Archive: March 2009 (301-310 of 518)

Mar 13 2009 03:53 PM ET

The Grammys' bizarre calendar change-up

Mia_lNot that I expect anything less from an organization as perennially out of touch as the Recording Academy — I’m looking at you, Herbie — but the new eligibility calendar they just announced for the Grammys is a puzzler. Next year’s ceremony will take place in January, a bit earlier than usual, and only music released between Oct. 1, 2008 and Aug. 31, 2009 will be counted for awards. Who cares about those dates? Well, as others have noticed, the new cut-off will basically eliminate the whole fourth quarter of 2009 from consideration. Considering how labels traditionally stack the fall and winter with high-profile releases to maximize holiday sales, it’s hard to see how this makes sense. Worst of all, that’s one less month that M.I.A. has to get pregnant in time to steal the show again. Not considerate, Grammys.

But hey, maybe this will lead to a 2010 Grammys broadcast that’s packed with wonderful (months-old) summer jams, and we’ll all agree that this was a good idea after all. Do you care about this change in the rules?

More on the Grammys:
EW Gallery: Best and Worst Grammy Performances ’09
EW Gallery: Best and Worst Grammy Style ’09
Live blogging the 2009 Grammys

Mar 13 2009 03:07 PM ET

Fields of Red: Would you drink Sting's wine?

As a kid, I used to lay awake and think: When was Sting gonna make a drink? Actually, I never thought that, but apparently somebody did, because good old Gordon Sumner is straight-up pressing red wine at his farm in Tuscany. This is a major landmark in the field of celebrity vino, joining such fine bottles as Francis Ford Coppola’s Rosso & Bianco; Carlos Santana’s Santana DVX (immortalized in NSFW song by the Lonely Island, below); and the official Sopranos wine that I saw a weird promo for on HBO one time.

As an unschooled quaffer myself, I hardly know where to begin with this stuff. Slate‘s wine critic did a semi-thorough roundup of the options a few years ago, and he seemed to enjoy Gerard Depardieu’s viognier. What do you say: Would you drink Sting’s wine? Or is there another celebrity whose vineyards you’d like to sample?

More on food and drink:
Bacon Explosion guys get a book deal. Wait, I thought bacon was over?
Padma Lakshmi pitches burgers: Do you buy it?
Movie Review: Sideways

Mar 13 2009 02:53 PM ET

'American Idol': Why are you afraid of being gay? (When you already are.)

Seacrestcowell_lEarlier this week, the Los Angeles Times‘ pop music critic Ann Powers wrote a thoughtful essay challenging Fox’s American Idol to “open the closet door.” She brings up a bevy of issues the giant karaoke show has locked away because of its overly family-friendly nature — religious affiliation, language barriers, and race. But, when we’re talkin’ the closet, folks, the big issue is clearly sexuality. Big ol’ gays! Hello! Idol has never dealt with this issue very well — or really dealt with it at all.

Just look to the homophobic, fratty banter between host Ryan Seacrest and judge Simon Cowell. (A classic back-and-forth from 2007: “Stay out of my closet!” Ryan told Simon. He responded: “Come out!”) Or the fact that season 1 finalist Jim Verraros was made to remove “gay-friendly” from an Idol-sponsored website. Or: Clay Aiken. It took  more than five years after he was named runner-up on the show for Aiken to come out of the closet. Yes, He’s Gay.

But this year we’ve got Adam Lambert on deck. Could he be the great hope for gays on Idol? He hasn’t specifically addressed his sexuality (and it’s a good guess that Idol producers are telling him not to), but judging by those photos that surfaced last week, it’s certainly a great possibility that this boy could be into boys. (I mean, he’s kissing other boys in some of the photos and dressed in some quite fabulous drag in others.)

The big question is: Why does it all matter so much? Idol is, by nature, a gay-friendly concept: Wannabe pop stars get up and stage rather theatrical performances. Sometimes they even — gasp! — are required to sing show tunes. And dance, too! It’s no shocker that the music industry, because of its creative nature, attracts folks of all stripes — including homosexuals.

Still, it’s complicated. On the one hand, the show is supposed to be a family-friendly event. But on the other, why would it be so awful if, in one of those schmaltzy vignettes that run about each contestant every week, we saw Adam Lambert putting on makeup for a drag show and talking about how much he loves it? No one would be surprised. And, believe me, the kiddies watching out there would giggle.

