Oct 19 2006 07:45 PM ET

Whitney defends 'Studio 60,' gets smacked down by the EW TV department

All right, that’s it. I have had it with the Studio 60 hating, Scott Brown of EW.com! It is all so easy! Yes! It’s idealistic television! Yes, the sketches aren’t funny! Yes, Aaron Sorkin is writing a thinly veiled dream version of his life! And you know what? I freaking love it, and I’m not afraid to say so. You think people who worked in the White House thought West Wing was anything but a unicorn cloud festival that completely distorted everything they did every day? No! So why should we be surprised that those of us who dwell in the unicorn cloud festival of pop culture should think Studio 60 anything other than preposterous?

I’ll tell you why I like it: because it shows me Hollywood the way it SHOULD be.  Because it poses the possibility that television– much like government– has the potential to do immense good, and that those in charge must only seize control of that opportunity. And because I love Bradley Whitford, Matthew Perry, Amanda Peet, Timothy Busfield, Nate Corddry, Steven Weber, Christine Lahti, and even slurpy little Sarah Paulson. They could get together every week and read VCR instructions, and I’d still watch, if it was lit right.

So can we give the pro-Studio 60ers a little piece of the floor now? Frankly, I think people are scared to watch this show for fear they accidentally fall in love with one or more characters and find themselves ostracized from the media elite. Well, I’m not. I LOVE THIS SHOW.

Thank you, That is all.

(After the jump, see the flame war that erupted in EW’s TV department over Whitney’s defense of Studio 60.)

Dalton Ross: Finally! I have some company in Scott Brown. I’ve been saying for months how weak I thought this show was, but was a lone voice in the wilderness. All the characters are smug and unlikable.

Kristen Baldwin: They lost me at "You look like one of them, but you talk like one of us."

WP: But… But… how is the idealism here ANY different than the idealism of West Wing? I mean, a bunch of characters sitting around saying things like "I serve at the pleasure of the president"?? Do you think Condi Rice and Tony Snow clasp each other on the shoulder and say that sort of thing very often? I just think because TV is expected to be inherently devoid of value, people can complain this show is over the top… but think about one of Scott’s big complaints about this week: that Amanda Peet turned down a ratings bonanza of a reality show in favor of an artistic sitcom. Well, maybe I’m wrong, but — isn’t that the sort of thing we are BEGGING networks to do every single day?

KB: But watching a show about network execs making the "right" choices while music swells in the background isn’t inspiring — it’s just a little awkward and boring, especially when it’s presented with such gravitas you’d think they were healing AIDS babies or something.

WP: Maybe, Kristen, healing AIDS babies starts with decent network TV. We just don’t know.

DR: I don’t know, but I just wrote a pilot for my own hour-long primetime drama where a bunch of people keep trying to convince me to throw my old newspaper in the trash can, but I decide to gallantly do the right thing and carry it over to the recycling bin instead. (Working title: Big Blue Bin.) The sad part about it is that the stakes are actually higher in mine than in Studio 60.

Tim Stack: Dalton, the first episode should be pretentiously titled  "The Long Crumple."

WP: I just think we all have a little bit of a double standard here. We roll our eyes and make gagging noises about Flavor of Love, but when something actually aspires to a higher goal, we tag it pretentious. Frankly, all good TV, in my opinion, is idealistic. (You think Friday Night Lights is really capturing the world of central Texas football?) But I’m done now.

TS: I actually like Studio 60 AND I like Flavor of Love. But at the same time, Studio 60 IS incredibly pretentious and talky and there is something obnoxious about Hollywood kissing its own ass. At least Flavor of Love is honest in its complete trashiness. There’s no pretense that it’s going to change the world.

Comments (78 total) Add your comment
Page: 1 2 3 6
  • thwarted

    Up with Flavor of Love, down with Studio 60!

  • katie g

    whitney, I am SO totally with you.
    I have had a heart on for sorkin since Sports Center, and the West Wing was my favourite show on television for a while. and I am loving Studio 60 too.
    I don’t care what anyone else says, Bradley Whitford is amazing, and I would watch him read the nutritional content on a package of cereal….

  • Mel

    Whitney,
    Between your weekly chart reviews and your defense of Studio 60, I think you might be my long lost twin. I knew I had one out there somewhere!!!

  • mon

    Love me some Flavor of Love because it’s just so trashy and it knows it! Good ol fashioned fun.
    Fun is what I feel is lacking from Studio 60. Yes, I know it’s a drama, but goodness, it’s just kind of like KB said above-boring.
    I REALLY wanted to love this show. I adore the cast, worked in tv, appreciate pop culture, so I was just kind of disappointed by it.
    It’s ok, not terrible, just not that exciting for me.
    Whitney, for your sake, I hope NBC has faith in it.

  • Cassie

    I love Studio 60! Holla! Aaron Sorkin can throw anything at me and I’ll watch it. And if it wasn’t for this show, I’d be going through a severe Bradley Whitford withdrawal right now. Josh Lyman was my homeboy. So is Flav.

