• More
Back to PopWatch Home
EW Home

Rating the late-night hosts' returns

Jan 3, 2008, 09:32 AM | by Ken Tucker

Categories: Celebrity Feuds, From Our Staffers, Television, Writer's Strike

Latenight_l Which of the late-night shows did you watch last night? Me, I watched all of 'em. And when I offered to PopWatch-blog them, I do believe this was the first assignment about which an editor said to me, "Oh, I think that's too much work!" (You're a kind one, Mr. Slezak — the very opposite of a grinch.) But, hell, I had planned to DVR and watch them all anyway, so why not toss out some opinions and then see what you thought? As once-regular David Letterman guest Marv Albert used to say, let's go to the videotape. (Speaking of, there's a video compiling highlights of all five of last night's shows over at Huffington Post.)

Late Show With David Letterman: Yes, Dave (pictured, left) and his Worldwide Pants production-company employee Craig Ferguson are the guys who struck agreements with the Writers Guild to use their writing staffs, thus supposedly giving them an advantage over the competition. But when it comes to live-on-tape TV and public opinion, is that really an advantage? I fully expect a little backlashing along the lines of, "Oh, sure, Dave was funny, but he had all his writers doing the work. Poor Leno!" Well, phooey on that theory. Letterman commenced Letterman-less: instead, a taped bit popped up starring Hillary Clinton who intro'd the host (with Clinton's camp undoubtedly collaborating with Letterman's writers) by saying, "All good things must come to an end."
• Monologue: Dave strode out sporting the unemployed-guy beard he'd grown — he said quite accurately that he looked like "a missing hiker" and "a cattle-drive cook." And he instantly made me feel the way my parents used to say Johnny Carson made them feel — relaxed and in a state of anticipatory good humor, knowing you're in the hands of a pro.
• Spontaneous banter: When he went to his desk, he told a nice little story about feeling overwhelmed by the holidays just past and feeling most comfortable hiding under a blanket with his four-year-old son, Harry. Non-spontaneous highlights included staff writer Bill Scheff "interrupting" Dave to excoriate "producers' greed" and urging them to stop spending their money on "cufflinks, cocktails, and whores" and start earnest bargaining with the Writers Guild. Speaking of labor leaders, my favorite joke of the evening was one few in the audience laughed at: At the start of the show, leggy female chorus dancers came out carrying picket signs, and Dave asked for applause for "the Eugene V. Debs." Loved that. The Top 10 List was read by ten striking writers, including comic essayist-director Nora Ephron, and Jon Stewart's Daily Show writer and former EW staffer Tim Carvell — hi, Tim!
• Guests: Robin Williams was his usual self, which is to say, alternately funny — rapid impersonations of everyone from a rabbi to character-actor Walter Brennan — and rapid-fire unfunny. He's still doing Brokeback Mountain jokes??
• Bottom line: Letterman was rock-solid, with a deep bench of pros to turn to, including veteran Letterman show director Hal Gurnee, who introduced a silly novelty act straight out of the circus for a segment of the revived "Hal Gurnee's Network Time-Killers."

Tonight Show With Jay Leno:
• Monologue: There was the usual glad-handing and audience-goosing going on here, with Leno's band punctuating nearly every joke with some vehement noise, and the studio audience members sounded as though the applause-sign was being beamed into their cortexes. How else to explain the raucous reaction to Leno's mild jabs at his boss Jeff Zucker regarding the power-players in the writers strike? Leno also played a groaningly unfunny video from the JibJab Internet folks reviewing the previous year in news and pop culture. Sanjaya jokes, anyone?
• Spontaneous banter: Leno took questions from the audience, and while his interrogators looked like real people, not plants, it also looked as though Jay more or less knew what they were going to ask. I could be wrong — his responses were feeble and interrupted by a mildly charming but not funny reminiscence of wooing a girl when he was young, prompted by a mention of Dan Fogelberg's death.
• Guests: Presidential candidate Mike Huckabee was permitted to give out probably a bit more of his stump speech than he might have been allowed had Leno been doing a tightly-written show with more sketch material. Jay did a decent job of getting him to explain his recent pulling of an attack ad Huckabee had made regarding rival Mitt Romney. The "Bam!" cook Emeril came on for a cooking segment during which he and Jay slathered nice looking pieces of steak with hideous amounts of mustard before frying them. Yuck. Emeril explained why he first started shouting, "Bam!" Too boring to repeat here.
• Bottom line: As tedious as the commercial "button" on the lower left corner of the screen plugging NBC's Sunday premiere of American Gladiators for what seemed like most of the hour. Welcome back, Jay.

