Archive: April 2009 (181-190 of 498)

Apr 20 2009 06:29 PM ET

'Saturday Night Live': Season 34 by the numbers

Justin Timberlake and Will Ferrell are set to host the final two episodes of this 34th season of SNL (on May 9 and 16), so let’s take a look at the year that was:

Number of episodes: 22

Number of episodes hosted by women: 3. There were three female hosts for season 33 — which had only 12 episodes. Of the eight previous 20-episode seasons, the average number of female hosts per season is 7.25.

Number of times Tina Fey hosted this season: 0. Her Sarah Palin appearances were all as a guest, not as a host.

Number of Peabody Awards this season earned
: 1, specifically for its"political satire." According to the awards committee, "The late-nightlegend stole the election-year thunder from its satirical competitionon cable and may have swayed the race itself."

Number of SNL characters who appeared on Superbowl commercials: 1 (McGruber)

Number of former SNL cast members who hosted this season: 2 (Tracy Morgan and Will Ferrell)

Number of first-time hosts:
13. Steve Martin and Alec Baldwin are both megahosts, and Ben Affleck, John Malkovich, Dwayne Johnson, and Justin Timberlake are all three-time hosts; Hugh Laurie, Will Ferrell, and Seth Rogen had hosted once before.

Number of featured players
: 4

Number of cast members: 9, down one after Amy Poehler’s departure

Number of episodes senior-most cast member Darryl Hammond will have been on by the end of this season: 272

Number of episodes newest featured Abby Elliot and Michaela Watkins will have been on: 15

Apr 20 2009 05:25 PM ET

'Brothers & Sisters' recap: Everyone's in heat

Brotherssisters_lI know I’m supposed to care about Tommy deciding that he’s not coming back even though the charges have been dropped and what that will do to Nora (who will be so consumed by the loss that she won’t be able to read, drink, and swim with newly-divorced Roger). And I’m supposed to be on the edge of my seat wondering if Robert, who actually got his cardiologist to sign an affidavit saying he’s good to go for sex with Kitty, will find out about her emotional affair with the park dad Alec. (Judging from the preview for next week, the answer is yes.) But really, as much as I love the entire Walker family (save Tommy), I would watch an hour of just Sarah, Kevin, and Scotty. Who’s with me?

Sarah prepared for her first day back at Ojai by going shopping with Kevin, buying an ill-fitting hot pink dress, and cracking a joke when they ran into Chad (guest star Jason Lewis), Kevin’s actor ex. "He’s bi, right?" she asked. "Maybe you should introduce me…. I’m 40. I can’t be that choosey." Chad spotted them, crossed the street, dipped Kevin, and kissed him hard (pictured). Excellent entrance. So much hotter than Tribute, Lewis’ recent Lifetime movie with Brittany Murphy. Clearly no longer closeted, Chad eventually invited Kevin and Scotty out for drinks and I, for one, knew where this was headed long before Chad asked them what married life was like ("It’s like an episode of Leave it to Beaver, without the…," Kevin trailed off) and whether they wanted to get out of there. And yet, my jaw still dropped. Cut to Kevin and Scotty making out in their apartment and a knock at the door. They both thought it was Chad not taking no for an answer (and the start of a porno), so they decided to let him in. Scotty opened the door and that shot of Sarah, standing there crazy-haired from her tryst with Cal (guest star Cristian de la Fuente) in the Ojai storeroom was one of my Top 10 favorites of the series. I love that Sarah had to share her office sex story with someone and since she couldn’t reach Kitty, just showed up at Kevin’s door because he’d been the most promiscuous Walker until he wed Scotty. I also love her response when Kevin told her that they thought she was Chad coming for a threesome. "Nice choice."

READ FULL STORY »

Apr 20 2009 05:19 PM ET

Heaven in 'Lovely Bones': We can wait

Filed under: Movies and tagged: ,

EmpireToday, Empire Online released a first-look photo of a scene from Peter Jacksons’ upcoming adaptation of The Lovely Bones, Alice Sebold’s novel about a murdered 14-year-old that narrates her family and killer’s goings-ons from heaven. The verdict? Meh. In the past, Jackson has proven himself to be so skillful a director, he can make a poo-on-a-stick look awe-inspiring on screen (and I am so big a fan that I would see an entire three-hour saga about poo-on-a-stick if Jackson were directing it). But this photo makes his take on heaven look a bit underwhelming and clichéd, especially when you consider that we saw the exact same version of the otherworldly locale in nearly every other film concerning the afterlife (1978′s Heaven Can Wait, for example). Of course, I’m being picky here, and yes, so far we only have this one photo to go on. But how can I not be a bit disappointed after seeing heaven’s awesome possibilities in Bill and Ted’s Bogus Journey?

Thoughts, PopWatchers? Are you as underwhelmed as I am?

