Archive: December 2009 (331-340 of 461)

Dec 8 2009 11:22 AM ET

Tiger Woods late-night roundup: Will David Letterman's personal experience help or hurt him?

David Letterman returned to the air Monday night with his first new show since Nov. 25, and he cautiously took a few swings at Tiger Woods. “Boy, it looks like that Tiger Woods is havin’ some trouble, huh?” he opened. After 24 seconds of silence (unless you count the audience’s laughter), he spoke again: “You know what, I was thinkin’ if this thing happened three months ago, I’d have material for a year.

That begs the question: Will Letterman’s personal experience dealing with “transgressions” publicly ultimately help or hurt his monologue as Tiger Woods continues to dominate the news? Last night, I’d say it helped. After joking about the media firestorm surrounding Woods being the largest blaze since his own gay kiss with Adam Lambert, Letterman cracked: “President Obama is sending troops to Afghanistan. Why hell, he oughta be sending ‘em to Tiger Woods’ house…. I wish he would stop callin’ me for advice.” He said Woods endorsements may be in jeopardy: He may no longer be on a box of Wheaties. ”And I was thinkin’, Well, my god, if he’s actually this active…I mean, maybe he deserves to be on a Wheaties box…. Yeah, not much else I can say.” More laughter. But there was more to say: Dave’s Top 10 list was the Top 10 Ways Tiger Woods Can Improve His Image: ”Maybe I’ll learn a little something here myself.” Should the subject make you uncomfortable, Letterman had good guy Tom Hanks react to each punch line (1. Blame Letterman. Hanks: “Ouch.”)

After the jump, we take a look at how the other late night hosts handled Woods last night. Were Letterman’s jokes the best? READ FULL STORY »

Dec 8 2009 09:00 AM ET

Guilty Pleasures Reality TV Showdown: Bobby Brown vs. Anna Nicole

PopWatch is on a quest to determine the Greatest Guilty Pleasure Reality TV Show of All Time. We have 32 seeded contestants in four categories (see full bracket here), and we’re finishing the quarterfinals in the Celeb-Reality category. After you vote, please leave comments about why you love the show you chose.

Being Bobby Brown The Anna Nicole Show

Quarterfinals, Celeb-Reality: Being Bobby Brown vs. The Anna Nicole Show

Being Bobby Brown
We’ll always have “kiss my ass!,” thanks to this trainwreckalicious how-is-this-even-happening doc-style reality trailblazer. And the immortal line, “hell to the no.” And the image of Bobby helping Whitney in the bathroom. – Margaret Lyons

The Anna Nicole Show
Were we ever this innocent? The reality world of 2002 seems so, so different than the one of today. At least part of that is thanks — thanks? — to The Anna Nicole Show, which showed us what the gaze of the realty eyeball could do: turn a washed up former model from tabloid trash into cable’s most popular star…and then slowly destroy her. For a while there, though, what a campy joy. The show’s tagline — “It’s not supposed to be funny. It just is.” — seems all the more tragic after her 2007 death. – Margaret Lyons


Dec 8 2009 07:45 AM ET

'Big Bang Theory' recap: Sheldon tries to teach Penny physics, barely succeeds

If it wasn’t already abundantly clear, last night’s Big Bang Theory locked down this iron-clad axiom: Sheldon + Penny > Practically anything else on the show. This is no knock on Leonard, Howard, or poor Raj, who was especially MIA last night, and especially missed. It’s just that the improbable platonic friendship between this persnickety Texan and down-to-earth Nebraskan is undeniably the show’s beating heart, and any episode that advances that relationship is all the better for it. For one thing, through them, we learned that Fig Newtons were named for a small town in Massachusetts and not Isaac Newton. Go fig. (Sorry, I had to.)

