every three minutes!!! (In fact, when my Big and I finally got married, I didn't let him out of my sight from the day before right up until the ceremony, haha!)

But once I read Scott and Jay's post reminding us that Carrie has always been an immature drama queen, I realized that they were right and any other reaction from her would have been unrealistic. ;-)

Chris Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 01:57 PM EST

Wow! A lot of people have weighed in.I was a huge fan of the series and my reactions to this movie are a little mixed. I do think the film pales in comparision to the end of the series.However, some of the impact of the films bigger moments were lost when spoiler pics were EVERYWHERE!!! I loved seeing the girls and found it sweet and funny.Too much time ,in my opinion was spent on Jeniifer Hudson's character when us big fans of the show wanted more magda, steve,harry etc. In aninterview cynthia nixon said magda had a romance that was cut out, as well as some lovely scenes with Anna Mera as steve's mom...sigh.parts of it felt really glossed over( I still don't get exactly what Samantha's beef with Smith was)...as for a sequel,not sure where that would go...a mad cap comedy might be really cool..and please,feature some of the minor characters we love!

kiwilatino Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 01:30 PM EST

It is an alright movie, my only two comments is that the so called fifth lady was diminished, in fact I don't think New York has ever looked that small in a movie. Also, the script was not as witty as the ones from the series but then again the best episodes of the series were written by women who I don't know if were involved in this movie

Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 01:23 PM EST

thanks Jayel... yeah, I used the word pathetic a lot... :) but I'm not really. anyway, like I said, thanks... your compassion really touched me.

Jayel Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 01:13 PM EST

a - you're not pathetic. You're a human being who loves a human being. And if the happiness you feel when things are working is worth the pain you feel when they're not, no one has any right to tell you differently. That's your decision to make.
And if watching a character in a movie or TV show make the same choices and come out okay makes you feel stronger and more confident in your own real life, nobody has any right to diss you about that, either.

Jayel Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 01:08 PM EST

Dayna, I'm choosing to believe you're not for real, that you're either joking or adopting a persona to get responses. Otherwise . . . . wow.

Jayel Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 01:06 PM EST

Something Laura said sparked a question for me that I think is equally valid for both sides of the argument. Do we think that SATC is a stylized, artistic reflection of a population of women that already existed before it hit the airwaves, or do we think that it has created a population of women who aim to imitate (to lesser and greater degrees) the lifestyle it portrays?
I think both may be true. I think that the original "Carrie" was writing her very specific point of view about a real mindset she witnessed and participated in. But I think that, for whatever reason, the version of that on HBO has sparked a lot of women to both imitate this stylized behavior in their reality and to envy this lifestyle that doesn't really exist.
But that's just me - I'd never tell anybody not to love something they love.

Nicole Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 01:04 PM EST

I was very dissapointed. I don't understand how 'true' fans can be happy with the movie. It was a shallow, shell of the characters we've seen develop over the course of the movie. Really, too bad.

Sara S Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:54 PM EST

The movie was amazing and it wasn't a fantasy, many people do live a life of luxury whether u agree or not. It was funny, glamorous and deep. The girls haven't changed a bit. I couldn't get over it, i wish the series was still going on!

Dayna Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:46 PM EST

I think all of you are stupid. If you are a true fan you will love this movie as I did. You have to watch every single eposide to enjoy and really appreciate the movie. For me, I was one that watched every single show and couldnt wait for the movie to come out and once it did I thought it was amazing. It was hilerious so I dont get how you can say it wasnt funny enough. If you dont love fashion and you guys are way to tense with the sex scenes that your not going to like it. you people need to get a hold of yourselves and loosen the hell up. it was a great movie!!!!! and all you people do is complain if you didnt like it that much then your prob just jealous because you people are ugly that cant get laid and the people in the movie are

Dayna Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:45 PM EST

I think all of you are stupid. If you are a true fan you will love this movie as I did. You have to watch every single eposide to enjoy and really appreciate the movie. For me, I was one that watched every single show and couldnt wait for the movie to come out and once it did I thought it was amazing. It was hilerious so I dont get how you can say it wasnt funny enough. If you dont love fashion and you guys are way to tense with the sex scenes that your not going to like it. you people need to get a hold of yourselves and loosen the hell up. it was a great movie!!!!! and all you people do is complain if you didnt like it that much then your prob just jealous because you people are ugly that cant get laid and the people in the movie are

