Author: Missy Schwartz (1-10 of 124)

Feb 5 2010 04:00 PM ET

Emma Watson is richer than Kristen Stewart (and 26 other Hollywood big shots)

She’s rich, beyotch! Yep, the lovely British actress who plays Hermione Granger in the Harry Potter films raked in some serious cash in 2009. According to a new Vanity Fair report, Watson earned more than any other female entertainer last year: $30 million, or $15 million for each Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows movies. She came in at No. 14, just below Denzel Washington and above her Potter costar Rupert Grint. (He also earned $30 million, so I’m guessing VF placed him lower because they consider him less popular/bankable. Potter himself, Daniel Radcliffe, came in at No. 6.) On VF’s list of 40 — which is topped by Michael Bay and his $125 million payday — Watson easily outranked Sarah Jessica Parker (No. 24), Angelina Jolie (No. 32), Sandra Bullock (No. 34), and even Twilight’s Kristen Stewart (No. 37). The only other woman who came close to her ranking is No. 19, Cameron Diaz.

The idea of someone that young — Watson is just 19! — having that much money to her name is sort of mind-blowing. And if she weren’t so classy, it’d be pretty damn scary. But as the red carpet darling has proven over the last year especially, she is no Hollywood trainwreck-in-the-making. Watson is poised, mature, and smart. She wears underwear! And hello! Tuition is ridiculously expensive, so we can take comfort knowing that some of that $30 mil will be well spent — at the Brown University comptroller’s office! The rest she can spend on textbooks and rounds of drinks for her new college friends.

What do you think of Watson emerging as the highest-paid female entertainer of 2009? Will she be able to keep the title in 2010? If not, who will succeed her?

Feb 1 2010 09:30 AM ET

Exclusive: This week's 'Project Runway' guest judge is [SPOILER ALERT]!

SPOILER ALERT! SPOILER ALERT! SPOILER ALERT!

Okay. Now that that’s out of the way, here’s the scoop: we have the lowdown about who is taking the guest judge chair on Project Runway this week. Want to know? The big news is after the jump… (Read full post)

Advertisement
Jan 29 2010 03:06 PM ET

'Project Runway': Why does everyone hate Mila's design?

As Tim Gunn frequently reminds the designers lucky enough to breeze through his orbit, fashion is subjective. We Runway fans try to remember this fact of life, too. But man oh man are there some baffled Runway-ites venting their frustration on EW.com today. Their gripe? That Mila’s 1960s-inspired op-art black and white jacket and pants ensemble (pictured, far left) is hideous, and (SPOILER ALERT) never should have won.

I guess I’m surprised by the outcries because I lurved Mila’s design. Now, is it wearable? Not particularly — at least not for any everyday occasion. But neither are any of those 10 iconic garments that Tim and the gang drooled over in the Met last night. And unless I’m mistaken, the point of the challenge was to create a “signature look” worthy of those Met items. To me, Mila’s was. It was bold, daring, and had more drama than a Lifetime movie of the week. It had a certain fantasy appeal. As I said in my recap of last night’s episode, the ensemble reminded me of The Avengers’ great Emma Peel, who is herself hailed by many as — pardon my use of an all-too-frequently abused term — a fashion icon.

In defending Mila’s win, I’m certainly not saying that those of you who don’t agree with me are wrong. We’re all right! Because we love clothes! But I’m curious to know which outfit you think should have won over Mila’s. Jay and Maya’s (pictured, above)? Emilio and Anna’s? Ping and Jesse’s? (Ha ha ha ha ha!) To refresh your memory, check out Lifetime’s Rate the Runway. Then sound off!

Jan 22 2010 03:25 PM ET

'Project Runway' alums Christian Siriano and Chris March make us proud

Hurray! There does indeed seem to be life after reality television for the worthy and able. Let us put our proud, fiercely fashionable hands together for Project Runway season 4 castmates Christian Siriano and Chris March, who nearly made me weep with nutty fan pride last weekend when they dressed two ravishing divas for the Golden Globes. Siriano wrapped voluptuous Mad Men beauty Christina Hendricks in a cocoon of ruffled peach silk, while March made Best Actress winner (and perennially brilliant woman) Meryl Streep look stunning in a drapey black gown that showed off her lovely neck and shoulders. Of the two, I have to give it up for Meryl’s look. I adore Christina Hendricks and don’t think she’s ever made a red carpet blunder (hello! she’s hot!), but richer colors suit her better than pastels. In any case, Meryl just looked so very regal and elegant — a veritable reine du cinéma. Plus, that belt! Such a boldly magnifique move! So unexpected!