Late Night With Conan O'Brien:
• Monologue: Conan (pictured, right) had grown himself a wee beard, too. But typical of O'Brien, he had Max Weinberg and his band play a semi-mournful "Strike-Beard Song" and compared his appearance to "young Kris Kringle" on the 1970 Rankin-Bass animated special Santa Claus Is Comin' to Town, thus aiming straight for his Gen X base.
• Spontaneous banter: Better rubric: Spontaneous Dancing. Conan speculated that if the strike wore on, he might have Weinberg's crew play a funky riff for an hour while he "busted out" some moves. Which he proceeded to do, boogalooing at, on, and in front of his desk — this was easily the best bit of physical comedy any late-night host performed. And he topped himself a little while later, during a taped bit about what he did during the strike, by performing a bit of the Beastie Boys' "Sabotage" using the voice of Edith Bunker — this was fantastic! As another late-night host used to say, I kid you not.
• Guests: Bob Saget was pretty lame; made a number of mildly risqué jokes about an old job he had cutting meat. Stand-up comic Dwayne Perkins seemed like a nice guy. Musical guests were singer Robert Gordon and guitarist Chris Spedding. Many years ago, in the waning days of punk, I wrote a review of the rumbly Gordon describing his face as resembling "a canoe with ears"; these days, the canoe more resembles a rowboat, but he was otherwise in fine form, warbling a solid cover of Elvis' "Devil in Disguise."
• Bottom line: Conan's high points — his dancing and the first time he spun his wedding ring on his desk and timed it before it stopped — were the funniest, most delightfully absurd moments of the entire night. He may not have the consistency of Dave, but he knows how to improvise with flashes of brilliance.

Late Late Show With Craig Ferguson:
• Monologue: The man I prefer to think of as "the real Fergie" did yeoman's work, loosing a cascade of jokes and sketch comedy. Vowing that his show would be "the same lame crap as always," the Scottish host commenced his hour showing himself sheep-herding in the hills of his native country and ended the show with a fine impersonation of U2's Bono, with his uncanny Michael Caine and Sean Connery transformations in between.
• Spontaneous banter: The spontaneity occurred mostly during sketches, especially during a gleaming version of one of his best semi-regular characters, in a bit called "The Rather Late Show With Prince Charles," in which a cretinous-looking Prince made lame jokes that occasionally cracked the host — and us — up.
• Guests: What guests? Craig really used his staff, going for wall-to-wall Craig-comedy for the full 60.
• Bottom line: Fitfully hilarious; we'll see what happens when he has to fold guests into the mix.

Jimmy Kimmel Live
• Monologue: I admit it: I haven't watched Kimmel since he first started his talk show, but it seemed as though nothing had changed. His no-writing-staff show commenced with him saying that his "fiancée" Jamie Lynn Spears is pregnant, and a "joke" announcing, "I'm a homosexual."
• Spontaneous banter: He brought out his Uncle Frank for the usual unfunny joshing (a few lousy regular routines I do remember). Some bile spewed at the Screen Actors Guild for suggesting that actors not appear on non-agreement shows like his. "I'm pissed," was Kimmel's astute analysis.
• Guests: Two segments with Andy Dick were almost unbearable. "I love sober Andy," said Jimmy, and yes indeed, I'm glad Dick isn't doing anything unhealthy. But, boy, is he one unfunny sober man. Also, I was getting very sleepy, but did Kimmel just play a days'-old segment of Kid Rock performing in Times Square on New Year's Eve?
• Bottom line: I doubt I'll tune in again to see if there's any improvement.

So, what did you think? Who made the best return?


PDub Tue, Jan 8, 2008 at 07:32 PM EST

Conan...all the way! Never have thought Leno was funny, nor do I care for Craig. Kimmel? Really...he's still on? And Dave: if you had writers, what did they do for your first show back? Not much if you ask me. And why do you need to kill time if you have writers? Am I missing something?

I love Conan...can't wait for him to take Lame-o's spot, and think he is the sharpest of them all. He is quick witted and doesn't need writers. Just stop your nervous habit of clapping your hands together every five seconds...PLEASE!

Jekyll Sun, Jan 6, 2008 at 04:52 AM EST

SAG sucks! They're just filled with over-paid, over-rated, talentless hacks anyways. Just like Hoffa, I wish these "teamsters" would disappear!

Coyote Fri, Jan 4, 2008 at 06:43 PM EST

To Ben: Letterman would have to gain 100 pounds to come close to catching up to Leno's chin!

And for those who found Leno's monologue funny(?), do you really think he cranked out those jokes overnight? He's had weeks to come up with them. Let's see how he does when he's got to do this night after night. If he's willing to go against the WGA and write his own material, I wouldn't be surprised if he starts to pay writers (quietly of course) for some jokes.

c miller Fri, Jan 4, 2008 at 11:02 AM EST

Craig always!

Reagan Fri, Jan 4, 2008 at 10:35 AM EST

"So, what did you think? Who made the best return?"

CONAN WOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!

!

Ben Fri, Jan 4, 2008 at 09:48 AM EST

The only reason Dave grew that stupid beard was so the media and the public would talk about it instead of the nearly 30+ pounds that he gained in only 8 weeks!