Rasha Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:42 PM EST

I really enjoyed the movie, but I had a huge problem with Big leaving Carrie at the wedding. After all they'd been through, I just can't believe that his character would do that or if he did, there would be some fake chest pains involved. Carrie hit him with flowers? HBO Carrie would have punched him in the neck and stomped on his foot! The writing of SATC the TV show was so good, that I found the movie to be not nearly as sharp and forced in a lot of areas. And while it was nice to see some black people on the screen (seriously, how do you live in New York City and never have a minorities in the show?) I felt that JHud was miscast and her entire role screamed "STUDIO MADE ME ADD THIS CHARACTER!" What kind of girl would leave NYC after being there a year to go back to St. Louis?! Ugh, it was good, but not at the level of the television show.

Laura Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:25 PM EST

TO R.C.: "My dear", the fact that you are so condescending and condemning about my dislike of watching shallow women, and the fact that you can't understand what's wrong with being a narcissist and not caring about others, just proved all the points that I was making.

Tammy Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:17 PM EST

As an avid fan of the series, the SATC film did not leave me wanting in any way. There were scenes of friendship that made me laugh (Charlotte with the angriest face I have ever seen, then toddling off in that black mermaid dress) and cry (Samantha feeding food to Carrie; Carrie getting to Miranda's at the stroke of midnight). So what if the characters are concerned about what others think of them? Ahem. That is true to life. Every fabulous woman I know is both strong and vulnerable. I read reviews complaining about the Jennifer Hudson character, but she represented the twenty-something optimism and enthusiasm that Carrie had lost. She also served as the way to move the story line forward at the end, with her private email stash. The film was all I could have asked for. I laughed so hard when Charlotte "Poughkeepsied". And yes, Big is a mess, but he loves Carrie, and she made her choice. Perhaps it would not have been your choice, but you aren't her.

Tammy Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:16 PM EST

As an avid fan of the series, the SATC film did not leave me wanting in any way. There were scenes of friendship that made me laugh (Charlotte with the angriest face I have ever seen, then toddling off in that black mermaid dress) and cry (Samantha feeding food to Carrie; Carrie getting to Miranda's at the stroke of midnight). So what if the characters are concerned about what others think of them? Ahem. That is true to life. Every fabulous woman I know is both strong and vulnerable. I read reviews complaining about the Jennifer Hudson character, but she represented the twenty-something optimism and enthusiasm that Carrie had lost. She also served as the way to move the story line forward at the end, with her private email stash. The film was all I could have asked for. I laughed so hard when Charlotte "Poughkeepsied". And yes, Big is a mess, but he loves Carrie, and she made her choice. Perhaps it would not have been your choice, but you aren't her.

Amanda Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:15 PM EST

For me, the movie wasn't funny enough. I felt like the funny stuff was spoon fed to us. And they even resorted to potty humor instead of its usual cunning and witty dialogue.

Also, some of my friends are saying that they were surprised by how clean it it was. I don't agree with them and find that whole debate about how clean it is interesting.

Snarf Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:14 PM EST

It's just entertainment. This is about as valid as fanboys who whine that Indy 4 "sucked" cause it was over the top. Hello?

Annabelle Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:06 PM EST

All I can remember about when SATC the TV show ended were all the comments WOMEN made about how they really wanted the show to end with Carrie and Big married. Now we've got that (in a very tried and true romance novel storyline) and it's being dissed?

Carrie's reaction when she saw Big on the street was exactly what it should have been.....anyone who has been through a breakup small or large would agree. And given her reaction when Berger left her in a post-it note (when she swung at that glass vase of flowers on her coffee table in the TV show) should have given you a clue of how she might react to being left at the altar!!!

a Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:00 PM EST

I completely understand Carrie's reaction to Big. He has let her down over and over and on some level, she just DIDN'T TRUST HIM to come through. Then when he let her down again, she flipped out. I have a relationship with a man who has treated me exactly the same way... let me down over and over. Yes, I keep going back, and yes, when he lets me down again I flip out too. Remember Carrie's diatribe to Big just before she goes to Paris... This cannot keep happening... just when I might be happy, you always come back and s**t all over it. I TOTALLY get it... AND her staying in bed for days... when you let your guard down and decide to trust someone that untrustworthy... and they s**t all over it again... it crushes you. AND yes, I get it that she just took him right back when they met in the closet. Again... I'm just as pathetic as she is... I always take him back too... and if he asked me to marry him, god help me but I would say yes. So I'm just as pathetic as Carrie!

