Archive: April 2009 (41-50 of 498)

Apr 28 2009 10:20 PM ET

'Sex and the City' sequel: Mr. Big's bringing up our issues yet again

Chrisnoth_lApparently, Mr. Big is coming back for more Sex and the City in the planned sequel, and there’s a certain comfort in that: It was tough not to root for Carrie and Big to finally tie the knot in the last movie, if for no other reason than that they’d worked so hard, for so long, to get to that satisfying "I Do." (Plus, you know, he got her that closet!) And it’s hard to imagine they would’ve pulled off a sequel without him — either Carrie and Big would’ve had to split by the time the movie picks up, which would be a pretty bleak beginning for a girls-night-out funfest, or Big would have to be conspicuously off on some prolonged business trip or similar. (New Line confirms that Noth will be in the film, but declines to comment on any details.)

On the other hand, Big still causes me all kinds of angst. I didn’t love the TV finale because I never bought that this conflicted man-boy mogul would follow anyone to Paris for a Grand Gesture moment. I didn’t like the feeling that this show had actually been about nailing down the impossible man — who rarely, in real life, chases his true love down to declare his undying ardor. I knew Carrie returned to New York at least partly because she missed her friends, but I wanted to feel like it was 100-percent about them. And to this day, even after tearing up with joy to see Carrie and Big tie the knot at the end of Sex and the City: The Movie, I still wonder if they truly belong together, or if they each would’ve been better off with someone more centered and sane and realistic. (Oh, Aidan.) Then again, maybe I’m just bringing my own Mr. Big issues to the situation (most of us single girls have them) — and maybe that’s just the point, that we all take Sex and the City personally…and we love it all the more for it.

What do you think, PopWatchers? Will you be happy to see Mr. Big back? Do you think this means Carrie could be pregnant with a little Mr. Big?

Apr 28 2009 09:24 PM ET

Tribeca 2009: Kate Hudson directs Kristen Stewart and Chevy Chase!

Since not everyone can experience the downtown Manhattan hootenanny known as the Tribeca Film Festival in person, the folks at said fest have arranged for four short films to be available at the YouTube Screening Room. One of these shorties is Cutlass, a 16-minute interlude written and directed by Kate Hudson. It stars Kristen Stewart, Virginia Madsen, Dakota Fanning, Kurt Russell, and Chevy Chase, and it’s a devastatingly heartwarming story of the lifelong bond parents share with their children…when they buy stuff. Okay, fine. Perhaps I’m being a tad glib. Here’s the story: Madsen plays a mom whose daughter (Fanning) covets a $1,200 vintage guitar, which reminds her of the time her 1970s self (Stewart) convinced her pops (Russell) to help her buy her very first car from a man named Stan (Chase). The production value is sky-high — check out the lighting on Stewart in particular; girl looks gorgeous! — and obviously, Hudson has a leg-up on most first-time filmmakers when it comes to casting famous folks.

Click below and judge for yourself how Goldie’s little girl did in her first time at the helm. What do you think of Hudson’s final, shall we say, message, as spoken by Madsen: "Whatever makes you happy makes me happy. And money is no object…if you’re buying." Ill-timed consumerist fantasy during a recession or sweet musings on the joys of parenting?

Apr 28 2009 07:41 PM ET

Robert DeNiro donating De-knickknacks to University of Texas

Deniro_lAcademy Award winning actor, high-end restaurateur, and (apparently) celebrity horder Robert DeNiro is donating memorabilia and props from some of his 60-plus films to the University of Texas. He will reportedly unload more than 1,300 boxes of papers, film, movie props and costumes, including the hack license he obtained while researching his starring role in 1976′s Taxi Driver, the leopard-print boxing robe he wore as Jake LaMotta in 1980′s Raging Bull, and the coats he wore as the creature in 1994′s Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein.

Of course, this is a welcome bit of news for UT students and anyone looking for insight for an unauthorized biography of the notoriously unchatty star. But this announcement also has me wondering: Are there DeNiro props that he deemed too precious to part with?

Perhaps the following five:

–Mickey Rourke’s soul (from 1987′s Angel Heart, in which DeNiro played — spoiler alert! — Lucifer).

