<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s missing from EW&#8217;s &#8216;Sci-Fi 25&#8242; list?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://popwatch.ew.com/2007/05/04/scifi_top_25/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://popwatch.ew.com/2007/05/04/scifi_top_25/</link>
	<description>Entertainment Weekly&#039;s PopWatch Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:16:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pbtc gwfj</title>
		<link>http://popwatch.ew.com/2007/05/04/scifi_top_25/comment-page-93/#comment-568357</link>
		<dc:creator>pbtc gwfj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewpopwatch.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/scifi_top_25#comment-568357</guid>
		<description>jyqipw iqkx ifls asqungib qcrunedzi bduhyqomx fzwpskehl
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jyqipw iqkx ifls asqungib qcrunedzi bduhyqomx fzwpskehl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://popwatch.ew.com/2007/05/04/scifi_top_25/comment-page-93/#comment-568355</link>
		<dc:creator>k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewpopwatch.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/scifi_top_25#comment-568355</guid>
		<description>Ooh, while I&#039;m at it, here&#039;s my list of shows that totally fail at science, fiction and acting:
- Andromeda
- Eureka
- Stargate Atlantis (SG-1 at least has some self-irony, Atlantis is so serious about itself it hurts)
- Heroes
(Torchwood started out okay, but then degenerated quickly. Not sure where it&#039;ll end up.)
I have wasted my time on these, so that you don&#039;t have to :-)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooh, while I&#8217;m at it, here&#8217;s my list of shows that totally fail at science, fiction and acting:<br />
- Andromeda<br />
- Eureka<br />
- Stargate Atlantis (SG-1 at least has some self-irony, Atlantis is so serious about itself it hurts)<br />
- Heroes<br />
(Torchwood started out okay, but then degenerated quickly. Not sure where it&#8217;ll end up.)<br />
I have wasted my time on these, so that you don&#8217;t have to <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://popwatch.ew.com/2007/05/04/scifi_top_25/comment-page-93/#comment-568353</link>
		<dc:creator>k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewpopwatch.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/scifi_top_25#comment-568353</guid>
		<description>One thing that take away all credibility from the list though, is the inclusion of Heroes. That show must be the worst attempt at sci-fi I&#039;ve ever seen. I gave it the benefit of the doubt and watched through the season one finale _hoping_ for a speck of self-irony (&quot;Save the Cheerleader, Save the World!&quot; ugh), a hint of intelligence or character development, but after the finale I had to give up on it. Who the heck throws a nuke _up_ into the sky in order to save people from it? Nukes kill more people the more altitude they have when they explode. Do some research... and that whole salad-stepping evolution talk; If you don&#039;t know the first thing about science, you shouldn&#039;t be writing sci-fi! (Or at the very least, write surreal stuff like Lexx, which doesn&#039;t rely on bad science science it neatly side-steps it.)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that take away all credibility from the list though, is the inclusion of Heroes. That show must be the worst attempt at sci-fi I&#8217;ve ever seen. I gave it the benefit of the doubt and watched through the season one finale _hoping_ for a speck of self-irony (&#8220;Save the Cheerleader, Save the World!&#8221; ugh), a hint of intelligence or character development, but after the finale I had to give up on it. Who the heck throws a nuke _up_ into the sky in order to save people from it? Nukes kill more people the more altitude they have when they explode. Do some research&#8230; and that whole salad-stepping evolution talk; If you don&#8217;t know the first thing about science, you shouldn&#8217;t be writing sci-fi! (Or at the very least, write surreal stuff like Lexx, which doesn&#8217;t rely on bad science science it neatly side-steps it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://popwatch.ew.com/2007/05/04/scifi_top_25/comment-page-93/#comment-568351</link>
		<dc:creator>k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewpopwatch.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/scifi_top_25#comment-568351</guid>
		<description>Stargate SG-1 was alright, but it&#039;s not _good sci-fi_. Their science is just..wrong, they let all the aliens speak English, and they just went on for too long. (And don&#039;t get me started on Atlantis..*shudder*)
Battlestar Galactica and Firefly must be some of the best series I&#039;ve ever seen; solid character development, intelligent use of technology without taking too many assumptions, and well-developed worlds. I&#039;d recommend those two series to anyone.
I also love Doctor Who, but can see that not everyone would enjoy the style (it&#039;s a bit...British?)
