Archive: April 2009 (301-310 of 498)

Apr 13 2009 04:30 PM ET

'Starlog' magazine: R.I.P., and thanks for all the geekery

Long before Entertainment Weekly, or Aintitcoolnews.com, or podcasts, Twitter feeds, blogs or THE INTERNET ITSELF, Starlog Magazine was in the business of covering all things geek. Spurred on by the popularity of the Star Trek conventions that cropped up in the wake of the classic series’ cancellation, editor Kerry O’Quinn and publisher Norman Jacobs launched Starlog in August of 1976. And after 33 years and 374 issues, Starlog is officially calling it quits, continuing for the time being as an online-only publication.

I’m sure many of you didn’t read Starlog, given that much of what constituted the magazine’s bread and butter — interviews with the people behind genre TV, film, and literature; casting and development news; photo galleries; reviews — is picked over a thousand different ways online before a monthly magazine could get to it. But in its heyday — the late ’70s through the early ’90s — Starlog was a vital part of the geek conversation. Starlog‘s writers and reporters were on the scene for the beginning of the Star Wars phenomenon, the continuation of Trek as a franchise; there to break news on Raiders of the Lost Ark, Back to the Future, Terminator, Alien, and RoboCop; and documenting for future generations the classic wonders of Ray Harryhausen and Willis O’Brien, Richard Matheson and Robert E. Howard, Fay Wray and Charlton Heston.

Cheesy as it may be, here’s a 1984 TV ad for Starlog. What other sci-fi magazine can you think of that took out TV ads?

READ FULL STORY »

Apr 13 2009 04:00 PM ET

Padma Lakshmi, Chelsea Handler, and Eliza Dushku naked: Good or bad for womankind?

Categories: Nudity, Sexytimes, ShePop

Masl01_padmaOh, tastefully nude national magazine photo shoots, how you vex us. Sometimes you boldly declare that a former child star is passed puberty, sometimes you are just trying to be funny, and sometimes, most vexing of all, you aim to "empower" us. The latter, which is what Allure‘s annual naked issue strives to be, brings up complicated feelings for us ladies. (And it’s primarily ladies who are the subjects of such things, unless you count famous beefcake shots of Burt Reynolds or Richard Gere as empowering, which you could.)

Celebrating women’s unadorned bodies? Genuinely awesome. (Especially these days, when most of us lack the funding for the designer threads normally featured in women’s mag pages.) But Allure seems to have airbrushed the likes of Padma Lakshmi, Chelsea Handler, and Eliza Dushku "like a Playboy spread," as one of my astute straight male colleagues observed. Not to mention that there’s something, well, confusing about how proud we’re supposed to be that the freakishly attractive people we call celebrities, who have trainers and possibly other body-oriented professionals on speed dial, are proud of their toned flesh. (And how they provocatively coo to the female readership, via Q&As, that they sleep naked, are "sensual" beings, etc., in a way that’s about half a step from being a Maxim interview.)

Is there a way to accomplish the same goal with a little more honesty and integrity? I’d venture that, within reason, we could handle a slightly less Barbie-esque presentation. As my straight male source also observed: "Most men like the gory details of a woman’s body. Thisspread is like looking at their wax figure likenesses more than fleshand blood." That, plus maybe some more insightful discussions with the ladies about their body images (beyond the standard "we’re all beautiful and it’s sexy to love yourself and we’re good enough and smart enough and gosh darn it people like us" talk) — issues they’ve overcome, worries for the future, ways their bodies have affected their lives. Think it doesn’t matter if you have big breasts or a small waist or tremendous curves, that all that matters is what’s on the inside? Think again. That’s the kind of naked discussion we’d like to see.

What do you think of Allure‘s naked spread? Too provocative, too plastic, or just right?

Apr 13 2009 03:56 PM ET

'Twilight': Does the Michael Sheen 'New Moon' casting win you over (or back)?

Categories: Deals, Movies, Twilight

Michaelsheen_l

New Moon director Chris Weitz’s "aggressive" pursuit of actor Michael Sheen — best known for playing Tony Blair and David Frost in the Oscar-nominated films The Queen and Frost/Nixon, and the Lycan (or werewolf) Lucian in the Underword films — is a serious hit with fans. Casting him as Aro, leader of the Volturi, a coven of ancient vampires who police (and kill) those who threaten to reveal the secret of the immortals’ existence, shows that Weitz knows what interesting characters he’s got to work with. And also, of course, that Twilight director Catherine Hardwicke got seriously screwed on her budget.