–The aluminum baseball bat that Joe Pesci got bludgeoned to death with in 1995′s Casino.

–Special Agent Alonzo (Yaphet Kotto) Mosely’s Foster Grant sunglasses from 1988′s Midnight Run.

–A signed copy of costar Barbra Streisand’s Christmas Memories CD we’re assuming he received on the set of 2004′s Meet the Fockers.

–The monocle, jackboots, and any and all memory of his role as Fearless Leader in the staggering 2000 box-office turkey, The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle (pictured).

Have any other ideas?

 

Apr 28 2009 07:28 PM ET

Supreme Court to f-bomb dropping celebrities: Yeah, you probably shouldn't have said that!

Holy !$#@$?!, it looks like TV stations and networks are going to have to start paying up if more salty-tongued celebrities accidentally drop f-bombs in prime time. Today, the Supreme Court (barely) ruled in favor of the FCC in its quest to clean up the airwaves before 10 p.m. The much-anticipated ruling — which also paves the way for more deliberation on the issue in the lower courts — stems from a battle between the FCC and the Fox TV Stations over the use of "fleeting expletives" during live awards show telecasts in 2002 and 2003 (hi, Cher, embedded below, and Nicole Richie!).

Purging the scripted shows of sailor talk is one thing (and even in that instance, personally, I’m fine with the occasional "bulls—" showing up in a gritty cop show), but I think the FCC should back off if a gob-smacked celebrity lets a naughty word slip when he’s, say, accepting his first-ever Golden Globe. Sadly, moments like that don’t really happen anymore; thanks to Janet Jackson, live telecasts on the Big Four are on a multi-second delay, so any slip of the tongue will be bleeped before the faint of heart can lodge his complaint to Brent freakin’ Bozell. I mourn the loss of those moments; they were spontaneous and fun and absolutely harmless. Unfortunately, the High Court did its best yesterday to make sure those moments will be few and far between.

What do you think? Do you think the justices f—ed up on this one? Are your sensibilities offended when someone like McLovin accidentally drops the f-bomb on Jimmy Kimmel Live?

Apr 28 2009 07:09 PM ET

DVD Insomniac: 'Bride Wars,' 'JCVD' and other fodder for your Netflix queue this week

Categories: DVD/Video

Bridewarsthehit_lEvery Tuesday a new batch of films is released on DVD. Some are good, some are bad, and some are so God-awful that they need to be seen to be believed. Here are our picks for the week of April 28.

THE BIG TICKET ITEMS

Bride Wars (2008) This week’s glitziest title (pictured, left) is also one that I’d only watch at gunpoint. Kate Hudson and Anne Hathaway are a pair of bitchy besties getting married on the same day. Neither is cool with that, so bridezilla pranks ensue. If that sounds hilarious to you, then by all means, have at it.

JCVD (2008) Jean-Claude Van Damme’s comeback is long overdue, right? Who can forget Universal Soldier, Hard Target, or TimeCop? Okay, so maybe not. But still, the Muscles from Brussels does his damnedest here to resurrect his mothballed career by playing himself in a taut and twisty heist film that toys with his action hero persona. Maybe the best twist in the film is the discovery about mid-way through that the guy can actually act.   

A TOUCH OF CLASS

The Hit (1984) Generally speaking, any movie that’s trotted out as part of the Criterion Collection is worth checking out. And while some may feel like dreary art-house homework, others like this under-seen Cockney crime flick (pictured, right) starring Terrence Stamp, John Hurt, and a young Tim Roth are 24-karat DVD gold. Put this one in your Netflix queue, stat.

READ FULL STORY »

Apr 28 2009 06:57 PM ET

'Scrubs,' it's time to pull the plug

Categories: Television

ABC is in talks to renew Scrubs for another year, minus Zach Braff and creator Bill Lawrence, which isn’t so shocking since Lawrence has been talking about that scenario for months. I say this as a hardcore, extremely devoted Scrubs fan, who has seen every episode and heard every DVD commentary track, who has the soundtrack to the musical episode on her iPod and can sing all of it, who almost died from joy when she interviewed Lawrence a few years ago: Please don’t do this.