Props for putting Brazil up there, that must be one of my all-time favourite movies.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stargate SG-1 was alright, but it&#8217;s not _good sci-fi_. Their science is just..wrong, they let all the aliens speak English, and they just went on for too long. (And don&#8217;t get me started on Atlantis..*shudder*)<br />
Battlestar Galactica and Firefly must be some of the best series I&#8217;ve ever seen; solid character development, intelligent use of technology without taking too many assumptions, and well-developed worlds. I&#8217;d recommend those two series to anyone.<br />
I also love Doctor Who, but can see that not everyone would enjoy the style (it&#8217;s a bit&#8230;British?)<br />
Props for putting Brazil up there, that must be one of my all-time favourite movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://popwatch.ew.com/2007/05/04/scifi_top_25/comment-page-93/#comment-568349</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 18:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewpopwatch.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/scifi_top_25#comment-568349</guid>
		<description>This blog really provides great updates on entertainment and entertainers!
http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/Satellite-Radio.html
http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/Direct-TV.html
http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/Dish-Network.html
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blog really provides great updates on entertainment and entertainers!<br />
<a href="http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/Satellite-Radio.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/Satellite-Radio.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/Direct-TV.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/Direct-TV.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/Dish-Network.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/Dish-Network.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://popwatch.ew.com/2007/05/04/scifi_top_25/comment-page-93/#comment-568347</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 18:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewpopwatch.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/scifi_top_25#comment-568347</guid>
		<description>Great blog with lots of useful information and excellent commentary!  Thanks for sharing.
http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/T1-Internet-Service.html
http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/Satellite-DSL.html
http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/Satellite-Internet.html
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great blog with lots of useful information and excellent commentary!  Thanks for sharing.<br />
<a href="http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/T1-Internet-Service.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/T1-Internet-Service.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/Satellite-DSL.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/Satellite-DSL.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/Satellite-Internet.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/Satellite-Internet.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://popwatch.ew.com/2007/05/04/scifi_top_25/comment-page-92/#comment-568345</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 18:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewpopwatch.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/scifi_top_25#comment-568345</guid>
		<description>Excellent blog that represents the stars!
http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/VoIP.html
http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/Phone-Systems.html
http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/Affiliate-Programs.html
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent blog that represents the stars!<br />
<a href="http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/VoIP.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/VoIP.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/Phone-Systems.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/Phone-Systems.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/Affiliate-Programs.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/Affiliate-Programs.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhwx ozumeby</title>
		<link>http://popwatch.ew.com/2007/05/04/scifi_top_25/comment-page-92/#comment-568344</link>
		<dc:creator>dhwx ozumeby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 08:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewpopwatch.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/scifi_top_25#comment-568344</guid>
		<description>isqhxntb ucnoqhj lvnaj bcxpgv gyzbjsqmd ldvgojpc gbosz
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isqhxntb ucnoqhj lvnaj bcxpgv gyzbjsqmd ldvgojpc gbosz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grainne Gillespie</title>
		<link>http://popwatch.ew.com/2007/05/04/scifi_top_25/comment-page-92/#comment-568341</link>
		<dc:creator>Grainne Gillespie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewpopwatch.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/scifi_top_25#comment-568341</guid>
		<description>You put dren like Firefly/Serenity and Dr Poo on your list, but left out Farscape? What&#039;s wrong with you people?
To Jay: Buffy ain&#039;t SciFi, it&#039;s fantasty/horror
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You put dren like Firefly/Serenity and Dr Poo on your list, but left out Farscape? What&#8217;s wrong with you people?<br />
To Jay: Buffy ain&#8217;t SciFi, it&#8217;s fantasty/horror</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alana Abbott</title>
		<link>http://popwatch.ew.com/2007/05/04/scifi_top_25/comment-page-92/#comment-568338</link>
		<dc:creator>Alana Abbott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewpopwatch.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/scifi_top_25#comment-568338</guid>
		<description>I read the top 15 (starting from the link someone on a Firefly mailing list sent me) and honestly, couldn&#039;t find much to argue with. The ranking, maybe, but that could be a matter of taste. I didn&#039;t see anything on the top 15 that didn&#039;t belong there.
However, with lists like this, I&#039;d love to see 1) a definition of sci-fi, and 2) a separate list for movies and television. I think movies impact the genre differently than serial storytelling--they&#039;re really two different beasts. And if you did the top 15, even, from each one, you&#039;d be opening up five more slots to make people happy. ;)
As far as definition goes... there are several suggestions from the readers that are either fantasy or horror, in my book, and therefore wouldn&#039;t make a science fiction list. (It would also clarify why Eternal Sunshine qualified and Buffy--really more traditionally horror or dark fantasy than science fiction--did not.)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the top 15 (starting from the link someone on a Firefly mailing list sent me) and honestly, couldn&#8217;t find much to argue with. The ranking, maybe, but that could be a matter of taste. I didn&#8217;t see anything on the top 15 that didn&#8217;t belong there.<br />
However, with lists like this, I&#8217;d love to see 1) a definition of sci-fi, and 2) a separate list for movies and television. I think movies impact the genre differently than serial storytelling&#8211;they&#8217;re really two different beasts. And if you did the top 15, even, from each one, you&#8217;d be opening up five more slots to make people happy. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
As far as definition goes&#8230; there are several suggestions from the readers that are either fantasy or horror, in my book, and therefore wouldn&#8217;t make a science fiction list. (It would also clarify why Eternal Sunshine qualified and Buffy&#8211;really more traditionally horror or dark fantasy than science fiction&#8211;did not.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