The boys’ success with these ladies got me thinking about other possible collaborations between Runway alums and stars. What would Uli Herzner design for, say, Amy Poehler? Or Korto Momolu for Chloë Sevigny? (After her Globes’ gown, girl could use some tips, for sure!) And for something completely off-the-wall … Laura Bennett and Lady Gaga?

Who’s your dream match-up? (And if you haven’t already, please do check out my recap of last night’s Runway episode.)

Jan 22 2010 02:03 PM ET

'Diary of a Wimpy Kid' trailer: Promising!

Full disclosure: I have never so much as leafed through a copy of any of the Diary of a Wimpy Kid series (but I ask you: how many 34-year-old women with posters of Siouxsie Sioux on her walls have?), so I come to this trailer in semi-complete ignorance. That said, I’m kinda intrigued by it. It seems sorta sweet-goofy-witty — something of a modern-day Freaks and Geeks, albeit a broader one. The following are all positives in my book:

-It has a cast of kid actors who don’t make me want to scratch my eyes out with their hideously cloying “cuteness.” (See: Tooth Fairy) Doesn’t seem to be any of that here, folks!

-Chloe Moretz, the funny little sister from (500) Days of Summer, is in it

-Steve Zahn is in it

-The line “A butt can’t be cute. It’s a butt.” Yes, I’m immature.

What’s your take? Are ya curious about this flick?

Advertisement
Dec 18 2009 03:41 PM ET

Metacritic's best- and worst-reviewed movies of the decade: How many have you seen?

Here’s the perfect illustration of how critics and mainstream audiences don’t always coincide. The site Metacritic has posted a list of the top-reviewed films of the past decade, and according to their data, Guillermo del Toro’s Pan’s Labyrinth is No. 1 with a score of 98. Just below it is the Romanian drama 4 Months, 3 Weeks, 2 Days (97). It’s a great list, packed with terrific movies like The Hurt Locker (No. 5), Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (No. 9), No Country for Old Men (No. 23) and Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (No. 42). But with the exception of a few titles — Pixar (duh) and The Lord of the Rings trilogy — the list is pretty slim on massive box office hits. Pan’s, for instance, grossed just $37.6 million. Compare that to the most-seen movie of the decade, The Dark Knight, which got a Metacritic score of 82. (Read full post)

Dec 16 2009 04:48 PM ET

'Project Runway' season 7 cast revealed: There will be bangs!

I’m still hungover from the long, disappointing slog that was season six, but Lifetime’s unveiling of a whole new crop of Project Runway hopefuls has me all kinds of excited today. For one thing, it’d be pretty hard not to improve on the last cast (like coupons at Macy’s, some exceptions apply). But a quick glance at Lifetime’s gallery of the 16 fresh faces who’ll be on season seven (debuting Jan. 14) gives me hope that our show might be back on track. Hopefully.

Some first impressions:

-Bangs! No fewer than four contestants are sporting a sleek straight fringe (see photo, left). And two of them have ‘dos similar enough that they could be sharing the same stylist. What does it all mean?! What is the greater meaning behind this proliferation of bangs?

-We might have an entertaining nutter butter in Ping Wu who, in her home visit video models some kooky, hand-knit socks that double as washcloths.

-Pamela Ptak: God is her favorite designer.

-There is a Rocker Dad. Oh jeez…

-Anthony Williams: I adore this guy already. He has personality! Dude lives with his mom in Atlanta (“You are officially in the luxury ghetto”), worships Manolo Blahnik, and compares his mother’s collection of “little colored children” figurines to “Children of the Corn…they’re gonna come get me in my sleep.”

-I still don’t care about Models of the Runway.

If you can stomach sitting through 16 repetitions of those cloying Cotton: The Fabric of Our Lives commercials that play before each video, take a trip on over to Lifetime to get acquainted with the Season Seveners, then report back in the comment section below: Who stands out for you?