1) O'brian
2) Leno
3) Ferguson
4) Kimmel
5) Letterman

noyb Fri, Jan 4, 2008 at 09:36 AM EST

True entertainers shouldn't need writers (period)

Kim Fri, Jan 4, 2008 at 09:34 AM EST

Conan was the only one who made me actually laugh out loud. I love Craig and think both Leno and Letterman need to hang up their hats. For their first nights back, here's my opinion:
1. Conan
2. Craig
3. Jay
4. Dave (Dave sucks!)

There really should be a quiz or a poll out there where we can all vote on who we thought was the funniest. LEAVING OUT your views of picket line crossers, etc... Just humor and who was the most funny.

Dome Fri, Jan 4, 2008 at 08:50 AM EST

Well, Letterman was on his game because he has done the right thing since day 1 of the strike and everyone who works for him was totally behind him. You gotta admire a guy who took on the entire financial burden of his crew durring the strike, and damn, he was funny and relaxed too.
Nice going Daddy

Darren Fri, Jan 4, 2008 at 02:47 AM EST

I don't get why people like Leno. The man is just not very funny. I mean sure letterman can be inconsistent but when he is on there is no one funnier. Last night Letterman was at the top of his game while Leno proved that he is just not very funny. I would much rather watch reruns of To Catch a Predator then Leno with out writers.

jessie Fri, Jan 4, 2008 at 01:07 AM EST

Jane, I "think" and I like to laugh but I don't watch Letterman. I just don't find him funny. Never have and never will.

SuzieC Fri, Jan 4, 2008 at 12:19 AM EST

I attempted watching Letterman but after the monologue I was back to Leno. Personally I find him funnier.
And Conan was hilarious! Funnier than I ever thought he could be.

Gary Woo Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 11:33 PM EST

I was glad to see David Letterman return last night. It was very funny, Robin Williams was very funny. Let us hope the rest of the writers go back to work soon, or we will be watching only David Letterman and be boycotting the networks on the endless rerun shows and some of the new reality shows as well. I think America was happy to see him back as well. A loyal David Letterman fan,
Gary Woo- Stockton, CA

CMV Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 11:17 PM EST

Loved Dave always fee he is the best. His interview skills are far superior that leno's and leno just fawns the guests asking only pre-approved questions, dave cuts straight to the core. Always been a fan and will continue being a fan

jane Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 10:13 PM EST

Conan was sharp as always - he can't help but be hilarious. That's just in his nature. I can see why some people won't like him when he gets the tonight show. You kind of had to watch over the years to find all the jumping around and jokes at his expense funny, I think lmao. But he was really fantastic last night. His taped pieces always kill.

Letterman was amazing as always. Anyone who actually wants to laugh and THINKS watches Letterman, sorry. If you just want lame jokes that anyone and their dog can think of - watch Leno. But if you actually want comedy gold then tune into Letterman who, I think, is probably one of the funniest people ever. And for those comparing Leno to Carson - Carson would hate that since he wanted Dave to have his job and really admired him. And sent him jokes and only appeared on DAVE's show and not Leno's.

It truly boggles my mind that so many people actually enjoy Jay Leno. Then again half of this country actually voted for GWB..

Coyote Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 09:59 PM EST

Letterman grows a beard nearly every time he has an extended break. The only thing new was that he didn't shave it off for the show.

docballen Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 08:50 PM EST

I am very happy that Dave is back.I enjoy his interviewing style-- I've been watching Dave since his daytime talk-show days, and he usually asks the questions that I want asked.He's gotten better since the Harry was born.... and I like Craig. He's not afraid to put on a goofy costume, or even to look ridiculous (am I thinking his Prince Charles here???) just for the sake of comedy. His monologues are usually excellent-- he doesn't just string some Britney Spears jokes together, he tells a story with a beginning, middle and end. I like Conan because he, too, is crazy-- I think the Tonight Show will be in almost perfect hands with Conan-- (but I'm a Dave fan and he was the one that Johnny should have put as his successor...) I think that Jay is the kind of guy you invite to your house for a party and he whizzes in your fishtank cause someone dares him to. We watch his show on occasion when Dave's in reruns, and we don't usually find him too funny.

heidi Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 08:41 PM EST

Conan had me in tears with the Edith Bunker version of "Sabotage" omg! The show was great, he is really good with improvising material. He even rocked the beard too!
Go Conan!!

sara Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 08:39 PM EST

Dave is and always has been the best. Leno is and always has been lame and unfunny- cant wait for Conan to take over for him.

John Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 07:21 PM EST

I like Kimmel. I think Dave and Jay are very boring. Carson was the man.

Holly Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 07:13 PM EST

Hands down Conan was the best. The Edith Bunker/Sabotage bit was brilliant! I can't remember the last time I laughed as hard as I did when I watched that.

Pepper Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 07:08 PM EST

Fergusen is my favorite; best monologues and enjoy his show the most. Then Dave. Then Conan. Then Jay.

Vi McIlveen Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 07:01 PM EST

Craig Ferguson IS the best. For those that can't stay up that late, record/tape it. You won't be sorry.I agree w/ most of you that Mr. Ferguson should be on earlier, so people can see what a great comedian and ad-liber he is.
Dave is my 2nd choice.