But you’ve also got to wonder if Weitz sought Sheen out because he’d lend the production a credibility that even the casting of Dakota Fanning as Volturi member Jane hadn’t managed. Comments on our weekend news brief about Sheen’s casting make you think he might’ve succeeded: 

Sara: Holy crap!  Now I will definitely go see this movie!  I love Michael Sheen!

beelkay: Fantastic! Now that I can get behind. I just hope all these goodactors they’re getting lift the original cast’s game rather thanovershadow them.

Jessi: I wasn’t sure if I’d bother to see New Moon in theatres, but Idefinitely will now! Michael Sheen is exactly the kind of actor Summitneeds to cast to atone for the mediocrity of the first film.

and my personal favorite…

stella: Twilight is a piece of trash, but Michael Sheen is the s—.

Are any of you haters non-believers contemplating giving the series a try now that Sheen is on board? Anyone who swore off the films after the first one planning a return?

READ FULL STORY »

Apr 13 2009 03:41 PM ET

Can Adam Scott just be famous already, please?

Adamscott_lAttention, fans of handsome fellows: It’s time to make Adam Scott a star. He is good looking! He is sardonic and funny! He is kind of everywhere! If that’s not a star-making trifecta, I don’t know what is.

The Party Down* lead has been cast on the highish-profile upcoming HBO comedy The Wonderful Maladys as Sarah Michelle Gellar’s businessman ex. I remember him best as Palek, proud recipient of a graphic HJ on Tell Me You Love Me, though I also enjoyed his performance as Veronica Mars’ scummy history teacher. He was good in The Aviator, and he was funny in Step Brothers — ugh, enough already, time to be really famous/beloved. I’m hoping Maladys will solidify his role as bonafide object of desire, but maybe I’ll have to wait for the 2010 release of his romcom with Amy Adams (Leap Year).

Who’s on Team Adam Scott with me, PopWatchers?

*You can watch a few episodes online. Legally!

Apr 13 2009 03:38 PM ET

'College Life' debuts tonight: Let the keg party begin!

MTV’s new reality show College Life premieres tonight (10:30 ET), and I’m kind of anxious to see how it’s going to play out. Instead of calling on their regular camera crews (and, ahem, expert lighting people — thank you, Hills), the network sent four college freshmen off to the University of Wisconsin with just a hand-held camcorder and their own raging hormones. The self-produced series is supposed to give viewers a voyeuristic look into the lives of these co-eds as they face the ups and downs of campus living (think: hook ups, finals, and partying).

In theory, this sounds like a great idea — after all, last year’s documentary American Teen, which had a very similar angle (real teenagers in their real environment), won critical acclaim for its compelling narrative, but those teens weren’t in charge of the power button on the camera following them. It makes me wonder just how much these College Life students were willing to record and how much they were able to hide. Those of us who have experienced higher education know that the last thing a massive hangover or a bad grade needs is a lens magnifying it, so it’s hard to imagine these 18-year-olds were completely candid.

After a look at a sneak peek clip from tonight’s premiere (press play below) it seemed like there was some leniency given in terms of when the camcorder could be turn on and off. Andrea, for example, had a dorm-room "date" with a new boy to watch Gossip Girl and One Tree Hill (racy, right?) but says she "couldn’t shoot it." Now, of course, I want to know why!

PopWatchers, what about you? Are you going to register for College Life? What do you think about MTV"s "new" way of documenting these stories? And how many apology notes do you think the four stars will have to issue to their parents on Tuesday mornings from now on?

Apr 13 2009 02:53 PM ET

Is DNA exoneration too real for reality TV?

Categories: Reality TV

Craigwatkins_lA new reality show will tackle the growing use of DNA evidence to exonerate wrongly convicted criminals, and it’s sparking debate before it even airs later this month (April 28 on Investigation Discovery, one of those many wonderfully nichey basic cable channels you didn’t know you had). Dallas DNA will follow Dallas County District Attorney Craig Watkins (pictured), whose work has helped free 10 men since he took office in 2007. And while Watkins says it’ll "make justice better by showing the good, the bad, and the ugly," others worry it’ll exploit the suffering of victims — and the wrongly incarcerated — in the name of entertainment (and in the name of Watkins’ political career). I say that if done correctly — which is to say as journalistically and documentarily as possible — it’s a better use of "reality" TV than, say, another Rock of Love Bus. Your basic news coverage "exploits" this kind of thing all the time. And while the same topic made for an unsuccessful ABC drama a few years ago, it’s pretty much what basic cable was made for. These cases are always more interesting when you know they’re real — that’s why Law & Order can’t shut up about being ripped from the headlines.

