• More
Back to PopWatch Main
Complete Archive

'Studio 60': That's a wrap

Jun 29, 2007, 06:28 PM | by Gary Susman

Categories: Television

Weber_l I'm not going to mourn now for Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip, which limped off the air last night after tying up all the grim plot strands of the last few episodes in a pretty bow in time for the final curtain. (Spoiler alert: Tom's brother got rescued from AFGHANISTAN, Jordan survived her postpartum complications, Jack decided not to make Simon apologize for his intemperate remarks to the press, and Matt and Harriet decided to give it another go. Really, did you expect otherwise?) I'm not grieving now because the series really died a few months ago, as it became clear that Aaron Sorkin's intellectual ambitions for the show outstripped its ability to convey those ideas with heart, humor, drama, and three-dimensional characters — and as it became equally clear that audiences didn't care about the backstage drama among pampered showbiz folk as much as they cared about the high-stakes drama at the White House on The West Wing. I've had plenty of time to adjust to how my initial euphoria over this show was overtaken by disappointment, dread, and ultimately resignation.

In the last four episodes, Sorkin finally ratcheted up the drama quotient by afflicting the characters with recoginzable human problems, but it was too little, too late. And too bad, since Sorkin had a couple of subtle but worthwhile points to make that may have gotten lost in all the melodrama. First, as the flashbacks indicated, that period of national unity and resolve following 9/11 was a lot shorter than many of us may remember; it took only a few weeks before people on either side of the political spectrum started demonizing each other and deeming each other insufficiently patriotic. Second, as Jack grew to realize (in the middle of a drunken stupor), the Hollywood blacklist may have been made possible by well-known McCarthyist politicians, but it was actually devised and implemented by faceless, timid studio executives operating in secrecy. And Jack realized that he didn't want to be one of those cowards — especially after the way he'd pushed Matt and Danny out the door years before after a post-9/11 sketch resulted in threats of an advertiser boycott.

To me, Steven Weber's Jack (pictured) has been the most fascinating character on the show, since he's the only one who seems not to have been blessed (or cursed) with ideological certainty. He means well, but as a corporate executive, he's usually  been inclined to sacrifice idealism for pragmatism. Despite his inner conflicts, he usually comes through in the clutch and does the right thing, astonishing no one more than himself every time he grows a conscience. Weber's fast and loose portrayal always caught me off guard; he was like a younger, smoother, less sleazy James Woods. It's one of the things I'll miss most about the show — that and the potential for intelligent commentary on our media age delivered in an entertaining package. For that, I'll have to rely on Tina Fey's more oblique, absurdist take over at 30 Rock.

oegqsfjyv ozwncyxae Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 05:12 AM EST

mfpivys cypwalxeq pwmxnfd bnfjy satpey wepuandb ynxdbcl

Peter Mon, Jul 9, 2007 at 11:45 AM EST

In an age filled with colorless dramas (CSI: the non-Vegas versions; Law and Order: the non-original; etc.), vapid "reality shows" (Flava' of Love, Age of Love, something about a tanning shop), and good but quirky comedies (Scrubs, 30 rock, The Office), one might think that this show had a niche carved out where it could be very successful.

Now, I'd be one of the first to admit that my enjoyment of the show was likely more than the average critic, but then I enjoyed the air about the show that it was educating me about the greater world (because at times it indeed was). Sorkin didn't hit a homerun in right away, but with time he could have.

Could this show have been better, of course, but it should have had a run longer than only 1 season. I'll tell you, it was a dark day when 'Arrested Development' was cancelled for being a great show that didn't attract enough viewers, I hope this show doesn't become a similar footnote.

Terry Mon, Jul 9, 2007 at 10:42 AM EST

I will so miss Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip. I loved the last four episodes that were aired. As you said, they pumped it up, but too little, too late. I agree also about Steven Weber as Jack. He's been one of my favorites to watch, along with Timothy Busfield, Matthew Perry and D.L. Hughley (I think I have the name right) .
I actually cried during the end of the last episode, due more to the end of the show than the content (thought that helped). Sorry to see it go. They didn't give it time to build momentum.

Joyce Tue, Jul 3, 2007 at 06:36 PM EST

I loved that show and really regret it being cancelled. There's not that much good stuff around. How can it not survive when all those reality shows make it! Darn!

