Archive: February 2009 (81-90 of 448)

Feb 24 2009 09:30 PM ET

Three reasons I'm concerned about the new version of 'Melrose Place'

Filed under: Television and tagged:

151419__melrose_lI am an absurdly big Melrose Place fan. I have seen every episode in the neighborhood of 10 times each. It’s a show close enough to my heart that it’s practically involved in my circulatory system, so I’m pretty emotionally invested in the remake. But I have some concerns.

1. Gasp-inducing, OMG scenes don’t, can’t, and shouldn’t exist anymore

Melrose Place arrived with the episode "The Bitch is Back." If you don’t remember having your mind explode when Kimberly ripped that wig off, well, maybe you were busy on April 27, 1994. I have watched tens of thousands of hours of television since then, but that will always be one of my biggest eyeball-popping moments of viewing. And there were a lot of those on Melrose, from the building blowing up, to Bruce hanging himself in Amanda’s office, to Richard’s hand coming out of the dirt, to zombie Brooke in the pool — and I don’t think those kinds of jaw-droppers really exist anymore on TV. That’s not a bad thing, considering how, you know, stupid and self-defeating it can become. Lost (which, of course, is radically superior in terms of objective quality) sometimes surprises me, but that’s sort of the show’s M.O. Gossip Girl‘s increasingly feeble attempts to create such duhn-duhn-duuuuuuhn moments have made the show less and less fun — I’m still waiting for someone to give a fart about Lily and Rufus’ love child. These almost campy, and sometimes straight-up campy, stories just seem stupid now. Spoilers are in, stunners are out: Like the Y-drop necklace it popularized, MP‘s calling card just isn’t in style anymore.

2. And minus those histrionics, Melrose is a little boring

Lots of low-level, amateur fans probably think of Melrose as a homogeneous unit of soapy ridiculousness. False! Early Melrose is extremely, almost comically earnest. It came out around the same time as The Real World, and there was an intense early-’90s vibe of social responsibility. Matt is a social worker! Stalker Keith is an environmentalist! Jo photographs homeless people! The characters go bungee jumping — as evidence of how cool and x-treme their lives are. On a Very Special Episode, Jo and Jake get tested for HIV. Hey, you guys, ectopic pregnancies are really dangerous. It wasn’t until most of the way through the second season that things got fantastically crazypants, which is the Melrose most people remember; the heyday. But then seasons 6 and 7 went back to being pretty blah, thanks to weird new characters no one cared about. (Cooper? Eve?)

3. They already remade Melrose Place, and it’s called The Hills, and I am kind of tired of it, and so is everyone else

Let’s see, we’ll spin off this high-school show and make something about twentysomethings. Say, a naive, relatively wholesome girl who tries to make her way in Los Angeles but finds herself repeatedly foiled by a two-faced bleach-blond vixen. She dates a string of doofuses; her brunette friend is the "edgy" one. Everyone seems to have a lot of money and be getting promoted all the time, except no one appears to do much work. There’s an aggressively present, on-trend pop soundtrack, lots of glamorous establishing shots of L.A. hotspots, and the acting is sometimes really, really bad. People break up and make up with abandon, and tenuously connected new characters appear, oh, all the time.

So, PopWatchers: Reason for concern, or is this just too close to my heart and I’m being paranoid? What other things should we be worried about? What can the producers do to avoid these and any other pitfalls?

Feb 24 2009 09:06 PM ET

Michel Gondry's 'Green Hornet': Crazy, or crazy like a fox?

Green_hornet_lI don’t care about the Green Hornet. I wanted to get that out of the way right up front. I don’t care about the Green Hornet in the same way I didn’t care about the Spirit: I don’t have a childhood love of the character, or the old serials, or the old TV show with Bruce Lee as crimefighter Britt Reid’s sidekick, Kato. And the only reason I cared about the Seth Rogen movie was the possibility of Kung Fu Hustle‘s Stephen Chow directing it. When he left the project, the care-o-meter went back to "eh."

But with the news that Michel Gondry is negotiating to direct Rogen’s Hornet, I’m all like a Faith No More song ("We Care a Lot," in case you couldn’t crack that nut). Not because I think it’ll be good — Ang Lee’s Hulk and David Lynch’s Dune are object lessons in what can happen when an indie iconoclast takes a whack at genre material — but because it’ll be Something to See. Could Gondry succeed where others have failed? Sure. I loved Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and Dave Chappelle’s Block Party, and liked the heck out of Be Kind Rewind. But it could also be The Phantom.

What I do know is that, whatever we get, I can’t see Gondry’s Green Hornet being boring. How about you? Does this news make you more likely to pay to watch Seth Rogen fight crime, or more likely to avoid it at all costs?