That lovely factoid was the fruit of Sheldon’s agreement to teach Penny physics, so that she could actually understand what it is her boyfriend does for a living. Apparently, until Howard’s new microbiologist girlfriend Bernadette took a real interest in Leonard’s upcoming experiment, this cognitive disparity had never really bothered Penny, but I am beyond grateful that the writers didn’t use this moment to launch into the tired cliché of the-girlfriend-who-gets-instantly-jealous-of-female-competition. Nope, when Bernadette asked Leonard if he’s going to “try to set up the voltages using tunnel junctions” (ahem), Howard was the one with the little green monster — which is as it should be, really. READ FULL STORY »

Dec 8 2009 07:00 AM ET

'Gossip Girl' recap: Chuck hangs with his father...and meets his mother (maybe)!!

This season of Gossip Girl is turning into a regular family reunion. We’ve met Vanessa’s annoying mother. We learned that Serena’s father had popped back up on the radar. And now we have seen Mother Bass or some lady who has the same taste in flowers. I knew she was still alive! In fact, I called this waaaay back when Chuck and Dan ended up in jail in season 2 and Chuck discussed his mother’s death. I knew it! Of course, I could totally be wrong and this mystery lady, played by Mulholland Drive’s Laura Harring, could end up being his childhood maid or something; she was kinda dressed like Dorota. READ FULL STORY »

Dec 8 2009 06:42 AM ET

'Biggest Loser' finale tonight: Who do you want to win?

Categories: Misc.

Toniiiiight, toniiiiight…is the season finale of The Biggest Loser. I’m so excited I could burst into show tunes! Who’s going to make it to the final weigh-in — America’s Choice Amanda or old-lady underdog Liz? (Don’t hate, she’s been harping on those things all season.) And how will the chosen lady fare against powerhouses Rudy and Danny in the final three?

I’m a proponent of girl power and all that, but I am firmly on Team Rudy-or-Danny going into tonight’s final episode rumble weigh-in. One thing that could sway my vote firmly into the Danny camp: Danny performance. Tonight. Make it happen, NBC! As season 8 recapper extraordinaire Darren put it, Thin Danny the High School Rock Star needs to make a triumphant return, stat. READ FULL STORY »

Dec 7 2009 09:50 PM ET

Michael Bay's Victoria's Secret commercial: Where are the giant robots?

Michael Bay has directed a Victoria’s Secret commercial. No, that’s not the premise for a Saturday Night Live skit involving enormous robots doing battle while wearing sexy lingerie. Bay, the director of slick, explosion-y mega-hits like Armageddon, Pearl Harbor, and the Transformers films, as well as numerous commercials, brings all the hallmarks of his style to his latest ad for Victoria’s Secret. These aren’t just shots of beautiful women in undergarments. These are shots of beautiful women in undergarments straddling pool tables, being followed by black helicopters, posing in front of a massive fireball, and, for some odd reason possibly having to do with a circus (a sexy circus!), throwing knives at each other — all assembled with lots of quick cutting and a soundtrack of thudding rock music. Hey, it makes a whole lot more sense than that weird Victoria’s Secret commercial Bob Dylan did a few years back.

Take a look.

Does Bay’s Victoria’s Secret commercial make you want to run right out and buy some bras? Or rent Bad Boys? Or both?

Dec 7 2009 09:00 PM ET

Looking back at decade, Peter Jackson tells EW he was 'amazed' at first response to 'LOTR'

Lord of the Rings trilogy director Peter Jackson, one of Entertainment Weekly‘s Entertainers of the Decade, shared some surprising memories of the past ten years. Asked, for instance, if  there had been one particular day when he realized he might pull off the wildy ambitious trilogy, he said, via email, “Yes, in May 2001, in Cannes. We screened 20 minutes of Fellowship to a group of journalists and distributors. It was a huge relief that the screening went well, because the studio had not responded very positively to the footage and they told us to expect the worst. This is why we approached the event with a mounting sense of dread. We were frankly amazed the footage was so well received.”

Jackson admitted he and his fellow filmmakers felt an enormous amount of pressure making LOTR because the studio, New Line, was in precarious financial shape and betting nearly $300 million on his movies: “The fate of the company was hanging in the balance. It was a fear and a pressure that never went away: the idea that if the films failed, we would be personally responsible for hundreds of New Liners losing their jobs. It was a horrible thought — that people with mortgages and families would find themselves out of work because we had failed to deliver.”