Cappy Mon, Jul 2, 2007 at 08:54 PM EST

"any show that would last longer than one season on network TV is probably not something I would want to watch. The shows with ideas are the ones that get canned early" James, that's such a stupid thing to say. There are plenty of good quality shows today that go past first season like "Heroes" or "The Office" or "30 Rock." Those shows are original, intelligent and are going back into production. The difference between those shows and Studio 60 is those shows respect their audience and recognize their intelligence. Studio 60 constantly had a smugness to it, like you have to be part of the leftist intelligencia to enjoy it. Please. Aaron Sorkin sees the audience as dumb riff raff, like Tom's parents, and puts characters like Tom on a pedestal even though he's a rich jerk who, unlike other families of captured soldiers, couldn't pay a ransom to get their family out of terrorist hands. This show was insulting and I'm happy to see it go away.

JoeyJoJo Mon, Jul 2, 2007 at 08:43 PM EST

I'm with Dio. How about it EW, let's a post-mortem on how such a promising idea could turn go so wrong?

Jane Mon, Jul 2, 2007 at 08:39 PM EST

This show made me hate seeing Mtthew Perry on Friends. I know that he's playing a character, but he did it so convincingly that I now cannot separate him from the skewed self-righteous politics of his character. I guess I won't be buying any Friends box set in the future. Thanks a lot Aaron Sorkin. Glad this show is gone.

frogprof Mon, Jul 2, 2007 at 06:09 PM EST

Not only did Aaron re-use a "Sports Night" title, he'd also used it for a "West Wing" episode. In Season 1, Episode 22 was entitled "What Kind of Day Has It Been" [also without the question mark]. It was the cliff-hanger where SOMEONE [dunh-dunh-DUNH] got shot after POTUS spoke at Rosslyn and we had to wait all damn summer long to find out who and how badly. But at least it wasn't the SHOW-ender.
I'll miss Studio 60, mainly because I'll miss the camaraderie between Danny and Matt. I think the chemistry between Brad Whitford and Matthew Perry [of which we also got a glimpse on TWW] was pretty damn amazing.

Jill Mon, Jul 2, 2007 at 05:27 PM EST

There was a brilliant show underneath the actual one we saw. It should have centered on the network and Jack, rather than a comedy show. Every time there was a network issue, I was far more engaged. The balance between the public's right to be informed, stockholders and entertainment is a perfect platform for Sorkin's ideology. They should have dropped the comedy show.

Tracy Mon, Jul 2, 2007 at 04:29 PM EST

Studio 60 shouldn't have been cancelled. It wasn't formulaic like so many other TV shows, it had a charming cast and interesting dialogue. Frankly, I'm just happy to see anything other than crime drama which seems to dominate today's version of 'dramatic television'. I'm more interested in seeing a few scenes of witty verbal banter than an entire episode about a violent crime. Studio 60 was a breath of fresh air that obviously didn't appeal to viewers who prefer their TV watching in the form of murder, assault and rape. Watch the news if you want an accurate depiction of violence in the world, and let TV be the escapism entertainment it should be.

NineDaves Mon, Jul 2, 2007 at 12:23 PM EST

i watched from the beginning, and always really enjoyed the show. but it was only in the last few episodes that i realized just how smart it was. the commentary on patriotism and free speech in the media was really poignant. i'm not saying the show was flawless, because there clearly were issues. but when that ghost light was turned off, all i could think of was "wow. there's so much more to talk about!" i'd like to see another show tackle issues within the industry - maybe a show on newspaper reporters or media personnel? something that tackles the issues we have in the media, and the internal debates networks/organizations are often having (or not having). something with diversity. studio 60 at least brought something different to watch – insight into a world we rarely see on tv. or, maybe we can put another cop/lawyer/crime show on instead? we have none of those!

martin albq Mon, Jul 2, 2007 at 10:25 AM EST

I will miss Studio 60. It was an attempt at great TV. What's on now, some lame reality show?????? TV is getting ridiculous. Studio 60 had interesting actors and storylines. I hope this reviewer on EW also hates reality TV. If he likes reality TV there is something wrong with his mind.

paige Mon, Jul 2, 2007 at 10:12 AM EST

I am very happy this show is cancelled.

