• More
Back to PopWatch Home
EW Home

'Gossip Girl': A few things it gets totally wrong

Oct 4, 2007, 03:21 PM | by Youyoung Lee

Categories: Mini TV Watch

Gossipg_l So much to write about! Last night's episode of Gossip Girl had movement, homosexual parents, sexy school uniforms, and that golden moment when Blair finally gets busted at her own game. That crumbling look on her face when she realizes she's the biggest bitch to walk this side east of Manhattan since Ru Paul? Precious. And S. and B. may be friends again! Let's bond over our dysfunctional families and mascara-tinged cheeks. But for lack of space, I'm going to be focusing on two major gripes I had with the show: the subjects of college admissions and race.

It's Monday and back to school for the kids. Confronted with Ivy Week, the juniors face the daunting prospect of courting representatives from their top-choice colleges. "For those of you that dream of attending an Ivy League school, this mixer is the most important event of your life," declares the school headmistress. Of course there's a catch: no mere plebeian is allowed to attend — no, you must interview for an usher position, which is chosen strictly by a last-name basis, class rank and extracurriculars notwithstanding.

I went to a competitive preparatory school growing up, and let me tell you, the college admissions process was nothing like that — at least, not now. Sure, there was some whispering and resentment, a lot of "so-and-so's father owns this…" and "she only got in because...". But GG's representation of an Ivy Week is archaic. Rumor has it that representatives from Harvard, Yale, and Princeton visited the boys division of my school and passed around a paper to sign up for whatever school they pleased. But that was in the early 1900s! A century later, at a time when second-tier schools are now top-tier, even a five-word last name, quadruple legacy, and a stadium can't get the class idiot in. And they didn't. And the smartest, not richest, kids in my class ended up going to Ivys. But what do I know? This was all in Baltimore, eons away from the UES.

In the meantime, Dan's father Rufus adopts a ludicrous self-deprecating attitude. "Nothing — not my last name, not my bank account — will keep you from what you're capable of," he swears to a heartbroken Dan, who was denied Dartmouth's usher position. Rufus, once the armpiece of Mrs. Van der Woodson, stoically sends his children to private school even if it banishes him to a Brooklyn apartment by the bridge (and one that I would do, um, anything to live in). But he lacks an infuriating amount of common sense regarding class systems. Rufus pries his children about their feelings on their lower social status, getting Jenny to admit embarrassment and ostracization, but then humbly accepts it while promising to struggle through it together. Oof. All this feels strangely manipulative, as if we're supposed to sympathize with the family for having a sweet apartment, in a sweet neighborhood, leading an educated and privileged life better than 90 percent of the city.

As for my minority-girl update? Every week, my coworker Fred approaches me to discuss the show's blatant "Frejudice," his coined term for anything regarding sexuality and race. And GG offers a lot of ammunition for fire. Practically mute, ostentatiously-dressed and subservient, the Asian and black sidekicks are seen massaging Blair's legs as she bosses them around, snarling at them like pesky animals when they no longer are of use. In fact, they’re only worth bothering with when Blair is afraid of being alone. And it's risible when the duo slip on black-rimmed glasses at the Ivy party, suddenly smart and spilling academic verbiage. Their passivity renders them twins, hardly worth noting when standing apart. Lacking an identity, the girls must latch onto a third person — Chuck, Blair, or a college representative, intermittently — to give them life, not unlike a fungus.

What could the producers be thinking? Are these bit parts originally color-cast in the books, or was this executive producer Josh Schwartz's attempt at integrating some diversity? Had they cast white actresses in these roles, would they be as easy to dismiss? I know that every aspect of the show plays on clichés, but to slap on tired stereotypes to supporting characters is painfully out-of-touch and downright offensive. (An interesting fact: actress Nan Zhang, one of the minority twins in GG, studies neuroscience in the meantime at Johns Hopkins, so her three-second mumble-jumble at the Ivy Party in the beginning may be, like, for reals.)

Popwatchers, what do you think?