Redeye Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 06:58 PM EST

I have always felt that Jay Leno is the most comfortable to watch, and very funny as well. I find that Dave gets weird, and it would make me change the channel . Conan is very smart and unique, and the viewer has to pay attention to see his wit. I just peeked at Craig Ferguson the other night, so I will try to watch him again. By far, Jay Leno is a pro, easy to watch and the most like Carson.

Julie Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 06:32 PM EST

Sven, you are showing your ignorance and bigotry. I live in the landlocked part of the country and I don't watch Two and a Half Men (The Office is more my style). I also prefer Ferguson to either Leno or Letterman. Reading the meanness on the internet makes me sad, but Ferguson makes me laugh. Go Craig!

Hungus Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 06:27 PM EST

What's with all the Kimmel hate? I'm a big fan and admit his show was not very good last night, save for his interview with Helio Castroneves. I did expect more from him working off the cuff, given his radio background. I think even with the loss of his underrated writing staff, he will find his feet and prove himself.

Trevise425 Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 06:19 PM EST

Let's face it - there hasn't really been a late-night host worth watching since Carson left the air. Carson would cap on anyone and everyone, but never took it to a personal level, and never made a point of droning on (directly or indirectly) with his political likes and dislikes. Comedy is supposed to be just that - comedy - not personal attacks and vendettas. As for some of these comments, why fry a host simply because he guests someone from a political party you don't happen to agree with? If you're so 'open-minded', why then the personal attacks against the other party? Where's the attacks against the other hosts who have folks like Gore and Billary on? Conan was Conan - 80s copycat style, not particularly funny (never was) and just doesn't have the face for a TV personality. Kimmel - no idea why he's even on the air. Dave - lose the beard. But all in all, nothing to make you want to stay up and watch like we did when Carson was on the air. Just a bunch of hopeless wanna-be comics.

skye Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 06:02 PM EST

I didn't know Dave grew a strike beard too!

swish Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 05:57 PM EST

Ferguson is the new heir to the throne of late night, if there's any justice in the TV world.

As for Dave, for ages he's filled up his shows with old "Stump the Band" and other audience participation bits, "Will It Float?" and tossing things off the roof of his building. His ad libs have been better than his puny and corny monologues. Did he even have any writers? He's great with good material, but he hasn't had any for years, the poor dear.

I must admit, tho', that I slept through their shows last night. SW

Al Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 05:56 PM EST

Dave was great back in his NBC days, and if he is not so great today, it is because he pales compared to those days.

Nevertheless, in this case, he took the high road, making the deal with the writers, and will be able to use all his material.

Jay was worth a tune in to see what his monologue would be like, and it was obviously written, so it wasn't as bad as one would think.

I recorded Craig Ferguson and will watch it later, but monologues are his deal, and he usually isn't bound by what's been written anyway.

I think my preference going on from here until the end of the strike is 1. Dave, 2. Leno, 3. Ferguson.

Joe Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 05:55 PM EST

Dave is always funny. I think Leno is a better scripted man and is more of an actor. But Letterman is just funny and has the odd sense of humor that people have enjoyed for decades. Bottom line...I'm watching Dave.

kary Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 05:55 PM EST

OMG!!! David Letterman is the one to watch. Such wit doesn't even need writers. I'll always be a Letterman girl and yes, I'm a gen x member. Jay Leno I agree is a lame, unfunny host who without the writers is proving why they are needed, so good for them(the writers). Conan will be fit for the job in the upcoming years(can't wait for that change). Craig rocks and Jimmy is just Jimmy(not that great, but never as lame as Leno).

Geo. Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 05:40 PM EST

Letterman was better than Leno and Craig was better than Conan. Kimmel should not have a talk show nor should Carson Daly. Dave has always been the better interviewer and he has mellowed alot since his heart operation and the birth of his son. Johnny Carson liked Dave best. Last night 1. Letterman 2.Craig Ferguson 3.Conan 4.Leno

Jabba Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 05:05 PM EST

David Letterman is always fun to watch. He's smart enough to know what's stupid.
Leno irritates me. He will always drive his jokes into the ground and brutally kill them. Even if they might have been funny, by the third time he explains the punchline and Kevin comments to prove that he gets the joke and the two of them yuk it up it's just depressing.
Craig Ferguson has the best monologues in the business. It's a fully fleshed-out stand-up routine every night.
After Ferguson's monologue, it's over to Conan for pure, giddy ridiculousness.

sally schulte Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 04:52 PM EST

Dave is a seventh grade boy who never grew up and is afraid of women. Because he's a thwarted juvenile delinquent, young people relate to him. They have no taste or culture. Jay is more of a mature adult so our gutter culture disrespects him.

Bob Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 04:52 PM EST

NB - Opinions by definition cannot be "invalid" and if they were that would make you an even bigger idiot for reading them and taking the time to comment... putz

Sadiq Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 04:51 PM EST

20 years on and Dave is still the best. He was as fresh as ever. Conan was hilarious. Didn't see Craig but I do enjoy his show.
Jay is way to lame and Jimmy is too frat-boy for me.

