• More
Back to PopWatch Home
EW Home

I saw it, so you don't have to! -- 'Wild Hogs'

Mar 5, 2007, 11:01 AM | by Michael Slezak

Categories: Film, I saw it, so you don't have to!

Mike_l There are some trailers that look so soul-crushingly awful, I instinctively start making fun of the movie without even seeing it. But is that really fair? I mean, maybe The Lake House had the potential to make me weep like Brokeback Mountain. Maybe Eddie Murphy's performance in Norbit was as award-worthy as his turn in Dreamgirls. And maybe I was just too wrapped up in my feelings of superiority to go see 'em. Well, no más, PopWatchers. I've decided that from now on, I'm going to tackle one movie every month whose trailer makes recoil in disgust — to find out if it's as bad as advertised, or perhaps unexpectedly good. We begin the journey with the Tim Allen-John Travolta road-trip vehicle Wild Hogs, which got a C- in EW, and which your unfortunate correspondent (pictured, at the theater) found as uninspired and flavorless as the chocolate-peanut butter cupcake I snuck into the auditorium to accompany a small concession-stand Diet Coke that, much to my chagrin, cost me $4.01. (Don't answer this, but what does it say about me that it was the one cent, and not the whopping four bucks, that really got under my skin?) Anyhow, here's my by-the-numbers assessment:

  • Total running time: 99 minutes
  • Number of times I laughed during the film: 4*
  • Number of laughs per minute: 0.04
  • Most humiliating moment for each of the film's stars: Tim Allen chugs gravy, eats stick of butter; John Travolta's penis compared to crawfish; Martin Lawrence maniacally sprays rivals with ketchup and mustard; William H. Macy's character repeatedly presented as butt of joke for eco-friendly decision to carry excrement in a plastic bag.
  • Number of scenes featuring icky "We're not gay! Really, we're not!" jokes/scenarios: 9
  • Number of times I suppressed a groan of pity for Oscar winner Marisa Tomei: 3
  • Number of times Travolta, Allen, Lawrence, and Macy shown lined up from behind while urinating: 2**

* Actually, five, but I didn't count one guffaw caused  by Ray Liotta's off-the-charts overacting as a violent, angry biker dude.
** Once with visible streams of urine!

Anyhow, that's my take. If you joined me in contributing to Wild Hogs' $38 million opening weekend, then by all means, share your thoughts in the comments section below.


Richard Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 03:50 AM EST

OK, has this item been buried far back enough in time? and does anyone care?

Dr. Slezak, I've seen you before...you have done other preivous important health saving work. I hope that all of your efforts win some type of lifetime award-winning award. Please keep on being funny (and if possible, totally real) in a world in which nothing is encouraged.

I do post a lot here under a lot of differernt names which I hope are sometimes funny. And which I hope are never hateful. Michael, I don't know if you can even get this, or how I might say this so that you can get this, yet there have been times in my life that you have taught me not to hate. And with your wit and style. I'm sure that I cannot fully describe how much that makes you such a full hero to me. I hope this item is buried way back from the mean people, because they will flay me.
xoxo, M. Slezak. I'm sorry if I've not said this before....but I'll certainly say it again.

Joe in Philly Wed, Mar 7, 2007 at 12:17 AM EST

Is Fred Jones on something? ;-) And those of you slobbering over Slezak, why aren't you watching the Idolatry videos on this site? He's in every one of them. Why, you can even hear his voice!

Fred Jones Tue, Mar 6, 2007 at 09:19 PM EST

Funniest movie my wife and I have seen in a long time. The audience was laughing hysterically throughout the film. People were outside the theater still laughing, and my wife and I are still laughing about it a couple days later. It even received an ovation at my theater as well as many others I've heard. What comedy receives an ovation? I guess the critics and the audience just don't see eye to eye. See the film and don't rely on a critic to make up your mind for you. And if you do care what other people think then look at what the audience is saying. Fantastic film and hope we can see some sequels.


http://movies.yahoo.com/mvc/drv?mid=1809426511&s=rc_d

Fred Jones Tue, Mar 6, 2007 at 09:12 PM EST

Wild Hogs is already a classic. Remember watching American Pie, or Old School and you knew you were already watching a classic. Same thing with Wild Hogs. This is one of the funniest movies I have ever seen. The critics are showing their true colors by bashing this film. The audience is already turning on them for their incompetent analysis of the film. You have to wonder if these critics even bothered to watch the film. I was listening to a Chicago movie cynic, I mean critic, on radio saying that within the first 3 minutes he had already decided that it was not funny. It's a comedy. Sit back, relax and take that stick out of your butt and laugh a little. Or in this case a lot. He also went on to say that there was not a single laugh in the entire movie and was urging desperately for people not too see the film. This begs the question, why are critics trying so hard to keep people away from an unbelievably funny movie? Wonder if it touched a nerve with them?

lisalisa Tue, Mar 6, 2007 at 01:49 PM EST

Slezak, I've been waiting for a picture of you and you give us... half a face in shadow? Shame.