R.C. Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:46 AM EST

TO LAURA: Get over yourself. Seriously. No one asked you to like these women. No one asked any person to like these women. But asked or not, millions of women and men love these characters. I'm still flabbergasted by this discussion. I have never once thought any of these women except Samantha was self-absorbed. Please explain to me what is wrong with four women focusing on themselves? Enlighten me. As far as I can see, these are real women. Real women with real emotions. The fact that they aren't sitting in a kitchen worrying about their kids makes them no less kind or caring than their domestic counterparts. I KNOW these women and I see them in my friends. You my dear, sound like Miranda.

Laura Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:40 AM EST

I say a big AMEN to the review on Jezebel and to Adrienne for making this post. SATC is an incredibly shallow show, that is about a bunch of shrill, shallow narcissists who only care about shopping and sex and themselves. For instance, I remember watching the episode where Miranda goes into labor, and all Carrie took away from that night was that her awesome shoes got ruined and her date with caddish Big was cut short. Nevermind the birth of a baby, and the incredible ordeal that her friend was going through.

Seriously people, there is soooo much more to women than that - there is so much more to LIFE than that. A lot of people here are saying, "It's just entertainment! Lighten up!" Well I'm sorry, but the millions of Carrie clones that have resulted from this show prove that it's not just entertainment - it's hugely influenced a new generation of women. In a bad way. And that is no light matter.

Steph Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:35 AM EST

I can see both sides of the argument - but - what I got out of the movie, is the same thing I got out of the series, which was how close friends can get you thru anything - and still make you laugh. Each story was intertwined in that way to me, not by the fact that they ended up with a man or not.

Also, if I got stood up on my wedding day (which IMO is not the same as "cold feet") I can only imagine I'd react quite the same - beat the crap out of him Naomi style with anything lying around!

R.C. Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:28 AM EST

This blog enrages me. I'm so exhausted from listening to all the discussion about how "real" Sex and the City is. And I'm offended at the casual remarks about how inappropriate and unrealistic Carrie's reaction to Big was. My very best friend was stood up the night before her engagement party. She sobbed and hollered at him and she laid in bed for a week. I've BEEN there and seen how a person is affected by something like this and the film captured that. If you're not into marriage or shoes, fine, but leave it be. The real story is about these women and their friendships. The clothes and shoes are just extras. Get over yourselves. By the way, does anyone question the ridiculous life of Batman or Iron Man or their relationships? No. Women connect with this film for a reason, but it's for their own reasons and the last thing they need is the blogosphere discussing all the reasons why they shouldn't connect with it.

Jayel Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:18 AM EST

I've never been able to plug into this show. To me, these characters that we're supposed to admire (and which are supposed to provide a full menu of single woman types for us to pick from and relate to) are so shallow, shrill, and self-involved, I can't even laugh at them. The clothes are fun; the guys are cute. But the plotlines are straight out of 'I Love Lucy - the Nympho Years.' I mean, why are four women who are all supposed to be so independent, sexually liberated, and fabulous spending so much time worrying that somebody might think they're sluts? Or worrying what someone - a lover, a client, the world at large - might think of them at all?
I can watch the reruns to fall asleep, but identify with these women or shell out cash to see them in theatre? Not likely.

Jayel Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:18 AM EST

I've never been able to plug into this show. To me, these characters that we're supposed to admire (and which are supposed to provide a full menu of single woman types for us to pick from and relate to) are so shallow, shrill, and self-involved, I can't even laugh at them. The clothes are fun; the guys are cute. But the plotlines are straight out of 'I Love Lucy - the Nympho Years.' I mean, why are four women who are all supposed to be so independent, sexually liberated, and fabulous spending so much time worrying that somebody might think they're sluts? Or worrying what someone - a lover, a client, the world at large - might think of them at all?
I can watch the reruns to fall asleep, but identify with these women or shell out cash to see them in theatre? Not likely.

E Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:15 AM EST

It's interesting that people have come to look at SATC as a representation of womankind and when it doesn't represent the way we want, it gets criticized. I think it's a testament to the impact of the show, but people forget that it's FICTION. It's silly and fun and it was never trying to be anything else. Do we look at Harold and Kumar and assume all Asian men are potheads? No, that would be silly. So let's take SATC for what it is and stop beating it to death with our moral compasses... I liked it, especially all the fashion porn.

Ames Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 10:56 AM EST

I for a long time have not appreciated SATC the way most women I know have. I've even tried to argue how it's not really all that funny or intelligent. But then last week my BF asked me what I want out of this, and I nearly lapsed into Carrie's speech to Alexander in the finale about wanting real, true love. So I'm eating some crow now and will probably see the movie this weekend.

Jessica Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 10:53 AM EST

The L Word wins.

Scott Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 10:52 AM EST

Here's my one problem with this reviewer's opinion: Carrie's reaction to being jilted. You can call it parody if you'd like, but the truth is that we're talking about Carrie Bradshaw here. That is EXACTLY how Carrie would react to a situation like that. It was very true to her character, whether it was empowering to women or not. This is a woman who has never EVER had a sane or adult reaction to Big. He's her Achilles heel....always has been and always will be...and he can cause her to act completely irrational. I had no problem with Carrie's reaction.

The only complaints I had with the film were these: (1) The events leading up to the jilting felt contrived to me. I realize they served a story purpose, but I wish we could have gotten there another way. (2) Jennifer Hudson's character felt extraneous and I think the underused Stanford could have filled that role just as easily, and (3) Samantha was NOT FAT!! Come on!!

d. Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 10:01 AM EST

I loved it. It's just a movie. Enjoy it. Charlotte was absolutely darling, and I think all the characters were wonderful. I didn't mind Carrie & Big ending up at city hall at all. That's exactly how it was supposed to be, but she let herself get caught up in the wedding prep (like most brides do). It's completely realistic. So to be 'stood up' (and she would have had more of an understanding if she had listened to her voice mails), I thought it was normal for her to hit him with the flowers. She was humiliated. I thought the movie was fantastic.

KristyS Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 09:54 AM EST

Take it for what it is without overthinking - a fashionable, funny & fabulous girl flick! Sex & the City is definitely a great, entertaining movie to see with your girlfriends - silly to analyze and scrutinize, just enjoy and don't be so serious! It's not real life and never has been - it is dramatized and extreme - that helps us have a little 'getaway' at the theatre!

carissa Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 09:49 AM EST

This reviewer obviously didn't watch every season if her opinion is that it was all about "material things". i think most of the real, grown up world understands that we could never afford their fashion or their apartments, but it's about the relationships between these four women that's most important. Granted the movie didn't break any new ground but it's meant to entertain. Just enjoy it, not everything needs to be judged or ripped to pieces. After four years w/ nothing new, i'll take this movie over nothing at all.

GeeMoney Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 09:33 AM EST

I honestly think that this reviewer had nothing better to do with her day other than to try and ruin the moods of others who liked this movie and further annoy us with this unnecessary blog post. Find a hobby already!

Molly Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 09:06 AM EST

I never really got into this show, tho I kept up with it one way or another. My 19 yr old daughter loves it, but when watching together it was all I could do to not sit there and point out all the relationship no-nos being committed, or the shallowness, or the "..get off the pot" moments. Like Dodai, these are not women I'd want to be, or be friends with.

Cassie Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 08:52 AM EST

I saw it twice-I probably would've liked it better if I saw it only once! I went to a Premiere viewing and loved it the first time. It was better than I thought it was going to be. The second time (with a friend)-I saw stuff that I thought was just plain stupid, and it was way too long! I think if they would've just had a couple more episodes and finished the show with the movie scenes, it would've been great! I was disappointed they barely showed Samantha having sex, yet they showed Miranda & Steve naked, Charlotte & Harry getting it on even when pregnant. Samantha's character in this movie wasn't the same as the show! The other characters were ok, Charlotte was somewhat dumb as dirt acting. Some things just was disappointing! What can you expect, a Movie from a TV show cannot be that wonderful!!!

Bee Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 08:35 AM EST

I always felt like Carrie wears stillettos so I don't have to.

