• More
Back to PopWatch Main
Complete Archive

Did we over-media 'Borat' to death?

Oct 26, 2006, 11:42 AM | by Scott Brown

Categories: Film

175452__borat_l_1 Yesterday’s newsflash: We, the foot soldiers of amalgamated media, love Borat (pictured)! Today’s newsflash: You don’t know who he is!

Well, some of you do. But not enough to warrant the planned 2000-screen rollout of comedian Sacha Baron Cohen’s excoriating satire Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan. Twentieth Century Fox has narrowed the Borat invasion to a more indie-friendly 800 screens, not because of the controversy with Kazakhstan or (as far as we know) a Fox-y fear of heartland backlash, but simply because most people simply don’t know Borat from Borax.

Could you come cold to Borat, "get" the joke and be wildly entertained? Absolutely. But if that question has to be asked at all, that’s too much ambiguity for the distribution wizards. They’re looking for "awareness," which also happens to be the lowest standard doctors look for in coma patients. (A measure of the esteem in which you’re held, gentle reader.) And, statistically speaking, the nation is not "aware" of Borat. They also worry that people won’t read the conceit unless they’re already "in on the joke." Golly, they must think you’re pretty stupid.

But you know what? They’re right. Not about the stupid part -- the jury’s out on that one. They’re right about the awareness thing and the breadth of the appeal. I freely admit a media conspiracy surrounding Borat: It’s a conspiracy of taste.

I don’t think of myself as a snob (I have other people to do that for me), but I confess, I like things that make me laugh. Jim Belushi farting conventionally doesn’t. Cartman farting anarchically does. So does Baron Cohen ripping this great nation a new one with fearless satiric flair. Baron Cohen’s great, Sellersesque even. He’s done something remarkable, he deserves to be seen, and we of the Media-nati desperately want to make him a fait accompli -- for all the right reasons, too. But because it’s for all the right reasons, we’ve been perhaps a bit too willing to jump aboard Borat’s promo train. Perhaps that wasn’t good for us -- or for Borat.

Because (and we forget this sometimes) you haven’t seen this movie yet. And our perfectly virtuous campaign to convince you of its (very real) genius began so early, and reached such a shrill pitch, it simultaneously convinced Fox to pursue an unrealistic rollout and convinced "early adopters" that Borat wasn’t an underground sensation, but a corporate stratagem. (In fact, it’s both.)

The fact of the matter is: You, discriminating media consumer, discovered Waiting for Guffman, Office Space, and Tenacious D. And you deserve to discover Borat, before we buzzkill it with highminded hype. We tried to make this an arranged marriage. We should've just let y'all flirt.

So, from all of us here at the Death Star, I apologize: to you, media consumers; to Borat; and to the nation of Kazakhstan, to whom we are sending 80 vats of our finest fermented horse urine.

jgnzf hrkautdim Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 02:37 AM EST

iezwqxkmu jqfz vrxkhj bpfcsmxid abom bqhstiv ntpwhvem

Juju Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 11:06 AM EST

Yuck!!!!

Tim Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 09:35 AM EST

RE: Mellow Man
If you subscribed to EW, you'd have seen that they gave covers to Revenge of the Sith and Pirates as well as those other movies you mentioned. Also, if you look at Premiere this month, they put "Blonde crater-faced new james Bond" on the cover. So what's the difference between the movies these magazines hype?

RE: Sunny Sally
All right. We get it. You're a sci-fi nerd.

RE:Marcus
My least favorite episode of Arrested Development was Save Our Bluths. Too gimmicky, which was the point of the episode, but it wore out its welcome. That said, AD and Freaks and Geeks are probably the best shows of all time.

Finally, I haven't seen the movie so I won't hazzard a guess as to the quality of the flick. I'm hoping that it'll make as good a cult film as Spinal Tap, but I'll settle for Waiting for Guffman.

munky Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 09:16 AM EST

Sasha Baron Cohen is a really funny guy. I did prefer him as Ali-G but i also liked his send ups as Borat.

Who else could make the leading figures of the USA appear as such twats ?