Tots Tue, Mar 6, 2007 at 11:35 AM EST

I think Movie critics are over-rated. there is always tht critic who'll pan a movie not regarding how good it is.
Not every movie is designed to make u wonder and marvel on some brilliant level.
Sometimes a movie just wants to make u loose urself in some senseless and blase plot. Last King of Scotland, Babel, and the Queen are all critically acclaimed yet have not gotten half as much audience(put together) as Epic Movie which was critically panned!
Nevertheless, i still like reading ur column, Mr Slezak and have it on my favorites Tab in my browser. Keep doing what u do...

REB Tue, Mar 6, 2007 at 11:21 AM EST

Hmm...Just figured out I must be the only straight guy that reads this stuff. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Rev. O.J. Flow Tue, Mar 6, 2007 at 11:08 AM EST

Thanks for taking one for the team, Mr. Slezak. :)

Neddie Tue, Mar 6, 2007 at 10:43 AM EST

The reveiw was worth reading just to see your picture. You are YUMMY.

furry_tom Tue, Mar 6, 2007 at 10:40 AM EST

Watching Tim Allen get hit in the crotch for an hour and forty minutes isn't my idea of a good time, but watching him get hit in the crotch for 99 minutes is pure comedy gold! A+ (It's all about judicious editing).

Cracker Tue, Mar 6, 2007 at 09:45 AM EST

Seriously, I hope none of you read reviews like this and don't go see the films. Have your own mind, see the films for yourself.

"While critics skewered "Wild Hogs," audiences loved it. Director Walt Becker's John Travolta-Tim Allen vehicle received an 89% positive rating from exit pollster CinemaScore. Though the audience was dominated by women, men liked the film more."

ArmandoG Tue, Mar 6, 2007 at 08:03 AM EST

is that really you in that photo, Slezak? My favorite EW.com'er has a face! thanks for suffering through the movie so i dont have to!!

Richard Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 10:33 PM EST

Thanks McSlezak (ha, ha Luke) for making me not even want to waste even a Netflix moment on this Wild (Old) Hogs Movie. In fact, seeing your lovely face, it just makes me want to jump with you on our Segway Built for Two and Ride all the way Back to Brokeback Mountain....where we spent that magical summer, herding twinks. Oh, for the good old days. Happy Trails, Cowboy!

e4ia Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 10:09 PM EST

Number of times I laughed when I read the words "Oscar winner Marisa Tomei" : 1

Marshall Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 07:55 PM EST

wow, sleze, I didn't know you were both funny AND cute. that IS you in the pic, right?

Luke Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 07:38 PM EST

McSlezakky! You fine!

Joe in Philly Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 07:15 PM EST

Michael: I wasn't gonna see it anyway, but thanks for thinking of me. But what kind of theater doesn't round off their prices (including sales taxes) so that pennies aren't needlessly involved? Next time take the soda, pay $4.00 and walk away. If security comes after you for that penny it'll make a much better story!

John Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 05:24 PM EST

You are really cute Michael Slezak!!

Dre Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 05:23 PM EST

I think the moral of the story is that sometimes the trailer is enough to show you if a movie sucks. If the trailer makes you groan, chances are that the movie will make you groan. And boy, did this trailer make me groan (with agony)! Don't torture yourself anymore with this experiment, Slezak. It's not worth it!

batgirl Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 05:17 PM EST

I went with my hubby and another couple. We laughed and so did the crowd in the theater with us. No, it won't win any awards and yes, it was predictable. But I went to relax, not think too hard, and enjoy dinner and a movie with friends. That said, it was a funny satire about middle-aged men. Peter Fonda's cameo was the bomb!

Lesley Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 05:12 PM EST

I saw it this weekend as well. It wasn't THAT bad. Yes, it was fairly predictable and was exactly what you'd expect from seeing the trailer. But I've sat through worse movies.

krushgroove Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 04:47 PM EST

"Oscar winner Marisa Tomei"? That's just like saying "Oscar winner Cher", or "Oscar winner Louis Gossett Jr.". Sure, feel sorry for her because you like her or she's a good actor, but don't think this is beneath her just because Jack Palance forgot to put his glasses on.