Kayro Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 08:20 AM EST

As far as the realness of her reaction at being stood up on her wedding day, I'd say that was very true to life. As someone who experienced it, I can tell you that when you realize that everything you thought your life was going to be is suddenly crashing down around your head, you feel an incredible disorientation and sickness. All you want to do is get the heck out of there as quickly as possible. And yeah, if flowers were what I had in my hand at the time I next saw him, I'd hit him with it too. I had to bite my lip to keep from crying during those scenes as I knew just how real her reaction was.

Catherine Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 08:13 AM EST

Ok, here it is: if the film was a standalone, it would be enjoyable nothing more, you watch, you leave, you forget. If the movie had been the series, I wouldn't have watch it for 6 seasons because the storyline was simple, not original and the characters were not inspiring any friendship emotion...
I will for now on, stick to my beloved DVDs!

Margaret Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 06:55 AM EST

I LOVED the movie! It was everything and more as far as I was concerned. Movies are for entertainment, to take us away from reality for a couple hours and that is exactly what SATC did! I was thrilled when Carrie forgave BIG and married him. He had cold feet, big deal... she went overboard with the wedding and realized that. I thought it was FANTASTIC!!

amah Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 06:52 AM EST

I really enjoyed the first 3 seasons. I LOATHED the next three. Mainly because Carrie started speaking like a shrill teenager (in season 4, I believe). However, I *do* think the show redeemed itself in season six, so I was a little bit curious about the movie when it was going to be made. However, since we'd been seeing pictures and clips and reading articles about the movie for what seems like over a year (while the film was being made, the multiple premieres, etc.), I quickly lost interest. I still don't want to see it... well, maybe I'll Netflix it. We'll see.

Sina Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 06:51 AM EST

I don't think people are over analyzing SATC. I don't think a lot of people who watched the show wanted to see a big screen movie with the exact same storylines as the show. This is 5 years after the fact. They should have been growing and learning from past experiences. This movie was basically a glamorous version of the show without the snapping dialogue and witty banter.

BrandonK Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 06:09 AM EST

I loved this movie, too...I guess I'm the demo they're going for with these "women's films"...gay 31-year-old professional male. LOL
I don't know...I guess some of the stuff might not have been very believable, but I'd rather watch a movie with outrageous or ridiculous plot points than something that seemed like real life. I live in real life, and I go to the movies to escape for a while. If I want reality, I'll watch the news or talk to my mom or clean the house.

tnygrl Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 04:02 AM EST

As long as we still read Vogue, and Glamour, and Allure, and Instyle, and every other magazine that celebrates fashion, relationships, and sex...we will always have a need for escapist fare. We will always want a bigger closet. We will always want a Mr. Right (or a Mr. Right-now). And yes, we can still want all those things and still be modern, enlightened and intelligent. It aggravates me to no end that people are over-dissecting SATC to have some greater commentary about society. It's like comparing People Magazine to NY Times. It's a MOVIE BASED ON A TV SHOW, people. Get over it. You don't read a romance novel expecting parallels to the Democratic Primaries, do you?

Mandy Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 02:16 AM EST

Wow it was a really fun movie and I think you are all really bored. Why does everything have to be political or over analized. Seriously I went with a group of my friends and we had a blast. It is what it is. Now, that writer that is talking about new yorkers like a different breed of people get over yourself. My family grew up in the bronks and it is nothing like you say. Your making it sound like more of a cliche then the movie. Let me guess your one of those people who stuck to the same streets and same people and obviously never ventured out much because if you did your article would have been a little different. In my opinion the movie was fun and it was honostly the ultimate girl movie...how many chances can you go out and bond with your girlfriends. Women don't bond over sports, poker or the whole male bonding experiance. But one brilliant writer found a way to give us some kind of sisterhood..So leave the dang thig alone and stop being so uptight.

Sina Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 02:05 AM EST

As a fan of the show, I was extremely disappointed. My cousin and I use to watch that show faithfully every Sunday then would buy the DVDs to sit up all night and watch them together. This movie was just horrible. J-Hud role made no sense. A 20 something coming to NY to look for love and she was actually boring. Why wasn't she partying and going though her love crisis.
Also that whole thing with Big and Carrie was crazy. Carrie overacted. This is the same man who told her he never wanted to be married. They break up and a second later he marries another woman than makes Carrie his mistress and she has the nerve to get upset because he was nervous. it's not like he stood her up. Samantha was just plain stupid. A 50 year old ho. Just what this world needs. Jerod and Samantha had one of the best relationships. And I remember after Miranda had Brady she could barely comb her hair. Now she's so busy married/working with a kid yet she was styling the whole time. Hair/earrings, etc.