Kazakhistan now invites this guy over for crumpets & tea after initially banning his film.

I think hats off to the guy, he has acheived what most of us can only dream about.....

cedar Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 03:25 AM EST

Karla:
What you say? Much slathering of celebrities and playing with Borat? Sexytime!

P.S.
There is at least one plant on this thread. Talk about underground marketing.

Karla Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:44 PM EST

I totally have to agree with Lewis Beale in the link. There's such a slathering devotion to stars and their PR needs that entertainment has really become an unregulated industry. For instance, when journalists play along with the Borat persona ... well, it's only funny for a minute, and then it gets stale, and then everyone starts looking like a tool.

Sometimes, EW's coverage of actors or directors seems like a mutual massage, though I do like it when a fluff bio piece about someone's new movie and their devotion to politics/the environment/orphans is followed by Owen or Lisa ripping said movie to shreds.

I like comedies - the darker the better, but the Borat thing doesn't appeal to me. I don't like watching people made into fools on camera. It feels like watching Cheaters or Cops or something. I feel for the people and don't really like myself for laughing.

I'm sure that it says some scathing things about America, but I wish it didn't have to profit off of the embarrassment and ignorance of what are essentially unwitting participants.

Jen Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 09:36 PM EST

Jaime: good movies would not "achieve stigma." A stigma is a mark of disgrace or shame. However, I certainly agree that success does not necessarily equate with poor quality, or that anyone who appreciates lesser-known movies/music is automatically an elitist snob. There's good and bad in both the mainstream and the underground.

Talking Moviezzz Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 08:36 PM EST

I don't think anything about BORAT is hype. If you saw DA ALI G show on HBO, you know how hysterically funny it is. And, from all the clips, including the opening 4 minutes on YouTube, the early reviews, this should easily live up to the hype.

SNAKES ON A PLANE was a title that some internet sites had fun with. No one ever thought it would be a great film. I had zero interest in it. I didn't see it.

But BORAT is different.

I just hope that one of those 800 theatres is in my area.

Ceballos Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:55 PM EST

I just think that, on a basic level, people don't like being told what to do (or in this case what they should watch and not watch.)

More than half of the fun in having a favorite movie or TV show is in discovering it organically and growing with it. On some subconcious level, I think most people think that if they watch something because someone (or a magazine) told them to, they kinda feel like sheep.

That may be part of the reason I didn't go see "Snakes on a Plane" (like many other didn't), and I haven't gotten into "Battlestar Galactica" or "The Wire"...I'm just afraid that they can't possibly be as good as the mountains of hype have made it out to be...and even if it is, it's not as exciting because then it just MEETS your expectations instead of blowing your mind like these two shows, which i'm sure are of VERY high quality, should do.

Jaime Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:43 PM EST

P.S. Arrested Development was pretty much perfect for me all the way through (excepting the episode with Martin Short), but I can see how someone wouldn't think so.

Jaime Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:42 PM EST

I'm sorry, having good taste is NOT elitist. How much money did the Lord of the Rings movies make? And I have to say, those movies were pretty amazing. If there's any modern films that achieve the stigmas of big budget successes like Star Wars and Indiana Jones before it, it's those films.

Speaking of Star Wars... I'm sorry, every Star Wars with Natalie Portman in it blows completely. I'm not just saying that because Entertainment Weekly says I should. In my opinion, it did. POTC, on the other hand, I loved.

Quality has nothing to do with box-office success (or Nielson ratings, or Billboard rankings), positive or negative. Good things with large success (in my humble opinion, of course) include Lost, Lord of the Rings, and Beck. Bad things include Desperate Housewives, the last three additions to Star Wars, and Fergie. Equating the two is elitist, but so is saying that someone who enjoys lesser known things is a snob. I'll take films of high quality wherever I can get them, whether it's in a ten theater cinema or the quirky little picture house across the street.

brandonk Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:35 PM EST

I was just thinking the other day that there was an awful lot of "Borat" promotion, especially for a film that doesn't even open for another week or whatever.