What do you think, PopWatchers? Will you watch Dallas DNA? Is it an ethical minefield or just solid documentary series making?

Apr 13 2009 12:12 PM ET

'Celebrity Apprentice' recap: Bring on the drama

There’s a very good reason this week’s episode of The Celebrity Apprentice had the teams compete in one and a half tasks: The first one just wasn’t all that interesting. No matter how talented the editors, even they couldn’t squeeze two hours out of it.

We picked up after last week’s boardroom, when everyone found out who got axed and who stayed. Joan summed up what I’d like to believe were everyone’s feelings after the viral video challenge: ”Clint is a jackass.” Melissa called out The Donald’s unfounded firing of Khloe: ”You don’t punish someone for trying to change.” And Annie summed up what I’d like to believe were everyone’s feelings about the viral video challenge: ”Your video did suck, Clint, by the way.”

Watch the full ep below, or find out who got canned after the jump.

READ FULL STORY »

Apr 13 2009 10:00 AM ET

Quote of the Day: 'Easter Parade' Edition

"In your Easter bonnet, with all the frills upon it / You’ll be the grandest fellow in the Easter parade / I’ll be all in clover and when they look us over / We’ll be the proudest couple in the Easter parade." — Judy Garland singing to Fred Astaire in Easter Parade (1948)

Apr 13 2009 07:00 AM ET

Tori Spelling vs. Candy Spelling: A 'Must List Live' battle of the books!

Tori Spelling and mom Candy both have new books out. But can EW’s resident Spelling expert, Jessica Shaw, guess which ridiculous excerpt comes from which book? We put her to the test on the latest episode of Must List Live! Why, it’s such an event that Tori herself even shows up with son Liam! We’re also chatting about my unhealthy obsession with Skins, paying homage to the twisted genius of The Cougar, and, oh, yeah — hanging out with live bears! But that’s not all: We’re continuing our big Comic-Con giveaway. Wanna win FREE passes to the big convention in San Diego this summer for both you and a friend? Want us to also include a free hotel room as well as passes to our awesome Entertainment Weekly Comic-Con party? Fine! Done. Just watch the video below and, if you can name all four movies in our montage (and provide a haiku about one of the films), then you could be on your way. Any questions? Then check out our way-detailed and way-sexy contest rules. Good luck!

Apr 12 2009 07:12 PM ET

'Alaska Week' begins on Discovery: This state will kill you

Categories: Animals, Television

Dirtyjobsmikerowe_l

You know how Discovery’s annual "Shark Week" is all about showing you what killing machines sharks are, but then assuring you that they don’t actually mean to eat us. The channel’s "Alaska Week" — which kicks off tonight at 9 p.m. ET and features the season five premiere of Deadliest Catch (April 14, 9 p.m.) and the series debut of Arctic Roughnecks (April 13, 9 p.m) — reveals the many dangers of the Last Frontier, and that it’s totally out to get you.

Yes, there’s lighter fare programmed during the week: Mike Rowe (pictured) kicks things off with a dog-sledding themed episode of Dirty Jobs (April 12, 9 p.m.), while Adam Savage and Jamie Hyneman put Alaskan myths such as "Can it get so cold that your urine freezes before it hits the ground?" to the test in a new installment of MythBusters (April 15, 9 p.m.). But those aren’t the hours I was sent screeners of. I received:

Bear Attack! (April 12, 10 p.m.): There were nine violent brown bear attacks in Anchorage city limits within a six-week period. The main theories why: The paths in the parks run too close to the streams where bears fish for salmon, and bears will protect their cubs and food source. The salmon run was late, so bears followed the streams into town, which provided a tasty alternative — garbage. Helpul tip: If you ever meet a brown bear, roll yourself into a ball and play dead. You will get mauled, but once the bear no longer perceives you as a threat, it should leave. (If you think you can take a bear, just watch the footage of one dragging a moose.)

READ FULL STORY »

Advertisement

TV Recaps

Powered by WordPress.com VIP