NB Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 04:48 PM EST

ok, A. We're really wearing out the word "unfunny" and B. You're all arguing on the internet about late night TV hosts that weren't funny when they had writers. Your opinions are all invalid.

Judy Ray Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 04:47 PM EST

Leno's jokes and interviews are usually more X-rated focused, but without the writers last night, he was more interesting. Letterman seems like an angry, bitter person and never funny (I don't know what people see as funny with his schtick) and Paul Shafer is ANNOYING as heck. Conan seems goofy funny. Never seen Craig... Overall, would have to choose Leno. They ALL could learn some valuable lessons from OPRAH. Let's get some late night ladies -- maybe they can infuse some humor and connect with an audience..

Watcher Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 04:41 PM EST

It looks like a lot of Leno's bad reviews are vindictive reactions to his dealings with the WGA, and are not valid reactions to his monologue. It is quite clear upon viewing the monologues that Leno did an excellent job without the overhead of a writing staff. It appears the negative reaction Leno is getting is due to how effective he is without writers. I think supporters of the WGA would be better served by ignoring Leno, rather than bringing attention to his effectiveness as a performer.

Erika Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 04:41 PM EST

Dave is always great, and last night proved no exception. Conan entertained as well. Jimmy Kimmel came off as arrogant, I think... yikes. And Leno was Leno. Blah. He didn't seem too affected, though, and that is not a compliment.

Meli Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 04:40 PM EST

Craiggie is the only one of the hosts who seriously could've done the monologue without writers. They simply give him bullet points and off he goes. Last night his show was inventive and hilarous, and his joy at returning to his job was palpable. My sleep patterns have been permanently altered by him. Ferguson rules.

Patric Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 04:31 PM EST

I don't really think they are comparable to each other. For me, they are different kind of comedians with different taste and personality. I am impressed that Jay Leno is still doing as good as he was with writer.

Michael Thompson Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 04:27 PM EST

with or without writers Letterman is still not funny!!!!!!!

Bob Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 04:14 PM EST

come on... Walter Brennan doing Brokeback Mountain "lines" was hysterical!

LizinAz Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 04:09 PM EST

Craig is frickin funny, Dave will always make me laugh, Conan's sharp as ever. Jay? The epitome of lame, especially when interviewing a guest. I sure miss Johnny...

Justin Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 04:07 PM EST

I pretty much agree with this blog post. I saw three of the shows (Letterman, Leno and Conan).

Dave really was good - you could tell he was fresh after two months off. And whoever said Dave is a bad interviewer doesn't know what he's talking about. Most hosts on political shows are worse than him. And they interview important world leaders.

Leno just doesn't appeal to me, I guess. He is kind of lame and mainstream. And that bit showing their writers living in a slum was offensive. I have friends living in conditions not much better than those.

Conan was pretty funny, too. I loved that video of what he's been doing in the office with his time off-the-air.

Hey, why does anyone watch Kimmel?

rlpalmer Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 04:07 PM EST

Building on what one responder said here, and quoting the great Krusty the Clown, "If this is anybody but Steve Allen, you're stealing my bit!"

Mr Boring Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 03:43 PM EST

LENO IS THE BIGGEST BORE AROUND. Honestly people, if you like watered down comedy, go for it! If you like comedy that makes you laugh and half the people out there sit in confusion because their too damn stupid to figure out anything beyond the TV guide listings and three stoogies comedy, then keep watching Leno and his L.A. glitzy garbage.

Jeremy Beaulne Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 03:43 PM EST

Conan was the best by far.

Larry Rand Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 03:39 PM EST

Does anyone under 60 still watch late night TV? I think their numbers are as fake as the laughter & applause. TV has turned into a giant media machine of boring shows and movie reruns to force people to the real corporate moneymaker - movie rentals and pay per view. The producers are correct in keeping the writers from dumbing down the internet like they have TV.

tony Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 03:34 PM EST

1st. Conan O'brien,
2nd. Jay Leno
3rd. NBC

Mr Baby Boomer Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 03:34 PM EST

Right on Sven

Randy Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 03:31 PM EST

Letterman has always been mean spirited and lame, he still is. I don't know what people see in Conan. He can't interview. He constantly pushes himself in front of his guests. That's just ugly. His "humor" isn't funny either, just lame and dumb.

Fergie is ok in small doses, but I don't want to watch him night after night. Kimmel needs to find another line of work.

Leno is good. His monologues are always worth a chuckle, and when he interviews a guest he gives the impression that he actually *listens* to what they have to say. Jay is the sort of guy you'd be comfortable inviting into your home. The others aren't, and that pretty much sums it up. Johnny Carson's real strength was that he was likable and people trusted him. Jay's like that too. The other late night hosts, I'd set the deadbolt if they were trying to get in my home.

helliy Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 03:28 PM EST

Hey! so nice discussion , BUT NEW YEAR is coming, how to celetrate the wonderful days? you love to try something new? http://interracialsingleonline.com you will be surprised there

Lars Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 03:26 PM EST

Now Jay used to be funny when he was just a comedian showing up on Dave's old NBC show. But the moment he started guest hosting for Johnny on a regular basis, Jay lost his edge. He became milquetoast.