Apr 20 2009 04:31 PM ET

Bill Murray hits woman with a golf ball, somehow becomes more endearing

Billmurray_lHow cool is Bill Murray? First, as my colleague Whitney Pastorek blogged some months back, we learned that Bill Murray makes the most delightful house party guest. Then, this weekend, we found out that the funny-man actor accidentally hit a woman on the head with a golf ball after one of his shots got away from him during a Tampa Bay golf tournament. Okay, that part in and of itself isn’t so cool. But the woman, who lives on the course, was ultimately fine, though she did need a few stitches, and in her retelling of the event to the AP, she seemed to indicate that Murray handled it with as much grace as possible. "He came over and laid down on the ground with me and he was very concerned, asking if I was okay," she says. "Once he knew I was okay and not seriously hurt, then he started joking with me, asking how many fingers he was holding up." During the next day’s round, Murray dropped by her backyard to ask how she was feeling. (She told the AP she has a request for him: She wants a signed copy of Caddyshack.) I’ve always been a Murray fan, but is it weird that his plunking of a woman somehow makes me like him even more? How many stitches would you endure for a chance to be personally cracked up by Bill Murray?

Apr 20 2009 04:12 PM ET

Perez Hilton on 'Miss USA': Our unlikely hero?

Say what you will about Perez Hilton and the Miss USA pageant, but when the two collided this weekend something went horribly right — for 59 seconds, anyway. Okay, really, only a fraction of the 59 seconds went right, but, hey, we’ll take what we can get. The glorious less-than-a-minute came when Miss California (coincidentally from the Prop 8 state itself) drew Hilton (who was on the judging panel) as her questioner in that part where they talk about allegedly socially relevant stuff like how pro-babies, puppies, and world peace they are. Hilton, known primarily for his ability to scrawl offensive things across paparazzi shots of celebs, suddenly morphed into a hardcore journalist and asked a gutsy, direct, genuinely relevant question: "Vermont recently became the fourth state to legalize same-sex marriage. Do you think every state should follow suit? Why or why not?" And, well, Miss Cali did no service to womankind — much less the gay marriage movement — with her stumbling answer, which started with: "I think it’s great that Americans are able to choose one or the other." (We are?) "We live in a land where we can choose same-sex marriage or opposite marriage." (We do?) She then goes on to say she chooses the latter — you know, "opposite marriage."

Check out the clip and then tell us: Did this turn you around on Perez? Or on opposite marriage, for that matter? Did this stumble help Miss North Carolina Kristen Dalton win?

Apr 20 2009 03:58 PM ET

Clip du jour: Batman lacks superpower, sense of humor.

Tagged:

The folks at College Humor achieved what Bryan Singer could not. They made Superman cool. Super-cool. Last October, they posted a hilarious cartoon of Supe meeting his harmless little Bat-bro.

Now, in a sequel, Supe goes on spring break, leaving Metropolis in Batman’s not-so capable hands. Fortunately, other Justice League allies are there to bail the Dark Knight out, but only after Wonder Woman comes to the conclusion that Batman “might just be a guy in a Bat costume.”

It’s somewhat refreshing to see the most humorless of vigilantes get slapped around a bit. Batman may be the current hero du jour but he’s also just a “little ordinary guy” outclassed by costumed superhumans. The Joker isn’t the only one laughing at Batman’s humiliation.

Apr 20 2009 03:50 PM ET

Does Iron Man need to be miserable, too?

Iron_l Robert Downey Jr. recently teased some Iron Man 2 details when he spoke to Collider.com and other outlets while promoting his upcoming film, The Soloist. We already knew Terrence Howard was out and Don Cheadle was in, along with Mickey Rourke, Sam Rockwell, and Scarlett Johansson.  But Downey confirmed that Garry Shandling will play a Senator who wants to control Stark’s technology. (Hey now!)

We’re also starting to see evidence that Iron Man 2 may be following in the more-angst mold of recent superhero flicks. Previous reports speculate that the sequel will be "more a look behind the mask of someone who says he’s Iron Man and what it really is to become a superhero." Now, Downey tells Collider that the film’s character "relationships are very complex…and the motivations Tony has and why he…does things has completely to do with his own internal processes."

Since Iron Manexploded into theaters last May, gritty crusaders like the Dark Knightand the Watchmen have annihilated the once-cartoonish world ofcinematic superheroes — with varying box-office results. A similarlybrooding Wolverine, amazingly, has this entire summer to himself, sowhen Iron Man 2 hits theaters on May 7, 2010, Tony Stark willencounter very different tastes and expectations, and it will be interesting to see how director Jon Favreau and his creative team will adapt Iron Man to the post-Dark Knight world. How will savvyaudiences receive a hero who brazenly flaunts his abilities rather thanbe tortured by them?