Enough’s enough. I rewatched this season this weekend, and as much as I enjoyed it, it’s definitely a farewell tour — to tack on one more is to become Cher, and not in the cool ways. For better or worse, Scrubs is about JD; a JD-less season is the telequivalent of one drink too many. Go forth, Scrubs writers, and make new hilarious shows!  We’ll watch them, and ABC needs them!  This show has had a good life, but that time is over now, and it’s time for a new never-quite-a-hit-but-still-so-awesome king to emerge.

ABC overlords, Bill Lawrence, hear my humble plea to go out on a high note. Like this, my all-time favorite Scrubs moment:

What do you think, PopWatchers? Are you hoping for One More Season? Or are you content to close the doors to Sacred Heart?

Apr 28 2009 06:28 PM ET

'NCIS' spinoff: Time to get psyched (or not)

Categories: Television, Waiting

Harmoncoolj_lTonight, we finally get to meet the characters that would lead that NCIS spinoff we’ve been hearing about for months. NCIS exec producer Shane Brennan gave EW.com an inside look at the two-part episode "Legend" (CBS, April 28 and May 5, 8 p.m.), which finds McGee and Gibbs heading to Los Angeles for a joint investigation with the Naval Criminal Investigative Service’s Office of Special Projects (OSP). Its agents, led by Chris O’Donnell and LL Cool J (pictured, filming with Sean Murray and Mark Harmon), specialize in undercover ops. Check out our photo gallery and Brennan’s commentary, which includes detailed character descriptions and, of course, a teaser for the "Tiva" story arc that will carry through the season’s final four episodes (and season 7 opener).

We (and Brennan) won’t know if the sister series is a go until CBS announces its fall schedule on May 20. In the meantime, we thought we’d guage your interest in the spinoff before tonight’s episode (vote in the poll below), and again tomorrow morning when we meet back on PopWatch to dissect "Legend (Part 1)." As of now, I’m hoping for a greenlight. Brennan assured us the spinoff would be different than NCIS: "There’s no Ducky. There’s no Abby. They don’t find a dead body at thebeginning of every episode. This is about life undercover; surveillanceand countersurveillance." He also said there’s a mystery with O’Donnell’s character, Special Agent G. Callen, that we’d only get to explore in the spinoff: ”It’s Special Agent ‘G.’ Callen. We don’t know what the ‘G’ standsfor. Callen doesn’t know what the ‘G’ stands for. He doesn’t know hisfirst name. He doesn’t even know who his family is. Only a few peopleknow the truth about Callen. Anyone who calls Callen ‘G’ must besomeone that he trusts.”

Vote now. Dissect tomorrow.

 

Apr 28 2009 05:14 PM ET

Tom Hanks tribute: Roasting 'the legend next door'

Tomhanks_l“Everybody f—in’ likes you,” fretted Julia Roberts, eighth speaker of the evening at the April 27 tribute to Tom Hanks. “What can I tell you that’s new? It’s late, and I’m paying my babysitter overtime, and I have to pee. Tom Hanks: What the f—?” The fancy-pants audience at the event, hosted by the Film Society of Lincoln Center in New York, roared with delight; the lavishly refurbished Alice Tully Hall is a venue not generally known for its F-bombs.

Next up was Mike Nichols, who directed Hanks (and Roberts) in Charlie Wilson’s War. “He’s funny, he’s generous, he’s kind,” Nichols intoned, as if wearily. “But that’s no reason to hate someone!”

Nichols did get serious, of course, describing the actor as “the one who is us, the guy we think we are — the one we are at our best.” Others sounded similar themes — Hanks is one truly beloved man — but those who paid tribute did their best to find something edgy to add about him. His You’ve Got Mail director, Nora Ephron, teased him about his typewriter collection and suggested he’d actually been born Pinchas Greenblatt in Middle Village, Queens.

Bruce Springsteen recalled meeting the honoree “in the men’s room of the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion, where we were comparing the size of our…Oscars.” Citing Hanks’ pop music knowledge (“encyclopedic”) and guitar playing (“not bad”), Springsteen observed that Hanks is “single-handedly insisting on bringing the Twist into the new century.” He then performed an acoustic version of the theme from Philadelphia (the Jonathan Demme film for which Hanks won his first Academy Award) with Patti Scialfa — “my lovely wife” — singing backup.