Jamie Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 04:41 PM EST

Moira, if you're going to insult someone, at the very least act like an intelligent human being and spell the person you're insulting's name correctly. Glad to know I made someone's day with my choice of movies. Hehehe...(Rolls eyes) I also enjoy Harry Potter, Con-Air and Coyote Ugly. Any other comments?

Dana Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 04:15 PM EST

I rented the Lake House and it was surprisingly very good despite Keanue Reeves being in it. I am not a big fan of his but I do love Sandra Bullock

Eric Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 04:10 PM EST

This review, as well as the NYTimes review, confirms what I suspected about this movie: half (or to hear A.O. Scott tell it, much more than half) of its humor derives from tired old gay panic shtick. I'm so over this as a source of humor. C'mon, people, being gay is not the end of the world. Why is there so much humor based on straight guys jumping through hoops to defend their heterosexuality? Gays are the mammies of modern film. In 20 years--I hope earlier--we'll be wincing at the treatment of gays and gay themes by Hollywood. I judge anyone who saw this movie in the theaters. Except Slezak, who had journalistic intentions.

Rick Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 03:58 PM EST

I saw the movie and thought it was pretty funny. If you went to see a serious "Biker" movie, no doubt you were disappointed. If you ride, you can relate to the riding scene with the bugs in your face. Overall, I liked it. It won't win one award, but it was entertaining.

Martin Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 03:48 PM EST

Slezak, your lips are as sweet as candy.
Yeah, yeah.
http://moviemartin.blogspot.com

Laurie Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 02:42 PM EST

I knew this movie was going to suck when I stayed home sick from work on Fri and Oprah had the whole cast on. They spent possibly ten minutes of the whole show talking about the movie and the rest of the time discussing Travolta's plane and Martin's coma experience. Even The Oprah could not b.s. through this giant pile of excrement and that is her speciality. Thank you for torturing yourself for our benefit Slezak!!!

Chloe fan Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 02:26 PM EST

Sounds like a good idea for a monthly feature. I didn't see the Lake House at the movies because people said it was too confusing, but I watched it on movies on demand and it was really sweet and touching. I enjoyed it and I didn't have any problem understanding it. Can't wait to read your "maybe it's not as bad as it looks" entry.

Also, Michael, you are much more handsome than any of the guys on the poster. WOW!

Gretchen Weiners Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 01:36 PM EST

Hilarious. And I love that we got a glimpse of The Slezak. Hot stuff.

Ep Sato Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 01:27 PM EST

I like the feature, which could also be called "I'll help you decide if this is worth watching on HBO or not", because my impression is that most of us didn't plan to see this in theaters...

Though the $38 mil. opening leads me to suggest some of us went to see it anyway.

Ed Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 01:14 PM EST

Michael, any preview that has the Valerie Cherish factor in it definitly will not be on my list of must sees. Some of these previews make me feel so embarrest that I actually get up and act like I'm going to the bathroom. I wouldn't go see this movie only because the comedy hits too close to reality; a bunch of middle aged midlife crisis men buying motorcycles. Isn't that why The Comeback got the boot?


The whole movie reminds me of that scene where Valerie brings in that poster of her with her jeans unbuttoned. She does this in order to compete with Juna. That feeling of embarresment for her when she unravals it in front of Paulie G - YIKES! Val is the only person I would experience that feeling for, not John Travolta and his ever changing hair pieces.

Cracker Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 01:11 PM EST

I caught this over the weekend and I disagree with most of the reviews I've seen. Personally I enjoyed the slapstick and toilet humor albeit a pretty forumlaic flick. I don't think it was quite or par with boring pieces of excrement in a bag like Babel or The Queen, but it's a mildly entertaining 90 minutes with several laughs. I need more culture perhaps. Nah, screw it. *begins searching for Big Mama's House DVD*

nunya Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 12:49 PM EST

maybe it's me, but now i seriously have to question oprah's taste and genuine opinion towards films, because she had an ENTIRE episode about this film and it's cast. come to think of it, she also gushed about 'dreamgirls' and its cast and i found that film to be mediocre at best. hmmm...

Moira Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 12:39 PM EST

Jaimie...wow, you and your hubby really enjoy quality entertainment.

I'm so happy you found each other - sounds like a match made in b-movie hell.