Time to lob it over to you, PopWatchers: Would it rock American Idol to the core if it finally came out of the closet? Would you stop watching if it did? Should contestants’ sexuality become transparent, or should we keep the focus only on the music and performances?

Kevin Winter/Getty Images

Mar 13 2009 02:11 PM ET

Jon Stewart's Jim Cramer smackdown: Watch it again

I almost felt bad for Mad Money‘s Jim Cramer as I watched him on The Daily Show last night. Jon Stewart hit Cramer with reasonable critique after reasonable critique, and the so-called financial guru had nothing to offer in return beyond shameless plea-coppage and goalpost-moving ("Who, meeee?") — and, eventually, what sounded like a groveling admission of professional wrongdoing. On a human level, it’s a little painful to watch someone’s credibility get destroyed like that in front of millions. But as Ken Tucker has already said, Stewart was performing a valuable public service by grilling Cramer. He may have been harsh, but that guy deserved it.

And now we can now relive every awkward moment of that interview in extended and uncensored form. Watch the first part below, then click over to The Daily Show‘s website for the rest — and weigh in below to tell us what you thought of this epic basic-cable prizefight.

More on Jon Stewart:
Ken Tucker’s Watching TV: Jon Stewart takes Jim Cramer apart
The Daily Show: Ready for the Jon Stewart-Jim Cramer smackdown?
Jon Stewart takes another swipe at CNBC on Letterman

Mar 13 2009 01:00 PM ET

Site of the Day: ShamrockShake.com

March has arrived, and with it basketball madness, funky weather, and excuses to get drunk and eat green-colored things — the most delightful (and rare) of which is definitely the elusive vanilla-with-a-dash-of-mint Shamrock Shake at McDonald’s. I tried to buy one of the tasty green treats the other day, but was devastated when I got to the counter and asked for one, only to be met with a blank stare. My sister updated her Facebook status on March 1 with ”It’s officially Shamrock Shake season!” — then texted me, furious, when the three different McDonald’s she tried didn’t have them either. We’re not alone in this conundrum — people from NYC to San Francisco to Ireland have searched to no avail. You can make your own, but will it really be the same? No. The answer is no.

Which brings me to today’s site of the day: the bare bones, to-the-point ShamrockShake.com. Illustrated with animated GIFs and a couple of YouTube videos, the site doesn’t even have instructions. But I’ll spell it out for you. Go to site. Search by state. Locate shake. Or, if you’re me: Go to site. Search by state. Get abnormally upset that they’re not available in your area. But there’s good news, people of Shawnee, Kan., and Sabraton, W.Va., — Shamrock Shakes are readily available for you to consume. The data is user-compiled, so if you’ve enjoyed a Shamrock Shake this year, add your location to the list. The entries are pretty sparse, so it would be a little more helpful if people actually used it. Those of you who are hoarding the locations of delicious, minty shakes for your own benefit, I implore you: Share your whereabouts. Please. The drive-thru line might be a little longer tomorrow, but it’s one sacrifice for the good of many.

Is anyone else as obsessed with Shamrock Shakes as I am (besides my sister)? How hard are you judging me right now for caring so much about a dairy dessert? Have you fulfilled your Shamrock Shake quotient this March?

Mar 13 2009 12:00 PM ET

'In the Loop': Will it be 2009's sweariest movie?

Categories: Movies

Intheloop_l If there’s one thing I really like, it’s sharp political satire. And if there’s one thing I like more than that, it’s swearing. So I can’t wait to see the movie In The Loop, a sharp political satire which, judging by this NSFW clip, drops enough F-bombs to make 1983′s Scarface look like, uh, 1932′s Scarface.

How do I know In The Loop is sharp? Well, the movie, which was well-received at this year’s Sundance Film Festival and will be released July 17, is a spin-off of the excellent U.K. sitcom The Thick of it. That show stars Peter Capaldi as Malcolm Tucker, the foul-mouthed and much feared press coordinator of the British prime minister (Tucker is based on ex-PM Tony Blair’s real-life enforcer Alastair Campbell). For the big-screen version, Armando Iannucci (the show’s creator and the movie’s director) has expanded the cast to include the always brilliant British actress Gina McKee and James Gandolfini, who plays a general. But the dialogue remains familiarly expletive-strewn.