ISHMAel back Sat, Feb 9, 2008 at 09:26 PM EST

MESSAGE

ISHMAel back Sat, Feb 9, 2008 at 09:26 PM EST

MESSAGE

ISHMAel back Sat, Feb 9, 2008 at 09:26 PM EST

MESSAGE

mal Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 10:09 PM EST

i think that they are showing that they are robots who dont have a big role, but when they are shown they act like blairs slaves. & everyone is saying that its the same as in the3 book, but they are the only non-white ppl in the show everyone else is white. i think that they make them stand out even though they arent very important. i think they should make them mixed or only white because when they are all white excpet for 2 it makes them stand out more & in this show as blairs robot-slaves!!

mal Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 10:09 PM EST

i think that they are showing that they are robots who dont have a big role, but when they are shown they act like blairs slaves. & everyone is saying that its the same as in the3 book, but they are the only non-white ppl in the show everyone else is white. i think that they make them stand out even though they arent very important. i think they should make them mixed or only white because when they are all white excpet for 2 it makes them stand out more & in this show as blairs robot-slaves!!

Sally Mon, Jan 7, 2008 at 04:47 PM EST

I am a huge fan of Gossip Girl and i was pondering the main characters Blair and Serena and wanted to know who everyone thought was the most innocent i would say Serena myself but then again she did back stab Blair and Deny it but Blair cheated on her boyfriend with chuck. What do you think?

MudRocks Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 08:14 PM EST

I love the show, though I have realize it's def not pro minority, feminism or diversity or any pro qualities.

The show basically purports the ideas that "guys will be guys" and are sex starved & no consequences exist for the rich.


1)no reprecurssions when chuck almost raped Jen
2) To "free herself" the underage Blair stripped
3) sex is casual
4) the minorities are mute models.

oh well. I still love it [shrugs], love the fashion, and feel bad for the kids that want to be them

Melissa Mon, Oct 8, 2007 at 03:29 AM EST

I went to a posh boarding school followed by Princeton undergrad and I know from experience that girls like me, African American and of regular working to middle class background, are literally invisible to girls like Blair. Side kick status is an absurdity. The best thing you could do, is play the Dan role with healthy attitude that appreciates the irony of the absurdities of privelege, a life of your own that doesn't revolve around not feeling rich enough, and great grades that force people to reckon with you even if they'd prefer not to. Curiously, although I did grad school at Yale, I didn't find the level of snobbery in the student body there that I found in undergrad or high school.

deb Sun, Oct 7, 2007 at 11:22 AM EST

I was a Baltimore prepster too. My experience was more like the school in Gilmore Girls, but maybe New York is different. This show has a Cruel Intentions feel to it.

GeeMoney Fri, Oct 5, 2007 at 10:26 AM EST

Oh yeah, and about the minority girls being Blair's minions.... who cares that they're minorities? I'm just glad to see that they even put some minorities on this show, because I didn't think they would at all!

GeeMoney Fri, Oct 5, 2007 at 10:23 AM EST

As much as I would like to see more diversity in this show, the show is about wealthy white kids in New York, not to mention wealthy white kids who come from a dynasty of weathly white people. I think that people forget that there are not a lot of minorities in New York who have an insane amount of wealth and connections as these white kids. I think that the writers of this show are just trying to stay true to what's really going on in the UES society, and that society is filled with a lot of whites.

Perhaps one day we'll see more minorities acquiring a lot more money and going to schools like the one on the show, but as for now all GG is doing is reflecting the scene that's going on up in NYC. And that scene has a lot of white people on the radar.

Sara Fri, Oct 5, 2007 at 10:04 AM EST

I went to one of the top private school in NYC, and let me assure you that 1) all the rich kids with libraries named after their families got into the ivy schools of their choice, regardless of their scholarly aptitude; and 2) in a super-wealthy class of 98 students, 75% were white.

Jo Fri, Oct 5, 2007 at 09:32 AM EST

I have to say that I am not as into this show as I was expecting to be. A disappointment from Josh Schwartz. I was a HUGE fan of the OC too. :( bummer

eventgal Fri, Oct 5, 2007 at 08:58 AM EST

Youyoung - As a fellow Bmore prepster, I'm dying to know what school you went to! It's part of the reason I love this show so much - it makes me nostalgic for my old uniform (which was no where near as sexy or cool as the ones on this show!)

kel Fri, Oct 5, 2007 at 08:18 AM EST

the "twins" are pretty true to the books-they play minor roles and only are used when blair needs them. if you really want to get into specifics, in the books jenny has curly brown hair and huge boobs-which they constantly talk about. so maybe the creators of the show are playing heavily on the "twins," but they also are not focusing on jenny's boobs, thank goodness.