Dec 15 2009 03:29 PM ET

Couch potatoes rule! New study shows Americans rate TV as top form of entertainment

According to today’s Hollywood Reporter, something called “Deloitte’s fourth annual State of the Media Democracy report” reveals that 34 percent of Americans rate TV as their favorite medium (up from 27 percent last year), with 71 percent listing it in their top three. Second place went to the Internets; third to music; and fourth to books. Meanwhile, only 22 percent of those polled cited going to the movies as their preferred form of entertainment. (Read full post)

Advertisement
Dec 13 2009 01:21 PM ET

Critics down on 'Lovely Bones,' but swoon for star Saoirse Ronan

The Lovely Bones has finally made it into theaters — well, three theaters; it’s in limited release until Christmas. It opened strong, pulling in $116,000 for a per-screen average of just under $39,000. If the movie, an adaptation of Alice Sebold’s bestseller, holds up over the coming weeks, it’ll be thanks to the many, many fans of the novel, and to the legions of die-hard devotees of director Peter Jackson.

Because Bones certainly won’t be benefiting from an abundance of critical love. For the first time since his days of making gross-out, low-budget wonders like Meet the Feebles, Jackson earned a round of reviews that were lukewarm at best, scathing at worst. The most widespread gripe? That the Oscar-sweeping Lord of the Rings guru indulged too much in CGI at the expense of emotion and consistent storytelling. (See EW’s review by Lisa Schwarzbaum here).

But even the harshest reviews (like Variety’s — ouch!) have pointed out at least one positive: the brilliance of lead actress Saoirse Ronan (above, with costar Rose McIver). The New York Times applauded her “unnerving self-assurance and winning vivacity,” while The Los Angeles Times went even further, arguing that Jackson’s “best move by far was casting young Irish actress Saoirse Ronan, Oscar-nominated for her compelling role in Atonement, as the murdered Susie Salmon. An enormously gifted performer, Ronan is the only element of the film that is exactly as it should be, bringing naturalness, honesty and radiance to the part of a young woman just on the cusp of life.” Click on over to The Hollywood Reporter, Newsweek, and Slate, where you’ll find similar adulation for Ronan.

I’ll leave it to Dave Karger to ponder whether Ronan’s got enough critical affection to snag an Oscar nom. I’m hoping she will. She’s a prodigiously talented actress and a cool kid to boot, mercifully devoid of any of that weird, overly precious kid-actor stuff that plagues so many youngsters in Hollywood. (Maybe it’s ’cause she lives in her native Ireland, a good 6,000 miles away from the ego-inflating bubble of Tinseltown?) Plus, she can spoof Britney Spears as well as any SNL-er. Don’t believe me? Check out the embedded clip below. It’s from Amy Heckerling’s I Could Never Be Your Women, which she shot when she was barely out of elementary school.

Awesome, right?

So are you pulling for young Ms. Ronan, PopWatchers? What about Mr. Jackson? Do you love him enough to ignore reviews? Will you see The Lovely Bones?

Dec 12 2009 10:09 AM ET

Are the animated movies of 2009 better than this year's live-action films?

Let’s hear it for The Princess and the Frog! The movie is poised to take the top spot at the box office this weekend — and it’s already taken the top spot on Time’s Richard Corliss’ list of the best movies of 2009. Yep, Disney’s 2D fairytale about a plucky gal in 1930s New Orleans is his favorite movie of the year.

And you know what else? Corliss’ Nos. 2 and 3 are also animated flicks: Up and Fantastic Mr. Fox. Plenty of critics have yet to publish their top 2009 lists (EW’s own Lisa Schwarzbaum and Owen Gleiberman among them; you’ll have to wait for our double issue, on stands next Friday), but I don’t think it’s a stretch to imagine that plenty of other reviewers’ lists will show similar love for what we used to call cartoons. Between Up, Fantastic Mr. Fox, Coraline, 9, The Princess and the Frog, and Ponyo, 2009 has been an unusually strong year for the genre. Some would argue — actually, some have argued, in the very halls of the EW offices, that this year’s crop of animated movies are superior to all the fancy live-action movies that come out this time of year and jockey for Oscar attention.

I’m not sure I’m ready to agree with that bold statement (I’m not a nut for animated movies, much as I appreciate what they achieve with either digital or more traditional 2D technology), but I can say unequivocally that I absolutely loved Fantastic Mr. Fox. It’s definitely one of my favorite movies of the year. Might even be my favorite animated movie of all time.

In any case, what do you think? Are the animated flicks of 2009 better than this year’s live-action films?

Advertisement
Powered by WordPress.com VIP