Downey was relatively tight-lipped, though he did allow that the sequel would be "risky" and "artistic." But I worry that too much such tampering might ruin what we loved about Downey’s Stark in the first place: his frivolous joie de vivre and the brashness to look into the camera and say, "I am Iron Man."

What do you hope to see, PopWatchers? Will Iron Man 2 be dark? Too dark? Can Downey singlehandedly reverse the superhero trend, or does every crusader now have to tackle his own self-loathing?

Apr 20 2009 03:34 PM ET

Russell Crowe in 'Robin Hood': 'Gladiator' with a bow

Filed under: Movies and tagged:

RobinhoodxThe world got a first glimpse at Russell Crowe as the legend of Nottingham in director Ridley Scott’s Robin Hood retelling, and I have to say I’m worried about his hair. Don’t get me wrong — Crowe looks great. But ever since I first heard about this project, I’ve been concerned by how similar it sounded, in theme at least, to Gladiator. Do Crowe and Scott really want to tackle a film that has such obvious echoes to their Oscar-winning triumph? Now that I’ve seen the photo, I’ve got a follow-up question: Do they really want Crowe’s Robin Hood to have the exact same hairdo as Maximus? In an interview with USA Today, producer Brian Grazer seemed more concerned about the tights problem, saying, "He doesn’t have the old Robin Hood tights. He’s got armor. He’s very medieval. He looks, if anything, more like he did in Gladiator than anything we’re used to seeing with Robin Hood." The problem is, we’ve already seen Robin Hood without the tights. (Remember Kevin Costner? Anyone?) And we’ve already seen Crowe playing a noble, freedom-fighting hero who harasses despots and defends the innocent…while sporting a close-cropped beard and Caesar haircut. Am I overreacting? Are you worried too? Or just psyched to see Crowe back in fighting form?

Apr 20 2009 02:57 PM ET

TiVo: One step closer to the new Nielsen

Filed under: Television and tagged:

Tivo_lTiVo is apparently moving farther into Nielsen territory. Specifically, it’s launching local-market measurement this summer, which is itself uninteresting except to network affiliates, advertisers, and the hardest-core TV ratings geeks. But the bigger issue is that TiVo is continuing to creep into the ratings business, having already launched a national service in February 2007. It’s always made far more sense for DVRs to do the work once relegated to "Nielsen families," whom the company chooses at random to stand in for the entire population. (And as my coworker Tim Stack has repeatedly asked, "Do you know anyone who’s a Nielsen family?" Who are these people?) Granted, Nielsen has made strides in measuring stuff like DVR usage and even minute-by-minute commercial viewing. But TiVo measures every move all of its users make, which just makes more sense in this technologically advanced entertainment age. There’s no doubt how many people have viewed a given YouTube clip; it seems absurd that we don’t have that kind of accuracy for ratings, which determine which shows live and die.

But don’t count Nielsen out just yet. The old faithful TV ratings service is still the only game in town when it comes to demographics. TiVo’s system is, and will remain, anonymous — which also brings up the little matter of Big Brother syndrome. How do we feel about TiVo, even anonymously, recording users’ every move and zapping it to some database? (That’s already been happening to some extent, mind you — this local move can just slice it into smaller pieces and, well, give us an excuse to reflect on this some more.) Another issue when it comes to demographics: Clearly these numbers will skew strongly toward folks who can afford not only a DVR, but a TiVo-branded DVR. That’s a very, very specific audience, no matter how big the sample is. As a Nielsen spokeswoman said in response to TiVo’s plans: "We don’t know anything beyond what has been written in the press. From press accounts, however, it seems clear that Nielsen offers an entirely different kind of service.  Our ratings can be used as currency because they are based on representative samples that reflect the entire community, not just a subset of DVR users.  Our ratings also provide value to buyers and sellers of ad time because they provide demographic breaks."

What do you think, PopWatchers? Would you rather see networks make decisions based on TiVo ratings than Nielsen numbers? Do you mind knowing your viewing habits are being tracked? Do you want TiVo users determining what lives or dies?

Apr 20 2009 01:31 PM ET

'The Celebrity Apprentice' recap: Going once, going twice...

We learned several important lessons from last night’s episode of The Celebrity Apprentice. First, Scott Ian from Anthrax (and those VH1 shows) is BFF with Annie Duke. Second, Clint Black makes me feel incredibly, painfully uncomfortable whenever he speaks — not just when he makes awkward sexual innuendos in viral videos. Third, according to Donald Trump, Sandra Bullock must have married Jesse James because he is good in bed (not because he’s level-headed, down-to-earth, and funny). Fourth, according to Annie Duke, Annie Duke gives a great blow job.

READ FULL STORY »

Advertisement

TV Recaps

Powered by WordPress.com VIP