Sunny Sally Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 04:36 PM EST

Marcus - Revenge of the Sith has an 82% "fresh" (i.e. positive reviews) at rotten tomatoes.com, so the vast majority of critics disagree with you and EW, and Sith was a great movie. You are just another elitist wanna-be that equates success with mediocrity, but are flat out wrong. But that's OK - your opinion is irrelevant in light of the movie's position as one of the top 10 blockbusters of all time (Just like the latest "Pirates")

Arrested Development was good it's firt season, but then became pretty painful to watch.

The only thing that EW has hyped lately that is any good is the new "Battlestar Galactica".

ripper Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 04:03 PM EST

Lord of the Rings were awful, awful movies. Snakes on a Plane was awful, and Borat is pretty dumb

Pirates was fun!)

Marcus Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 03:58 PM EST

Um, Mellow Man...EW may focus on things like King Kong, Harry Potter, The Lord of the Rings and Borat and "dis" movies like Revenge of the Sith and Pirates. And, yeah, their favorites may not have been HUGE like those two movies but I respect EW for their taste. Pirates and Revenge of the Sith SUCKED. They were awful movies that no one with respectable tastes liked. The movies they hype (and the TV shows like Arrested Development, which is, in a word, HILARIOUS) may not be mega-hits, but they are well-made and enjoyable. And, um...Lord of the Rings was a humongous hit.

Besides, if you are such a huge fan of Premiere, go read their blog.

Dave Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 03:26 PM EST

Hey Mellow Man, um, EW's an ENTERTAINMENT magazine. Of course they're obsessed with popular culture because, you know, IT'S ENTERTAINMENT. To bash them for focusing on CBGB instead of the Roman Coliseum (??), and then turn around an promote another entertainment mag (premiere) is, well, strange.

t3hdow Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 03:06 PM EST

The only thing I heard about Borat (besides the commericals) was EW's cover story. Since I never heard anything about Sasha Cohen or watched Da Ali G show, I liked it.

And what's with some of you guys comparing EW's overhyping this compared to Snakes on a Plane? THAT was overhyping. They did countless articles over that film between the 9 or so months prior to its release...enough to the point of oversaturation. This is all I've heard of Borat, so it's hardly overhyping this close to its domestic release.

Jon Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 03:03 PM EST

Yes, Borat has been surrounded with hype, a little too much for my usual taste. However, i saw a pre-screening 2 weeks ago, and this film transcends the genre. Simply put, THE FILM IS WORTH THE HYPE. It's easily the most intelligent satire I've ever seen, and of equal importance, every scene is beyond hilarious. The crowd skewed young (probably 70% college students, including myself), but I didn't see one person walk out who wasn't thrilled, shocked, or both. I agree that word of mouth will help the film; I tell everyone I know to see it opening weekend and I'll be attending the film again. Cohen is a genius and even though comedies don't generally get award attention, his complete immersion into this character is (dare I say it?) Oscar-worthy. I'm not usually this enthusiastic about any film, but trust me, Borat won't disappoint.

ceo Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 03:03 PM EST

Of course EW hyped Snakes on a Plane to death and of course they're going nuts over Borat, now. New Line Cinema, which released Snakes, HBO, which picked up Da Ali Show in America and EW are all owned by one person: Ted Turner!!! Nothing is coincidental. Wake up, people!!

Logan Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:58 PM EST

Did you guys not learn anything from "Snakes on a Plane"?

Betty Boop Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:26 PM EST

Yes overhyped. I mean c'mon EW...let the public watch and judge, then do a story on it's fabulousness after. Overhyping only leads to disapointment when you actually see the film and you wonder "huh, what was all the fuss about".


tarjay Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:05 PM EST

Yes, you overhyped Borat! I might have been willing to rent this, but I wasn't planning to go to the theater to see it. It's a one-trick pony and yes, using someone else's ethnic background as a means for a joke is really quite deplorable. Beyond that, you guys have hit us over the head with it and now I don't even want to rent it. I'm tired of the overly-snarky, holier than thou stuff that is supposed to pass as comedy. And that's what Borat is.

