• More
Back to PopWatch Main
Complete Archive

Meet the 'Watchmen'

Jul 26, 2007, 07:27 PM | by Gary Susman

Categories: 'Entourage', 'Grey's Anatomy', Comic Books, Comic-Con 2007, Deals, Film

Malin_l For 21 years, Watchmen fans have probably been casting the film version of the classic Alan Moore/Dave Gibbons graphic novel in their minds, but now, just in time for Comic-Con, we have the official announcement about who will star as Moore's costumed crimefighters in the forthcoming version that Zack Snyder (300) is directing. According to the Hollywood Reporter, our heroes are Jackie Earle Haley as the foul-tempered Rorschach, Matthew Goode (the handsome, tennis-playing aristocrat of Match Point) as hero-turned-pitchman Ozymandias, Billy Crudup as nuclear-powered superhero Dr. Manhattan, Patrick Wilson (Evening) as nerdy tech-wizard Nite Owl, Jeffrey Dean Morgan (Grey's Anatomy's Denny) as cynical mercenary The Comedian, and Malin Akerman (pictured) as second-generation heroine and Nite Owl love-interest Silk Spectre.

Now, I probably wouldn't have cast any of these actors, if only because most of them seem too young to be playing middle-aged (more or less) pariahs who've long since been forced into retirement. Maybe Snyder is casting younger for the sake of flashback scenes, and he'll age them digitally or with makeup for the latter-day sequences. Or, maybe he just wanted good-looking, marketable, sexy faces. (And inexpensive ones, too, to save money that will be needed for special effects.) That would explain the casting of Akerman, probably best known for sly sexpot roles like Harold and Kumar's almost-fling (thwarted by disgusting hubby Christopher Meloni), or E's threesome crush on Entourage, but not yet for anything like the dramatic, emotional arc she'll have in Watchmen (Silk Spectre has a lot of baggage). Nite Owl is supposed to have gone soft and flabby; that hardly describes the buff Wilson, as anyone who saw his athletic, often shirtless Little Children performance can attest. Goode still seems too wet behind the ears to play Ozymandias, who becomes a powerful tycoon after hanging up his cape. Morgan also seems too green to play his role, a battle-hardened, cigar-chomping, middle-aged man of action. (If Robert Rodriguez were directing this movie, this would have been the place for one of his trademark Bruce Willis cameos. Me, I'd have picked someone like Ray Winstone.)

Still, I'm happy about Crudup, a chamelonic actor who'll face a real challenge playing Dr. Manhattan, and not just because he'll have to shave off all his body hair, paint his skin blue, and run around in the buff. The harder task, which I'm confident that the skilled actor can handle, will be playing a being whose powers are so godlike that he's lost touch with the hopes, fears, and dreams of ordinary humans. And I'm especially happy about Haley, whose Oscar-nominated performance last year opposite Wilson in Little Children proved he can play the brooding, intense, violent Rorschach without losing audience sympathy.

Think you could have done a better casting job? Do tell.

Alan Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 12:34 AM EST

Gary Susman, Malin Akerman... "The Comeback" much? Lisa Kudrow? COME ON!

Jackie Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 11:06 PM EST

Nathan Fillion? Paul Bettany? John Cusack? Gerard Butler? Alan Rickman? Hugh Dancy?

As much as I like Patrick Wilson, Matthew Goode and Billy Crudup, I just feel like there are other actors (see above) who would be better...

Who's going to play the elder Silk Spectre?

But I'm very very very excited for Jakie Earle Haley...he could be the perfect Rorschace.

Jess Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 06:14 PM EST

I think the cast is pretty damn good, actually. Zach Snyder said that hiring different actors for the flashback scenes would be too confusing, and I agree. I think Haley is the perfect Rorschach, and Wilson is a lot like how I pictured a younger Nite Owl. For people saying that Morgan is too young, have you seen Supernatural? He pulls off a 50-year-old man extremely well. I also think that if any character in the book could get off being played by someone younger than the character's age, it's Ozymandias, so Goode ought to do fine.

Ep Sato Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 03:29 PM EST

Agreed that League and From hell could have been a lot better, but I really enjoyed V for Vendetta.

Now that Watchmen got the greenlight, how about a D.R and Quinch adaptation? That strip was fargan hilarious!


