Comments on: ‘Without a Paddle: Nature’s Calling’: Most unnecessary sequel ever?

By: Alicia

Alicia — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 19:17:13 +0000

I do not agree. This is an awesome movie! I saw it on netflix, and loved it so much I bought it! You can’t tell a book, or dvd by its cover! If one watches a sequel with fresh eyes, and does not judge it by the first perhaps they would review it differently! These actors, and Directors ect. worked very hard, and deserve credit for an awesome movie! No It is not like the first one, It is even better! Oliver James is an awesome actor as well as the rest of the cast! It was a wholesome romantic comedy, unlike the first. It all depends on the level of your sense of humor, If you have one!

By: Andrea Montes

Andrea Montes — Sat, 28 Mar 2009 04:06:47 +0000

Well Im fan of Oliver James so I will definitelly buy the movie just to watch him!

By: Tom

Tom — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 07:29:10 +0000

Ok Look. Eric sometimes sequels are necessary to complete the end of the original. Shrek 2 was hilarious, with Puss in Boots giving everybody the puppy dog eyes is funny. Indiana Jones is awesome I loved the new movie. I’m kind of surprised that you didn’t put in any of the Star Wars movies. Ghostbusters is great I loved the sequel. The Pirates of the Caribbean was a great series
You could have put in the second Miss Congeniality film, that was a dumb movie.

By: Bob

Bob — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:40:44 +0000

i have seen the first 1 quite a few time and every time was as good as the first. this new one is probably going to be more cartoony and no where near as good as the first 1 with seth green and the gang
and saw, lethal weapon 3,terminator three,beverly hills cop three were not bad as bad as this is going to be

By: wints

wints — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:18:50 +0000

the original was a hilarious movie and they could have wrote a sequal if you could get the same crew but it did end good and there really wasnt a reason for a 2nd and eric friedmann the rocky movies were awsome so dnt get me started on you

By: Cait

Cait — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:10:59 +0000

SERIOUSLY. This movie was SO not needed. I got all excited when I saw this on watch-movies.net too. I expected Matthew Lillard and Seth Green and the other guy. But I get some stupid nobodies. Who in their right minds would have actually WANTED a sequel to the movie that ended in a way that no good possible thing could have grown from it. The first one ended so perfectly. This is a disgrace.

By: angelamia

angelamia — Sun, 04 Jan 2009 14:05:04 +0000

Unnecessary sequel? Maybe. Will I watch it for Oliver James? Yes.
Also the ridiculous games they keep churning out on myspace.com/withoutapaddle interest me a bit…

By: Movies82

Movies82 — Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:33:56 +0000

You have to actually see the movie for what it is. Most of the great actors you know, started out in movies like this. These actors are starting their careers in a traditional way. So, it’s not really about how ‘corny’ or ‘cheesy’ the movies is, rather, it gives you a look at potentially great actors in their earliest stage, while making you laugh your ass off in the process….. come on….lighten up.

By: Chris

Chris — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:31:40 +0000

Kristopher Turner is on “Instant Star” on the “N” and has been in some tv movies, he’s not a nobody.
That said, I dont think this movie was a good idea.

By: William J. Bivens

William J. Bivens — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:54:50 +0000

This sequel needed to be made if only to give me a shot at obtaining my life long dream of being in a crappy movie. I am an extra in the bar scene. Unless I ended up on the cutting room floor, I am the largest long hairiest guy in the bar. I can die happy now. Sell you an autographed photo for a $1.00?