Feb 24 2009 08:45 PM ET

'The Hills' season 5 trailer: Interchangeable with every other season!

Last night on The City After Show (yes, as in one of thoserecap shows where MTV emcees Jessi and Dan make fun of the night’sepisode using their screechiest voices), a trailer for season 5 of The Hills — or as I like to call it, The Hills: Does Anybody Out There Still Care? — premiered.

In it, Lauren analyzes her friendships, Stephanie gossips, Lo asksphilosophical questions, Audrina stares blankly, Brody acts as ashoulder to cry on, Spencer starts fights, and Heidi cries about losingher "favorite memory," a.k.a. Lauren.

I’m guessing I’m not the only one experiencing deja vu here. The above description can be used for just about any season of The Hillsthus far, so what about the trailer is supposed to be enticing? Whycan’t we see new excitement (i.e. Lauren’s supposed relationship with My Boys‘ Kyle Howard. Or heck, even Audrina’s house getting robbed)?

Check out the preview below, and let us know your thoughts about yetanother season of the reality show: will you still be watching comethis spring when it returns because you just can’t not watch? Or are you as over the Hills gang as you are with Heidi’s hideous manicures?

Feb 24 2009 04:51 PM ET

John Cusack starring in 'Hot Tub Time Machine': Will you see it NOW?

Johncusackhottub_l_2Hot Tub Time Machine, a comedy previously described on PopWatch as having arguably "the stupidest movie title ever," has landed John Cusack and Rob Corddry. (The Office‘s Darryl, Craig Robinson, and Sex Drive‘s Clark Duke are in negotiations to join them.)

Cusack will also serve as a producer on the film, which Variety says revolves around a group of frustrated friends who hit a hot tub at the ski resort where they partied as teens — and get transported back to 1987. Steve Pink, who cowrote Cusack’s Grosse Pointe Blank and High Fidelity, will direct.

Now, I’ve always maintained that I would see Hot Tub Time Machine (and just buy my ticket from a kiosk instead of a person who could judge me), but has Cusack’s casting altered your intentions? The sudden faith I have in the film is sort of funny, considering I haven’t actually seen Cusack in a movie since 2005′s Must Love Dogs, and before that, it was 2001′s Serendipity. (I even scored the War, Inc. and Martian Child DVDs off the office giveaway table.) What would be even funnier, of course, is if Hot Tub Time Machine turns out to be one of the best career moves Cusack’s made in years: Going back to the ’80s, the decade he owned and can now poke fun at lovingly, in a high-concept male comedy that feels like it might have a Better Off Dead vibe? Kinda genius. Agree?

More John Cusack:
John Cusack recalls the highlights of his career
John Cusack’s memorable roles

Feb 24 2009 03:39 PM ET

Jonas Brothers don't know themselves as well as a superfan? Shocking!

On last night’s Jimmy Kimmel Live!, the Jonas Brothers faced off against superfan Jessi in a game of "Who Knows Jonas?" — and lost. I blame Nick, who really should’ve known what he wanted to be if he wasn’t a musician. (My favorite part is when Jessi yells "Cheating!" as the brothers stall. She’s in it to win it, boys.)

How many questions would you have gotten right? I’d have scored a big fat zero, however, I’m seriously contemplating going to see their 3D Concert Experience, in theaters Feb. 27, as a crash course (and because I want to watch young girls try to reach out and touch them).

More Jonas Brothers:
EW Spotlight: The Jonas Brothers
PopWatch Duel: Jonas Brothers vs. Pete Wentz
Gallery: 20 Best Boy Bands Ever!

Feb 24 2009 12:30 PM ET

Danny Boyle: Will an Oscar finally get the 'Slumdog Millionaire' director some respect?

Filed under: Movies and tagged: , ,

Dannyboyledirector_lDanny Boyle has just won an Oscar for Best Director, and his movie, Slumdog Millionaire, was just named Best Picture. Missing the real significance of that statement? Okay, let me try this: Danny Boyle — the independent auteur who splashed across the international radar in 1996 with Trainspotting, a movie about heroin-addled Scottish junkies who dive into cruddy toilets to fish out opium suppositories…to the music of Bizet’s Carmen! — has just earned Hollywood’s highest honor.

I mean, wow, how cool is that?! What an endorsement of someone who, in my mind, is one of the most original filmmakers in the world today — someone who has never truly gotten the props he has long deserved. It’s hard to think of another current director whose work so seamlessly spans genres, from thriller (Shallow Grave, which he made before Trainspotting), to dramatic fantasy (Millions), to horror (28 Days Later), to sci-fi (Sunshine), to Bollywood (Slumdog Millionaire). Even though I’ve always been baffled by his weird, misguided big-studio followups to TrainspottingA Life Less Ordinary and The Beach — I’ve always taken comfort in knowing that I’d go to a Danny Boyle film and get to watch something new and exciting. For him, the label "independent" has always been more than a mere state of finance.