Okay, I’m British and a tad biased about this (I also think longtime media terrorist Iannucci is a bit of a genius). But PopWatchers of all nationalities must agree that, if nothing else, In The Loop promises to be the sweariest movie of the year. Don’t you f—ing agree?

Mar 13 2009 11:00 AM ET

Anna Chlumsky: 'My Girl' has a pilot!

Annachlumsky_l Just catching up on my pilot casting news, and buried deep within this Hollywood Reporter item, below names like Miranda Otto (attached to the CBS drama A Marriage) and Billy Zane (more on him in a bit), was a sentence that made me squeal: "Also set in a lead role is Anna Chlumsky, who plays an aide to the Speaker of the House." My Girl! It’s like I felt a motherly pride — even though Chlumsky’s, like, five years younger than I am. Her CBS pilot, House Rules, revolves around a freshman class of Congress. Zoe McLellan, Dirty Sexy Money‘s Lisa George, has also been cast as a quick-witted congresswoman.

As for Zane, his untitled ABC pilot finds him playing a managing partner at a Los Angeles law firm. Could this be the network trying to fill the creepy-sexy void left by the loss of Boston Legal‘s James Spader?

Also noteworthy, to me at least, was the mention of British Coupling‘s Jeff, Richard Coyle, joining Jeremy Northam in the CBS drama Miami Trauma. That hospital is actually starting to sound interesting.

After the jump, more of our pilot season coverage.

READ FULL STORY »

Mar 13 2009 10:04 AM ET

Jeff Probst blogs 'Survivor: Tocantins': episode 5

Jeffprobst_lOkay, I’m done talking about Coach. For now anyway, let’s turn ourattention to Stephen and one of my favorite quotes of this episode:

Ext. Camp – Day
Stephen scratches the back of Taj.

Stephen: "I’ve never brought such pleasure to a woman before."

Did this comment catch anyone’s ear? I have a few explanations for this comment:
a. Stephen is gay, not that there’s anything wrong with that
b. Stephen is straight but has limited experience with women
c. Stephen is going for broke and playing this game full on

I vote for C. I think Stephen is one of the most sophisticated andsubtle players in the game. He is letting people believe that he’s thequiet, "one beat behind" city kid just happy to not have bugs crawlingup his arse. Who knows, he may be gay and/or he may have limitedexperience with women, but that is irrelevant. This guy could go deep.

READ FULL STORY »

Mar 13 2009 10:00 AM ET

Quote of the Day: 'The IT Crowd' edition

"With all due respect John, I am the head of IT and I have it on good authority. If you type ‘Google’ into Google, you can break the Internet. So please, no one try it, even for a joke. It’s not a laughing matter. You can break the Internet." — Jen (Katherine Parkinson) on The IT Crowd

Mar 13 2009 12:25 AM ET

George Clooney returning to 'ER': Yes!

Categories: Television

Georgeclooney_dlIf the news reports are true, tonight’s the night that George Clooney’s Doug Ross will make his much-anticipated return to ER with –- we’re hoping — his beloved Carol (Julianna Margulies) intow. Unlike the last time Clooney made a surprise appearance -– when the entire episode was shot in secret -– fans have been given lots ofnot-so-subtle clues this season that hot boy could show up any day now. Heck, it’s not like executive producer David Zabel tried to hide the fact; hetold EW last year that he planned to court the vets like Clooney, Margulies, and Anthony Edwards to return for the show’s final season.Talk about an anticlimactic moment.

But will any of this spoil myenjoyment of tonight’s not-to-be-missed episode? Heck no! I was giddy whenClooney showed up in 2000 to reunite with Carol, and I’m sure my goose bumps willreturn if and when Clooney appears in those yummy scrubs. I just pray he hasdeeper dialogue than "give me a CBC" or "a TBD" and instead talks longinglyabout the old days when he used to beat up child abusers in the E.R. Might we berewarded with a little gurney-based hibity-dibity with Carol, even? Can a girldream? What are you hoping from the Clooney comeback?

Advertisement

TV Recaps

Powered by WordPress.com VIP