Victor Perez Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 12:39 PM EST

My dear Slezak, thank you for that report, even tho i pretty much knew that Wild Hogs was going to be the waste of time and space i figured it would be..

and yeah, i agree with Jamie.. Mor pics of you in the future!!!! xo

anne Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 12:28 PM EST

Michael: your bravery is to be commended. The idea of paying $11.00 to see this film actually makes me feel queasy. I saw "Starter for Ten" this weekend and was rewarded with almost two hours of James McAvoy -- now thats worth $11.00!

Nose Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 12:27 PM EST

Jamie, I am with you...more pics of Slezak! Michael, there should be a pic of you in every Pop Watch and TV Watch that you do.

aramis Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 12:09 PM EST

I saw it. But to balance the furies, I went and saw "Zodiac" as well. Obviously the latter was far superior, but WH was good for what it was: a one-time frivolously comical film that I will never watch again because the comic value expires after the first viewing.

Kim Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 12:08 PM EST

My brother and his group of middleaged Parrotheads saw it this weekend and said it was the best movie they've seen in a long time. They thought it was hilarious. Armed with that info and now this review, I will wait for HBO to see it. Could John Travolta be more full of himself?

Rose Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 12:05 PM EST

I suspect it's getting big numbers because middle aged men feel this is something they can really relate to. And men make fun of us for "chick flicks" !!!

P.S. Since this is your job, Michael, I don't think you should have to pay for your soda - can you put it on an expense report?

Ned Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 12:00 PM EST

Two of my co-workers just spent the last 15 minutes talking about how funny this movie was. I think I'm going to resign this afternoon.

Blown Potential Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 11:46 AM EST

Hey Michael,

Your idea for a review was good; so good in fact that a friend and I started such a site 2 YEARS AGO.

At www.blownpotential.com, we strived to take the Hollywood studios entire marketing concept into consideration and base our reviews as to if the movie met our expectations or not.

Sadly, blownpotential.com is currently inactive (we could not get press cred. to see previews and advertising revenue was not covering all costs). But, I'm happy to see EW is off and running with our concept.

Howard Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 11:45 AM EST

Slezak, nothing that you've done, including the fact that you wish to come between me and Katherine Heigl, has indicated that you deserved to sit through this waste of celluloid. I couldn't imagine which bills it was William H. Macy's turn to pay in his and Felicity's household that he needed the paycheck from this (I'm also bemoaning John C. McGinley's appearance in this). And no, I didn't contribute to the $38 million; the trailer kept me away.

Jamie Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 11:39 AM EST

Man, Slezack! You're even sexier than I imagined! Whoa! Forget the movie, next time just put up another picture of yourself. It'll save you some $.
BTW, I'm planning to go see this movie next weekend with a bunch of friends. I'm sure it will be just as stupid as I thought. It should make my hubby laugh though. He's the only reason I'm going. We went and saw Ghost Rider this weekend b/c I wanted to, next weekend it's his pick. Ugh. Be thinking about me!

mike Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 11:34 AM EST

Next time, talk to the other movie goers and ask if the bad reviews and unfunny trailer mattered to them at all.
Wild Hogs made 38 million. WHY?

paige Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 11:33 AM EST

i dont like this experiment at all! youre just contributing to the paychecks of everyone involved. this a movie you illegally download. now since, this piece of crap made money- expect a sequel... and im sure you'll be contributing to that also.

Brian Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 11:29 AM EST

Totally great idea.

cRAIG Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 11:27 AM EST

is there an actor (or actress) with a filmography worse than John Travolta in the last ten years? his last good film was Get Shorty, which i believe was 1995. embarassing...

Ceballos Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 11:23 AM EST

I think this feature is a great idea, and you're a braver man than I for seeing these craptastic movies. I also wonder whether movies like this are as bad as they look, but I'm too poor to go and find out for myself.
Also, that one cent would've totally made me flip out too! What IS that?!

Adam B. Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 11:22 AM EST

That three times as many people saw this than Zodiac is a national embarassment.

Jason Mon, Mar 5, 2007 at 11:22 AM EST

Thanks for taking hte bullet for me on this one. I will now mercilessly make fun of this movie, without the usual guilt I feel for not having seen the movie.

Good work, might I suggest either "Are We Done Yet?" or "Perfect Stranger" for next month?


advertisement

Add Your Comments

The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject — or we may delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field.



  • 1000 characters remaining
    • When you click on the "Post Comment" button above to submit your comments, you are indicating your acceptance of and are agreeing to the Terms of Service. You can also read our Privacy Policy.
Latest Comments
Top Categories

All Categories

Blog Roll
Top Authors
Recent Posts
PopWatch Archive
July 2009
S M T W T F S
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Complete Archive