Jan 19 2007 03:32 PM ET

Reviewing the Reviews: 'Pan's Labyrinth'

Pan_l_1It’s an odd thing: reading (and frankly, writing) reviews of bad movies is most often more entertaining than reading reviews of good ones. But it’s a treat to see how much fun critics are having hailing Guillermo del Toro’s Pan’s Labyrinth, which expands into wider release today.

Of course, no one does it more effusively than Rolling Stone’s Peter Travers: "To hail Pan’s Labyrinth for its visionary ravishments is hardly to do it justice. You leave del Toro’s one-of-a-kind film feeling you’ve never seen the world before, not like this, not with such aching beauty and terror in the service of obliterating barriers of time, place, genre, and language."

Well, except for The New York Times‘ A.O. Scott, who does it with a bit more weight (and a better vocabulary): "Like his friend and colleague Alfonso Cuarón, whose astonishing Children of Men opened earlier this week, Mr. del Toro is helping to make the boundary separating pop from art, always suspect, seem utterly obsolete. Pan’s Labyrinth is a swift and accessible entertainment, blunt in its power and exquisite in its effects. A child could grasp its moral insights (though it is not a film I’d recommend for most children), while all but the most cynical of adults are likely to find themselves troubled to the point of heartbreak by its dark, rich, and emphatic emotions."

Zertinet Movies‘Steven Synder, who says the same thing in a simple, poetic tone: "It’sa nightmare, a daydream and a solemn prayer all at once. In an age ofmovies that are often about one thing and one thing only, here’s amovie open to the possibilities of what these people, in this place andat this time, can say about us all."

The BBC’sJonathan Trout, who does an exceptional job at following the first ruleof reviews (people should know whether you loved or hated it from yourfirst graph): "Dark, dreamlike and dangerous, Guillermo del Toro’s Pan’s Labyrinthis a fairytale every bit as scary and moving as they were always meantto be. In both the real world — civil war-riven Spain — and thefantasy underworld she discovers, our heroine Ofelia must battleagainst the most twisted, nightmarish evils to survive. Transcendent,passionate, full of beauty, and endlessly affecting, this is withoutquestion the movie of the year."

And, of course, EW’sown Lisa Schwarzbaum: "This is a tale within a tale within a tale, achameleon creation in which the actual and the symbolic intermingle sointuitively that we’re happy to divest ourselves of logic — to go withthe flow suggested by the movie’s lulling, lingering seven-note musicaltheme…. Rated R, for some graphic, blood-spattering violence, Pan’s Labyrinthmay for now be off-limits to the very viewers to whom the story is sorespectfully dedicated. Fair enough, so long as one day soon they’regranted admission to enter del Toro’s magic kingdom, where adults cangasp at a filmmaker’s magic."

Comments (1-9) of 9 Add your comment

  • paige

    this is the best film of the year. i know it wont be nominated for Best Picture… but the ones that most likely will be, dont hold a candle to this one.

  • kinglouieXVIII

    I cannot wait to see this movie. I keep hearing exceptional things about it. Along with Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu (BABEL) & Alfonso Cuaron, Del Toro is proving that the Mexicans are tearing it up at the movies this year! Holla!

  • Arleigh

    Yes, this is the best film of 2006 and yes it won’t be nominated for best picture and probably won’t for best foreign film which just shows that despite the success of Lord of the Rings, fantasy is still a bad word for the Academy members.

  • Silas Bent

    I agree with Paige. The films this year that should be nominated for best picture, that will have the most resonance from the history books of tomorrow are, that transcend our time: Pan’s, United 93, Children of Men, Departed, Letters from Iwo Jima. Too bad for the fluff. But Mandi missed Scott’s best comment: that the movie “is his finest achievement so far and a film that already, seven months after it was first shown at the Cannes Film Festival, has the feel of something permanent.” If that’s not art, what is?

  • Sally

    If we look back on Oscar history, I don’t remember a dark, violent fantasy along Pan’s lines ever being nominated or winning. While I enjoyed the film, it kept me engaged, I was disturbed by the ending. Oscar likes happy, singing, emotions, history, social commentary. It does not like violence towards children.

  • Andrew Wickliffe

    Is overrated mediocrity an oxymoron?

  • TD

    Jesus, Sally. Spoil the movie for everyone, why don’t you? Who, with even half a brain, discloses the ending of a movie in a post when it just opened.
    Incredibly rude.

  • Mozz

    We all know that when the nominees are announced on Tuesday, if this picture is not on the list of nominees, then the awards have indeed degraded to awards for Best Marketing Campaign the only award Dreamgirls is clearly suited for.

  • rqzhcm cbukfz

    dyqnaeh unsdhx eufhdvx vgytoanb kigd nxde vkwt

Add your comment

The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject - or we may delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field.

When you click on the "Post Comment" button above to submit your comments, you are indicating your acceptance of and are agreeing to the Terms of Service. You can also read our Privacy Policy.
Advertisement
Powered by WordPress.com VIP