//

READ FULL STORY »

Apr 28 2009 04:51 PM ET

TV is a social surrogate, studies say. Which show is yours?

Bones_cast_lI wasn’t sure how to take it when my editor sent me the link to a Variety story with the headline "Studies: TV pushes away loneliness," the subhead "Viewers have illusion their social needs are being met," and the note, "Can you do something with this?" But he assures me it wasn’t a comment on my personal life (or lack thereof) but on my "uncanny knack for making those kinds of stories into relatable PopWatch items." Right.

So according to four new studies reported in the Journalof Experimental Social Psychology, and distilled by Variety‘s James Hibberd, viewers can experience a profound sense of belonging, a "social surrogacy," when watching their favorite programs. Subjects reported feeling "less lonely" when viewing the shows. They "verbally expressed fewer feelings of loneliness" after writing about the shows. Even just thinking about the shows "buffered subjects against drops in self-esteem, increasesin negative mood and feelings of rejection."

All that is normal, right? TV is supposed to be an escape. If you’re not thinking about yourself for an hour, it would make sense that your self-esteem isn’t going to drop. It’s also supposed to engage you. What’s the point of watching a show every week if you’re not going to get to know the characters well enough that you can call out the writers when they have them do something that they never would have done? I suppose the finding that "subjects whose ‘belongingnessneeds were aroused’ wrote longer essays about their favored TVprograms" is a little worrisome. Maybe I want to belong at the Jeffersonian and that’s why my Bones recaps are always twice as long as they need to be for a PopWatch recap. That could also explain why I used the "we" in my lengthy Brothers & Sisters recap yesterday — as in, Kitty and I were both having an emotional affair on Robert — and talked about going to Happy Hour with Kitty, Kevin, and Sarah. Now that I’m thinking about it, I also recall imagining myself in bed with Richard Castle and his daughter, Alexis, watching TV, and eating ice cream for breakfast in an item about Nathan Fillion’s new show. And didn’t I once do a Valentine’s Day-themed post about which TV character I’d date? (I was going to end with the question ‘When does your TV officially become a surrogate?’ but then I remembered how I recently named my DVR "Peter" and spent, like, 15 minutes during a morning commute pondering whether or not he was gay, and I got my answer.)

Let’s all pretend that our relationship with "our shows" is healthy for a moment, and that we’ve never missed out on a real-life experience to stay in and watch one of them (The PopWatch Confessional that started it all!). Which show is your social surrogate and what needs do its characters fulfill?   

Apr 28 2009 04:29 PM ET

The Universe has it out for 'Wolverine'...Don't worry, he can take it

Wolverine_lIt’s hard out there for a short, Canadian, nigh-invulnerable mutant superhero. First, pirates leak your movie all over the Internets, letting geeks of all stripes take a gander without your special-effects bloomers on. Then the swine flu forces your studio to cancel your Mexico City premiere, dramatically reducing…well, probably not much at all. Why is all this crap happening to X-Men Origins: Wolverine?

Because Wolverine can take it. Because he’s got bones of crazy-hard metal and the heart of a genetically modified lion. Because he’s the best at what he does, and what he does isn’t very nice. Because he’s got a hairdo that only he can pull off. Because, even though he’s only five-foot-nothing in the comics, he’s played by the 6′ 2" Hugh Jackman on the big screen. Because swine flu is something he puts on toast. Because he calls people "bub."

Don’t you worry about Wolverine. Unless he shows up at your door…flanked by pirates carrying swine flu bagels.

More on ‘Wolverine’:
Movie Preview: ‘X-Men Origins: Wolverine’
‘Wolverine’ Mexico premiere postponed due to swine flu outbreak
‘Wolverine’ workprint leaked online
Fox chairman says leaked ‘Wolverine’ is an ‘unfinished version’
‘Wolverine’ leak: Fox issues a statement vowing to prosecute
‘Wolverine’ leak: Hollywood’s mixed response

Advertisement

TV Recaps

Powered by WordPress.com VIP