Comments on: Did I just get flashed by the PTC?

By: tony

tony — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 21:49:47 +0000

new ptc with blog: http://www.ibux.200u.com/

By: ladyli1

ladyli1 — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 06:24:55 +0000

Oops! “a lot of time”

By: ladyli1

ladyli1 — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 06:23:48 +0000

Hey Mark- thanx for the heads up on bookmarking the PTC site. It does save a all of time!

By: Jael

Jael — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 02:52:44 +0000

Why would parents let their kids watch a show set in a Vegas casino to begin wth?

By: V.M.L.

V.M.L. — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:58:04 +0000

If the PTC keeps making the FCC censor programs, we’d all be watching BARNEY AND FRIENDS every day and night!

By: ep sato

ep sato — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:48:18 +0000

Hey Soapboxer, you might consider that plenty of conservative folks post on this very site without feeling edged out by our alleged pro-sex and pro-gay points of view.
Oh, and EW is a Time/Warner publication, so how liberal can they be? Compared to say “Atlantic Monthly” or “Mother Jones”, EW’s pretty conservative.
But then again, when right wingers drop the term “liberal”, they frequently mean to say “disagrees with Jerry Fallwell and is therefore irrelevant.”
There’s space for all points of view here, but it strikes me that no one (not even Soapbox) felt like the PTC makes any points that are worth defending. And there’s plenty of people who post here that have kids. Go figure.

By: Snarf

Snarf — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:31:09 +0000

Toodles Soapboxer! We’ll miss you – like a case of intestinal flu.

By: Mark

Mark — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:17:48 +0000

The PTC is a complete joke, but I have their page bookmarked, since they’re always so considerate to have a copy of whatever scene they’re ranting about that week online. Who needs to search for smut on TV when the PTC’s site give you one-stop shopping?

By: Soapboxer

Soapboxer — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:16:36 +0000

It’s obvious that most on these EW blogs are liberal to the core and are not part of you’d call the ‘moral’ minority. So the bias here is overwhelming. It’s a sexfriendly, gayfriendly, dowhatyouwant friendly place. And the ragmag EW is exactly the same of course.
I’m not comfortable here anymore, so I’m out.

By: Jennifer

Jennifer — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:23:23 +0000

One time I got on the PTC website and read about their anti-”Nip/Tuck” campaign. Instead of just listing the things they found objectionable, they went into detailed summaries. For example, where “the woman strips down to skimpy lingerie and has sex with the man” would suffice, the website was more like, “Kimber slowly peels off her sweater, under which she is wearing a lacy push-up bra. She then slides her skirt down to her ankles, revealing a tiny red thong. Christian begins to caress her exposed breasts…” and so on. I think they even counted the thrusts. It’s like they want ‘smut’ off the air because they’re too perverted to not drool over it themselves.