A studio takes a film away from its director, recuts it, and puts out the revised version over the director’s objections. Read the full post.
Mar 21
2007
01:01 AM ET
Beatle battle: We can work it out -- maybe
- Comments 17
- Add comment
Latest News
- 'Celeb Apprentice': Mr. Trump has hired...
- 'SNL': Kristen Wiig's last time
- 'Avengers' is No. 1 movie again: $55.1M
- Robin Gibb, Bee Gees singer, dies at 62
- Robin Gibb remembered: 11 songs
- Will Smith: 'Fresh Prince' rap on U.K. TV
- 'Idol,' 'DWTS' finales: The week ahead
- 'Community' boss Dan Harmon: 'I got fired'
Most Commented
Top 5 Most Read
- ‘Celebrity Apprentice’: And the winner is…
- ‘Game of Thrones’: Blackwater battle has ‘dramatically exceeded our expectations’ — EXCLUSIVE
- ‘Saturday Night Live’ recap: Jagger rocks out, and Kristen Wiig bids farewell
- 'The Celebrity Apprentice' season finale recap: Racing To The Finish
- 'Game of Thrones' recap: Return of the Kingslayer








Sometimes a director plays ball with the patron studio (certainly not a saint in this case) that pays (her) to take the reins to make an expensive motion picture– (and this one was alot more expensive than any press release would indicate…)– and sometimes NOT. In a case like this a studio can have no choice but create a confrontation (her publicist at work) just to do what might actually be rational for the presentation of the material, It’s Taymor’s material— just less of it — and that may be MORE as an experience for the average viewer. Personally, who gives a damn about the average viewer? I don’t but studios do. It’s Show-BUSINESS people! If she wants to make a movie for more than 50 million- she either has to play ball or take the lumps. What would you do if you were Joe Roth and the distributor said they don’t like the how long the movie is? You’d cut twenty minutes out and release it.
Taymor’s version all the way! Joe Roth has nothing on her! I really hope she wins in this battle.