Tipper Mon, Jul 2, 2007 at 10:03 AM EST

I agree wholeheartedly -- Jack was my favorite of all the characters. I actually found the behind the scenes stuff at the fake NBC ten times more interesting than the behind the scenes at the show. I loved the fight over the swear word delivered by that soldier, and the infighting over choosing the shows on the roster, and the back and forth between Jordin and Jack and Ed. As for the show, the only thing I liked were the Matt and Danny scenes. But Harriet...how much did I hate Harriet. Everytime she appeared on the screen, I felt like the air was sucked from the show. She was two dimensional, flat, self-righteous and, worst of all, incredibly repetitive. It was painful. I almost feel, if the characters had come in without attachments of any kind, it would have been so much more fun. Live and learn, I guess.

Shannon Mon, Jul 2, 2007 at 10:00 AM EST

I am really going to miss this show too, I thought it was very witty and entertaining and a great cast. This was my first Sorkin show and it was nice to have a show to watch that could hold you interest make you think and entertain you all at the same time. I agree with all the posts about the reality shows we are inundated with, we are so dumbed down an intelligent show can't be appreciated naymore

GingerCat Mon, Jul 2, 2007 at 08:07 AM EST

madtd, it's people like you who give Studio 60 fans a bad name. It failed in the ratings because "you needed a brain" to watch it? Please, I HAVE a brain, and still didn't like Studio 60. The fact is, there was nothing particularly intellectual about it.
This comment isn't geared toward most Studio 60 fans, just the ones, like madtd, who think if you don't like it, it could only be because you don't have two brain cells to rub together. You don't do yourselves any favors with that argument.

Patrick Mon, Jul 2, 2007 at 08:01 AM EST

The show simply became a monologue on his opinion of the world, similar to what MASH became when it ran out of ideas. Sad state if affairs, even for a show as poorly written as this one. Thank God it's over.

Michael Mon, Jul 2, 2007 at 07:50 AM EST

While it took me a few episodes to get into Studio 60, there was something that kept me watching and I did. By the time they canceled the show, I'd become a fan. I think it took that long to make the characters likable. While I agree that the series finale tied things up in too neat of a package, I feel it necessary to defend the show. Art is subjective, and I know not all things are for all people. --But week after week the show really hit me emotionally. It brought me tears many times. Not only did I learn to love this show I thought I would hate after the first episode, but I came to love it more than WEST WING. I'll miss Jack, Danny, Matt, Harriet, Simon, Tom and the crew. It would have been nice if just one critic could have given the show a proper funeral.

Jer Mon, Jul 2, 2007 at 03:43 AM EST

I also found myself realizing during the last episode that Webber's character was actually the one that I enjoyed the most on the show. I also realized that of all of the story threads this show had in one season, I cared about zero. The show could have been more, but really fizzled out. I would have preferred a Veronica Mars ending myself...

Now look out America, here comes Big Brother 8!!

Rebekah Sun, Jul 1, 2007 at 10:00 PM EST

I loved Studio 60. I am very sad to see it go.

anne Sun, Jul 1, 2007 at 05:54 PM EST

One other thing--the flashbacks that dealt with putting the show on the air were so full of people. I thought it was weird that there were so few writers in the "now" segments. I thought that added an air of exhaustion and desparation to the whole enterprise. With this show's budget, couldn't they have hired more folks to populate Studio 60's backstage?

anne Sun, Jul 1, 2007 at 05:49 PM EST

I was so sad watching the last episode of this show. I am especially going to miss getting to see Matthew Perry and Amanda Peet every week. I had high hopes for this show at the beginning of the season and I, too, am flabbergasted that it is off and 30 Rock is on. I wish they had hired a team of comedy writers specifically to write the show within a show and that Aaron Sorkin hadn't squandered his audience's interest and goodwill with the tiresome and seemingly never-ending Matt and Harriet faith debate. His fixation on their relationship flummoxes me almost as much as his abandonment of Sam and Ainsley's snappy sparring on The West Wing. I will miss seeing this show mature into the great show it could have become. I agree that Steven Weber did a great job portraing what turned out the be the most interesting character in the show.

madtd Sun, Jul 1, 2007 at 04:25 PM EST

I really am going to miss this show; I enjoyed every episode. This is where I think networks should take these kind of shows and put them on cable to give them a chance to be as good as they want them to be while allowing the audience to get aquainted with the chacters.
This show get pulled and 30 Rock stays on, I don't get it. I'm guessing Studio 60 requires a brain to enjoy and with the day & time slot NBC gave it most people have long since shut down theirs!

tex mex Sun, Jul 1, 2007 at 08:00 AM EST

Gary Susman, good article.

