Archive: May 2009 (151-160 of 467)

May 19 2009 10:45 PM ET

'Medium': Five reasons CBS should save it from NBC's death sentence!

Mediumcbs_lThe foolios at NBC have failed to pick up Patricia Arquette’s psychic crime-solving drama Medium for a sixth season, but what else did you expect from a network that’s handing over its Mon-Fri 10 p.m. hour to Jay Leno? Still, all hope is not lost! My colleague Michael Ausiello reports CBS is considering throwing a lifeline to one of TV’s most underrated dramas. Aside from Arquette’s Emmy-winning turn as Allison Dubois, here’s five additional reasons the show deserves another season on a new network:

1) Joe and Allison DuBois are TV’s best married couple. Seriously, network TV loves depicting married life as an endless cycle of bickering, resentment, and negotiations. But Medium, while never ignoring the workaday challenges faced by an average middle-class couple, also manages to depict the joys and comforts of a long-term relationship. Which is comforting, and almost quaint, in the ‘Til Death/Rules of Engagement era.

2) Miranda Carabello (Marie Dubois) is currently challenging Maria Lark (Bridgette Dubois) for supremacy as cutest kid on the small screen. Anyone catch the recent episode in which Marie woke up with a nightmare about being dressed as a pea pod and forgetting her lines in the school play? Well, if you missed it, it’s embedded after the jump. Sometimes, video is worth 1,000 words!

3) Jake Weber still needs his Emmy nomination! Dude got shortlisted last year, and while it’d be great if he makes the cut in 2009, I’m worried he’ll get shafted in favor of William Shatner (again!).

4) Weekly scares are fun for the whole family! How many shows on your DVR roster consistently leave you clutching your pillow all scurrr’d-like? (Aside from some of those VH1 reality shows?) With Medium, you get an elevated heart rate without ever leaving the couch!

5) Medium is like a creepy, well-written, modern-day Love Boat for TV guest stars. Season 5 alone has found nifty roles for everyone from Jeffrey Tambor to Blythe Danner to James Van Der Beek to Emily Bergl. Support working actors, CBS, and give Medium its sixth season!

READ FULL STORY »

May 19 2009 10:15 PM ET

'According to Jim' series finale: The first episode I want to watch

Accordingtojim_l

So this was supposed to be a Hallelujah! follow-up to the item I wrote last May, when ABC announced its Fall 2008 schedule: ‘According to Jim’: Still Not Canceled. (The only text was: Just FYI.) But then I saw this picture from what we now know will be the Jim Belushi comedy’s June 2 series finale, and, for the first time, I kinda wanna watch this show. Here’s the episode description, straight from the press release. SPOILER ALERT for the 3 million of you still tuning in:

"Heaven Opposed to Hell" — When Jim chokes on a shrimp puff, he diesand arrives at Heaven’s gate. With Jim on trial to prove his selflessacts on earth, best friend Andy is summoned to heaven to defend him. AsJim attempts to prove his good works to God (Lee Majors), hissister-in-law, Dana (Kimberly Williams-Paisley), represents the Devil(Erik Estrada), arguing that Jim’s selfishness should mean a certaintrip to Hell.

Back to me: I will have so much (read: some) respect for this show if they actually kill Jim off. And send him to Hell. Anyone else feeling the teensiest bit of interest in Jim? Anyone mourning the series’ passing?

More TV Upfront news:
ABC announces fall schedule, ‘Ugly Betty’ moves to Fridays
Ken Tucker’s ‘Instant TV reviews’ of ABC’s new fall shows
NBC announces fall schedule: ‘Chuck’ stays, ‘Southland’ moves to Fridays
Ausiello Exclusive: ‘Without a Trace,’ ‘Privileged,’ canceled, ‘Gossip’ spin-off DOA
Breaking: ‘Earl, ‘Unit’ axed, ‘Medium’ moving to CBS
CBS picks up four new dramas, new Jenna Elfman comedy
Fox announces fall schedule, acknowledges Whedon fans
Ken Tucker’s ‘Instant TV reviews’ of Fox’s new fall shows
The Ausiello Files, for the latest renewals and cancellations
Ausiello’s Fall TV cheat sheet

May 19 2009 09:54 PM ET

Martin Luther King Jr. movie: The latest from the What the Heck Took So Friggin' Long department

Mlkmovie_lThe news broke today that Steven Spielberg is producing a Martin Luther King Jr. biopic. Which is awesome, clearly. His was a life marked by incredible accomplishment — Nobel Prize, the Civil Rights movement, a march-based fitness program — that was cut short by his assassination at age 39. There are lots of questions surrounding this project — who’ll star as King (I’m sure every Black actor of a certain age is tuning up his preacher voice), who’ll direct, when will we finally see it — but I’ve got just one: What the hell took so long?