Sven Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 03:24 PM EST

It is my suspicion that most folks who prefer Jay to Dave don't live on either coast. Instead they are from the landlocked part of the country. They are are the same folks who watch Two and a Half Men.

Mike Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 03:23 PM EST

As usual, Jay was good during the monologue, whether he wrote it or not, but the Q&S segment was awkward. His interview with Huckabee was good.

Dave was good during the interview, but honestly, his best years are behind him. The monologue was so unfunny, I wonder if the writers didn't even come back to work the first day.

Conan was awesome! He is so good at the "monologue" stuff (hard to call his antics a monologue, but still), and it was a pleasure seeing him back.

I didn't see the other two.

Overall, I'd rank them
1. Conan
2. Leno
3. Dave

brad Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 03:22 PM EST

First of all, I love dave, but the show was pretty boring...but i did like how he looked just like Steve Zissou...he should have started the "reboot" with Bill Murray.

I love Conan too, his show was great...the only thing that sucked about watching conan was that i had to miss watching Craig (I have been out of the country for about 2 years and havent seen him before, but it was a great show---the two minutes i watched of it)

Mr. S Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 03:19 PM EST

Craig is the undisputed king of the pack. Great mononlogs, hilarious sketches, unbridled enthusiasm for his job. The next best is Conan, who was a lot funnier when Andy Richter was his foil on the show. Dave been doing the same schtick for 20 years, and I just can't watch him any more. Even last night, it was the same stupid top 10 crap, and the lame facial expressions... Jay has never been funny, he plays too safe, and comes off as a total sycophant. Nothing ever feels spontaneous on his show, and his inteviews are agony.

Fishman Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 03:18 PM EST

THANK GOD DAVE IS BACK!!!!AND BETTER THAN EVER!!!!! KUDOS TO HIS WORLD WIDE PANTS PRODUCTION COMPANY FOR GOING TO WORK AND DOING THE RIGHT THING BY PENNING THEIR OWN AGGREEMENT WITH THE WRITERS TO GET EVERYBODY BACK TO WORK.

Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 03:11 PM EST

Dave's whole thing is getting old, just like him. it has a few moments, but nothing special at all anymore. the "i want a date with a woman" was the best thing of the night there.
Jimmy did look like he mailed it in last night. I think he's usually pretty funny. maybe because he had andy dick on...and that can't be good.
conan just does the same thing over and over again. let's act like a idiot and dance around like a crazy man. his sketches are usually pretty funny, but when he's just standing around he's kind of annoying. funny, but slapsticky. not that i like jay, but he should not take over that spot. it just doesnt seem like his thing. he's fine at what he does. his show is what it is. he doesnt seem to fit.
jay...ugh. obvious jokes, everything planned and set up. last night was a little better, but still.
craig. honestly i dont watch him that much. when i have watched, its been okay. i think its just the set, the lack of quality guests, and the too small-ish atmosphere

james Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 03:06 PM EST

Sorry Mikey, I think you meant to say Dave rules...Jay sucks always has!

donna Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 03:05 PM EST

Leno was super boring.

Mr Baby Boomer Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 02:58 PM EST

Craig ROCKS, real. Dave comes in just over Jay, Jimmy needs to focus, and what's the other guys name?

Mikey Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 02:46 PM EST

Jay rules.... Dave sucks Always has!

Griffith Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 02:46 PM EST

Jay Leno's show constantly beats out Letterman in the ratings because Jay is funnier than Letterman. Late at night, I am not in the mood for trying to figure out Dave's antics. And Dave's banter with that bandleader is awful. The only time Letterman's show will ever lead in the ratings will be when Leno leaves in 2009. NBC's fatal error to replace Leno with Conan will cause Letterman's ratings to temporarily soar. When Fox brings Leno over there or NBC wakes up and hires a decent replacement for Leno, Letterman's ratings will again drop. Letterman simply is not everyone's cup of tea.

Sam Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 02:40 PM EST

Craig Ferguson continues to be the leader of the pack in my book. He's very funny, not mean spirited, and he seem to genuinely love what he's doing. If he ever takes over Dave's chair, he'll kick O'Brien's butt.

mjfrig Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 02:37 PM EST

I thought Dave was good, though he looked a bit curmudgeonly with that beard. Also, anyone notice that Robin ripped his pants when he was making fun of Britney. May need to slow-mo, to catch it.

MP Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 02:34 PM EST

Conan is a brilliant comedian & is often dumbed down by his inconsistent writers. Seeing him on his own, in his element, reminded me of how much I admire his chops. He revitalized SNL & the Harvard Lampoon, he reshaped The Simpsons & he has added a greatly needed absurdist voice to late night TV. And last night, he proved yet again that he is one of America's greatest entertainers. I hope his writers never come back! (A frustrating interviewer, though.)