Jenks Sun, Jul 1, 2007 at 05:54 AM EST

I could not agree more with Brenda.As I watched the last episode, I was mostly furious with Aaron Sorkin for wasting this cast and the creative opportunity. I think we could have cared about these rich show-biz folks if he had given us more to care about.

James Sun, Jul 1, 2007 at 12:57 AM EST

I know this show was flawed, but I stuck around for the 'sorkin moment' in each episode. You know what I mean: The bit with the musicians displaced by Katrina, or even in the spectacularly bad episode with Allison Janney, her confrontation with Tim Busfield over the earpiece at the end.
Besides, I think at this point, any show that would last longer than one season on network TV is probably not something I would want to watch. The shows with ideas are the ones that get canned early.

FLGrl Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 10:59 PM EST

I'm seriously bummed Studio 60 is over. What a great ensemble cast! I thought Matt Perry and Brad Whitford were a particularly ingenious pairing, would love to see them work together again! What is happening to TV? It's almost like America has to have the ability to phone in a vote in order to be interested...

GingerCat Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 08:59 PM EST

It's pretty sad, what happened to this show. I remember at the beginning of the season, everyone seemed to think it would be a fantastic, star-studded return to Sorkin's glory days. Then it flamed out so fast, it was almost unbelievable. I gave up halfway through. For the sake of the fans, though, I'm glad they finished out the season and will be releasing a DVD.

Jeff Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 05:47 PM EST

So glad they tied up all the loose plot ends of this great show in a neat package and didn't leave fans hanging, like the series ending of Veronica Mars.

brenda Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 04:49 PM EST

There wasn't a single episode of this show that wasn't flawed in some way. What will survive it will be Matthew Perry's ability to act, Bradley Whitford's ability to hold the screen, and Amanda Peet's ability to do TV. That, and Dolphin Girl. What a waste of good talent. Sorkin clearly needs someone to discipline him, and I hope in his next venture, he has some counterweights.

XSE DRake Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 02:13 PM EST

Weber stole this show from a fantastic cast. I hope this leads him to bigger and better things.

Marie Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 01:16 PM EST

The best part of the first show was the strong female character of Jordin. Finally, a smart woman in a position of power ... and she soon fell victim gossip about her past, self-doubt and an unplanned pregnancy ... maybe, not so smart.

Janeway Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 01:05 PM EST

I will miss Studio Sixty, but as much for what it was, as what it had the potential to become. With such a great cast and great people behind the scenes, given time it could have evolved into the show it should have been. I agree that Steven Weber's character was the best, the struggles he was going through seemed very real and a great commentary on the state of the media today. I especially liked the episode about whether to fight the FCC fine. Maybe a program about making a late night entertainment show wasn't the best forum to address these issues- after all some of them just aren't funny.

CZP Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 06:09 AM EST

This is a lame review from someone that never liked the show. The finale was excellent, and it's a shame that the show is gone forever now, but we still get gems like "The Real Wedding Crashers" and "The Spelling Bee". Thanks for attempting to make an excellent show for your fans Aaron Sorkin, and for assembling one of the best ensembles of the television season. We'll be anxiously awaiting your next television venture and your writing the way you can only do it.

Peggy Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 05:22 AM EST

This show had Sorkin's trademark "I'm superior" tone all over it. The casting choices were a mess. Bradley Whitford's "life is so hard" character wore thin-fast. Tim Busfeld's cartoonish "save the day" director was cringe worthy. Overall, the characters were just annoying and the plot lines were a stretch, at best. I'm a liberal too, however, Sorkin's personal political & religious opinions (week after boring week), felt more like a class audit than "entertainment." I don't know who over estimates their "talent" more-Sorkin or David Chase.

Maureen Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:20 AM EST

I was a huge Sports Night fan -- perhaps the biggest. I hope he comes back to TV, but with more of an inner critic.