  • hp

    Thank you Whitney! I adore Aaron Sorkin for the same reasons you do, idealism should not be condemned. Although I don’t think Studio 60 is as great as The West Wing(one of the best shows of all time in my opinion) it is still better than most of the crap out there today. The networks fill our TV sets with the bottom portion of our own people, put up there so we can mock them of their stupidity. It’s not as if we don’t know this, we complain all the time about it. So what if Studio 60 isn’t perfect, at least it tries. When Jordan turned down that crappy reality show, I cheered…wishing any of the real-life execs had the same balls. Maybe it is a bit pretentious, is it wrong to be intelligent? We need more shows that make people actually listen to dialogue and use their minds.
    If all this isn’t enough, the cast is amazing. Bradley Whitford can do no wrong in my book. Amanda Peet continues to grow on me. Matthew Perry is divine, and I actually like Sarah Paulson. I am rooting for Matt and Harriet.
    Apparently I’m in the minority, but I think this show deserves to stay. So stand strong Whitney, you’re fighting the good fight…

  • hp

    Thank you Whitney! I adore Aaron Sorkin for the same reasons you do, idealism should not be condemned. Although I don’t think Studio 60 is as great as The West Wing(one of the best shows of all time in my opinion) it is still better than most of the crap out there today. The networks fill our TV sets with the bottom portion of our own people, put up there so we can mock them of their stupidity. It’s not as if we don’t know this, we complain all the time about it. So what if Studio 60 isn’t perfect, at least it tries. When Jordan turned down that crappy reality show, I cheered…wishing any of the real-life execs had the same balls. Maybe it is a bit pretentious, is it wrong to be intelligent? We need more shows that make people actually listen to dialogue and use their minds.
    If all this isn’t enough, the cast is amazing. Bradley Whitford can do no wrong in my book. Amanda Peet continues to grow on me. Matthew Perry is divine, and I actually like Sarah Paulson. I am rooting for Matt and Harriet.
    Apparently I’m in the minority, but I think this show deserves to stay. So stand strong Whitney, you’re fighting the good fight…

  • The Other Kyle

    I like Studio 60. It’s good TV. Good acting and good dialogue.
    Why do the sketches have to be funny?!? That is the lamest excuse for not liking a show. This show isn’t a comedy for godsakes.
    The comedy is THE BACKDROP of Studio 60 and irrelevant. Is the artist style of painting Isaac does in Heroes reason to not like his character because it doesn’t follow proper technique?
    It infuriates me the lame reasons critics come up with to dislike a show. Things like that make you sound like Comic Book Guy.

  • melissa

    Whitney: Yes. You make some good points. I’m with ya.

  • brendan

    Sports Night may have been one of the most intelligently written shows i’ve ever watched. since then, anything sorkin does gets my vote until proven otherwise. so far studio 60 seems to be alright, and as long as he keeps everyone verbose and snappy, i’m happy. ya dig?

  • mgm

    I gave up on Studio 60, and I really tried.

  • dan cullinane

    Okay, so first I don’t watch Studio 60 because I’m pretty much over the whole Hollywood plays itself trend, but Friday Night Lights is actually the best thing that network television has done in, well, ever. Seriously. So I’m glomming on to Whitney’s oh so passing reference to it in hopes that everyone will watch it, and EW will read this and go, “yeah, and we should do a cover story on it because really everyone should be watching this instead of Dancing with the Stars.” Really. Dancing with the Stars? WTF?! So, Friday Night Lights. Good enough to save television. Watch it or you hate grandmothers and pie and kittens and america and you’re a terrorist.

  • Ali

    Thank you so much, Whitney. Don’t let them get you down. I’ve been posting Scott Brown’s articles for the last few weeks trying to defend “Studio 60″. I actually posted one just this afternoon on his blog discussing how moved I was by some of the scenes in this weeks episode. I am extremely grateful that there is a show out there aspiring to be something more than the ridiculous, trashy reality shows and brain dead sitcoms I’ve been complaining about for years (with no one listening to me, I’d like to add). I’m so sick of falling in love with good tv shows only to have them be taken from me due to low ratings, and I am worried that I will be heading down that path again. But should the unthinkable happen, be brave Whitney, and all you other “Studio 60″ fans. There’s a place out there for us, somewhere, where we can enjoy more “pretentious” offerings of popular culture and not feel heckled by our peers. And if any of you find this place before I do, please let me know.

  • Jakeem

    This show won me over with Monday night’s summit meeting featuring idealistic NBS president Jordan McDeere (Amanda Peet), overbearing network chairman Jack Rudolph (Steven Weber), and parent company chairman Wilson White (Ed Asner). The Bill Parcells quote and Jack’s response to it made my year, and I’m a Dallas Cowboys fan!
    Talk about well-written television!

  • mrcr

    I was looking forward to Studio 60 and I really like the cast, but I just don’t find myself caring about the characters. But it is better than whatever else is on at that time.

Page: 1 2 3 6
Add your comment
The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject - or we may delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field.

When you click on the "Post Comment" button above to submit your comments, you are indicating your acceptance of and are agreeing to the Terms of Service. You can also read our Privacy Policy.

Advertisement

TV Recaps

Powered by WordPress.com VIP