Of course, until the smash success of Slumdog Millionaire, I wasn’t sure many folks necessarily agreed with me. Boyle’s movies have never been box-office magnets: Before Slumdog came along, the zombie saga 28 Days Later was his top domestic grosser, with just $45.1 mil, and my nominee for his best film to date, Millions, banked a paltry $6.6 mil in 2005. And we’ve heard plenty about how Slumdog Millionaire was sat on, passed around, and almost sent straight to video before Fox Searchlight picked it up.

So I wonder: Can Oscar success mean even better things for Boyle? Will this independent-minded director finally garner some mainstream respect, even after the Oscar glimmer has faded? And what should he do next? Maybe not a James Bond or Narnia film, but certainly there’s a lot of big-budget fare that could benefit from his creative juice. Oh, and what’s your favorite Danny Boyle movie? Let the love-in commence…er, continue!

addCredit(“Mark Ralston/Getty Images”)

Feb 24 2009 12:00 PM ET

Clip du Jour: Louis CK on why everything is amazing and nobody is happy

After a long night of Twittering from the Oscar red carpet, this old clip of comedian Louis CK on Late Night With Conan O’Brien made me extraordinarily happy yesterday. I do not know exactly why…but I suspect there’s an answer to be found in this line: "Give it a second! It’s going to space! Can you give it a second to get back from space?" Watch it, PopWatchers, and then weigh in below: Agree? Super funny? Insulted by the realization you might be part of the "generation of spoiled idiots" Mr. CK is addressing here?

Watch more SpikedHumor videos on AOL Video

 

Feb 24 2009 11:30 AM ET

Pee-wee Herman saying no to crack and other odd PSAs: What's your favorite?

For every public service announcement that effectively raises awareness for an important issue, there’s one that’s just, well, bizarre. The Huffington Post has compiled a list of the nine strangest PSAs ever broadcast on television, and it’s an amusing mix of spots that are inappropriately funny, downright cheesy, or just plain awful. However, my favorite of the bunch may actually promote its message successfully. It features Pee-wee Herman (Paul Reubens) lecturing us about the dangers of cocaine. At some point, we realize we are trapped in some mysterious dark room with only Pee-wee and an anonymous camera crew, and then the soundtrack starts simulating a thumping heartbeat (or a rave-club beat, your call). If this even remotely resembles what being on crack is like, then I agree with Pee-wee: "It isn’t worth it."

What do you think? Are there any wacky PSAs that still haunt you?

Feb 24 2009 11:00 AM ET

Quote of the Day: 'A Beautiful Mind' edition

"I need to believe that something extraordinary is possible." –Alicia Nash (Best Supporting Actress Oscar winner Jennifer Connelly) in 2001′s Best Picture, A Beautiful Mind

Feb 24 2009 06:22 AM ET

Chris Harrison blogs 'The Bachelor': The Women Tell All

Chrisharrisonportrait_lI had a really tough time trying to figure out how I wasgoing to write this week’s blog and what I should say to you. I’m in a bit of atough position. As much as I would love to "Tell All," that’s justnot possible right now. But believe me when I tell you, that will happen inthis space next week. As much as I’m sorry that some of you have somehow founda reason to doubt my integrity and honesty, there’s not a whole hell of a lot Ican do about that. If something you’ve heard or seen from somebody you don’tknow has suddenly changed your opinion of me then is there really anything Icould say or do that could change your mind anyway? I learned a long time ago(15 years of marriage) to pick my battles and this, my friends, is one I reallydon’t care to fight. With that said, let me share a little something with you.The Bachelor producers have scriptedand are responsible for certain events: the first moon landing, the end ofthe cold war, Astro-turf, and the Internet (sorry, Al Gore, it wasus). But we are not responsible for, nor have we ever scripted, the ending ofthis show. Let me re-type this slowly so all of you can read this: We donot, and have not, decided the ending of any of our seasons. Let’s behonest, if we did don’t you think we would do a better job and have a muchhigher success rate? As much as we’d love to take credit, we didn’ttell Trista to fall in love with Ryan, get married, and have two babies.We didn’t script Charlie falling in love with Saraonly to struggle as a couple battling an addiction and then persevereand now thrive as a happy couple. Nor did we tell Brad Womack tonot pick anybody and just leave and go back to his life in Texas. These wereall cases of good ol’ fashioned human behavior and free choice.

READ FULL STORY »

Advertisement

TV Recaps

Powered by WordPress.com VIP