<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Mr. Woodcock&#8217; finally takes a lap around the multiplex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://popwatch.ew.com/2007/09/14/mr-woodcock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://popwatch.ew.com/2007/09/14/mr-woodcock/</link>
	<description>Entertainment Weekly&#039;s PopWatch Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: yjkefiozs jwiocrb</title>
		<link>http://popwatch.ew.com/2007/09/14/mr-woodcock/comment-page-2/#comment-540992</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yjkefiozs jwiocrb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 05:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewpopwatch.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/mr-woodcock#comment-540992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lgjbnhsu mokar zwmxct ksbvhudle ealp kgmev gheokbx
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lgjbnhsu mokar zwmxct ksbvhudle ealp kgmev gheokbx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monica</title>
		<link>http://popwatch.ew.com/2007/09/14/mr-woodcock/comment-page-1/#comment-540991</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[monica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 22:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewpopwatch.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/mr-woodcock#comment-540991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. If the movie is something like Dark Knight, then it doesn&#039;t matter how long it took to make. But if it&#039;s Snakes on a Plane I wouldn&#039;t even bother.
2. I&#039;ll watch Woodcock maybe when it&#039;s on video, but most likely when it&#039;s on cable.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. If the movie is something like Dark Knight, then it doesn&#8217;t matter how long it took to make. But if it&#8217;s Snakes on a Plane I wouldn&#8217;t even bother.<br />
2. I&#8217;ll watch Woodcock maybe when it&#8217;s on video, but most likely when it&#8217;s on cable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nix</title>
		<link>http://popwatch.ew.com/2007/09/14/mr-woodcock/comment-page-1/#comment-540989</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 16:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewpopwatch.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/mr-woodcock#comment-540989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I first heard about the WWII movie &quot;The Great Raid&quot; with James Franco and Joseph Fiennes years before it finally got released. Of course, it was one of those movies that got messed up under that whole Weinstein/Miramax mess, but when it came out, it was disjointed, both overlong and sketchy. Too bad, the story itself could have been great.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I first heard about the WWII movie &#8220;The Great Raid&#8221; with James Franco and Joseph Fiennes years before it finally got released. Of course, it was one of those movies that got messed up under that whole Weinstein/Miramax mess, but when it came out, it was disjointed, both overlong and sketchy. Too bad, the story itself could have been great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snarf</title>
		<link>http://popwatch.ew.com/2007/09/14/mr-woodcock/comment-page-1/#comment-540988</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Snarf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 06:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewpopwatch.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/mr-woodcock#comment-540988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the third film that I&#039;ve read about that this has happened to &quot;The Assassination of Jesse James...&quot; and &quot;Southland Tales&quot; are the other two. I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s a case of studio execs interferring or directors tinkering (actually that is the case with Southland Tales) but it doesn&#039;t exactly inspire confidence.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the third film that I&#8217;ve read about that this has happened to &#8220;The Assassination of Jesse James&#8230;&#8221; and &#8220;Southland Tales&#8221; are the other two. I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s a case of studio execs interferring or directors tinkering (actually that is the case with Southland Tales) but it doesn&#8217;t exactly inspire confidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://popwatch.ew.com/2007/09/14/mr-woodcock/comment-page-1/#comment-540987</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 23:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewpopwatch.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/mr-woodcock#comment-540987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think there&#039;s a difference between a delayed release and a movie that&#039;s been gathering dust. I don&#039;t really give it a thought if the movie&#039;s delayed because they&#039;re still working on it. I probably won&#039;t go see it if I hear it&#039;s been sitting on a shelf.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s a difference between a delayed release and a movie that&#8217;s been gathering dust. I don&#8217;t really give it a thought if the movie&#8217;s delayed because they&#8217;re still working on it. I probably won&#8217;t go see it if I hear it&#8217;s been sitting on a shelf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LisaMama</title>
		<link>http://popwatch.ew.com/2007/09/14/mr-woodcock/comment-page-1/#comment-540985</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LisaMama]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 23:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewpopwatch.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/mr-woodcock#comment-540985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of the time, a long delay and a troubled production means a terrible movie. But sometimes it turns out the opposite -- just look at Titanic. I won&#039;t be going to see this, however.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the time, a long delay and a troubled production means a terrible movie. But sometimes it turns out the opposite &#8212; just look at Titanic. I won&#8217;t be going to see this, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snsetblaze</title>
		<link>http://popwatch.ew.com/2007/09/14/mr-woodcock/comment-page-1/#comment-540984</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Snsetblaze]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 22:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewpopwatch.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/mr-woodcock#comment-540984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Woodcock sounded like a stupid movie to begin with, delayed or not.  With so many other quality or interesting movies out in the past two weeks, its a skipper.  I might see it on tv when it comes to HBO.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Woodcock sounded like a stupid movie to begin with, delayed or not.  With so many other quality or interesting movies out in the past two weeks, its a skipper.  I might see it on tv when it comes to HBO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ceballos</title>
		<link>http://popwatch.ew.com/2007/09/14/mr-woodcock/comment-page-1/#comment-540983</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ceballos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 22:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewpopwatch.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/mr-woodcock#comment-540983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ugh test audiences! I haven&#039;t seen the film, but it seems that the test audiences reaction (rather than any sort of on-set problems) are what ailed this movie. Seems like the test audienced any sharpness and wit that may have been in the original screenplay right out of the film, leading to the tame flop the EW review described.
I also agree with EP...why is Thornton stuck doing all these stupid comedies. In addition to Primary Colors, he was fantastic in &quot;A Simple Plan&quot; (underrated). And if he insists on doing comedies, find something worthwhile like &quot;Bad Santa.&quot; Anything with Seann William Scott attached to it just doesn&#039;t seem like a winner these days.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh test audiences! I haven&#8217;t seen the film, but it seems that the test audiences reaction (rather than any sort of on-set problems) are what ailed this movie. Seems like the test audienced any sharpness and wit that may have been in the original screenplay right out of the film, leading to the tame flop the EW review described.<br />
I also agree with EP&#8230;why is Thornton stuck doing all these stupid comedies. In addition to Primary Colors, he was fantastic in &#8220;A Simple Plan&#8221; (underrated). And if he insists on doing comedies, find something worthwhile like &#8220;Bad Santa.&#8221; Anything with Seann William Scott attached to it just doesn&#8217;t seem like a winner these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stef</title>
		<link>http://popwatch.ew.com/2007/09/14/mr-woodcock/comment-page-1/#comment-540981</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stef]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 21:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewpopwatch.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/mr-woodcock#comment-540981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Billy Bob creeps me out and I wouldn&#039;t pay to see him in anything.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Billy Bob creeps me out and I wouldn&#8217;t pay to see him in anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicky</title>
		<link>http://popwatch.ew.com/2007/09/14/mr-woodcock/comment-page-1/#comment-540980</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vicky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewpopwatch.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/mr-woodcock#comment-540980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had no desire to actually see this film in the first place. Delay or no delay.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had no desire to actually see this film in the first place. Delay or no delay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