TenderLovingKiller Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 02:29 PM EST

It truly amazes me how many people find The Tonight Show even remotely funny. I have no Idea how Jay Leno consistantly pulls better numbers than Letterman. The only possible reason for this has to be that your average american doesn't want to have think to much before they go to sleep. Since Jay Leno, the Tonight Show has been consisantly UNfunny and I wouldn't bother watching it again until Conan takes over the helm.

Rex Chickeneater Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 02:28 PM EST

Leno is a bore; the only advantage he has over Letterman is that Leno is more funny looking than him (with that ugly chin and awful hair); however, Letterman has narrowed the gap with the shaggy dog beard. Is Conan still in the business? Craig is funny about 70% of the time, which is a high ratio in the late show business.

Moi Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 02:26 PM EST

Get rid of the beards! ICK!

Dave Forever Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 02:24 PM EST

I miss the old Late Night with David Letterman show on NBC...when things were actually spontaneous and new, and every word in the show wasn't prewritten and verified by a team of personnel, modified to make the greatest number of people enjoy and laugh at each comment. It's all watered down now. Kimmel shows at least a bit of the 'ol Dave days where 'i don't give a damn, i'm doing this for beer money' off-the cuff feeling.

mataom Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 02:06 PM EST

I like Jay Leno. He is still funny without the writers. I'm glad he doesn't have one anymore, that means he is really a talented comedian. He can handle it by himself without the writers.more power Jay!

Mark Gordon Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 02:00 PM EST

I thought that Leno did a very good job, sans writers. When compared to Letterman, who had writers, I could see no real improvement. Leno was the better of the two.

Rick Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 02:00 PM EST

Jon: There are precious few subjects about which I am "laughably ignorant," and talk show hosts is not one of them. I stand by my comments concerning Letterman's abysmal lack of skill as an interviewer -- a criticism that has been corroborated by quite a few others who have posted here today. As for comparisons, you should order up some old Jack Paar shows from Netflix to see just how far things have slipped. In fact, Letterman doesn't really interview at all, he just shills for the mediocrities that get sent to him by Burbank's PR flacks. I do think Craig Ferguson is terrific, though, and Conan is pretty good too, although I find his pompadour disconcerting.

Stef Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 01:58 PM EST

They were all better than the hack Jimmy Fallon that's supposed to move into some slot eventually.

Three cheers for Craig! You cheeky monkeys!

m Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 01:58 PM EST

Jay wasn't funny. Conan was silly, but in a good way. Robin Williams and Craig Ferguson were hilarious. CBS owned it.

Sorry, boys.

Chuck Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 01:55 PM EST

Dave has my vote (Craig is probably funnier), but I can see why the others appeal to their different audiences. For all the haters out there - chill out, this isn't a political election or even the Bowl Championship Series. I remember when Leno did stand up on Dave's show. I liked that Leno better too.

blamo Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 01:51 PM EST

Dave and Conan were just on last night. Conan was just hands down the funniest though.

http://www.blamonet.com

cheese Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 01:40 PM EST

Conan

Mike Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 01:39 PM EST

I thought Jay was great! I flipped
back and forth between him and Letterman, and even with writers,
Letterman was lousy. I thought Huckabee would be boring, but actually
I enjoyed the interview. Robin Williams wasn't too funny when I flipped to Letterman. I think Jay
took this one.

James Rausch Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 01:36 PM EST

Dave mails it in often enough - but you watch for the moments when he's "on". Jay - well, late nights lowest common denominator leaves me cold. His interviews could not possibly be worse. Like Conan but Craig gets my nod.

DD Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 01:31 PM EST

late night talk shows - a very tired and extremely worn out genre

DD Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 01:28 PM EST

Late night talk shows - a very tired and extremely worn out genre.

Moople Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 01:28 PM EST

Letterman has been phoning it in for quite a few years. Leno is an obsequious cheeseball. Conan, even without writers, is better than anyone. If I were magnanimous I'd say use all 3 for one show: have Leno do the stand-up part (minus the cheesy band), Conan the “comedy bits” and Letterman the interviews. Leno should never, ever interview anyone ever---it’s painful. Conan also has the best band BY FAR.

doc_doc Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 01:27 PM EST

Thanks for covering all the shows I couldn't watch. I couldn't watch Leno or Kimmel because it was too painful. He has great writers - when he has writers - and in person there was no one better in the 80's, but as someone pointed out, he's not a good fit for the Tonight Show. Kimmel's just a wiseass with no visible talent.

Dave was rusty, but even rusty he's just what you said about Carson...he makes you feel that while you are wasting your life watching tv, at least it will be pleasant.

And thanks to Jake for correcting the Marv Albert attribution. It was Warner Wolff. Marv's tag line was, "Hand me the diaper..."

Colleen Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 01:22 PM EST

A former Hoosier myself, I've been watching Dave since the 80's. He's #1 in my book. I do love the "new" guy" Craig. He's a riot! I have to admit, Conan is a funny, talented guy, also. As for Jimmy, how'd he get a show anyway??