Something Something Oranges Something

GT Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 01:57 PM EST

Frowny, actually I have read a few interviews with Alan Moore where he seems to have no interes in the movie adaptations and doesn't care to contribute. He is pretty much happy to get paid for the rights but beyond that he knows his works don't translate so well so he doesn't have any expectations. He does also appreciate the fact that the movie give massive exposure to his original works though. And yes LoEG and From Hell were both terrible movies (although I am not sure you could have made From Hell into a good movie without it being 5 hours long)

Frowny McBeard Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 01:52 PM EST

Incidentally, Crudup can be called a chameleon because I've never seen him play a role that had any discernible personality whatsoever. (Want to waste a couple of hours? Watch Jesus's Son! You'll wonder where the time went and how to get it back.) He's a younger Jason Patric, which is about the worst insult I can think of.

Frowny McBeard Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 01:41 PM EST

I've posted this before but-
(Alan Moore, author/Terry Gilliam, original director attached to the project)

TG: So Alan, how would you make a movie out of this?
AM: It's quite simple Terry, I wouldn't.

As someone who's been reading Alan Moore for 20 years (almost 3/4 of my life) and has seen two terrible adaptations of his work that have very little to do with the source material, I'm really astonished anyone who enjoyed the book is excited at this news. Why not just not make the movie and encourage everyone to read the book? How can you hope to possibly capture a story like that in an hour and a half? From Hell was bad enough, and Snyder's absolutely the wrong director.

GT Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 11:00 AM EST

I also really wonder how much of the political stuff that was in the book is going to show up in the movie. I mean the cold war was a huge theme in the book, but not too relevant today. Same with the characters serving in Vietnam.

GT Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 10:57 AM EST

Letterdavidman, as far as The Comdian goes, you have to remember he isn't really in any present day scenes in the movie, (Spoilers Ahead) other than his murder and his dead body almost all of his scenes are flashbacks. Like is said in my earlier post you know they are going to have to cut out tons of the story to make this work as a movie, so the success of the actors really depends on how much of the story they leave in. Who know the new silk spectre might not even be in that much of the movie.

Letterdavidman Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 09:16 AM EST

First off, Ian from CT needs to take a valium (or twelve).
Like most people, I'm incredibly psyched about Jackie Earle Haley as Rorschach and Billy Crudup as Jon Osterman/Dr. Manhattan. The one I'm most worried about is Jeffrey Dean Morgan as the Comedian. He just seems WAY too young. I mean, think about it--the Comedian was part of the original Watchmen team, which would make him around the same age as Hollis Mason, the original Nite Owl.
Anyway, as far as casting goes, a friend of mine came up months ago with what I thought would be absolute spot-on casting for the Comedian: Bruce Campbell.

Ep Sato Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 08:35 AM EST

PS I'm hella psyched to see Jackie Earle Haley working again. Not long ago EW did a "where are they now" type feature on this grown up child actor, and his persona strikes me as perfect for the role of Rorschach.

Ep Sato Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 08:33 AM EST

I could care less if they cast Matt Damon and the Wayans brothers in these roles. My fanboy azz will be in line to watch the Watchmen (hehehe)movie, and will be trashing it here or giving it love depending on how it's made.

How long have we waited for this movie? 20 years? The source material is way too fantastic that even Brett Ratner couldn't screw it up.

Skeptic Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 08:03 AM EST

I know this is a little off topic but I am more concerned over the choice of director. 300 was cool but the story/script wasn't the focal point. I don't think Snyder has the chops for a story as complex as Watchmen. It may look cool in the end but I really worry about how "good" it will actually be. I mean, Dawn of the Dead and 300, neither film really made me think that much. Watchmen is meant to be a thought provoking story with action. Snyder seems to have a track record of making breathtaking action movies that are light on gravitas. I think the casting of young, hot stars is a bad omen. However, Haley as Rorschach, great choice.