Lauren Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 01:29 AM EST

this movie was a major disappointment. i literally walked out of the theater early feeling like i had just been tortured with 2 1/2 hours of nothing but sobby woman complaining about how horrible their lives are. is designer clothes and a man all a woman needs in her life to be happy? i think not. the movie stereotypes women as a human who needs to rely on the opposite sex at all times or else they're miserable. i highly disagree. don't even get me started on how predictable every single little detail was going to be. "i would marry you in the court house if i had to." come on. you don't think they're going to ACUTALLY have the big wedding she planned after saying a line like that? please. there were also so many long, unnecessary scenes such as talking at the table, new years, etc etc. i about lost it. the show was good, but this was just too much.

Liz M. Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:32 AM EST

I literally just came home from my second viewing of the movie. I went again because some of my friends wanted to see it and I honestly liked it the first time. This was a mistake. The second time, since you know the story and are not anticipating the futures of our favorite characters you notice the flaws of the movie. It was way to pridictable and "cheesy." The parts I teared up on the first time I saw the movie I found my self laughing at how rediculously cliche it all was. The script was over the top gushy talking about love every 5 minutes. This is not like the sexy and the city of old where finding love was there yes but not the sole purpose of show. This movie did not impower me as a 20 something woman; it depressed me by making me feel that shoes clothes and a man in your life is the only way to be happy.

Cicidee Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:27 AM EST

SATC was just ok. It was completely unnecessary but I will give it credit for showcasing middle age women in a summer movie. SATC worked better as a TV show. I was offended by the Jennifer Hudson character, because it was purely a calculated attempt to bring diversity to the movie but she was given nothing to do. She just got Carrie's affairs in order, missed her boyfriend and then went back to the midwest to marry him. Why couldnt she get a little action if they wanted a young twentysomething prespective on dating and mating in the big city.

Jay Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:11 PM EST

This movie was like catching up with old friends...and for the reviewer who stated the way Carrie acted after being stood up by Big was unrealistic...maybe it was, but it was totally within character for Carrie. Any real fan of the show knows all the back and forth, ups and downs, "i will, i won't" crap that Big put Carrie through over the years. Her reaction to that latest display of wishy washy behavior...the ULTIMATE humiliation, was totally warranted. It was part frustration with him, and part frustration with herself for allowing him to put her in such a predicament yet again. He ripped her heart out...so that reaction, no matter how "stereotypical" (i don't agree), was totally warranted and totally within character.

Brian Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:02 PM EST

Who are you anyway? This movie was fun and nothing more. Leave it alone. Why are we digging into it and trying to find things we didn't like about it?

Shari Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:18 PM EST

As someone else who lives in Manhattan, the constant stiletto wearing IS bullsh. I loved the movie and the show but I will always roll my eyes at these moments. Nonetheless, I appreciate the 2 occasions we have seen Carrie take the subway (once on the show to go ring the bell at Wall Street, once in the movie to go visit Miranda) which proves to me she's not as pretentiously high maintenance as she can come across.

loveshownotmovie Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 09:18 PM EST

I have to say that I was really disappointed in the movie, I really don't think it was at all a correct reflection of the edgy, modern, smart show it was based on. It seemed to be a vanity project for SJP to parade around in an way too long Vogue shoot and ooze this "I cannot live without the love of my life" schmaltz! I think I rolled my eyes more than I laughed and Samantha was the only fun character in the entire movie! The writing just seemed like a sell-out by MPK and SJP, the rest of the ladies would just do anything for the money unfort. I loved the series and expected something smarter and less superficial & materialistic! whatever happened to Carrie's hobo-chic sense of style? Def won't pay to see a sequel.

