'Hogwarts High': Harry Potter meets 'Back to the Future'

Comments (1-14) of 14 Add your comment

• Jamie
  Tue 10/27/09 12:50 PM

  Wow, why hasn’t Warner put a kaibosh on this comic yet like they did that british womans dinner party in the ‘Deathly Lawyers’ article? How convenient that the comment section for the ‘Deathly Lawyers’ article is shut down considering Entertainment Weekly is like Warner, a division of Time Warner. So taking my 5th into consideration all i can say is go pound sand. TW and JK are really full of themselves and can’t take the criticism that’s pending them. This is very Whitehouse not wanting Fox involded in news. Control the media much?

  Reply
  • Ern
    Tue 10/27/09 1:27 PM

    You’re pathetic.

    Reply
  • Brian
    Tue 10/27/09 1:27 PM

    You’re not on the stand nor are you being asked to incriminate yourself so you don’t have any 5th amendment rights. Also, there is nothing wrong with the creator of copyrightable material protecting his or her copyright. You’ve also used the word “pending” incorrectly. And Fox is by nature only mildly involved with news. Take your screed elsewhere.

    Reply
  • Lisa Simpson
    Tue 10/27/09 2:43 PM

    It’s very simple. This is considered parody, which is protected under law. The British woman’s party was something she was doing to make money (she was charging for tickets online), and was therefore in violation of copyright law, as she had not gotten prior permission to profit from someone else’s intellectual property.

    Reply
  • JMB
    Tue 10/27/09 2:45 PM

    Uh, Jamie–Whuh? You make no sense. Put down your drink and go sober up before you post again, please.

    Reply
  • Danielle
    Tue 10/27/09 2:47 PM

    Considering that the woman hosting the dinner was charging admission, whereas this comic is free of charge, I think you’re comparing apples to oranges (I couldn’t think of a good Harry Potter/wizarding metaphor.)

    Reply
  • Chris
    Tue 10/27/09 3:01 PM

    I wouldn’t stand there, they sky might fall on you.

    Reply
• Cricket
  Tue 10/27/09 12:56 PM

  I think you mean “involved” in your little tantrum.

  Reply
• Mary Q. Contrary
  Tue 10/27/09 1:02 PM

  I really wish I could read it better. Maybe I need new glasses. Mine have been broken for awhile. Anywho, it looks cute and funny, and I’m a total kid of the 80’s, so this is hilarious. I especially love Jon Cusack as Harry and Mark Paul Gosselaar as Drako. Haha.

  Reply
• Stacie
  Tue 10/27/09 1:17 PM

  There’s a picture on the internet of Bowie I saw that looked TOTALLY like Voldemort. Also, in Labrynth, Connely actually says Hogwart!

  Reply
• trepithet
  Tue 10/27/09 2:02 PM

  whoa, I’ve been following Lucy on livejournal for years! she once drew me a picture of a person with a banana in place of a unicorn horn- trust me, it was awesome. so excited to see her featured here.

  Reply
• AJ Simon
  Tue 10/27/09 2:07 PM

  Ally Sheedy would make a better Hermione – anyone else think Emma Watson looks exactly like Ally Sheedy?

  Reply
• Jessie
  Tue 10/27/09 2:12 PM

  That was great! Made me smile

  Reply
• Delboy
  Wed 10/28/09 1:42 PM

  If JK had created HP 20 years ago, the reality would be more likely a BBC Children’s series with wobbly sets, dodgy effects and probably most of the same (adult) cast that ended up in the movies…

  Reply