i reccommend reading the books-they are insane guilty pleasures :)

Hamburger Royal Fri, Oct 5, 2007 at 08:04 AM EST

To really appreciate this show (and in retrospect The O.C. as well) it is important to understand that they are spoofs of a) the actual reality and b) shows like 90210. The genious of both shows lies in the subtle (O.C.) and not-so-subtle (GG) parody of the WRASP life, R for rich, and of TV in general. Only on TV do you have people in their mid-twenties going to high school (Ryan Atwood even makes a reference to this in one O.C. episode) or having two junior years. Or see broke people live in 'Billburg wearing Cosmopolitan-class apparel (nevermind the appartment - where the heck does Rufus get the tuition for Dan and Jenny from?). GG even more blatantly so than The O.C. lives on the "Hello? Realism?" moment when all end up at the same college, stay at that hospital (unless the actor slurs backstage) or stay President after lying to the public about having MS. Contrary to 'serious' Gray's Anatomy, 90210 or West Wing, GG is unapologetically stupid. And that makes it great.

ENM Fri, Oct 5, 2007 at 03:17 AM EST

Isabel and Katie are true to their book characters, who are also Asian and African-American. I hope they will play a bigger role in future episodes, and I hope they'll show more dimension on TV than in the books.

Gigi Fri, Oct 5, 2007 at 01:33 AM EST

The show's is obviously working with a formula that has already been sucessfull - given that it was a book first, they can palm any underlying themes that arn't working off to the writers of the book.
I'm not sure how true to the book series the show is, but, i have to admit, that i enjoy the hot outfits and hot stars, and if the sexy bods are what's pulling the crows, then i dare say it'll stick around for at least a third season

Ellen Fri, Oct 5, 2007 at 12:05 AM EST

My friend and I have noticed - why is it that Nate is always sleeping on Chuck's couch? Doesn't Chuck have enough money (and the fact that his father owns the hotel) to give Nate his own room with a bed?

Mike Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 10:18 PM EST

I'm a previous fan of Josh Schwartz's work. This show is absolutely terrible. What were he and Kristin Bell thinking?

christine Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 09:52 PM EST

GG RULES!

Liz Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 08:00 PM EST

"Nate had an original thought last year. I think it died of loneliness."

Snarf Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 07:00 PM EST

No one can "let" someone talk or not talk to anyone else. Any person who actually believes they have that power over another is delusional at best.

Jessica Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 06:53 PM EST

Well. I have been reading the books and a friend of mine just told me to watch the show.. so ive only seen the epiode that was on last night. But i pretty much know what is going on.

The show was really good last night. Im totally on Blair's side! I think Serena was totally wrong for doing what she did to Blair. [[sleeping with Nate.]] I also think that its right for Nate not to be allowed to talk to Serena.
what about you?
i mean wouldent you do the same thing if you were in that position?

let me know.
:]

Amy Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 06:31 PM EST

I think it's silly that Isabel and Katie are cast as "racially diverse," when they are obviously white in the books. And their sole purpose in the books is to gossip about people and latch on to the powerful ones because they're wannabes: their lives revolve around being in the know in the inner circle - they really don't have any personalities to speak of. And we all know that there are real people out there just like that that live to please others and be considered "popular." It's sad, but true.

Maddy Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 06:30 PM EST

Isabel and Katie are described as being African-American and Asian in the books, as well. So this is one element of the show that is, for better or worse, staying true to the books.

YaleGuy Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 06:08 PM EST

A show based in the UES full of white people: quelle surprise!

bf Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 06:07 PM EST

my problem is the uniforms. wouldn't these schools be a little more strict about skirt lengths and having the perfect matching shirt. i went to catholic school in the south(a FAR cry from this) but those nuns and priests were really strict about uniforms. there's no way we would have gotten away with what serena wore to school in this episode.

seattlebob Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 06:03 PM EST

UES=Upper East Side

nunya Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 06:00 PM EST

what does UES stand for?

nunya Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 05:59 PM EST

what does UES stand for?

kate Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 05:26 PM EST

I noticed the race stuff right off the bat with this show, especially with these two Blair underlings, but also in that episode where Chuck had to basically kick out two non-white hotel employees from his bed. Aside from them and the non-white twinsies who kiss Blair's ass, it's a lily-white pond. Nice!

seattlebob Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 05:04 PM EST

Justin--were you an athlete? Because everyone I knew at Princeton was a friggin genius (including myself). So maybe you were just with the wrong crowd...