Brad Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 01:55 PM EST

I am happy for all of the hype over this movie. I don't have HBO so I have had little exposure to Sacha Cohen. The online coverage has been all I have seen about the movie and it looks freakin' hilarious. To those who say he is "nothing new and unfunny", speak for yourselves.

Stef Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 01:38 PM EST

I don't care how much it's been hyped, as long as I an get to see it the second it comes out. It looks totally hilarious.

Jayel Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 01:30 PM EST

I'm a snob, too - yes to Cartman, no to Jim Belushi. And as a snob, yes, I want to discover stuff on my own, not be bombarded with endless hype that suggests, however subtly, over and over again that I wouldn't have the taste to appreciate it if I weren't given a nudge by the savvier souls at EW or wherever. It ticks me off, which does indeed put me off the product being sold.

I've never been a big fan of Sascha Cohen (not even in the Madonna video where I first saw him), and seeing him on the cover of EW last week didn't help. So yeah, Scott, I think you're on to something.

Mellow Man Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 01:28 PM EST

EW overhypes what they like (Borat, Lord of The Rings, Harry Potter, King Kong, Blonde crater-faced new james Bond etc.), and then disses what they do not like (Star Wars, Pirates of the Carribbean, etc.). The rag lost any kind of objectivity almost 10 years ago. Buy Premiere - a much better magazine with good writers, as opposed to pop-culture obsessed amatuers who argue that CBGB's was as important as a historical landmark as the Roman Colisseum. Very sad.

The funny part is that they are usually wrong in what they hype and dis - Snakes on a Plane flopped, King Kong was a box-office dissapointment and Borat gets pulled from larger distribution, whereas Revenge of the Sith and Pirates of the Carribbean were the #1 box office smashes of 2005 and 2006, respectively. Ha!

Ron Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 01:01 PM EST

Ever heard of Balki from Perfect Strangers? This is the motion picture.Ever heard of Yakoff Smirnoff? Nothing new and still unfunny.

dave Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 12:58 PM EST

wait, who's borat?

Mak Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 12:56 PM EST

Has the media overhyped Borat? Does a bear poop in the woods?

I have to say, Scott (who is probably not actually reading this anyway), that I get kind of annoyed when the media tries to tell us what to like, regardless of whether or not it's for "virtuous" reasons. Maybe Cohen made a canny satire with this one. Based on the ads, I'm a little skeptical. So we all need to see this because... it will make the world a better place? Sort of like how Jon Stewart should run for president, right?

Why is it always comedy that seems to engender the more condescending tendencies of the media? Is it because comedy appeals to the elitist tendencies of people by its very nature?

James Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 12:53 PM EST

I think its offensive. Mocking people from ethnic backgrounds is not something to laud, let alone over-hype. Cohen is a Cambridge University graduate. He should know better. He is exploiting people and their cultures for money; and not just Kazakhstan's people but everyone he interviews; he maintains this belligerent superiority over them behind his ironic little mask. It's not in good fun, it is deplorable, especially in this day.

Ken Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 12:40 PM EST

He's not really very funny or original - very derivative of something that might have been fresh in 1973.

Ed Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 12:14 PM EST

I think the media will like this one more than the general public. All I've seen are snippets and sound bites, still hasn't caused me to want to run to the theater.

This is the type of movie that becomes trendy to see; an either you get it or don't get it type of movie. Everyone who get's it will have their nose up in the air because they think they've discovered something.

Much like my behavior when I tried to explain Valerie Cherish.

McNutt Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 12:08 PM EST

Well put, Scott. The thrill of discovery is so often lost in the 24-news-cycle *hearts* internet culture we live in, replaced by hype and anticipation. Can you imagine what it would have been like had audiences had the chance to dicover, for example, the Blair Witch Project on their own instead of every media outlet hyping it as the scariest film ever? Perhaps people would have enjoyed it on its own terms.

Ep Sato Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 12:07 PM EST

Mike, kudos for calling out SOAP. Borat will do as well as other undergound hits like Office Space.
I do see Mr. Brown's argument that some level of white collar snobbery required to enjoy Cohen's love of making us all look foolish.