And what does he think was his single worst decision of the decade? “To renovate our house whilst shooting three movies back-to-back. The renovations took longer than making the films. Our house was swathed in scaffolding for over two years. It was so bad that a local newspaper suggested that the neighbors might like to pitch in, in good Kiwi DIY style, to help us finish basic repairs and get rid of the eyesore. Flash forward to 2009 and renovations are still a work in progress. We realize now that they will never finish. The builders are very much ‘family’ now.”

For more about Peter Jackson, and other Entertainers of the Decade, check out the Best of the Decade issue, on stands now.

Photo Credit: Robert Smith/Retna Ltd.

Dec 7 2009 08:56 PM ET

'The Pee-Wee Herman Show' is back! For reals!

The Pee-Wee Herman Show is back. Paul Reubens, who created Pee-Wee and played him on stage, TV and film between 1980 and 1991, is bringing his goofy-geeky man-child to the Los Angeles stage for a limited live-performance run at Club Nokia next month. “It’s going to be really, really good! I swear!” Reubens said, wearing Pee-Wee’s signature gray suit and bow tie, at a press conference today.

The full-scale stage performance, produced by Tony Award-winner Scott Sanders (Elaine Stritch: At Liberty) and directed by Alex Timbers (Bloody Bloody Andrew Jackson) will revive the character Reubens first brought to life on stage in a comedy act and then spun into HBO’s The Pee-wee Herman Show in 1980. That show gave rise to two feature films, Pee-Wee’s Big Adventure (1985) and Big Top Pee-Wee (1988), and the CBS children’s program, Pee-Wee’s Playhouse (1986-1991). READ FULL STORY »

Dec 7 2009 07:46 PM ET

JJ Abrams, an EW Entertainer of the Decade, on 'Star Trek,' 'Lost,' and his collaborators

Alias. Lost. Fringe. Mission Impossible 3. Cloverfield. Star Trek. All in all, writer/director/producer JJ Abrams had a pretty sweet decade. That’s why we at Entertainment Weekly named him one of the Entertainers of the Decade in our Best of the Decade issue, on stands now. In particular, 2009 was a peak year for the 43-year-old Abrams thanks to Star Trek, a global box-office smash that revitalized a lagging pop culture franchise. Abrams — an unabashed Star Wars guy — had been a Trek shrugger himself, but fell in love with the world the more he worked on it. “I didn’t feel like I could relate to any of the characters,” Abrams tells EW. “I didn’t feel cocky or self-confident like Kirk. I wasn’t as logical or rule abiding as Spock. I wasn’t grumpy as Bones or as wide eyed as Chekov. I didn’t have the intelligence of Scotty or the reliability of Sulu. I knew I wasn’t Uhura. I was none of these characters. Looking at the whole group, they were all wonderful archetypes, but I didn’t feel a bond with any of them. But working on the movie I fell in love with all of them. The torment of Spock. The full-of-potential-but-unrealized Kirk. The strength of Uhura, the wit of Scotty, the bravery of Sulu, the innocence of Chekov — I loved them all. It took working on it for a long time to not just love them, but become them.” READ FULL STORY »

Dec 7 2009 06:15 PM ET

An 'action-adventure' 'Nutcracker'? How could this go wrong?

File under “this is happening?!”: New Line has signed on for an “action-adventure” reimagining of The Nutcracker. I’m picturing an explosion/chase sequence set to the “Waltz of the Flowers.” Perhaps the tagline can be “aw, nutz!” Or maybe something about shoe-throwing. I just really hope I hope this turns into a balls-out Michael Bay-meets-George-Balanchine festival of the insane.

Writer Darren Lemke, who wrote the upcoming Jack the Giant Killer and Shrek Forever, told The Hollywood Reporter: “I like the classic stories, but only if you can find a way to embrace them, without betraying them, and tell the tale with a forward thrust, making them feel modern.”

I’m guessing it’ll be based more on the book than the ballet, but presumably the vile Mouse King will still be present. Whom shall we cast as the Sugar Plum Fairy? And who can credibly wrangle an army of vermin?

Advertisement

TV Recaps

Powered by WordPress.com VIP