Hannah Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 08:38 PM EST

I like this movie. I watched almost entire 6 seasons of SATC. And it is great in telling women's frendships and relationships in NYC. It's not a sheer reflection of reality though. But that's TV shows and movie, right? And i think the movie is quite a hit. Well connected with the 6th season, and as someone said above, It is a fantacy. I cried and laughed during the movie, fully indulged. Anyway, Love, friendship-those are the things that people'll permanent cherish. Right?

catrinac Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 08:18 PM EST

Hello! Sex and the City early on was always about the high rollin' lifestyle but back in the day it seemed I guess tolerable or even something to aspire to. Now the whole country's gotten on this prudish anti money trip and it just really sucks. Especially because SATC the movie *was* too materialistic and intolerable. Let's face it people, the SATC characters are dead and so are their stories. I am going to continue watching season 2 and 3 and will choose to forget the horrible film was ever made.

BJohnson Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 07:28 PM EST

I use movies like SATC for the reasons it was created...for entertainment and to escape. For 2+ hours, I didn't care about how much gas was in my tank, what was on my plan for the week, whose call I needed to return. I was just a chick in the theater in my baggy jeans and shirt watching other characters lives. Everyone does know that movies aren't real, don't they? Even the biographies have embellished details to make it more entertaining. So it was a fine movie to bring into summer. Now Michael I better not hear any crap about the X-Files movie later! Haha

piscesguy73 Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 07:06 PM EST

As an avid fan of the tv show, i left the theater very satisfied. the movie is not about real life it;s about sheer fantasy, escapism. the movie was just what i hoped for: funny, touching, colorful, over the top. it's not meant to reflect real life, it's a fantasy.

Zooey Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 06:30 PM EST

I disagree. I walked out of the theater in my frayed jeans, comfy shirt and sneakers and thought "Well, that was a sweet, fun fluff movie just like I was expecting." I don't really know why people were expecting anything other than fluff and clothes and friendship.
After watching the show for six seasons how could anyone think that the movie wouldn't involve high fashion and 400 dollar shoes and things these people wouldn't really be able to afford? The show was like that too! They were never very realistic when it came those things.
Sure there were things here and there I didn't enjoy and it was far from perfect, but all in all I liked it.

Liz Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 06:18 PM EST

From watching the show I don’t know what else you expected from the movie. The show ended with all four in some sort of monogamous relationship (even Samantha!), so the movie is just an extension of society’s perception that all women are broken/unsatisfied until they can find true love. I found the movie to be shallow, but fun.

Melanie Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 06:10 PM EST

My first response to reading this is Ugh - can we not just enjoy the movie for pure entertainment's sake? Does everything have to have a more important message behind it? I don't disagree with the article entirely, but I still managed to enjoy the movie for what it was - two and a half hours of escapism. If that makes me shallow, so be it. Frankly, I don't have a single designer label in my closet but for me that wasn't what it was about. It was about catching up with four old friends who I hadn't realized I'd missed so much until they popped up on screen. Is it a perfect movie that will go down as a classic? Probably not. But it was money well spent to get away from everything (including the politics you can't escape outside of the theater - thanks for tying that one in)and experience a couple of mindless but enjoyable hours.

WendyD Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 06:02 PM EST

While I didn't get all dressed up to see the movie (I don't have clothes like that), I did see it on opening night with a girlfriend and I loved it. I loved the show even though I never related to any of the characters despite being a 30-something single girl. Its complete fantasy to me and I enjoyed every minute of it. I thought it was a fantastic movie adaptation. It gave me every predictable moment I wanted. I look forward to seeing it again and adding it to my DVD collection.

Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 06:02 PM EST

The ending was horrendous. It wasn't great, but I was enjoying it. And then the last ten minutes ruined it all. To take all the growth and development Carrie had done, to take all the leaving at the altar, and then to have her forgive him without a single moment of anger or resentment or even refusal was RIDICULOUS. It mocked the idea that in the course of this series, anything changed.

advertisement

Add Your Comments

The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject — or we may delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field.



  • 1000 characters remaining
    • When you click on the "Post Comment" button above to submit your comments, you are indicating your acceptance of and are agreeing to the Terms of Service. You can also read our Privacy Policy.
Latest Comments

follow EWPopWatch at http://twitter.com
Top Categories

All Categories

Blog Roll
Top Authors
Recent Posts
PopWatch Archive
December 2008
S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Complete Archive

Copyright ©2008 Entertainment Weekly and Time Inc. All rights reserved.