Vivian Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 04:47 PM EST

As a freshman at an Ivy League school, I have no doubt that legacy still matters. Not as much, but admissions counselors all admit that with two equally qualified candidates during early action/decision, legacy will give one an inherent advantage, and the population at schools reflect that. Others get advantages from sports or affirmative action but it would be "middle class" white kids like Dan that would fall through.

also, this kind of portrayal of minority sidekicks is kind of current throughout pop culture. I don't think it bothers me because i think the characters would be as shallowly developed even if they were white, and it adds some minute diversity to a network that tends to have teen shows filled with only white characters.

Carrie Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 04:34 PM EST

I like where the show is going. Granted, it's a poor O.C. knock off, but it makes everyone look normal by comparison.

Rose Tyler Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 04:29 PM EST

I watch this show to escape. Of course it's not realistic but it sure is juicy and fun too watch. Besides all that I could turn the sound off and look at the clothes. I think if ya want a show with something more to say or a social conscience you're going to have to look elsewhere. It's just great trash and I'm ok with that.

Justin Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 04:06 PM EST

I mean, I didn't go to school on the UES, but I went to an expensive NYC private school, and this Ivy Week nonsense seems to have been created out of whole cloth, whether it's in the books or the show (of which I know only what I've read).

That said, I must quibble with one thing: maybe the smartest kids in your school get into the best places, but I graduated from Princeton a few months ago, and if those are the smartest kids we have to offer, we are screwed...

Libertine Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 03:55 PM EST

Anyhow at least there some diversity in the show, Take the OC I don't even think they cast one minority figure for a main role. Josh Schwartz a true crusader for diversity!

cabingurl Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 03:35 PM EST

I personally love the show. And I do see where in some aspects the show is not realistic. But if I wanted reality I would turn off the TV. And the characters of Katie and Isabel are just like that in the books. Though I don't think that their race is ever defined. But I don't think that the show is trying to sterotype their characters. I think it is trying to show that Blair is the Queen Bee of the school and to be part of that "in-crowd" you have to suck up to the Queen.

Jen Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 03:29 PM EST

Wow, I don't even watch this show but somehow I got sucked into this article. Good writing!

whimsey Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 03:28 PM EST

I'd be irked about the sidekicks except for one reality check: If I'm bothered by them, producers will just write them off and replace them with someone they can identify better with and write for. More vanilla cast. If this is how the characters are in the book, then ye gads! Speaks volumes about fans of the tripe.

maya Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 03:17 PM EST

I have to say, the minority sidekicks (essentially Gwen Stefani's Harajuku Girls) really got to me last night. I have to think it's a (bad) parody of minority sidekicks in TV and pop culture (see Gwen Stefani, above) and that the producers have thought long and hard about this. Right? Right??? Regardless, it's dumb and annoying and offensive. They were even shown getting ready together for the big event. They live together??? Are they adopted sisters?? It's so bizarre. I want to love the show as cotton candy, but the race thing is a chicken bone getting stuck in my craw.

Pam Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 02:57 PM EST

Correct me if I am wrong but.....isn't Dan and Jenny's father's name Rufus not Lucas????

Nicole Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 02:56 PM EST

Okay first of all the dad's name is Rufus. Second of all the characters of Katie and Isabel are just like that in the books but thier race is undefined.I never thought of the show in the way that you have put it. I do agree with the fact that the Humpherys are rather privlaged and that they are trying to make it seem that they aren't. I don't see many working class girls wearing what Jenny did in the first 2 episodes. In the books they seem much poorer. I think that they made their lifestyle seem much more glamorous for the show. And the fact that the choir was singing Glamorous by fergie told you something off the back about the class diferences.


advertisement

Add Your Comments

The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject — or we may delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field.



  • 1000 characters remaining
    • When you click on the "Post Comment" button above to submit your comments, you are indicating your acceptance of and are agreeing to the Terms of Service. You can also read our Privacy Policy.
Latest Comments
Top Categories

All Categories

Blog Roll
Top Authors
Recent Posts
PopWatch Archive
July 2009
S M T W T F S
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Complete Archive