That said, I could care less. Larry the Cable guy doesnt get her done to make me laugh, and while it escapes me who likes Dane Cook, he too speaks to a particular audience. We all have humor that is specifically tailored for us. Borat, like most things in popular culture is ultimately a product invented to make someone money.
Overhyped as he is, I will be there on opening night, and bet the movie will be Berry Nice.

Ariella Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:54 AM EST

I saw a sneak peak at Borat about a month ago and it was FRIKIN' HILARIOUS. It may have been the funniest movie EVER MADE. People in the theater were literally VOMITING WITH HILARITY. I urge you to see it, because it can only be seen to be believed.

Oliver Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:45 AM EST

All the previews I've seen look exactly like clips of his show from HBO. That show had its moments, but it certainly never got this kind of hype and I doubt its ratings came anywhere near The Sopranos. Why is this suddenly a much bigger deal when we have to pay $10 to see it?

miles high Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:28 AM EST

No. No. No. I went to the MySpace screening and it was hilarous. Easily one of the funniest movies Ive ever seen. The fact that it's only opening on 800 screens is a shame. But I bet by its release date, it will open 1200-1500 screens. A funny film that I hope many get to see.

miles high Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:27 AM EST

No. No. No. I went to the MySpace screening and it was hilarous. Easily one of the funniest movies Ive ever seen. The fact that it's only opening on 800 screens is a shame. But I bet by its release date, it will open 1200-1500 screens. A funny film that I hope many get to see.

Mozz Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:20 AM EST

I couldn't wait to see this movie, but it slowly worked itself down the list of other films. I would have given an arm and a leg to see this movie this summer which was deadly a unfun summer (not counting the laughter at Superman Returns) but now with all the oscar bait coming out, I still gotta see the Queen, the Last King of Scotland, shut up and and Sing, and a bunch of others by the time I get around to Borat he's going to be seen where I think he'll have the best reception, on my hdtv on dvd.

Mozz Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:19 AM EST

I couldn't wait to see this movie, but it slowly worked itself down the list of other films. I would have given an arm and a leg to see this movie this summer which was deadly unfun, but now with all the oscar bait coming out, I still gotta see the Queen, the Last King of Scotland, shut and and Sing, and a bunch of others by the way I get around to Borat he's going to be seen where I think he'll have the best reception, on my hdtv on dvd.

Mike Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:17 AM EST

Well, I seem to remember a little film called "Snakes on a Plane" that got the same EW treatment that we've come to know and despise, and we all know how that turned out.

Guy Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:16 AM EST

I saw Borat 2 weeks ago and it deserves all of the attention it gets. Since it was a sneak peak it was probably uncut. But it was one of the funniest movies made in the last 20 years.

Peggy Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:05 AM EST

Yes, Borat is yesterday's news. He's a one-line joke of a fish-out-of-water playing gotcha. Yaaawwwwwwn. Everyone is totally bored with this guy.

Rich Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:03 AM EST

Because (and you forget this sometimes), as alleged journalists, you are supposed to report on a phenomenon, not create one. "It’s a conspiracy of taste." Holy Moley, could you be any more arrogant?!? Is there any entertainment journalist, no matter how lowly a blogger he or she might be, that does not consider himself or herself an arbiter of taste for the whole nation?

Borat looks funny. So show me the commercials and post a review and then get the heck out of the way. Do your jobs and stop being cheerleaders.

Rahul Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:02 AM EST

Even though box office business is greatest on opening weekend, I think that having the screen count go up the following week will help the movie. I'm betting that people will see this movie more than once, and that word-of-mouth will help. In the long-run, business will not suffer. Now let's talk about getting this movie a Best Original Screenplay nom.

nathan Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 10:54 AM EST

2000 screens does seem like a lot, I just hope my theater is one of the 800, can't wait to see it. I doubt it has anything to do with the Kazakhstan controversy, I just can't see anyone caring enough about that country for it to make any difference.

advertisement

Add Your Comments

The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject — or we may delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field.



  • 1000 characters remaining
    • When you click on the "Post Comment" button above to submit your comments, you are indicating your acceptance of and are agreeing to the Terms of Service. You can also read our Privacy Policy.