I get that, apparently, the rights to King’s life have been tangled up in the family — King copyrighted all of his speeches; without which, a King film might’ve played like 30 Rock‘s Janis Joplin flick, Jackie Jormp-Jomp. But every year I’d see biopics like The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, The World’s Fastest Indian, and A Mighty Heart — all fine, but ultimately marginal films — come down the pike and wonder, "Why is this man, who changed the face of America, not getting the same treatment?"

I’m not going to say there’s an undercurrent of racism at play — I’m also not going to say there isn’t — but people haggling over who controls someone’s estate is one of the few problems that, nine times out of 10, can be solved by throwing money at it. And, perhaps, President Obama’s election proved to those people with money that the country is ready to see the biography of an inspirational black man writ large — unlike Ray and Malcolm X, which were budget epics (Spike Lee famously needed donations from people like Oprah Winfrey, Bill Cosby, and Michael Jordan to finish X). And HBO’s stellar Boycott, in which Jeffrey Wright played King at the beginning of his revolutionary road, was still just a TV movie.

I can remember, as a kid in the late ’70s/early ’80s, being sat down by my parents to watch Like It Is every January, when the black-centric show would run King’s speeches to commemorate his birthday, before it was a national holiday. I didn’t know the history that lived behind those speeches, but I felt it. The lure, the pull, the sheer force of that man and those words was irresistible…it’s about time Hollywood has answered the call.

May 19 2009 09:36 PM ET

'Mega Shark vs. Giant Octopus': Deborah Gibson's DVD thriller is out today!

Categories: 100% Pure Cheese, Movies

Buried amidst today’s ample crop of fresh DVD releases is a title worthy of closer inspection: 2009′s Mega Shark vs. Giant Octopus. You may be wondering why this direct-to-video opus is any more noteworthy than other cheapie monster faceoffs like, say, 2005′s Komodo vs. Cobra? Fair question. And here’s the answer: It stars Deborah Gibson as a marine biologist. Ms. Gibson is, of course, none other than the grown-up ’80s bubblegum pop princess "Debbie" Gibson, peddler of the infectiously timeless "Foolish Beat." Well, it turns out, now she’s acting opposite mega sharks and giant octopi. And why not? Good for her. It probably beats what Tiffany’s up to.  Then again, maybe not. Take a look at the clip….

Okay, now pick your jaw up off your desk. It was kind of like a hallucination, right? A very, very low-budget hallucination. Did you notice anything else that was eerily familiar in that craptastic clip? I mean, other than the fact that it looked like something dreamed up by the collective minds of Jules Verne and Verne Troyer? That’s right, Gibson’s costar: Lorenzo Lamas. Is there any question that this celluloid gem is bound for critics’ 10 Best Lists come December? I’m not sure what Mega Shark vs. Giant Octopus says or doesn’t say about Ms. Gibson’s career or about our culture as a whole. But I do know this: As soon as I get out of work tonight, I’m picking up a copy of this thing. Who’s with me?

May 19 2009 09:13 PM ET

Heath Ledger's final peformance: Looks totally weird! (But good?)

Categories: Movies

When Heath Ledger passed away in January 2008, the actor was midway through completing what would unfortunately be his last movie, Terry Gilliam’s The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus. The film screened for distributors in L.A. earlier this month and will premiere in Cannes later this week. But will it turn out to be as weird as it sounds? Will it earn Ledger another posthumous Oscar? Well, judging from the 16-second clip below, the answers are: "Yes" and "Too early to call." Aside from raising even more questions, this amuse-bouche of Ledger’s final performance makes Parnassus look like the long-lost sequel to Stanley Kubrick’s Eyes Wide Shut, what with the actor’s freaky-deaky carnivale mask and carny barker come-ons.  But at least we now have our first strange taste of the film.

Check it out and tell us what you think below.

May 19 2009 08:47 PM ET

Hellooooo, Huxtables!

Categories: Television

Some members from the cast of The Cosby Show were on the Today show this morning to reminisce. The show debuted on September 20, 1984 and ended on April 30, 1992, so I’m not completely clear on how today is the "25th anniversary," but I’ll go with it. Bill Cosby, Phylicia Rashad, Earle Hyman, Malcolm-Jamal Warner, Geoffrey Owens, Keshia Knight Pulliam, and Raven Symone were all on hand to weigh in on the show’s legacy. Parts one and two of the interview are pretty benign (except for when Rashad has to remind Matt Lauer that "an African-American family is an American family"), but things get going in part three:

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

I watched several episodes of The Cosby Show recently, and I have to say: It stands up shockingly well.

Everyone still loves The Cosby Show, right PopWatchers?

May 19 2009 07:39 PM ET

'Star Wars': Happy Birthday, Chewbacca!

Categories: Star Wars

While my colleague and fellow Star Wars drooler, Marc Bernardin, regards May 19th as a glass-half-empty kind of day, allow me to introduce a sunnier note. A long time ago, in a galaxy very much like our own, Peter Mayhew was born. That’s right, "The dude inside the Chewie suit" turns 65 today!