RIP, Studio 60 Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 11:55 PM EST

It is a shame...Judd Hirsch's anti-modern-media diatribe that led off the opener showed the potential and ideals Sorkin must have felt about the show's concept. Too bad he got wrapped up in the Harriet/Matt who-cares?-fest...it would have been a lot more engaging as a scathing indictment of the current "entertainment" landscape - with it's innumerable three-quels, boring music, and screechy, yowling political talking (empty) heads on TV (yes, Glenn Beck and Anne Coulter, I mean BOTH of you!) - but Sorkin decided melodrama, leavened with dry humor, would make his point better...ah well...maybe next time...

Ang Knee Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 11:32 PM EST

[comment below]

Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 11:31 PM EST

I appreciated that they finally had someone translate Lucy. I have not understood a word she has swallowed all season.

The final exchange between Matt and Danny was preposterous.

Sorkin could have done anything in those final episodes.

Dio_K Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 11:25 PM EST

Completely frustrated with this show and how it turned out. Like nearly everyone else who stuck around to the bitter end, I had great hopes. Aaron Sorkin is amazingly talented. I loved his other shows and his movies. And the cast on this thing! Excellent point Mr. Susman, Weber's char did become the most watchable. So how did it go so wrong, so quickly? I'd love to know the insider story on this. Hey, EW, how's that for an article? How did something so right go wrong-told by the producers, writers, cast and crew? I'd love to know what they think.

Pai Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 09:42 PM EST

Funny that the last show had the same title as one of the best Sports Night eps. But that just pointed out further how this show was not up to that level.

But kudos to Aaron if he gets Kristin back.

Anyway back to the final show, this was as up and down as it is possible to get. When you know what's going to happen at every turn, the snappy dialogue seems pinched.

The show reached a high point with the ep featuring the New Orleans musicians and then ka-splat. Sorry, I won't miss it. And we'll get to see all these people again because they are fine talents.

Kris Peterson Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 08:50 PM EST

I liked the show. I looked at Matthew Perry in a different light, as well as Amanda Peet (Peat....?). I thought that the casts' delivery was great....from the actual art standpoint. I hated "Friends". It was so square. But I liked the show and was disappointed when I heard that it was cancelled..

Media Maven Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 07:00 PM EST

The series DVDs are already in the top 100 bestsellers on amazon.com. Weren't they just cleared for pre-order? Seems the fan base is small but loyal.
P.S. I agree with Wendi that Matt and Danny were the best relationship on the show. Wish that had been Aaron Sorkin's obsession instead of the never-ending she's-religious/he's not Harriet-Matt wankfest. Felt like a multi-million-dollar 22-episode bid by Sorkin to woo back his ex, Kristin Chenoweth. And it reportedly worked. Warner Bros./NBC should bill him.

Floridaboy8703 Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 06:12 PM EST

Heralded as the second coming of a clever sitcom. It failed to impress 10% of the population. I can admit to never having watched a single episode. But I remember popwatch raving about it when it was initially announced as as how..

GONE BUT NOT FORGOTTEN!
You couldnt live up to your own hype dear studio.

Todd Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 05:45 PM EST

You may not be mourning the show, but I know I still am. After "Sports Night" died a too-quick death, I was really hoping this could take its place. It was a similar idea, but actually presented as an hour drama instead of a half-hour sitcom (since while it was funny, it didn't follow the characteristics of a typical sitcom). Even some of the stories were recycled a bit, but it finally seemed like maybe they'd have a chance to live on. But sadly no. I was definitely a fan of the show and the first "K&R" episode a few weeks ago may have been the best episode of anything I saw all season (although why, after 3 "K&R" episodes, did last night's have a different title?). Hopefully Sorkin can manage to find a way to bring something back that'll stick because I've definitely enjoyed his stuff so far.

Wendi Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 05:40 PM EST

The best part of the show was Matt and Danny's relationship. If the program had focused on that first, maybe we would have cared more about how they reacted to personal/work/ideological issues. But it didn't, so we didn't. A better show might be one that focused on Matt and Danny's lives in between Studio 60 gigs -- how they went from unemployed traitors to the only people who could rescue a dying show.

Matt and Bradley, I love you both and will watch anything you're involved with. Aaron, ditto.

advertisement

Add Your Comments

The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject — or we may delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field.



  • 1000 characters remaining
    • When you click on the "Post Comment" button above to submit your comments, you are indicating your acceptance of and are agreeing to the Terms of Service. You can also read our Privacy Policy.
Copyright ©2008 Entertainment Weekly and Time Inc. All rights reserved.