Kris Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 01:18 PM EST

I can't stand Letterman for more than 60 seconds. I don't know why, I just find him unfunny, sometimes to the point that it's uncomfortable to watch him. Leno was great considering he didn't have writers. But the best was Conan. He is just naturally funny. I think he is the best interviewer. Letterman is an annoying interviewer, Leno is funny(but nothing spectacular) with guests, but Conan can make the most boring guest entertaining. Can't wait till he is on even earlier!

JP Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 01:18 PM EST

We have seen the future of late night television and it is.....Craig Ferguson. I like Conan. His show, however, does not have the broad audience appeal that the suits will require for The Tonight Show and he would positively get destroyed going head to head against Lettermen. Craig Ferguson's show, on the other hand, could easily appeal to a broader audience in an earlier time slot. Craig simply has a winning, self-deprecating manner that allows you to laugh along with him comfortably.

And even though he works for a show owned by Dave's production company on a a different network than the Tonight Show, there once was this popular young host of a late night talkshow that switched networks....

a Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 01:12 PM EST

Love Jay. Interviews well and you get the feeling that all guests enjoy the time there. Even if they are acting it - you atleast get the feeling. Letterman - when the guests are uncomfortable (which is often) you feel it. You sense it. I don't like feeling uncomfortable at night watching tv. Click. Craig Rocks. I find him funny and witty. When I am up late enough to watch him it is a must!!

auramac Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 01:11 PM EST

I didn't even bother watching Republican butt-kisser Leno, who used to be funny before he got a talk show. Letterman was great- but the beard's gotta go. Same for Conan- who was hilarious. Different vibe without the writers- a little more raw, but still brilliant.

tkharmonic Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 01:07 PM EST

I would love to see a poll detailing late-night and political preferences...they seem equally polarized.

gokarm Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 01:04 PM EST

Oh, jon, I know! Even I know that Letterman is a good interviewer and you said it perfectly...Conan tends to step on peoples answers. I think he overcompensates a "boring" interview by throwing his own jokes in there and sometimes I just want to tell him to shut up and let the celebrity talk for 2 seconds. The only one who managed Conan REALLY well was James Spader. Conan seemed to want to hear what he had to say.

Helen Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 01:04 PM EST

I used to be a big fan of Letterman for years, but he has been stale, same old skits, just boring, and rude to many guests. The top ten lists is so outdated and not even funny.
And, Paul is pathetic. It's time for Dave to retire.

Jay is fun, has terrific skits and each show is different, and you hardly see the same things redone. When Jay's contract expires he should have his own show.

Craig is the best of all and should be in the 11:30 time slot. He is refreshing, very funny, and love his facial expressions. I would watch him every night but I can't stay up that late.

Conan is slap stick comedy and a goon. I can't imagine him replacing Jay. Craig Ferguson should replace Jay. Plus Conan is repulsive to look at.


Lola Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 01:01 PM EST

I hate Leno. He's a truly stupid person.

--read my blog at http://fashionpoirot.blogspot.com

Jon Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 12:58 PM EST

As someone with a fair bit of experience interviewing people, I almost fell out of my chair when I read the earlier comment saying David Letterman is "one of the worst interviewers ever to hold down a late-night slot." That statement is just laughably ignorant. Leno (who was funny prior to his talk-show gig) has trouble stammering out the most basic of questions, and Conan (whose show I really like) still tends to get in the way of his guest's answers trying to be funny himself.
If you're hacked off because of a perceived slight of a conservative guest, I guess you'll just have to find a way to come to terms with that. A few hours of talk radio should be just the thing to reaffirm your shaken world view, but shush with all the crazy talk about interviewing.

Don Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 12:56 PM EST

I think that Jimmy has a decent show while he interviews except last night. Otherwise his show sucks. Leno starts off strong but he falls off when the guest come out. Very lame interviewer, never a good question and no follow through.

Dave Letterman is by far the best interviewer out of all late night. If you want to laugh and be informed watch Letterman dig out the stuff no one thinks to ask.

The other two goofballs are past my bed time.

Don Thu, Jan 3, 2008 at 12:56 PM EST

I think that Jimmy has a decent show while he interviews except last night. Otherwise his show sucks. Leno starts off strong but he falls off when the guest come out. Very lame interviewer, never a good question and no follow through.

Dave Letterman is by far the best interviewer out of all late night. If you want to laugh and be informed watch Letterman dig out the stuff no one thinks to ask.

The other two goofballs are past my bed time.


advertisement

Add Your Comments

The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject — or we may delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field.



  • 1000 characters remaining
    • When you click on the "Post Comment" button above to submit your comments, you are indicating your acceptance of and are agreeing to the Terms of Service. You can also read our Privacy Policy.
Latest Comments
Top Categories

All Categories

Blog Roll
Top Authors
Recent Posts
PopWatch Archive
July 2009
S M T W T F S
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Complete Archive