And while I have no clue whether or not Harrison Ford bothered to send the gentle giant a card from Hallmark’s delightful Shoebox collection, perhaps the rest of us should take a moment to watch the wonderful Wookiee at work and send Mayhew our best wishes.

May 19 2009 05:50 PM ET

ShePop: Could Sherri Shepherd be a good thing for Lifetime?

Sherrishepherd_lSherri Shepherd might be a polarizing figure, but I’ve always admired her penchant for honesty in her time on The View – about what she does and doesn’t know, and about her sometimes-messy personal life. She’s also damn funny as Tracy Jordan’s wife on 30 Rock. So putting those two aspects of her personality together in a new sitcom for Lifetime seems like a great idea to me. Sherri will follow the scripted adventures of a single mom startlingly like Shepherd in her pre-View days — she’s juggling being a paralegal and a struggling actress.

It’s hard to judge these things without seeing them — and the few clips Lifetime showed at a media presentation a few weeks ago were chuckle-worthy but hardly mind-blowing. However, it’ll team nicely with Rita Rocks (Nicole Sullivan’s cute-enough sitcom about a mom in a rock band). And with summer’s upcoming dramedy Drop Dead Diva — about a shallow model who dies and comes back to life in a plus-size lawyer’s body — it could mark a promising-ish turning point for the network known as "television for women." (Despite the cringeworthy premise,  Drop Dead Diva has some startlingly sweet and satisfying moments, not to mention the fabulous Margaret Cho in a supporting role.) Sure, the new offerings aren’t exactly substantive, but they’re a nicebreak from schmaltz, with some snappy writing and relatable femalecharacters.

What do you think, PopWatchers? Do you like the idea of Sherri Shepherd in a sitcom? Does this mark a new era for Lifetime?

May 19 2009 05:16 PM ET

Is it time for Nielsen ratings to go?

Categories: Television

Americanidol_l

Fox’s public criticisms of the Nielsen ratings service have become the latest knock to the age-old system of counting how many people watch primetime shows — you know, the thing that determines whether series live or die. The criticism itself is boringly technical: The ratings giant recently did a study to determine why some Nielsen families were screwing up the way they record their viewing choices, so much so that the readings could be off by about 8 percent. In the ratings biz, especially these days as viewer totals shrink thanks to cable and DVRs, 8 percent can mean a lot. As in millions of dollars, which is why Fox is upset. (Nielsen responded that the study was meant just to fix internal problems, not to determine an actual margin of error.)Fox Networks Group chairman and CEO Tony Vinciquerra specifically questioned the numbers for TV’s biggest hit (and his net’s cash cow), American Idol: "It’s been a hugely successful season, yet the ratings are down 11 percent,"he said. "There are significant, double-digit gains in (the show’s)votes, and there’s been a huge response. We believe the show is doingbetter than we see in the ratings."

It’s the latest in a series of problems Nielsen: ABC President Steve McPherson also has questioned their accuracy recently, Miami-based station owner Sunbeam filed a suit claiming the company is a monopoly, and primetime ratings were delayed for days earlier this month because of a computer glitch. TiVo, meanwhile, has been inching closer to becoming an alternative to Nielsen.

But for all of its problems, Nielsen will likely live on for a while. First of all, the panicking networks can’t blame all their problems on Nielsen — numbers are plummeting because people are watching TV differently. Even my parents have a DVR, which means that trend has reached critical mass; I also know huge TV fans who don’t actually own TVs. (They watch everything online.) And BTW, cable hits and broadcast hits are approaching parity in terms of numbers, all hovering in the 6- to 12-million range. If people are voting more on American Idol, it’s probably just because more folks have figured out how to text and call in multiple votes, and a higher percentage of viewers are voting. (Again, I base this on unscientific Mom Data: If my mom can text it up for Adam Lambert, anyone can.)

What do you think, PopWatchers? Do the Nielsen numbers you read about seem accurate? Should TV networks find a better way to measure viewership?

May 19 2009 03:33 PM ET

'Zoolander' sequel? He's so hot right now!

Usually when I hear about possible sequels to nearly-10-year-old movies, I think bleh. But Ben Stiller kicking around ideas for a sequel to Zoolander? Uh, the opposite of bleh!

Zoolander is one of those movies that I can watch over and over and over, one that I find myself referencing with surprising frequency — lih-trally just this weekend, I needed a "merman" clue in a game of $25,000 Pyramid. Is it the greatest comedy of all time? Eh, probably not. But will I ever get tired of saying "hot bread, Zeke!" when I take toast out of the toaster? Never. Please, Ben Stiller, hear my cry for more Zoolander.

Would you dust off your Blue Steel for another go-round?

Advertisement

TV Recaps

Powered by WordPress.com VIP