Ian from CT Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 08:03 AM EST

Well, it's a good thing you aren't casting the movie Susman! What an idiot you are!!! Matthew Goode in the Lookout? Maybe you missed that one. Maybe you didn't even read the Watchmen...Wilson looks alot like Nite Owl. Robert Rodriguez shouldn't even be mentioned in the same article as Snyder. Snyder is on a level unparalleled in Hollywood right now. He's the only person that could do that movie justice and if I were you I'd just shut up and watch when it comes out. You probably couldn't shoot a movie for a 5 year old's birthday.

jeet Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 06:40 AM EST

If this were being made c. 1990 (when I last gave thought to this question):

New Nite Owl: Albert Brooks
Old Nite Owl: Charlton Heston
New Silk Spectre: Demi Moore

whol Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 12:40 AM EST

Ummm....'The Comeback'? Ring any bells for ya about Akerman?

StLBoy Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 12:37 AM EST

Not familiar with the source material, so I can't comment on the appropriateness (or lack thereof), but, considering the 2nd-tier nature of the starpower (Crudup, possibly, excepted), these are some incredibly fine actors who should turn in interesting performances. To call Jeffrey Dean Morgan, who has been kicking around H-wood for longer than most of us have been shaving, "green" is just ridiculous. An underrated, under-booked actor finally getting his due.

mark in nyc Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:11 PM EST

I think they went wayu too young on this. I will still see it though.
My casting:
The Comedian, Ian McShane. Silk Spectre, Diane Lane or Maria Bello. Rorsach, Paul Bettnay. Nite Owl, Nathon Fillon.

Jonah Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 09:36 PM EST

I'm very disappointed by this casting. I do think Haley will rock and Crudup could be good, but I'm very suspicious of the rest. Goode and Akerman are just too young. I would think you could deage someone, like they did to Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellan in X-Men 3, so I'm unconvinced by the idea them because of the flashbacks. I don't see Denny from Grey's Anatomy in the part at all. I could go either way with Wilson; he's a good actor, but I don't really see him as Nite Owl. This casting reeks of studio intervention to keep the budget down and put in attractive younger people who they can sell.

To be honest, I was suspsicious of this as soon as I saw 300. The film looked great, but it had absolutely no substance, which won't make for the kind of Watchmen adaptation we've been waiting for. I wish Paul Greengrass were still directing this. I just don't think Zach Snyder can make an intelligent and emotionally powerful Watchmen.

GT Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 09:34 PM EST

I think this could be good, definely some intersting names there. Yes the Silk Spectre and Night Owl might be a little young but I can see their parts being reduced when you cut a 12 part series into a 2-3 hour movie I think Denny from Greys Anatomy could be good too, especially since almost all of his scenes would have to be flashback. I dont know about crudup, I wonder if it will be him in blue or if they will use CG?

BrandonK Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 09:29 PM EST

I'm curious how they'll handle Dr. Manhattan. In the comic, he's naked and letting it all hang out, and it's not sexual, but even non-sexual full-frontal nudity is hard to imagine in a mainstream American movie.

Ed Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 09:03 PM EST

...she will always be "baby-girl" to me.

Ceballos Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 07:45 PM EST

These are good actors, (and i'm especially happy about Haley, GREAT story) but it really does seem like they decided to go for the younger, prettier faces, as opposed to getting the RIGHT actors for the role. I agree with Gary that Crudup'll be fine, but most of the rest of the cast seems WAY too young...and "old" makeup rarely works without looking cheesy.

Court Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 07:26 PM EST

Could they have done a better casting job? Lord, yes. I'm not too upset about Wilson and Crudup--they have the acting chops to overcome it. Crudup's voice alone is great casting for Manhattan, I think. He's got a great tone and quality to his voice, and the monotone he uses in the Mastercard "priceless" commercials should lend itself well to the unemotional qualities of Dr. Manhattan. Also, Wilson has been "aged" before--in the frame sequences of Phantom of the Opera--granted he had no speaking lines in those, but I thought he looked okay as an old man. haha.

But I'm ecstatic about Haley. That is fantastic casting, in my opinion. He is going to own this role. I really hope the movie is good so the accolades he got for Little Children will continue into this part. I can't wait to see it, just for Rorschach. He's everybody's favorite anyway.

But yes, the actors for Silk Spectre and Ozymandias are way too young. I hope you're right and it's for the flashback scenes.

advertisement

Add Your Comments

The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject — or we may delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field.



  • 1000 characters remaining
    • When you click on the "Post Comment" button above to submit your comments, you are indicating your acceptance of and are agreeing to the Terms of Service. You can also read our Privacy Policy.